Records
6 records where Émeline K/Bidi is listed as a sponsor, author, or other actor. Search with topics and years
Question· Question écrite9727answered
France · National Assembly · 16 September 2025
Ms. Émeline K/Bidi draws the attention of the Minister of Public Action, Civil Service and Simplification to the situation of civil servants recognized as disabled workers (RQTH). The MP informs the Minister of a worrying situation which has been reported to him several times by civil servants from different administrations. Indeed, several civil servants whose status as worker disabled (RQTH) was recognized and for whom the occupational doctor recommended a job adaptation, explain having suffered a refusal from the administration based on “the operational requirements of the service”. The concrete assessment of the cases which were reported to the Member nevertheless demonstrated possible adaptations or arrangements compatible with the operational needs of the service; other officials do not disabled people who have also obtained timetable adjustments for personal convenience within the same administration. The application of the reason of “necessity for the operation of the service” in reality reveals a large part of arbitrariness. In any case, this reason makes it possible to ignore the recommendations of occupational medicine and not to take into account the state of health of the civil servant. In the private sector, employers are bound by an obligation of safety of result which obliges them to apply the recommendations of the occupational doctor. It is clear that on this point, public service agents are less well protected. She therefore asks him whether internal directives define and regulate the notion of “service necessity” and whether this notion applies to the cases of civil servants benefiting from a RQTH and a recommendation for adaptation of occupational doctor's station.
Question· Question écrite9722answered
France · National Assembly · 16 September 2025
Ms. Émeline K/Bidi draws the attention of the Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs to the conclusions of the flash mission on the increase in postal parcel prices carried out within the overseas delegation. On June 24, 2025, the flash mission on the increase in postal parcel prices revealed the inconsistencies and injustices suffered by overseas users. With particular regard to the threshold for VAT exemptions and dock dues, the report indicates that: “from France to the Droms, commercial sales are exempt up to 22 euros inclusive; from the Drom to France, in the absence of a commercial transaction, this franchise applies up to 45 euros inclusive; finally, in terms of non-commercial sending from France to the Droms, this franchise amounts to 400 euros. A package sent by an overseas individual to France is therefore taxed if its value exceeds 45 euros. On the other hand, an individual living in France and wishing to send a parcel overseas will be exempt from tax if the parcel does not exceed 400 euros. The excess is 9 times higher for overseas users than for those in France. The report from the overseas delegation points the finger at European legislation. She therefore wishes to know if France has contacted European authorities to harmonize the tax exemptions applicable to postal parcels exchanged between individuals and thus put an end to the breach of equality suffered by overseas users.
Question· Question écrite9721answered
France · National Assembly · 16 September 2025
Ms. Émeline K/Bidi draws the attention of the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Industrial and Digital Sovereignty to the conclusions of the flash mission on the increase in postal parcel prices carried out within the overseas delegation. On June 24, 2025, the flash mission on the increase in postal parcel prices submitted its conclusions after several weeks of work combining research and hearings. Mrs. MP, co-rapporteur of this mission, then detailed the various reasons for the increase in the prices of postal parcels exchanged between individuals to and from overseas. Among these reasons, the MP was particularly surprised by the application of double taxation on value added (VAT). The report states: “If they are part of the European customs territory, the overseas departments and regions are, however, not part of the tax territory of the European Union: they are thus assimilated, from a tax point of view, to non-member States of the Union, including in their relations with France. Postal parcels sent from or to overseas are therefore considered imports or exports and are subject to taxation under value added tax (VAT) (...) if these taxes are not formally part of of the price of the postal parcel sent from or to overseas, they are nevertheless often added to it and are therefore an integral part of the "real cost" of these shipments. Indeed, it appears that in addition to the VAT already invoiced at the time of purchase of the goods intended to be sent, the package is also subject to VAT. The same good is therefore subject to the same tax twice, once at the time of purchase and once at the time of shipment. This situation does not exist for packages exchanged between individuals in France. This difference in treatment between overseas territories and France is particularly unfair. On the one hand, because it denies the full and complete belonging of overseas people to the territory of the Republic. On the other hand, because this double taxation affects the poorest territories in the country. She wants to know what solutions he plans to implemented to put an end to this mechanism of double taxation on the added value of postal parcels exchanged between individuals to and from overseas.
