Question· Question écrite17325open
France · National Assembly · 28 July 2026
Mr. Emmanuel Duplessy draws the attention of the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Industrial, Energy and Digital Sovereignty to the situation of SCOP Duralex and the prospects for maintaining its industrial activity. An emblematic company of French industrial heritage, Duralex has been a major player in the glass industry for several decades and a symbol of made in France. Located in La Chapelle-Saint-Mesmin, in Loiret, it also represents an essential employer for the region. Following the legal recovery procedure initiated with regard to SCOP Duralex, the Orléans commercial court decided, on July 2, 2026, to open a plan to sell the activity. This situation gives rise to serious concern about the future of the company's 243 employees as well as the maintenance of this activity. industrial in the Loirétain territory. This development takes place in a broader context marked by the difficulties encountered by many French industrial companies and by the multiplication of restructurings in several strategic sectors. In Loiret, the economic and social consequences of the difficulties encountered by certain companies, particularly in industry, have already strongly affected the local fabric and employment. Beyond the particular situation of Duralex, this procedure raises the question of the preservation of French industrial know-how, the maintenance of production capacities on the national territory and industrial sovereignty, regularly affirmed as a priority by the public authorities. Also, he asks what measures the Government intends to implement to support research of a buyer, guarantee the sustainability of the activity of the La Chapelle-Saint-Mesmin site, preserve the jobs of the 243 employees and sustainably support the French glass industry.
Question· Question écrite17116open
France · National Assembly · 21 July 2026
Mr. Emmanuel Duplessy questions the Prime Minister on the cost of material means and protection devices granted to former Prime Ministers pursuant to Decree No. 2019-973 of September 20, 2019, amended by Decree No. 2025-965 of September 16, 2025. Following this reform, certain material benefits have been limited in time while protection devices continue to be discretionary of the state. He asks him to communicate, for each of the former Prime Ministers still benefiting from a support system in 2026, the exhaustive list of benefits actually granted, distinguishing the material means (vehicle, driver, secretariat or any other benefit in kind) from the protection measures provided by the Ministry of the Interior. He also asks him to specify, for each of the beneficiaries, the exact annual cost of each of these measures, expressed to the nearest euro, as well as the budgetary program and the administration which ensures its financing. He also wishes to know the number of public agents mobilized for the protection or support of former Prime Ministers, their distribution by beneficiary as well as the corresponding cost in payroll. He also asks him to present the complete budgetary assessment of the reform entered into full force on January 1, 2026, indicating the savings actually observed compared to the previous situation, the number of beneficiaries having lost all or part of their material benefits and the residual cost of the system. Finally, he asks whether the Government plans to carry out a regular assessment of the relevance, cost and conditions of allocation of these advantages with regard to the principles of sobriety of public spending and transparency of state finances.
Question· Question écrite17166open
France · National Assembly · 21 July 2026
Mr. Emmanuel Duplessy draws the attention of the Minister of Culture to the adaptation of French monumental heritage to the consequences of climate change. The work of the IPCC converges to announce an increase in the frequency, intensity and duration of heat waves, drought episodes as well as extreme weather phenomena. These developments now constitute a direct threat to the conservation of the built heritage. The Loire castles, emblematic of national heritage, offer a particularly worrying illustration of this. At the Azay-le-Rideau castle, owned by the State and managed by the Center for National Monuments, the drop in the level of the Indre linked to drought poses a risk to the oak stilts which support the foundations of the monument. Episodes of high heat also promote proliferation of invasive species in the moats, while water variations require constant monitoring of the site. Other monuments are experiencing comparable difficulties: in Chenonceau, the alternation between droughts and intense rains weakens the foundations, masonry and water evacuation systems, while in Chambord or Amboise, bad weather has recently required major emergency work. According to the balance sheet 2019-2024 from the Ministry of Culture, almost a quarter of protected historic monuments are still considered to be in poor condition or in danger. At the same time, several studies, notably those of the Climate Action Network, identify the Centre-Val de Loire region as one of the most exposed to the consequences of climate change, in particular due to the shrinkage-swelling of clay soils and the multiplication of episodes of drought. Although restoration operations today make it possible to respond to the most urgent situations, they often remain ad hoc and are not part of an overall strategy for adapting heritage to new climatic conditions. He therefore asks whether the Government intends to initiate a national plan to adapt historic monuments to climate change, making it possible to anticipate the risks weighing on heritage, to strengthen the expertise and monitoring capacities of the most exposed monuments and to support public owners in the investments necessary for their preservation.
