Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · EU

Transport

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

194 records in EU in 2021

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0572_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#European Road Transport Telematics Implementation Coordination Organisation - Intelligent Transport Systems & Services Europe (Ertico - ITS Europe) v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities – Recommendation 2003/361/EC – Decision of the Validation Panel of the European Commission on classification as a micro, small or medium-sized enterprise (SME) – Decision 2012/838/EU, Euratom – Annex – Sections 1.2.6 and 1.2.7 – Request for review – Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 – Article 22 – No administrative proceedings – Link between request for review and administrative proceedings – Refusal of SME status despite formal observance of the Recommendation 2003/361 criteria – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Handicaps usually faced by SMEs – None.#Case C-572/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 March 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0572decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#European Road Transport Telematics Implementation Coordination Organisation - Intelligent Transport Systems & Services Europe (Ertico - ITS Europe) v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities – Recommendation 2003/361/EC – Decision of the Validation Panel of the European Commission on classification as a micro, small or medium-sized enterprise (SME) – Decision 2012/838/EU, Euratom – Annex – Sections 1.2.6 and 1.2.7 – Request for review – Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 – Article 22 – No administrative proceedings – Link between request for review and administrative proceedings – Refusal of SME status despite formal observance of the Recommendation 2003/361 criteria – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Handicaps usually faced by SMEs – None.#Case C-572/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 March 2021

Record· TOCELEX 62019TO0885(04)_RESdecided

Beschikking van het Gerecht (Tweede kamer) van 5 maart 2021.#Aquind Ltd e.a. tegen Europese Commissie.#Beroep tot nietigverklaring – Energie – Trans-Europese energie-infrastructuur – Verordening (EU) nr. 347/2013 – Delegatie van bevoegdheden aan de Commissie – Artikel 290 VWEU – Gedelegeerde handeling waarbij de Unielijst van projecten van gemeenschappelijk belang wordt gewijzigd – Aard van de handeling gedurende de termijn waarbinnen het Parlement en de Raad bezwaar kunnen maken – Handeling waartegen geen beroep kan worden ingesteld – Kennelijke niet-ontvankelijkheid.#Zaak T-885/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 March 2021

Record· TOCELEX 62019TO0885(04)decided

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 5 March 2021.#Aquind Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Energy – Trans-European energy infrastructure – Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 – Delegation of power to the Commission – Article 290 TFEU – Delegated act amending the list of projects of common interest of the Union – Nature of the act during the period within which the Parliament and the Council may express objections – Act not open to challenge – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-885/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 March 2021

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0570decided

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 4 March 2021.#Irish Ferries Ltd v National Transport Authority.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Irlande).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Maritime transport – Rights of passengers when travelling by sea and inland waterway – Regulation (EU) No 1177/2010 – Articles 18 and 19, Article 20(4), and Articles 24 and 25 – Cancellation of passenger services – Late delivery of a vessel to the carrier – Notice given prior to the originally scheduled date of departure – Consequences – Right to re-routing – Procedures – Payment of the additional costs – Right to compensation – Calculation – Concept of ticket price – National body responsible for the enforcement of Regulation No 1177/2010 – Competence – Concept of a complaint – Assessment of validity – Articles 16, 17, 20 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principles of proportionality, legal certainty and equal treatment.#Case C-570/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 March 2021

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0906decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 4 March 2021.#Criminal proceedings against FO.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Road transport – Harmonisation of certain social legislation – Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 – Article 3(a) – Non-application of the regulation to carriage by road by vehicles used for the carriage of passengers on regular services where the route covered by the service in question does not exceed 50 km – Mixed-use vehicle – Article 19(2) – Extraterritorial penalty – Infringement detected on the territory of a Member State committed on the territory of another Member State – Principle that offences and penalties must have a proper legal basis – Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 – Recording equipment in road transport – Article 15(2) – Obligation to insert the driver card – Article 15(7) – Obligation to produce the driver card whenever an authorising inspecting officer so requests – Failure to insert the driver card into the recording equipment affecting several of the 28 days preceding the day of inspection.#Case C-906/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 March 2021

