Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

401 records in EU in 2025

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 494Germany · 293United States · 141Austria · 123Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0343_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 October 2025.#Maria Albot v Council of the European Union.#Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of actions destabilising the Republic of Moldova – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Association with listed persons – Article 1(1)(b) and Article 2(1)(b) of Decision (CFSP) 2023/891 – Article 2(3)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2023/888 – Obligation to state reasons – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to property – Freedom of association – Freedom of expression – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-343/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 October 2025

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0044decided

Order of the Court of 1 October 2025.#Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-44/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0651decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 October 2025.#Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Poof!…and done – Earlier EU and national figurative marks ETI PUF – Relative grounds for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-651/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0600decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 1 October 2025.#Bundesnetzagentur für Elektrizität, Gas, Telekommunikation, Post und Eisenbahnen (BNetzA) v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 – Regulation (EU) 2019/943 – Allocation of cross-zonal capacity between bidding zones and congestion management – Determination of common regional methodologies for the calculation of daily and intraday capacity – Proposals from the transmission system operators of the ‘Core’ capacity calculation region – Internal critical network elements – Economic efficiency – Power transfer distribution factor (PTDF) – Decision of the Board of Appeal of ACER.#Case T-600/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1175decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 October 2025.#Siemens Healthineers AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark teamplay – Earlier national word mark TEAMPLAY – Relative ground for invalidity – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 57(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 – Independent subcategory of goods and services – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity between the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009.#Case T-1175/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1047decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 October 2025.#AF v Council of the European Union.#Civil service – Officials – Administrative investigation – Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Disciplinary proceedings without consultation of the Disciplinary Board – Warning – Principle of impartiality – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Protection of personal data – Reimbursement of costs – Article 21 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Liability – Non-material damage.#Case T-1047/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0600_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 1 October 2025.#Bundesnetzagentur für Elektrizität, Gas, Telekommunikation, Post und Eisenbahnen (BNetzA) v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 – Regulation (EU) 2019/943 – Allocation of cross-zonal capacity between bidding zones and congestion management – Determination of common regional methodologies for the calculation of daily and intraday capacity – Proposals from the transmission system operators of the ‘Core’ capacity calculation region – Internal critical network elements – Economic efficiency – Power transfer distribution factor (PTDF) – Decision of the Board of Appeal of ACER.#Case T-600/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0651_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 October 2025.#Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Poof!…and done – Earlier EU and national figurative marks ETI PUF – Relative grounds for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-651/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 October 2025

Proposal· PCCELEX 52025PC0592open

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT pursuant to Article 294(6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union concerning the position of the Council on the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European statistics on population and housing, amending Regulation (EC) No 862/2007 and repealing Regulations (EC) No 763/2008 and (EU) No 1260/2013

European Union · European Commission · 1 October 2025

Proposal· PCCELEX 52025PC0630open

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT pursuant to Article 294(6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union concerning the position of the Council on the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights and Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 on air carrier liability in respect of the carriage of passengers and their baggage by air

European Union · European Commission · 30 September 2025

Proposal· PCCELEX 52025PC0625open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union at the eighth session of the Meeting of the Parties to the Aarhus Convention regarding communications ACCC/C/2015/128 concerning access to justice regarding State aid decisions, ACCC/C/2013/96 concerning Projects of Common Interest, ACCC/C/2014/121 concerning Industrial Emissions Directive and ACCC/C/2010/54 concerning National Energy Action Plans

European Union · European Commission · 30 September 2025

Decision· DCELEX 32025D2047in force

Council Decision (EU) 2025/2047 of 29 September 2025 establishing the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Joint Committee established by the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community as regards the adoption of a decision adding a newly adopted Union act to Annex 2 to the Windsor Framework

European Union · EUR-Lex · 29 September 2025

Decision· DCELEX 32025D2066in force

Council Decision (EU) 2025/2066 of 29 September 2025 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the OACPS-EU Council of Ministers, the Africa-EU Council of Ministers, the Caribbean-EU Council of Ministers, the Pacific-EU Council of Ministers, the OACPS-EU Ambassadorial Level Senior Officials Committee, the Africa-EU Joint Committee, the Caribbean-EU Joint Committee and the Pacific-EU Joint Committee as regards the adoption of their Rules of Procedure

European Union · EUR-Lex · 29 September 2025

Report· CCCELEX 62024CC0350decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 25 September 2025.#HJ v Crédit agricole Corporate & Investment Bank.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 50 TEU – Article 288 TFEU – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community – Court of a Member State seised before the end of the transition period provided for in that agreement – Application by the courts of the forum of the law of another State – United Kingdom legislation transposing a directive – Directive 2006/54/EC – Applicability of EU law – Principle of mutual trust – Principle that national law must be interpreted in conformity with EU law.#Case C-350/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 September 2025