Question· Question écrite17078open
France · National Assembly · 21 July 2026
Mr. Emmanuel Duplessy draws the attention of the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Industrial, Energy and Digital Sovereignty to the worrying acceleration in the disappearance of artisanal bakeries throughout the country. While the Government regularly presents the economic situation of artisanal baking as generally favorable, establishment closures are increasing in many territories. Nearly 62% of French municipalities today do not have a bakery and two out of three municipalities no longer have any local shops. In many areas, residents have to travel more than seven kilometers to access a bakery, revealing a loss of access to an essential daily service and a weakening of social ties. These situations, far from being isolated, result in a progressive disorganization of the local commercial network on a national scale. This situation results from the lasting combination of rising costs of energy, raw materials, payroll costs and recruitment difficulties, to which is added a drop in profitability which is now weakening even viable companies. Thus, despite the existence of public support systems, the crisis experienced by the artisanal bakery can no longer be seen as cyclical, but rather as structural. Also, he asks how the Government explains that the existing measures do not make it possible to halt this dynamic of disappearance of artisanal bakeries and what structural adaptations of its support policy it intends to undertake to guarantee the economic sustainability of these companies and the maintenance of a network of proximity throughout the territory.
Question· Question écrite17075open
France · National Assembly · 21 July 2026
Ministry of Small and Medium Enterprises, Commerce, Crafts, Tourism and Purchasing Power
Question· Question écrite17119open
France · National Assembly · 21 July 2026
Ministry of the Interior
Question· Question écrite17115open
France · National Assembly · 21 July 2026
Mr. Emmanuel Duplessy questions the Minister of the Interior about the cost of protection measures provided by State services for the benefit of former ministers, former members of the Government and former holders of high public functions. If the protection of certain personalities can naturally be justified by a particular threat, the attribution criteria, the duration of the measures and their cost remain largely unknown. In a context of controlling public finances, it nevertheless appears necessary for Parliament to have a precise vision of the human and budgetary resources devoted to these measures. He therefore asks him to communicate, as of July 1, 2026: the total number of former members of the Government benefiting from protection provided by the State services, distinguishing between former Prime Ministers, former ministers of interior and other former ministers; the number of former Presidents of the Republic benefiting from protection provided by State services; the total number of police officers, gendarmes or specialized agents mobilized under these measures, broken down by category of beneficiaries; the total annual cost of these protections, distinguishing between personnel expenses, means of transport, vehicles made available, travel expenses as well as any other expenses directly linked to these missions; the individualized annual cost of protection measures granted to former Presidents of the Republic and former Prime Ministers. It also asks it to specify the objective criteria used to decide on the maintenance, reduction or elimination of protection, the authorities competent to make these decisions as well as the frequency of their reassessment. Finally, it asks it to indicate how many protective measures have been lifted, reduced or, on the contrary, reinforced since January 1, 2022, specifying, for each of these cases, the reasons leading to this development, subject to information covered by national defense secrecy or likely to compromise the security of the persons concerned.