Report· CCCELEX 62020CC0012decided

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 25 February 2021.#DB Netz AG v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rail transport – International rail freight corridors – Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 – Article 13(1) – Establishment of a one-stop shop for each freight corridor – Article 14 – Nature of the framework for the allocation of the infrastructure capacity on the freight corridor laid down by the executive board – Article 20 – Regulatory bodies – Directive 2012/34/EU – Article 27 – Procedure for submitting applications for infrastructure capacity – Role of infrastructure managers – Articles 56 and 57 – Functions of the regulatory bodies and cooperation between regulatory bodies.#Case C-12/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 February 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0259_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 February 2021.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – French air-transport market – Deferral of payment of civil aviation tax and solidarity tax on airline tickets due on a monthly basis during the period from March to December 2020 in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Free provision of services – Equal treatment – Criterion of holding a licence issued by the French authorities – Proportionality – Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Duty to state reasons.#Case T-259/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 February 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0238_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 February 2021.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Air-transport market in Sweden, from Sweden and to Sweden – Loan guarantees to support airlines amid the Covid-19 pandemic – Decision not to raise any objections – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Measure intended to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State – Free provision of services – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Criterion of holding a licence issued by the Swedish authorities – Failure to weigh the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition – Article 107(3)(b) TFEU – Ratio legis – Duty to state reasons.#Case T-238/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 February 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0259decided

__[no-tr-for:arret-t-10-g]__ of 17 February 2021.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – French air transport market – Deferral of payment of civil aviation tax and solidarity tax on airline tickets due on a monthly basis during the period from March to December 2020 in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Free provision of services – Equal treatment – Criterion of holding a licence issued by the French authorities – Proportionality – Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Duty to state reasons.#Case T-259/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 February 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0238decided

__[no-tr-for:arret-t-10-g]__ of 17 February 2021.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Air transport market in Sweden, from Sweden and to Sweden – Loan guarantees to support airlines amid the Covid-19 pandemic – Decision not to raise any objections – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Measure intended to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State – Free provision of services – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Criterion of holding a licence issued by the Swedish authorities – Failure to weigh the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition – Article 107(3)(b) TFEU – Ratio legis – Duty to state reasons.#Case T-238/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 February 2021

Regulation· RCELEX 32021R0267in force

Regulation (EU) 2021/267 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2021 laying down specific and temporary measures in view of the persistence of the COVID-19 crisis concerning the renewal or extension of certain certificates, licences and authorisations, the postponement of certain periodic checks and periodic training in certain areas of transport legislation and the extension of certain periods referred to in Regulation (EU) 2020/698 (Text with EEA relevance)

European Union · EUR-Lex · 16 February 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0407decided

Arrest van het Hof (Vierde kamer) van 11 februari 2021.#Katoen Natie Bulk Terminals NV en General Services Antwerp NV tegen Belgische Staat.#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Artikel 45 VWEU – Vrij verkeer van werknemers – Artikel 49 VWEU – Vrijheid van vestiging – Artikel 56 VWEU – Vrij verrichten van diensten – Uitoefening van havendiensten – Havenarbeiders – Toegang tot het beroep en aanwerving – Vereisten voor de erkenning van havenarbeiders – Havenarbeiders die niet zijn opgenomen in de bij de nationale wettelijke regeling ingestelde pool van werknemers – Beperking van de duur van de arbeidsovereenkomst – Mobiliteit van havenarbeiders tussen havengebieden – Logistieke werknemers – Veiligheidscertificaat – Dwingende redenen van algemeen belang – Veiligheid in de havengebieden – Bescherming van de werknemers – Evenredigheid.#Zaak C-407/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 February 2021

