Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects

Rule of law

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

101 records in 2013

Records

Bill· Selbständiger Antrag22/Aselbständiger antrag

Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz, Arbeitslosenversicherungsgesetz, Änderung

Austria · National Council · 29 October 2013

Antrag der Abgeordneten Mag. Judith Schwentner, Kolleginnen und Kollegen betreffend ein Bundesverfassungsgesetz, mit dem das B-VG und Bundesgesetz, mit dem das Arbeitslosenversicherungsgesetz geändert werden <i>(Notstandshilfe)</i>

Bill· Selbständiger Antrag8/Aselbständiger antrag

Konsumentenschutzgesetz, Änderung

Austria · National Council · 29 October 2013

Antrag der Abgeordneten Ing. Norbert Hofer, Kolleginnen und Kollegen betreffend ein Bundesgesetz, mit dem das Bundesgesetz vom 8. März 1979, mit dem die Bestimmungen zum Schutz der Verbraucher getroffen werden (Konsumentenschutzgesetz - KSchG), BGBl. Nr. 140/1979, geändert wird

Bill· Selbständiger Antrag24/Aselbständiger antrag

Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz, Geschäftsordnungsgesetz u.a., Änderung

Austria · National Council · 29 October 2013

Antrag der Abgeordneten Mag. Daniela Musiol, Kolleginnen und Kollegen betreffend ein Bundesgesetz, mit dem das Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz, das Bundesgesetz über die Geschäftsordnung des Nationalrates, das Volksbegehrengesetz 1973 und das Volksbefragungsgesetz 1989 geändert werden

Bill· Selbständiger Antrag17/A und Zu 17/Aselbständiger antrag

Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz, Änderung

Austria · National Council · 29 October 2013

Antrag der Abgeordneten Mag. Christiane Brunner, Kolleginnen und Kollegen betreffend ein Bundesverfassungsgesetz, mit dem das Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz geändert wird <i>(Maßnahmen zur Bekämpfung des Klimawandels)</i>

Bill· Selbständiger Antrag7/Aselbständiger antrag

Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz, Änderung

Austria · National Council · 29 October 2013

Antrag der Abgeordneten Mag. Harald Stefan, Kolleginnen und Kollegen betreffend ein Bundesverfassungsgesetz mit dem das Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz - B-VG, BGBl. Nr. 1/1930, geändert wird <i>(Interpellationsrecht)</i>

Bill· Selbständiger Antrag6/Aselbständiger antrag

Informationsfreiheit-BVG

Austria · National Council · 29 October 2013

Antrag der Abgeordneten Mag. Beate Meinl-Reisinger, MES, Kolleginnen und Kollegen betreffend ein Bundesverfassungsgesetz über die Informationsfreiheit (Informationsfreiheit-BVG)

Bill· Selbständiger Antrag18/Aselbständiger antrag

Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz, Änderung

Austria · National Council · 29 October 2013

Antrag der Abgeordneten Mag. Albert Steinhauser, Kolleginnen und Kollegen betreffend ein Bundesverfassungsgesetz, mit dem das Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz (B-VG) geändert wird <i>(Informationsfreiheit statt Amtsgeheimnis)</i>

Bill· Selbständiger Antrag5/Aselbständiger antrag

Parteiengesetz, Parteien-Förderungsgesetz, u.a., Änderung

Austria · National Council · 29 October 2013

Antrag der Abgeordneten Dr. Rainer Hable, Kolleginnen und Kollegen betreffend ein Bundesgesetz, mit dem das Parteiengesetz, das Parteien-Förderungsgesetz und das Einkommensteuergesetz geändert werden

Bill· Selbständiger Antrag12/Aselbständiger antrag

Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz, Geschäftsordnungsgesetz, Änderung

Austria · National Council · 29 October 2013

Antrag der Abgeordneten Dr. Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek, Kolleginnen und Kollegen betreffend ein Bundesgesetz, mit dem das Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz und das Bundesgesetz über die Geschäftsordnung des Nationalrates (Geschäftsordnungsgesetz 1975) geändert werden <i>(Einsetzung von Untersuchungsausschüssen als</i> <i>Minderheitsrecht)</i>

Record· CJCELEX 62012CJ0151decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber), 24 October 2013.#European Commission v Kingdom of Spain.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Environment — Directive 2000/60/EC — Framework for Community action in the field of water policy — Transposition of Articles 4(8), 7(2), 10(1) and (2) of and sections 1.3 and 1.4 of Annex V to Directive 2000/60 — Intracommunal and intercommunal river basins — Article 149(3) of the Spanish Constitution — Supplementing clause.#Case C‑151/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2013

Bill· HJRESH.J.Res. 98 (113th)referred

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to applying laws equally to the citizens of the United States and the Federal Government.

