Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · HCONRES

H.Con.Res. 252 (103rd)

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp should be issued to recognize the achievements of Lewis Howard Latimer.

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

25 May 1994

Last action

25 May 1994 · Introduced

Status

Referred to the House Committee on Post Office and Civil Service.

Sponsors

Rep. Flake, Floyd H. [D-NY-6], Rep. Ackerman, Gary L. [D-NY-5], Rep. McKinney, Cynthia A. [D-GA-4], Rep. Meek, Carrie P. [D-FL-17], Rep. Brown, Corrine [D-FL-5], Rep. Watt, Melvin L. [D-NC-12], Rep. Reynolds, Mel [D-IL-2], Rep. Rush, Bobby L. [D-IL-1], Rep. Payne, Donald M. [D-NJ-10], Rep. Ford, Harold E. [D-TN-9], Rep. Waters, Maxine [D-CA-43], Rep. Clayton, Eva M. [D-NC-1], Rep. Thompson, Bennie G. [D-MS-2], Rep. Hilliard, Earl F. [D-AL-7], Rep. Dixon, Julian C. [D-CA-32], Rep. Rangel, Charles B. [D-NY-15], Rep. Johnson, Eddie Bernice [D-TX-30], Rep. Collins, Barbara-Rose [D-MI-15], Rep. Collins, Cardiss [D-IL-7], Rep. Mfume, Kweisi [D-MD-7], Rep. Lewis, John [D-GA-5], Rep. Conyers, John, Jr. [D-MI-13], Rep. Clyburn, James E. [D-SC-6], Rep. Bishop, Sanford D. [D-GA-2], Rep. Tucker, Walter R., III [D-CA-37], Rep. Wynn, Albert Russell [D-MD-4], Rep. Jefferson, William J. [D-LA-2], Rep. Boehlert, Sherwood [R-NY-24], Rep. Fish, Hamilton, Jr. [R-NY-19], Rep. Gilman, Benjamin A. [R-NY-20], Rep. Hinchey, Maurice D. [D-NY-22], Rep. Hochbrueckner, George J. [D-NY-1], Rep. McHugh, John M. [R-NY-23], Rep. Manton, Thomas J. [D-NY-7], Rep. Molinari, Susan [R-NY-13], Sen. Schumer, Charles E. [D-NY], Rep. Velázquez, Nydia M. [D-NY-7], Rep. Maloney, Carolyn B. [D-NY-12]

Subjects

Postal service

Source updated

6 February 2024

Postal service

Official sourceDownload fileView documentsShare

Summary

Expresses the sense of the Congress that: (1) a U.S. postage stamp should be issued in recognition of the distinctive life and scientific achievements of Lewis Howard Latimer and his civic contributions to U.S. social and technological advancement; and (2) the Citizen's Stamp Advisory Committee of the U.S. Postal Service should recommend to the Postmaster General that such a postage stamp be issued.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 25 May 1994

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on Post Office and Civil Service.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 25 May 1994

    Introduced

    Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1068)

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 25 May 1994

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 25 May 1994

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (text)

    Introduced in House · EN · 25 May 1994

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Introduced in House (PDF)

    Introduced in House · EN · 25 May 1994

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 25 May 1994

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.