Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

51 records in EU in 2022

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 493Germany · 292United States · 141Austria · 75Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0313_SUMdecided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#Council of the European Union and European Commission v FI.#Appeal – Article 182 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Pension – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 20 of Annex VIII – Grant of a survivor’s pension – Surviving spouse of a former official who had been in receipt of invalidity allowance – Marriage entered into after that official had become eligible for invalidity allowance – Condition that the marriage must have lasted for at least five years at the date of the official’s death – Article 19 of Annex VIII – Marriage entered into before the official became eligible for invalidity allowance – No condition as to the minimum duration of the marriage – Plea of illegality in respect of Article 20 of Annex VIII – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 20 – Principle of equal treatment – Article 21(1) – Principle of non-discrimination – Article 52(1) – No arbitrary or manifestly inappropriate differentiation in the light of the objective pursued by the EU legislature.#Joined Cases C-313/21 P and C-314/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 December 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0237_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#Generalstaatsanwaltschaft München v S.M.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the European Union – Articles 18 and 21 TFEU – Request sent to a Member State by a third State for the extradition of a Union citizen who is a national of another Member State and who has exercised his right to free movement in the first of those Member States – Request made for the purpose of enforcing a custodial sentence – Prohibition on extradition applied solely to own nationals – Restriction of freedom of movement – Justification based on the prevention of impunity – Proportionality.#Case C-237/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 December 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0082_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#Jean-François Jalkh v European Parliament.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Law governing the institutions – Member of the European Parliament – Protocol (No 7) on the privileges and immunities of the European Union – Third paragraph of Article 9 – Decision to waive parliamentary immunity – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-82/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 December 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0237decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#Generalstaatsanwaltschaft München v S.M.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht München.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the European Union – Articles 18 and 21 TFEU – Request sent to a Member State by a third State for the extradition of a Union citizen who is a national of another Member State and who has exercised his right to free movement in the first of those Member States – Request made for the purpose of enforcing a custodial sentence – Prohibition on extradition applied solely to own nationals – Restriction of freedom of movement – Justification based on the prevention of impunity – Proportionality.#Case C-237/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 December 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0313decided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#Council of the European Union and European Commission v FI.#Appeal – Article 182 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Pension – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 20 of Annex VIII – Grant of a survivor’s pension – Surviving spouse of a former official who had been in receipt of invalidity allowance – Marriage entered into after that official had become eligible for invalidity allowance – Condition that the marriage must have lasted for at least five years at the date of the official’s death – Article 19 of Annex VIII – Marriage entered into before the official became eligible for invalidity allowance – No condition as to the minimum duration of the marriage – Plea of illegality in respect of Article 20 of Annex VIII – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 20 – Principle of equal treatment – Article 21(1) – Principle of non-discrimination – Article 52(1) – No arbitrary or manifestly inappropriate differentiation in the light of the objective pursued by the EU legislature.#Joined Cases C-313/21 P and C-314/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 December 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0082decided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#Jean-François Jalkh v European Parliament.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Law governing the institutions – Member of the European Parliament – Protocol (No 7) on the privileges and immunities of the European Union – Third paragraph of Article 9 – Decision to waive parliamentary immunity – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-82/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 December 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0341decided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#European Commission and Council of the European Union v KM.#Appeal – Article 182 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Pension – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 20 of Annex VIII – Grant of a survivor’s pension – Surviving spouse of a former official in receipt of a retirement pension – Marriage entered into after termination of that official’s service – Condition that the marriage must have lasted for at least five years at the date of the official’s death – Article 18 of Annex VIII – Marriage entered into before termination of the official’s service – Condition that the marriage must have lasted for at least one year only – Plea of illegality in respect of Article 20 of Annex VIII – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 20 – Principle of equal treatment – Article 21(1) – Principle of non-discrimination on grounds of age – Article 52(1) – No arbitrary or manifestly inappropriate differentiation in the light of the objective pursued by the EU legislature.#Joined Cases C-341/21 P and C-357/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0644_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Pharmadom v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark WellBe PHARMACEUTICALS – Earlier national word mark WELL AND WELL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-644/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0554_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#European Lotto and Betting Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Cash4Life – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-554/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0129decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Simba Toys GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark BIMBA TOYS – Earlier international word and figurative marks Simba – Earlier trade name Simba Toys GmbH & Co. KG – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Comparison of the goods – Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Proximity of the economic sectors.#Case T-129/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0043decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Sanrio Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark SANRIO CHARACTERS – Earlier EU word mark CARACTÈRE – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-43/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0777decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Trend Glass sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark ECO STORAGE – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Legal certainty – Equal treatment.#Case T-777/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0242decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Artem Viktorovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-242/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0250decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Tradición CZ, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark TRADICIÓN CZ, S.L. – Earlier EU word mark RIVERO CZ – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-250/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0004decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark PUMA – Earlier international figurative mark PUMA – Relative ground for refusal – Detriment to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-4/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0644decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Pharmadom v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark WellBe PHARMACEUTICALS – Earlier national word mark WELL AND WELL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-644/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0537decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Vialto Consulting Kft. v European Commission.#Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance – Grants – Investigations by OLAF – Administrative penalty – Exclusion, for a period of two years, from public procurement procedures and from procedures for the award of grants financed from the general budget of the European Union – Obligation to state reasons – Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2185/96 – Principle of good administration – Legitimate expectations – Unlimited jurisdiction – Proportionality of the penalty.#Case T-537/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0044decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#International Masis Tabak LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing a pack of cigarettes – Earlier international figurative mark Marlboro SELECTED PREMIUM TOBACCOS – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-44/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0250_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Tradición CZ, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark TRADICIÓN CZ, S.L. – Earlier EU word mark RIVERO CZ – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-250/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0129_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Simba Toys GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark BIMBA TOYS – Earlier international word and figurative marks Simba – Earlier trade name Simba Toys GmbH & Co. KG – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Comparison of the goods – Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Proximity of the economic sectors.#Case T-129/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0043_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Sanrio Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark SANRIO CHARACTERS – Earlier EU word mark CARACTÈRE – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-43/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0264_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Lin Suicha v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark MK MARKTOMI MARKTOMI – Earlier EU figurative mark MK MICHAEL KORS – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-264/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0242_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Artem Viktorovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-242/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0554decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#European Lotto and Betting Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Cash4Life – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-554/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0243decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Viktor Pavlovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-243/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0243_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Viktor Pavlovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-243/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0777_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Trend Glass sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark ECO STORAGE – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Legal certainty – Equal treatment.#Case T-777/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0264decided