United States · United States Congress · 23 October 2013

Constitutional Amendment - Prohibits Congress from making any law that is applicable to a U.S. citizen but not equally applicable to: (1) Congress; (2) the executive branch, including the President, Vice President, ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and all other officers of the United States, including those provided for under the Constitution and by law; and (3) Justices of the Supreme Court and judges of inferior courts.

Bill· HJRESH.J.Res. 97 (113th)referred

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to applying laws equally to the citizens of the United States and the Federal Government.

United States · United States Congress · 22 October 2013

Constitutional Amendment - Prohibits Congress from making any law that is applicable to a U.S. citizen but not equally applicable to: (1) Congress; (2) the executive branch, including the President, Vice President, ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and all other officers of the United States, including those provided for under the Constitution and by law; and (3) Justices of the Supreme Court and judges of inferior courts.

Bill· SJRESS.J.Res. 25 (113th)referred

A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to applying laws equally to the citizens of the United States and the Federal Government.

United States · United States Congress · 11 October 2013

Constitutional Amendment - Prohibits Congress from making any law that is applicable to a U.S. citizen but not equally applicable to: (1) Congress; (2) the executive branch, including the President, Vice President, ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and all other officers of the United States, including those provided for under the Constitution and by law; and (3) Justices of the Supreme Court and judges of inferior courts.

Question· writtenPQ 513asked

513. Deputy Michael Healy-Rae asked the Minister for Health in view of the fact that it has been publicly stated that if tobacco companies are not allowed to use their branding, it could breach the intellectual property rights of these companies and these rights are guaranteed under the Constitution and the European Convention of Human Rights, if there is a possibility that the Government is exposing the Irish taxpayer to a court case which could cost hundreds of millions of euro; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41948/13]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 8 October 2013

513. Deputy Michael Healy-Rae asked the Minister for Health in view of the fact that it has been publicly stated that if tobacco companies are not allowed to use their branding, it could breach the intellectual property rights of these companies and these rights are guaranteed under the Constitution and the European Convention of Human Rights, if there is a possibility that the Government is exposing the Irish taxpayer to a court case which could cost hundreds of millions of euro; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41948/13]

Resolution· HCONRESH.Con.Res. 58 (113th)passed

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the need for the continued availability of religious services to members of the Armed Forces and their families during a lapse in appropriations.

United States · United States Congress · 5 October 2013

Recognizes the performance of religious services and the provision of ministry as protected activities under the First Amendment of the Constitution. Urges the Secretary of Defense, during any lapse in appropriations, to permit: (1) the performance of religious services on property owned or maintained by the Department of Defense (DOD); and (2) military chaplains and other personnel, including contract personnel, hired to perform duties of a military chaplain to perform religious services and ministry. Expresses the sense of Congress that such services be permitted and available during a lapse in appropriations in the same manner and to the same extent as they are otherwise permitted and available.

Question· writtenPQ 157asked

157. Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked the Taoiseach the reason printed copies of the Constitution are not currently available for purchase from the Government Publications Office; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40744/13]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 1 October 2013

157. Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked the Taoiseach the reason printed copies of the Constitution are not currently available for purchase from the Government Publications Office; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40744/13]

Bill· HRH.R. 3215 (113th)referred

Shutdown Pay for Members of Congress Act of 2013

United States · United States Congress · 28 September 2013

Shutdown Pay for Members of Congress Act of 2013 - Amends the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 to prohibit Members of Congress from receiving pay until a government spending agreement on future spending is agreed to by the House of Representatives and the Senate. Makes such prohibition effective with the termination of a fiscal year at the end of which the House and Senate fail to reach agreement on government spending. Directs the Committee on House Administration, consistent with the Constitution and the Anti-Deficiency Act, to consider the definition of &quot;employing authority&quot; under House Rules where Members of Congress would be deemed &quot;non-essential.&quot; Requires the amendments made by this Act to apply with respect to any adjustment which, but for this Act, would otherwise become effective in the event of a lapse in appropriations for government spending where the government would thereby shut down.