Record· TOCELEX 62020TO0771(01)_RESdecided

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 September 2025.#KS and KD v Council of the European Union and Others.#Actions for damages – Common foreign and security policy – Damage resulting from the alleged infringement of fundamental rights – Serious offences committed in Kosovo in 1999 – European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (Eulex Kosovo) – Failure to meet formal requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Manifest inadmissibility in part – Non-attributability of the alleged omissions – Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-771/20 RENV.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 September 2025

Record· TOCELEX 62020TO0771(01)decided

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 September 2025.#KS and KD v Council of the European Union and Others.#Actions for damages – Common foreign and security policy – Damage resulting from the alleged infringement of fundamental rights – Serious offences committed in Kosovo in 1999 – European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (Eulex Kosovo) – Failure to meet formal requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Manifest inadmissibility in part – Non-attributability of the alleged omissions – Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-771/20 RENV.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 September 2025

Proposal· PCCELEX 52025PC0532open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the EPA Council, in the Committee of Senior Officials and in the EPA Consultative Committee, established by the Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Union, of the one part, and the Republic of Kenya, Member of the East African Community, of the other part, as regards the adoption of the Rules of Procedure for the EPA Consultative Committee, the recommendation of the Committee of Senior Officials to the EPA Council on the participation in the EPA Consultative Committee, the EPA Council decision on the participation in the EPA Consultative Committee and the decision of the Committee of Senior Officials agreeing to the adoption of Rules of Procedure of the EPA Consultative Committee

European Union · European Commission · 25 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1101_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#AQ v European Chemicals Agency.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Document relating to notifications for the export of dangerous chemicals which are prohibited or severely restricted within the European Union – Decision of ECHA to grant access to a third party – Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests – Proportionality.#Case T-1101/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0196_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Digi International, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark DIGI – Earlier EU figurative mark DIGI – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-196/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0390_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Barry’s Bootcamp Holdings LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark representing two horizontal black chevrons – Action for annulment – Time limits for instituting proceedings – Admissibility – Genuine use of the mark – Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Nature of use of the mark – Form differing in elements that do not alter the distinctive character of the mark – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-390/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0582_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Claims Balkans d.o.o. Beograd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark CLAIMS – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-582/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0326_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Tamasu Butterfly Europa GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark BTFY – Earlier EU word mark Butterfly – Earlier national trade names Butterfly and BTY – Relative grounds for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance – Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001 – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-326/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0409_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Al-Aqeelah Takaful Insurance Company v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted against Syria – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Partial inadmissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business – Proportionality.#Case T-409/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0238_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Bogoljub Karić v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment.#Case T-238/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0406_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Manufaktur Jörg Geiger GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark PriSecco – Earlier PDO ‘Prosecco’ – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Article 103(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Concept of ‘evocation’ of a PDO.#Case T-406/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0415_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Cham Wings Airlines LLC v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘association with the Syrian regime’ – Error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality.#Case T-415/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0340_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Barry’s Bootcamp Holdings LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing two inverted chevrons – Action for annulment – Time limits for instituting proceedings – Admissibility – Genuine use of the mark – Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Nature of use of the mark – Form differing in elements that do not alter the distinctive character of the mark – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-340/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0031_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Barry’s Bootcamp Holdings LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing two chevrons pointing to the right – Genuine use of the mark – Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Nature of use of the mark – Form differing in elements that do not alter the distinctive character of the mark.#Case T-31/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0340decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Barry’s Bootcamp Holdings LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing two inverted chevrons – Action for annulment – Time limits for instituting proceedings – Admissibility – Genuine use of the mark – Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Nature of use of the mark – Form differing in elements that do not alter the distinctive character of the mark – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-340/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0483_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 24 September 2025.#Sanofi BV, anciennement Genzyme Europe BV v European Commission.#Public health – Medicinal products for human use – Marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Nexviadyme (avalglucosidase alfa) – Non-recognition of avalglucosidase alfa as a new active substance – Directive 2001/83/EC – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Commission document ‘Notice to Applicants, Volume 2A, Procedures for marketing authorisation, Chapter 1, Marketing Authorisation’ – Standard of proof – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of good administration – Right to be heard – Decision to remove the medicinal product from the European Union Register of Orphan Medicinal Products – Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 – Regulation (EC) No 847/2000 – Significant benefit – Standard of proof – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-483/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0582decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Claims Balkans d.o.o. Beograd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark CLAIMS – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-582/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

PreviousPage 8 of 9Next