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Lin Suicha v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark MK MARKTOMI MARKTOMI – Earlier EU figurative mark MK MICHAEL KORS – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-264/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0004_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark PUMA – Earlier international figurative mark PUMA – Relative ground for refusal – Detriment to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-4/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0537_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Vialto Consulting Kft. v European Commission.#Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance – Grants – Investigations by OLAF – Administrative penalty – Exclusion, for a period of two years, from public procurement procedures and from procedures for the award of grants financed from the general budget of the European Union – Obligation to state reasons – Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2185/96 – Principle of good administration – Legitimate expectations – Unlimited jurisdiction – Proportionality of the penalty.#Case T-537/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0044_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#International Masis Tabak LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing a pack of cigarettes – Earlier international figurative mark Marlboro SELECTED PREMIUM TOBACCOS – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-44/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0019decided

Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 20 December 2022.#Piaggio & C. SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – European Union three-dimensional mark – Shape of a scooter – Cross-claim – Application for alteration – Request for the Court to issue directions – Partial inadmissibility – Partial jurisdiction.#Case T-19/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 December 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0019_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 20 December 2022.#Piaggio & C. SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – European Union three-dimensional mark – Shape of a scooter – Cross-claim – Application for alteration – Request for the Court to issue directions – Partial inadmissibility – Partial jurisdiction.#Case T-19/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 December 2022