Resolution· HRESH.Res. 360 (113th)referred

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Congress should retain its authority to borrow money on the credit of the United States and not cede this power to the President.

United States · United States Congress · 26 September 2013

Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that Congress should retain its authority vested in the U.S. Constitution to borrow money on the credit of the United States and not surrender its authority to establish the debt limit of the United States to the executive branch or allow the President to raise the debt ceiling unilaterally.

Resolution· Unselbständiger Entschließungsantrag1097/UEAunselbständiger entschließungsantrag

verfassungsrechtliche Verankerung der Mitbestimmung der Bevölkerung bei Gemeindezusammenlegungen

Austria · National Council · 25 September 2013

Unselbständiger Entschließungsantrag der Abgeordneten Mag. Werner Kogler, Kolleginnen und Kollegen betreffend Einbringung einer Regierungsvorlage zur verfassungsrechtlichen Verankerung der Mitbestimmung der Bevölkerung bei Gemeindezusammenlegungen

Resolution· Unselbständiger Entschließungsantrag1099/UEAunselbständiger entschließungsantrag

Bestandsgarantie für Gemeinden durch verpflichtende Volksabstimmungen bei Gemeindezusammenlegungen

Austria · National Council · 25 September 2013

Unselbständiger Entschließungsantrag der Abgeordneten Gerald Grosz, Kolleginnen und Kollegen betreffend Einbringung einer Regierungsvorlage zur Schaffung einer Bestandsgarantie für Gemeinden durch verpflichtende Volksabstimmungen bei Gemeindezusammenlegungen

Bill· HRH.R. 3159 (113th)referred

Ensuring Adversarial Process in the FISA Court Act

United States · United States Congress · 20 September 2013

Ensuring Adversarial Process in the FISA Court Act - Amends the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 to require the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (an independent agency that reviews executive branch actions taken to protect the nation from terrorism in order to ensure a balance with privacy and civil liberties) to appoint: (1) attorneys to serve as public interest advocates in proceedings before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC), a judge of the petition review pool, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review (FISCR), and the Supreme Court under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA); and (2) technical and subject-matter experts (including experts of computer networks, telecommunications, encryption, and cybersecurity), not employed by the federal government, to be available to assist such advocates in performing their duties. Requires such courts, in any matter involving a significant interpretation or construction of FISA, to appoint at least one public interest advocate who will: (1) participate fully with the same rights and privileges as the federal government; (2) represent the interests of the people of the United States in preserving privacy and civil liberties, including with respect to rights under the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution; and (3) have access to all relevant evidence as well as the authority to petition the court to order the government to produce other necessary evidence. Authorizes such advocates to file motions and briefs, respond to motions or filings made by the federal government, and request rehearings or en banc consideration of a decision. Permits the FISC to request review by the FISCR, and permits the FISCR to request review by the Supreme Court, when matters before such courts in which a public interest advocate has been appointed involve a question of law in which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion. Requires the United States and the public interest advocate, when a court has requested such a review, to be given an opportunity to provide written briefs or arguments related to a decision by the FISCR or the Supreme Court to review a ruling. Allows each relevant court, upon a finding that it would benefit from additional views, to permit participation by amicus curiae.

Question· writtenPQ 1027asked

1027. Deputy Andrew Doyle asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if the Thirty-third Amendment of the Constitution (Court of Appeal) Bill 2013 intends to deal with the one-judgment rule if the President of Ireland should invoke his Article 26 power to refer a Bill from the Oireachtas to the Supreme Court; the views of the Constitution Review Group on this matter; if he will detail the concerns of the group for not amending the one-judgment rule in this particular scenario, as opposed to the change the amendment will make to Article 34; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37137/13]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 18 September 2013