Question· Question écrite17165open
France · National Assembly · 21 July 2026
Mr. Emmanuel Duplessy draws the attention of the Minister of Action and Public Accounts to the conditions under which donations made to certain political groups give rise to a tax reduction under article 200 of the general tax code. The political organization Action Française, registered under the name “La Restauration nationale” with the National Commission for Campaign Accounts and Financing politicians, publicly indicates to its supporters that their donations entitle them to a tax reduction of 66% within the limit provided by law. It also presents this tax advantage as an argument intended to encourage the financing of its activities. Founded at the end of the 19th century in the context of the Dreyfus affair, Action Française still claims today its attachment to royalism and the restoration of monarchy, as its name suggests. These guidelines are part of the political debate and cannot, on their own, justify calling into question the regime applicable to the financing of political parties. On the other hand, this organization is also marked by a history deeply linked to anti-Semitism and support for the Vichy regime. Even today, several of his publications, positions taken or militant actions are regularly the subject of criticism or reports due to their anti-Semitic, racist or discriminatory nature. However, the tax reduction mechanism provided for by the law of March 11, 1988 relating to the financial transparency of political life leads, in practice, to the State participating indirectly, through tax expenditure, in the financing of all political groups which meet the legal conditions, without the respect for the fundamental principles of the Republic does not constitute an assessment criterion. He therefore asks whether the Government considers that the current legal framework remains satisfactory or whether it plans to change the legislation so that the benefit of tax deductibility of donations to political parties and groups can be conditional on respect for the fundamental principles of the Republic, in particular the rejection of speech or actions constituting incitement to hatred, discrimination or provocation of a racist or anti-Semitic nature.
Question· Question écrite17056open
France · National Assembly · 21 July 2026
M. Emmanuel Duplessy attire l'attention de Mme la ministre de l'agriculture, de l'agro-alimentaire et de la souveraineté alimentaire sur l'efficacité de la réforme de l'assurance récolte face à la multiplication des épisodes climatiques extrêmes. Alors que de nombreux départements connaissent cet été des épisodes de sécheresse, de fortes chaleurs et de restrictions d'usage de l'eau, de nombreuses exploitations agricoles sont confrontées à des pertes de rendement, à une dégradation de la qualité des productions et à des difficultés croissantes de trésorerie. Ces évènements s'inscrivent dans une succession d'aléas climatiques qui fragilisent durablement l'agriculture française. Entrée en vigueur en 2023, la réforme de l'assurance récolte avait précisément pour ambition de mieux protéger les exploitants face à ces risques, de sécuriser leur revenu et de garantir une indemnisation plus lisible et plus efficace. Trois ans après sa mise en œuvre, il apparaît indispensable d'en dresser un premier bilan objectif. De nombreux représentants du monde agricole continuent en effet de s'interroger sur le niveau réel de couverture offert par le dispositif, sur le reste à charge supporté par les exploitants ainsi que sur les délais d'indemnisation effectivement constatés. Il lui demande, d'une part, si le Gouvernement entend publier un bilan détaillé de la réforme, précisant notamment, par département et par filière, le taux de couverture des exploitations, le niveau moyen du reste à charge et les délais moyens d'indemnisation observés depuis son entrée en vigueur. Il lui demande, d'autre part, si le Gouvernement considère que cette réforme permet aujourd'hui de sécuriser efficacement le revenu des exploitants face à la multiplication des aléas climatiques et, dans le cas contraire, quelles évolutions structurelles il envisage afin de renforcer durablement la résilience économique des exploitations agricoles.
Question· Question écrite17182answered
France · National Assembly · 21 July 2026
La liberté de création et la libre diffusion des uvres sont des principes fondamentaux garantis par la loi du 7 juillet 2016 relating to la liberté de la création, à l'architecture et au patrimoine. Toute campagne de dénigrement, de pression ou de harcèlement tendant à restreindre la liberté de programmation ou de diffusion des ouvrages librement choisis par les librairies doit être examinée dans ce cadre. Le ministère de la culture condamne donc sans réserve les violences répétées visant les librairies depuis plusieurs mois. Particulièrement attentif à toute atteinte à ces principes, le ministère de la culture a publié, en juillet 2025, un guide juridique présentant les mesures préventives et juridictionnelles à mettre en uvre pour se prémunir contre les différentes formes d'entraves et de