Question· Question écrite9720answered
France · National Assembly · 16 September 2025
Ms. Émeline K/Bidi alerts the Minister of State, Minister of the Interior, to the problem of access of civil servant police officers to their transfer scale. Regularly questioned by Reunion police officers awaiting transfer, the MP noted that their scale did not appear on any document in their transfer file nor on the refusal decision notified to them. This does not put agents in a position to understand or usefully contest the administration's decision. It is also not possible for them to verify that legal priorities that may be applicable to them, such as the centers of material and moral interests (CIMM), have been taken into account, and therefore to assess their chances and time limits for returning to their territory of origin. To obtain their scale, agents must write to the administration and are subject to variable deadlines, not very compatible with the deadlines for appealing administrative decisions. Some administrations include the scale of their agents automatically on the transfer request documents, others allow simple online access via secure platforms. Concerning police officers, she deplores the lack of transparency on the officers' scales and therefore questions the possibility of systematically send them their scale before their transfer request and when the administration responds.
Question· Question écrite9527answered
France · National Assembly · 2 September 2025
Ms. Émeline K/Bidi draws the attention of the Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs to the lack of representation of France within the Association of Parliaments of the Member States of the Indian Ocean Commission (APCOI). Indeed, while all IOC member states have parliamentary representatives sitting in the regional parliament, France has no active parliamentarian in this body. This absence representation raises several questions about the country's commitment and influence in discussions and decisions that concern France in the Indian Ocean. The IOC plays an essential role in regional cooperation, sustainable development and the promotion of peace in the Indian Ocean. It is therefore crucial that France, which has two French departments, Réunion and Mayotte, is represented within the APCOI in order to defend its interests and actively participate in regional projects. She therefore asks him to enlighten her on the reasons for this situation and on the measures that the Government plans to take to remedy this lack of representation. She also asks him to identify the issues concerning France's participation in the APCOI and to determine the means deployed to strengthen France's voice within this parliament. regional.
Question· Question écrite15669open
France · National Assembly · 27 February 2024
Ms. Emeline K/Bidi draws the attention of the Minister Delegate to the Minister for Ecological Transition and Territorial Cohesion, responsible for transport, to the eco-contribution on air transport and the exemption provided for overseas in Article 72 of Law No. 2019-1479 of December 28, 2019 on finance for 2020. This text expressly provided that reductions would apply to commercial flights " carried out between overseas departments or communities and mainland France as well as between these same overseas departments or communities.” This exemption is justified by the insularity or remoteness of overseas territories and the essential nature of air transport for their opening up and territorial continuity. The poverty rate and the cost of living, higher overseas, also justified these reductions. However, the finance law for 2020 postponed the date of entry into force of this exemption for overseas territories to "a date set by joint decree of the ministers responsible for civil aviation and the budget which cannot be more than one month later than the date of receipt by the Government of the response from the European Commission allowing this legislative measure to be considered in compliance with Union law European”. However, the European Commission's response was never communicated to Parliament. In any case, the National Assembly does not know whether the European Commission was indeed questioned and, if so, since what date. On the other hand, it is established that the eco-contribution on air transport has come into force overseas since January 1, 2020, in the same proportions as for the entire national territory, without no exemption. Overseas countries have therefore been waiting for the effective application of this exemption for more than four years. This tax reduction is always justified by the geographical and social situation of the overseas territories. It is all the more justified as the price of plane tickets to and from overseas has seen a very sharp increase in recent years. Data for the year 2023 showed an increase prices of 30.3% in four years to overseas territories and an increase of 28.3% for flights departing from these same territories. She therefore questions him on the date on which the European Commission received this request for exemption and would like to know the response given.