Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · HCONRES

H.Con.Res. 270 (103rd)

Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to the use of racially based quotas designed to thwart the implementation of the death penalty.

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

21 July 1994

Last action

18 August 1994 · Referred

Status

Referred to the Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights.

Sponsors

Rep. Huffington, Michael [R-CA-22], Rep. Calvert, Ken [R-CA-41], Rep. Torkildsen, Peter G. [R-MA-6], Rep. DeLay, Tom [R-TX-22], Rep. Knollenberg, Joe [R-MI-9], Rep. Greenwood, James C. [R-PA-8], Rep. Goodlatte, Bob [R-VA-6], Rep. McCollum, Bill [R-FL-8], Rep. Bonilla, Henry [R-TX-23], Rep. Pombo, Richard W. [R-CA-11], Rep. Cunningham, Randy (Duke) [R-CA-50], Rep. Kingston, Jack [R-GA-1], Rep. Lewis, Jerry [R-CA-41], Sen. Grams, Rod [R-MN], Sen. Portman, Rob [R-OH], Rep. Condit, Gary A. [D-CA-18], Rep. Everett, Terry [R-AL-2], Rep. Walker, Robert S. [R-PA-16], Sen. Kyl, Jon [R-AZ], Rep. McKeon, Howard P. "Buck" [R-CA-25], Rep. Fowler, Tillie [R-FL-4], Rep. Stenholm, Charles W. [D-TX-17], Rep. Barcia, James A. [D-MI-5], Rep. Herger, Wally [R-CA-2], Rep. Dunn, Jennifer [R-WA-8], Rep. McCandless, Alfred A. (Al) [R-CA-44], Rep. Armey, Richard K. [R-TX-26], Rep. Stearns, Cliff [R-FL-6], Rep. Doolittle, John T. [R-CA-4], Rep. Emerson, Bill [R-MO-8], Rep. Dornan, Robert K. [R-CA-46], Rep. Fields, Jack [R-TX-8], Rep. Horn, Stephen [R-CA-38], Rep. Ramstad, Jim [R-MN-3], Rep. Manzullo, Donald A. [R-IL-16], Sen. Santorum, Rick [R-PA], Rep. Johnson, Sam [R-TX-3], Rep. Saxton, Jim [R-NJ-3], Rep. Kolbe, Jim [R-AZ-8], Rep. Bilirakis, Michael [R-FL-9], Rep. Solomon, Gerald B. H. [R-NY-22], Rep. Smith, Robert [R-OR-2], Rep. Duncan, John J., Jr. [R-TN-2], Rep. Livingston, Bob [R-LA-1], Rep. Bereuter, Doug [R-NE-1], Rep. Callahan, Sonny [R-AL-1], Rep. Hancock, Mel [R-MO-7], Rep. Gilchrest, Wayne T. [R-MD-1]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

2 June 2021

Summary

Expresses the sense of the Congress that neither the President nor any other entity in the executive branch should attempt to impose a racially based quota system to challenge death penalties.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 21 July 1994

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 21 July 1994

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 21 July 1994

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 18 August 1994

    Referred

    Referred to the Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (text)

    Introduced in House · EN · 21 July 1994

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Introduced in House (PDF)

    Introduced in House · EN · 21 July 1994

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 21 July 1994

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Showing 48 of 61 sponsors and actors.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.