Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · HRES

H.Res. 368 (103rd)

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to the inclusion in any comprehensive benefits package under health care reform of mammography screenings for women under the age of 50.

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

23 February 1994

Last action

11 March 1994 · Referred

Status

Referred to the Subcommittee on Health and the Environment.

Sponsors

Rep. Towns, Edolphus [D-NY-10], Rep. Collins, Cardiss [D-IL-7], Rep. Velázquez, Nydia M. [D-NY-7], Rep. Vucanovich, Barbara F. [R-NV-2], Rep. Slaughter, Louise McIntosh [D-NY-25], Sen. Sanders, Bernard [I-VT], Rep. King, Peter T. [R-NY-2], Rep. Moakley, John Joseph [D-MA-9], Rep. Morella, Constance A. [R-MD-8], Rep. Lloyd, Marilyn [D-TN-3], Rep. Burton, Dan [R-IN-5], Rep. Danner, Pat [D-MO-6], Rep. Edwards, Don [D-CA-10], Rep. Frank, Barney [D-MA-4], Rep. Reynolds, Mel [D-IL-2], Rep. Schiff, Steven [R-NM-1], Rep. Moran, James P. [D-VA-8], Rep. Lewis, John [D-GA-5], Rep. Barrett, Thomas M. [D-WI-5], Rep. Meek, Carrie P. [D-FL-17], Rep. Holden, Tim [D-PA-17], Rep. Foglietta, Thomas M. [D-PA-1], Rep. Gejdenson, Sam [D-CT-2], Rep. Evans, Lane [D-IL-17], Rep. Flake, Floyd H. [D-NY-6], Sen. Portman, Rob [R-OH], Rep. Ford, Harold E. [D-TN-9], Rep. Hilliard, Earl F. [D-AL-7], Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large], Rep. Torkildsen, Peter G. [R-MA-6]

Subjects

Healthcare

Source updated

3 June 2026

Healthcare

Official sourceDownload fileView documentsShare

Summary

Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that: (1) any comprehensive benefits package under health care reform should include mammography screenings for women under the age of 50 (as well as those over 50); (2) there be a copayment for such screenings, except for low-income families; and (3) there should be a randomized clinical trial to determine the benefits of mammography and other screening technologies.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 23 February 1994

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 23 February 1994

    Introduced

    Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H566)

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 23 February 1994

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 23 February 1994

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  5. 25 February 1994

    Referred

    Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

    Source: Committee

  6. 11 March 1994

    Referred

    Referred to the Subcommittee on Health and the Environment.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (text)

    Introduced in House · EN · 23 February 1994

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Introduced in House (PDF)

    Introduced in House · EN · 23 February 1994

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 23 February 1994

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.