1027. Deputy Andrew Doyle asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if the Thirty-third Amendment of the Constitution (Court of Appeal) Bill 2013 intends to deal with the one-judgment rule if the President of Ireland should invoke his Article 26 power to refer a Bill from the Oireachtas to the Supreme Court; the views of the Constitution Review Group on this matter; if he will detail the concerns of the group for not amending the one-judgment rule in this particular scenario, as opposed to the change the amendment will make to Article 34; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37137/13]

Question· writtenPQ 1026asked

1026. Deputy Andrew Doyle asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if the Thirty-third Amendment of the Constitution (Court of Appeal) Bill 2013 will manage both criminal and civil cases in view of the fact that the Court of Criminal Appeal is still in existence; if he intends to merge the Court of Criminal Appeal into the singular Court of Appeal, if the referendum is ratified by the people; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37136/13]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 18 September 2013

1026. Deputy Andrew Doyle asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if the Thirty-third Amendment of the Constitution (Court of Appeal) Bill 2013 will manage both criminal and civil cases in view of the fact that the Court of Criminal Appeal is still in existence; if he intends to merge the Court of Criminal Appeal into the singular Court of Appeal, if the referendum is ratified by the people; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37136/13]

Question· writtenPQ 1025asked

1025. Deputy Andrew Doyle asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if the Thirty-third Amendment of the Constitution (Court of Appeal) Bill 2013 attempts to remove the President of the High Court as an ex-officio member of the Council of State; if this is permitted under current constitutional law or if the current President of the High Court's situ on the Council of State is secured until the next President of the High Court is appointed after the establishment of the Court of Appeal; if the new President of the Court of Appeal will have a position on the Council of State from the establishment of the Court of Appeal, or from after the current President of the High Court steps down; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37135/13]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 18 September 2013

1025. Deputy Andrew Doyle asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if the Thirty-third Amendment of the Constitution (Court of Appeal) Bill 2013 attempts to remove the President of the High Court as an ex-officio member of the Council of State; if this is permitted under current constitutional law or if the current President of the High Court's situ on the Council of State is secured until the next President of the High Court is appointed after the establishment of the Court of Appeal; if the new President of the Court of Appeal will have a position on the Council of State from the establishment of the Court of Appeal, or from after the current President of the High Court steps down; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37135/13]

Question· writtenPQ 1024asked

1024. Deputy Andrew Doyle asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if the Thirty-third Amendment of the Constitution (Court of Appeal) Bill 2013 attempts to remove the President of the High Court as an ex-officio member of the Supreme Court; if this is permitted under current constitutional law or if the current President of the High Court's situ on the Supreme Court is secured until the next President of the High Court is appointed after the establishment of the Court of Appeal; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37134/13]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 18 September 2013

1024. Deputy Andrew Doyle asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if the Thirty-third Amendment of the Constitution (Court of Appeal) Bill 2013 attempts to remove the President of the High Court as an ex-officio member of the Supreme Court; if this is permitted under current constitutional law or if the current President of the High Court's situ on the Supreme Court is secured until the next President of the High Court is appointed after the establishment of the Court of Appeal; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37134/13]

Bill· HRH.R. 2978 (113th)referred

Let the People Draw the Lines Act of 2013

United States · United States Congress · 2 August 2013

Let the People Draw the Lines Act of 2013 - Prohibits a state that has been redistricted after an apportionment from being redistricted again until after the next apportionment of Representatives, unless the state is ordered by a court to conduct such a subsequent redistricting in order to comply with the Constitution or enforce the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Requires any congressional redistricting to be conducted according to: (1) a plan developed by the independent redistricting commission established in the state; or (2) if such plan is not enacted into law, the redistricting plan selected by the state's highest court or developed by a U.S. district court. Requires each state to establish an independent redistricting commission to develop a redistricting plan for the state in accordance with specified criteria, including requirements that districts: (1) have equal population per representative as nearly as practicable; (2) comply with the Voting Rights Act of 1965; (3) are geographically contiguous; (4) have boundaries that minimize the division of any municipality, county, neighborhood, or community of interest; and (5) are geographically compact and use visible geographic features. Prohibits consideration, in developing a redistricting plan, of the political party affiliation of the population of a district or the residence of any Member of the House of Representatives or candidate. Sets forth requirements for public notice and hearings on redistricting plans and a process for enactment of a final redistricting plan. Sets forth alternative procedures for the the development of a redistricting plan by a state's highest court or a federal district court if a plan developed by a state independent redistricting commission is not enacted into law by a specified date. Provides for: (1) Election Assistance Commission payments to states for carry out redistricting, and (2) civil enforcement to carry out this Act by the Attorney General or an individual state elector who is aggrieved by a violation of this Act.

