Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · S

S. 343 (104th)

Comprehensive Regulatory Reform Act of 1995

openUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

2 February 1995

Last action

20 July 1995 · Floor

Status

Third cloture on the substitute amendment (SP 1487) not invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 58-40. Record Vote No: 315.

Sponsors

Sen. Dole, Robert J. [R-KS], Sen. Nickles, Don [R-OK], Sen. Bond, Christopher S. [R-MO], Sen. Hutchison, Kay Bailey [R-TX], Sen. Murkowski, Frank H. [R-AK], Sen. Lott, Trent [R-MS], Sen. Cochran, Thad [R-MS], Sen. Hatch, Orrin G. [R-UT], Sen. Domenici, Pete V. [R-NM], Sen. Kassebaum, Nancy Landon [R-KS], Sen. Coats, Daniel [R-IN], Sen. Abraham, Spencer [R-MI], Sen. Inhofe, James M. [R-OK], Sen. Smith, Bob [R-NH], Sen. Santorum, Rick [R-PA], Sen. Thompson, Fred [R-TN], Sen. Warner, John [R-VA], Sen. Kyl, Jon [R-AZ], Sen. Thomas, Craig [R-WY], Sen. Gramm, Phil [R-TX], Sen. Mack, Connie, III [R-FL], Sen. Gregg, Judd [R-NH], Sen. Shelby, Richard C. [R-AL], Sen. Stevens, Ted [R-AK], Sen. Helms, Jesse [R-NC], Sen. Faircloth, Lauch [R-NC], Sen. Grassley, Chuck [R-IA], Sen. Kempthorne, Dirk [R-ID], Sen. Simpson, Alan K. [R-WY], Sen. Frist, William H. [R-TN]

Subjects

Healthcare, Environment

Source updated

10 August 2026

Healthcare · Environment

Summary

Comprehensive Regulatory Reform Act of 1995 - Amends Federal law to define "major rule" as a rule or a group of closely related rules that the proposing agency or the President determines is likely to have an annual effect on the economy of $50 million or more in reasonably quantifiable increased costs, or has a significant impact on a sector of the economy. (Sec. 2) Authorizes an agency proposing the rule or the President to designate as a major rule any rule or group of closely related rules which is likely to result in: (1) a substantial increase in costs or prices for wage earners, consumers, individual industries, nonprofit organizations, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic regions; or (2) significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, the environment, public health or safety, or the ability of enterprises whose principal places of business are in the United States to compete in domestic or export markets. Requires each Federal agency, before publishing notice of proposed rulemaking for any rule, to determine whether the rule is or should be designated major. Requires the agency to issue at the time of the notice of proposed rulemaking a draft cost-benefit analysis which shall be summarized in such notice. Prohibits an agency from promulgating a rule unless it finds that: (1) the rule's potential benefits to society outweigh its costs; and (2) such rule will provide greater net benefits to society than reasonable alternatives, including certain market-based mechanisms. Subjects agency and presidential rule determinations or designations to judicial review. Authorizes any person subject to a major rule to petition the agency or the President to perform a cost-benefit analysis. Requires an agency, before a major rule can become final, to submit to the Congress a copy of the rule and a report containing a concise statement on the rule, a complete copy of the cost-benefit analysis, and the proposed effective date of the rule. Prohibits a rule from becoming final if the Congress passes a joint resolution of disapproval. Prohibits the promulgation of any rule that expands Federal jurisdiction beyond the level of regulatory action needed to satisfy statutory requirements. Requires a court reviewing a final agency action to affirm an agency's interpretation of the statute granting authority to promulgate the rule if, in applying traditional principles of statutory construction, it finds that the interpretation is clearly the interpretation of the statute intended by the Congress. Requires the President to: (1) establish procedures for agency compliance with this Act; and (2) monitor, review, and ensure such compliance. Authorizes an affected small entity to petition for the judicial review of a final rule with respect to which an agency: (1) has certified that it would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities; or (2) prepared a final regulatory flexibility analysis.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 2 February 1995

    Introduced

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

    Source: Floor

  2. 2 February 1995

    Introduced

    Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S2056-2057)

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 2 February 1995

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 3 February 1995

    Introduced

    Referred jointly to the Committees on Judiciary; Governmental Affairs by unanimous consent.