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0120decided

Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 28 January 2021.#X v College van burgemeester en wethouders van de gemeente Purmerend.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Inland transport of dangerous goods – Directive 2008/68/EC – Article 5(1) – Concept of ‘construction requirement’ – Prohibition on laying down more stringent construction requirements – Authority of a Member State requiring a service station to be supplied with liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) only from road tankers fitted with a particular heat-resistant lining not provided for by the European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR) – Unlawfulness – Decision legally unchallengeable by a category of persons – Strictly limited possibility of obtaining the annulment of such a decision where there is clear conflict with EU law – Principle of legal certainty – Principle of effectiveness.#Case C-120/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 January 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0288_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 20 janvier 2021.#QM contre Finanzamt Saarbrücken.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous c) – Prestations de services à titre onéreux – Article 26, paragraphe 1 – Opérations assimilées à des prestations de services à titre onéreux – Article 56, paragraphe 2 – Détermination du lieu de rattachement fiscal – Location de moyens de transport – Mise à disposition de voitures à des employés.#Affaire C-288/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 January 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0619_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Land Baden-Württemberg v D.R.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Aarhus Convention – Directive 2003/4/EC – Public access to environmental information – ‘Stuttgart 21’ infrastructure project – Refusal of a request for environmental information – Article 4(1) – Grounds for refusal – Term ‘internal communications’ – Scope – Limitation in time of the protection of such communications.#Case C-619/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 January 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0288decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#QM v Finanzamt Saarbrücken.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht des Saarlandes.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 2(1)(c) – Supplies of services for consideration – Article 26(1) – Transactions treated as supplies of services for consideration – Article 56(2) – Determination of the point of reference for tax purposes – Hiring of means of transport – Making cars available to employees.#Case C-288/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 January 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0619decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Land Baden-Württemberg v D.R.#Request for a preliminary ruling from Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Aarhus Convention – Directive 2003/4/EC – Public access to environmental information – ‘Stuttgart 21’ infrastructure project – Refusal of a request for environmental information – Article 4(1) – Grounds for refusal – Term ‘internal communications’ – Scope – Limitation in time of the protection of such communications.#Case C-619/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 January 2021

Proposal· PCCELEX 52021PC0025open

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL laying down specific and temporary measures in view of the COVID-19 outbreak concerning the renewal or extension of certain certificates, licences and authorisations and the postponement of certain periodic checks and periodic training in certain areas of transport legislation, for reference periods subsequent to those referred to in Regulation (EU) 2020/698

European Union · European Commission · 18 January 2021

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0264_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 January 2021.#Airhelp Limited v Austrian Airlines AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(3) – Right to compensation in the event of cancellation or long delay of flights – Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ – Unexpected flight safety shortcomings – Collision with a foreign object – Damage to an aircraft due to the movement of another aircraft – Concept of ‘reasonable measures’ to redress an extraordinary circumstance or the consequences of such a circumstance – Re-routing.#Case C-264/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 January 2021

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0264decided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 January 2021.#Airhelp Limited v Austrian Airlines AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(3) – Right to compensation in the event of cancellation or long delay of flights – Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ – Unexpected flight safety shortcomings – Collision with a foreign object – Damage to an aircraft due to the movement of another aircraft – Concept of ‘reasonable measures’ to redress an extraordinary circumstance or the consequences of such a circumstance – Re-routing.#Case C-264/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 January 2021

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0108_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 January 2021.#Krakvet sp. z o.o. sp.k. v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti and Administraţia Fiscală pentru Contribuabili Nerezidenţi.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 33 – Determination of the place where taxable transactions are carried out – Supply of goods with transport – Supply of goods dispatched or transported by or on behalf of the supplier – Sale through a website – Contract for the carriage of goods concluded by the buyer with a company suggested by the supplier.#Case C-108/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 January 2021

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0108decided

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 January 2021.#Krakvet sp. z o.o. sp.k. v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti and Administraţia Fiscală pentru Contribuabili Nerezidenţi.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 33 – Determination of the place where taxable transactions are carried out – Supply of goods with transport – Supply of goods dispatched or transported by or on behalf of the supplier – Sale through a website – Contract for the carriage of goods concluded by the buyer with a company suggested by the supplier.#Case C-108/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 January 2021

PreviousPage 4 of 4