menaces qui pèsent sur les artistes, les auteurs et les acteurs culturels. Une haute fonctionnaire pour la liberté de création, ainsi que des référents chargés de cette question dans chacune des directions régionales des affaires culturelles, ont également été désignés afin d'accompagner the whole ofs acteurs. Outre la lutte contre ces agissements, le ministère de la culture a fait du maintien d'un réseau de librairies dense et diversifié une priorité politique, compte tenu de leur rôle en faveur de la diffusion du livre et de la création éditoriale, mais aussi en matière d'aménagement culturel et de développement économique des territoires. Ce réseau représente plus de 3 200 librairies et près de 14 000 emplois. L'État agit d'abord en faveur des librairies par la régulation, qui a pour socle la loi n° 81-766 du 10 août 1981 relative au prix du livre. À travers le mécanisme du prix unique fixé par la maison d'édition, la loi poursuit trois objectifs: l'égalité des citoyens devant le livre, vendu au même prix sur the whole of territoire national; le maintien d'un réseau décentralisé et dense de distribution; le soutien au pluralisme de la création et de l'édition. Cette régulation s'est adaptée aux évolutions du secteur. La loi n° 2011-590 du 26 mai 2011 a transposé sa logique au livre numérique. La loi n° 2021-1901 du 30 décembre 2021 a instauré un tarif minimum de frais de port, afin de restaurer une concurrence par la qualité de service vis-à-vis de la vente en ligne; le rapport d'évaluation de cette loi a conclu à ses effets bénéfiques pour le secteur. Si la régulation vise à assurer une concurrence équitable entre les détaillants, le coût induit par la qualité de service offerte par les librairies justifie également un soutien public direct. Le ministère de la culture accompagne ainsi les librairies dans leurs projets, à travers ses services déconcentrés (directions régionales des affaires culturelles, directions des affaires culturelles et missions aux affaires culturelles) et son opérateur, le centre national du livre (CNL). Les librairies ont bénéficié de 6,2 millions d'euros d'aides directes du ministère de la culture en 2025. Le ministère verse en outre une subvention annuelle à la centrale de l'édition, afin que les librairies et points de vente de livres établis dans les départements et régions d'outre-mer bénéficient d'une prise en charge partielle des coûts de transport des livres. Le ministère a également confié des fonds à l'Institut pour le financement du cinéma et des industries culturelles (IFCIC), afin de faciliter l'accès des librairies au crédit bancaire. Il encourage par ailleurs la transmission et la formation des libraires, en collaboration avec l'association pour le développement de la librairie de création (ADELC) et l'école de la librairie. L'action de l'État en soutien aux librairies s'articule avec celle des collectivités territoriales. Ainsi, afin de distinguer, de valoriser et de soutenir le travail qualitatif mené par les librairies indépendantes, le ministère de la culture a créé, en 2009, le label « librairie indépendante de référence » (LIR). L'obtention de ce label permet aux librairies concernées de demander l'aide du CNL pour la mise en valeur des fonds et de la création éditoriale, et de bénéficier de l'exonération facultative de contribution économique territoriale prévue à article 1464 I du code général des impôts, sous réserve d'une décision des collectivités concernées. De même, depuis 2012, des contrats de filière réunissant les régions et le ministère de la culture, à travers ses services déconcentrés et le CNL, garantissent la cohérence des aides apportées par l'État et les collectivités territoriales au secteur du livre. Ces contrats portent une attention particulière à l'équilibre du maillage territorial, en tenant compte notamment des spécificités des zones rurales et des quartiers prioritaires de la politique de la ville dans l'attribution des aides. Les collectivités sont également associées au développement du programme interministériel « Jeunes en librairie », qui permet aux élèves du secondaire de découvrir concrètement les librairies et leurs enjeux, favorise l'établissement d'un lien durable avec les jeunes et renforce le rôle des librairies comme médiateurs culturels. Enfin, la loi n° 2021-1901 du 30 décembre 2021 a introduit la possibilité pour le bloc communal de soutenir les librairies de son territoire au moyen de subventions directes destinées à des projets d'investissement ou de fonctionnement. Le secteur traverse toutefois une période difficile, dans un contexte d'augmentation des coûts et de diminution des ventes de livres, qui appelle une réflexion partagée entre les pouvoirs publics et l'interprofession sur son modèle économique. C'est dans ce contexte qu'une mission consacrée à la situation des librairies a récemment été confiée à l'Inspection générale des affaires culturelles. Ses conclusions devront permettre d'identifier des voies d'amélioration et d'examiner le rôle de la politique publique, sans se substituer aux nécessaires solidarités interprofessionnelles qui caractérisent la « chaîne du livre ».