Resolution· HRESH.Res. 329 (113th)referred

Calling for the support of the fundamental rights of all Egyptian citizens, equal access to justice and due process of law, and transparent and accountable governance in Egypt.

United States · United States Congress · 2 August 2013

Supports economic and political reforms that uphold the fundamental rights of all Egyptian citizens, equal access to justice, due process, and transparent and accountable governance. Calls on interim Egyptian President Adly Mansour and the government of Egypt to restore the Egyptian Constitution and the rule of law. Urges: (1) the process of amending the Egyptian Constitution to be transparent and secure broad consensus; (2) the Egyptian Armed Forces and security services to respect the rights of all Egyptian citizens; and (3) full restoration of media and civil society freedoms, including protecting media and journalists and overturning the verdicts in which 43 U.S. citizens, Egyptians, and others were given harsh sentences for their work to support democracy. Calls on: (1) the government of Egypt to continue to meet its obligations under the 1979 Egypt-Israel Peace Treaty; and (2) interim President Mansour and the Egyptian Armed Forces to end the climate of impunity, end arbitrary arrests and politically motivated detentions, prosecute acts of violence, and make the protection of of all Egyptian citizens an urgent priority.

Bill· HJRESH.J.Res. 57 (113th)referred

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require a two-thirds vote of each House of Congress to increase the statutory limit on the public debt.

United States · United States Congress · 1 August 2013

Constitutional Amendment - Requires Congress, by law, to establish a statutory limit on the public debt. States that, if such a limit is in effect upon the adoption of this amendment, that limit shall be the limit for purposes of this resolution. Requires the statutory limit on the public debt to be increased only by the passage of legislation upon the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the Members of each chamber.

Bill· SS. 1404 (113th)referred

Enumerated Powers Act

United States · United States Congress · 31 July 2013

Enumerated Powers Act - Requires each Act of Congress, bill, resolution, conference report, or amendment to contain a concise explanation of the specific constitutional authority relied upon as the basis for enacting each portion of the measure. Permits a statement of constitutionality, to the extent that a measure limits or abolishes any federal activity, spending, or power overall, to cite the 9th or the 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Declares that invoking one or more specified parts of the following clauses in a statement of constitutionality is not sufficient to satisfy the requirements of this Act: (1) the enumerated spending clause; (2) the necessary and proper clause; or (3) the commerce clause for any purpose other than the regulation of the buying and selling of goods or services, or their transportation, across boundaries with foreign nations, across state lines, or with the Indian tribes. Declares that failure to comply with this requirement shall give rise to a point of order in either chamber.

Bill· HRH.R. 2812 (113th)referred

Justice Exists for All of Us Act of 2013

United States · United States Congress · 24 July 2013

Justice Exists for All of Us Act of 2013 - Prohibits a state, for each fiscal year beginning three years after enactment of this Act, from having in effect a law or policy that: (1) allows a person to use deadly force when such person is threatened and that does not impose a duty to retreat before using such force in any place where that person is lawfully present (commonly known as a &quot;stand your ground law&quot;), except where the person is a victim of domestic violence; or (2) allows the establishment, organization, or operation of, or participation in, a Neighborhood Watch program that is not registered with the local law enforcement agency and the Department of Justice (DOJ). Allows the Attorney General to authorize up to two one-year extensions of such deadline. Provides that a state that fails to substantially implement this Act for any fiscal year shall not receive 20% of the funds that would otherwise be allocated to it under the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant program. Provides for alternative procedures for compliance by a state that is unable to substantially implement this Act because of a conflict with the state's constitution. Directs the Attorney General to conduct a study of state stand your ground laws, including by examining: (1) the effect that such laws have on rates of violent deaths, and (2) whether women and minorities are targets of the force authorized by such laws at a higher rate than the general population.

PreviousPage 2 of 3Next