    Source: IntroReferral

  5. 22 February 1995

    Committee

    Committee on the Judiciary Senate Subcommittee on Administrative Oversight and the Courts. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 104-677.

    Source: Committee

  6. 24 February 1995

    Committee

    Committee on the Judiciary Senate Subcommittee on Administrative Oversight and the Courts. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 104-677.

    Source: Committee

  7. 14 March 1995

    Committee

    Subcommittee on Oversight and Courts. Approved for full committee consideration with an amendment in the nature of a substitute without recommendation.

    Source: Committee

  8. 17 March 1995

    Committee

    Committee on Judiciary. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 104-686.

    Source: Committee

  9. 23 March 1995

    Reported

    Committee on Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

    Source: Committee

  10. 5 April 1995

    Committee

    Committee on Judiciary. Committee consideration and Mark Up Session held.

    Source: Committee

  11. 6 April 1995

    Committee

    Committee on Judiciary. Committee consideration and Mark Up Session held.

    Source: Committee

  12. 26 April 1995

    Reported

    Committee on Judiciary. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

    Source: Committee

  13. 26 May 1995

    Calendars

    Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 118.

    Source: Calendars

  14. 26 May 1995

    Floor

    By Senator Roth for Senator Hatch from Committee on Judiciary filed written report. Report No. 104-90. Additional and supplemental views filed.

    Source: Floor

  15. 26 May 1995

    Committee

    By Senator Roth for Senator Hatch from Committee on Judiciary filed written report. Report No. 104-90. Additional and supplemental views filed.

    Source: Committee

  16. 26 May 1995

    Reported

    Committees on Governmental Affairs; Judiciary. Jointly reported to Senate by Senator Roth with amendments in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 104-89. Additional views filed.

    Source: Committee

  17. 26 May 1995

    Reported

    Committees on Governmental Affairs; Judiciary. Jointly reported to Senate by Senator Roth with amendments in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 104-89. Additional views filed.

    Source: Committee

  18. 28 June 1995

    Floor

    Measure laid before Senate. (consideration: CR S9260-9296)

    Source: Floor

  19. 29 June 1995

    Floor

    Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S9349, S9351-9356, S9412-9414)

    Source: Floor

  20. 30 June 1995

    Floor

    Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S9509)

    Source: Floor

  21. 10 July 1995

    Floor

    Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S9606-9624, S9628-9637)

    Source: Floor

  22. 11 July 1995

    Floor

    Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S9653-9693, S9695-9708)

    Source: Floor

  23. 12 July 1995

    Floor

    Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S9733-9792, S9794)

    Source: Floor

  24. 13 July 1995

    Floor

    Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S9834-9902)

    Source: Floor

  25. 14 July 1995

    Floor

    Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S9946-9971, S9974-9979, S9981-9986, S9988-9996)

    Source: Floor

  26. 17 July 1995

    Floor

    Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S10086-10146)

    Source: Floor

  27. 18 July 1995

    Floor

    Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S10189-10224)

    Source: Floor

  28. 20 July 1995

    Floor

    Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S10386-10401)

    Source: Floor

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

9 official files

Reported to Senate (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reported to Senate (text)

    Reported to Senate · EN · 26 May 1995

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Reported to Senate (PDF)

    Reported to Senate · EN · 26 May 1995

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reported to Senate amended, 2nd committee reporting

    summary · EN · 26 May 1995

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reported to Senate amended, 1st committee reporting

    summary · EN · 26 May 1995

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reference Change Senate (text)

    Reference Change Senate · EN · 3 February 1995

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reference Change Senate (PDF)

    Reference Change Senate · EN · 3 February 1995

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in Senate (text)

    Introduced in Senate · EN · 2 February 1995

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in Senate (PDF)

    Introduced in Senate · EN · 2 February 1995

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in Senate

    summary · EN · 2 February 1995

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Showing 10 of 339 related records.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.