Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · HCONRES

H.Con.Res. 25 (112th)

Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to the Obama administration's discontinuing to defend the Defense of Marriage Act.

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

3 March 2011

Last action

21 March 2011 · Referred

Status

Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution.

Sponsors

Rep. Hartzler, Vicky [R-MO-4], Rep. Akin, W. Todd [R-MO-2], Rep. Bachmann, Michele [R-MN-6], Rep. Bachus, Spencer [R-AL-6], Rep. Bartlett, Roscoe G. [R-MD-6], Rep. Bishop, Rob [R-UT-1], Sen. Blackburn, Marsha [R-TN], Rep. Brooks, Mo [R-AL-5], Rep. Buerkle, Ann Marie [R-NY-25], Rep. Burton, Dan [R-IN-5], Rep. Carter, John R. [R-TX-31], Rep. Cole, Tom [R-OK-4], Rep. Denham, Jeff [R-CA-10], Rep. DesJarlais, Scott [R-TN-4], Rep. Duncan, Jeff [R-SC-3], Rep. Fleischmann, Charles J. "Chuck" [R-TN-3], Rep. Flores, Bill [R-TX-17], Rep. Franks, Trent [R-AZ-8], Rep. Gibbs, Bob [R-OH-7], Rep. Gingrey, Phil [R-GA-11], Rep. Gowdy, Trey [R-SC-4], Rep. Griffin, Tim [R-AR-2], Rep. Huelskamp, Tim [R-KS-1], Rep. Huizenga, Bill [R-MI-4], Rep. Johnson, Sam [R-TX-3], Rep. Jordan, Jim [R-OH-4], Rep. King, Steve [R-IA-4], Rep. Latta, Robert E. [R-OH-5], Rep. McHenry, Patrick T. [R-NC-10], Rep. McMorris Rodgers, Cathy [R-WA-5], Rep. Mulvaney, Mick [R-SC-5], Rep. Pearce, Stevan [R-NM-2], Rep. Pitts, Joseph R. [R-PA-16], Rep. Roe, David P. [R-TN-1], Rep. Rogers, Mike D. [R-AL-3], Rep. Stearns, Cliff [R-FL-6], Rep. Walsh, Joe [R-IL-8], Rep. Westmoreland, Lynn A. [R-GA-3], Rep. Woodall, Rob [R-GA-7], Rep. Roby, Martha [R-AL-2], Rep. Pence, Mike [R-IN-6], Sen. Flake, Jeff [R-AZ], Rep. McKeon, Howard P. "Buck" [R-CA-25], Rep. Wilson, Joe [R-SC-2], Rep. Jones, Walter B., Jr. [R-NC-3], Rep. Ross, Dennis A. [R-FL-15], Rep. Graves, Tom [R-GA-14], Rep. Olson, Pete [R-TX-22]

Subjects

Defence

Source updated

3 January 2025

Defence

Official sourceDownload fileView documentsShare

Summary

Condemns the Obama administration's direction that the Department of Justice (DOJ) should discontinue defending the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and demands that the DOJ continue to defend DOMA in all instances.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 3 March 2011

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 3 March 2011

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 3 March 2011

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 21 March 2011

    Referred

    Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (text)

    Introduced in House · EN · 3 March 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Introduced in House (PDF)

    Introduced in House · EN · 3 March 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 3 March 2011

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Showing 48 of 124 sponsors and actors.

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.