Decision· DCELEX 32022D2575in force

Council Decision (EU) 2022/2575 of 19 December 2022 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Partnership Council established by the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part, as regards the adoption of a decision establishing a list of individuals who are willing and able to serve as members of an arbitration tribunal under that Agreement

European Union · EUR-Lex · 19 December 2022

Decision· DCELEX 32022D2574in force

Council Decision (EU) 2022/2574 of 19 December 2022 on the position to be taken on behalf of the Union within the Partnership Council established by the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part, as regards the extension of the interim period referred to in Article 552(11) of that Agreement during which the United Kingdom may derogate from the obligation to delete Passenger Name Record data of passengers after their departure from the United Kingdom

European Union · EUR-Lex · 19 December 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62021TO0751decided

Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 16 December 2022.#EMS Electro Medical Systems GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment – EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark AIRFLOW – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-751/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0419_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 16 December 2022.#Group Nivelles v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-419/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62021TO0751_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 16 December 2022.#EMS Electro Medical Systems GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment – EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark AIRFLOW – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-751/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0419decided

Order of the Court of 16 December 2022.#Group Nivelles v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-419/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0366_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 December 2022.#Maxime Picard v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Pension – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – 2014 reform – Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 – Annex XIII to those regulations – Second paragraph of Article 21 and second subparagraph of Article 22(1) – Transitional measures relating to the annual rate of accrual of pension rights and retirement age – Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union – Annex – Article 1(1) – Application of those transitional measures by analogy to other staff employed on 31 December 2013 – Signature of new contract as a member of the contract staff – Act adversely affecting an official – Effective judicial protection.#Case C-366/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 December 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0545decided

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 15 December 2022.#Azienda Nazionale Autonoma Strade SpA (ANAS) v Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – European Union Structural Funds – Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 – Article 2(7) – Concept of ‘irregularity’ – Article 98(1) and (2) – Financial corrections by Member States in connection with irregularities detected – Criteria to be applied – Directive 2004/18/EC – Point (d) of the first subparagraph of Article 45(2) – Concept of ‘grave professional misconduct’.#Case C-545/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 December 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0366decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 December 2022.#Maxime Picard v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Pension – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – 2014 reform – Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 – Annex XIII to those regulations – Second paragraph of Article 21 and second subparagraph of Article 22(1) – Transitional measures relating to the annual rate of accrual of pension rights and retirement age – Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union – Annex – Article 1(1) – Application of those transitional measures by analogy to other staff employed on 31 December 2013 – Signature of new contract as a member of the contract staff – Act adversely affecting an official – Effective judicial protection.#Case C-366/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 December 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0204decided

Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 15 December 2022.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union ‐ Rule of law – Effective legal protection in the fields covered by EU law – Independence of judges – Article 267 TFEU – Possibility of making a reference to the Court for a preliminary ruling – Primacy of EU law – Jurisdiction in relation to the lifting of the immunity from criminal prosecution of judges and in the field of employment law, social security and retirement of judges of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) conferred on the Disciplinary Chamber of that court – National courts prohibited from calling into question the legitimacy of the constitutional courts and bodies or from establishing or assessing the lawfulness of the appointment of judges or their judicial powers – Verification by a judge of compliance with certain requirements relating to the existence of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law classified as a ‘disciplinary offence’ – Exclusive jurisdiction to examine questions relating to the lack of independence of a court or judge conferred on the Extraordinary Review and Public Affairs Chamber of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court) – Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Rights to privacy and the protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 6(1), first subparagraph, points (c) and (e), and Article 6(3), second subparagraph – Article 9(1) – Sensitive data – National legislation requiring judges to make a declaration as to whether they belong to associations, foundations or political parties, and to the positions held within those associations, foundations or political parties, and providing for the placing online of the data contained in those declarations.#Case C-204/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 December 2022

Page 1 of 2Next