Question· Question écrite17152open
France · National Assembly · 21 July 2026
Ministry of Health, Families, Autonomy and People with Disabilities
Question· Question écrite17193open
France · National Assembly · 21 July 2026
Ministry of Labor and Solidarity
Question· Question écrite17203open
France · National Assembly · 21 July 2026
Mr. Emmanuel Duplessy draws the attention of the Minister of Action and Public Accounts to the difficulties of coordination between the different Urssaf funds in the processing of protest procedures initiated by self-employed workers and self-employed people. In the constituency, several situations revealed particularly worrying dysfunctions. Contributors who have initiated a dispute procedure with the competent department continued to receive, at the same time, formal notices, reminders or threats of prosecution from other regional funds, even though their file was still being investigated. In certain cases, forced recovery procedures, notably by means of constraint issued by a justice commissioner, were even initiated even though Urssaf had finally recognized the validity of the dispute and notified a decision favorable to the contributor. These situations seem to reveal insufficient operational coordination between the different services of the organization. For self-employed workers, often lacking legal support, these contradictions create significant insecurity. They must simultaneously respond to a substantive procedure while facing recovery measures which prove then unjustified. Beyond the financial consequences, these dysfunctions undermine the trust that contributors are entitled to place in the public service. He asks what measures the Government intends to implement in order to guarantee effective coordination between the different Urssaf funds during the dispute procedures, to avoid the initiation of recovery measures during the investigation of a file and to ensure that a decision favorable to the contributor immediately produces its effects in all the services concerned.
Question· Question écrite17117open
France · National Assembly · 21 July 2026
Mr. Emmanuel Duplessy questions the Prime Minister on the cost of the material, human and logistical resources made available to the former Presidents of the Republic in application of Decree No. 2016-1302 of October 4, 2016. In order to guarantee the transparency of the use of public funds, he asks him to communicate, for each of the former Presidents of the Republic still benefiting from this system and for each of the years 2023, 2024, 2025 and 2026, the exact amount of expenses incurred by the State, broken down according to the following categories: rent, charges and taxes for premises, logistics expenses, IT expenses, travel expenses, representation and reception expenses, employee remuneration, remuneration of service agents as well as any other expenditure directly attributable to the application of the aforementioned decree. He also asks him to specify, for each former President, the address or, failing that, the surface area of the premises taken over by the State, their legal status (rental or State property), the annual amount of rent paid as well as their exclusive or shared use. Concerning the collaborators made available, he asks him to indicate, for each of the former Presidents, the exact number of collaborators and service agents actually assigned, their status (civil servant or contractual), the total salary cost borne by the State as well as the average of the two highest remunerations and the two lowest remunerations. He also asks him to communicate, for each of the former Presidents, the annual cost of the security and protection measures provided by the Ministry of the Interior, distinguishing the staff mobilized, the means of transport, the vehicles used. provision as well as all related expenses. Furthermore, he wishes to know whether the final criminal conviction of a former President of the Republic or the execution of a custodial sentence is likely to result in the suspension, reduction or elimination of all or part of the benefits provided for by the decree of October 4, 2016. If so, he asks him to specify the benefits concerned, the criteria retained as well as the corresponding budgetary savings. Finally, he asks him whether the exercise of a parliamentary mandate by a former President of the Republic is likely to lead to the accumulation of resources attached to his mandate as deputy with those granted as a former head of state, particularly in terms of collaborators, premises, travel expenses or material resources and, if so, what is the annual cost overall of this accumulation for public finances.
Question· Question écrite16934open
France · National Assembly · 14 July 2026
Mr. Emmanuel Duplessy questions the Minister of the Interior about a possible authorization of roulette in Parisian gaming clubs. Several press reports report discussions initiated by the Ministry of the Interior with a view to authorizing, through regulations, the operation of roulette within Parisian gaming clubs. Such a development would constitute a significant break with the balance which has governed for more than a century to the special regime applicable to the capital. Indeed, if gaming clubs have gradually found their place in Paris, it is precisely because they are based on a model distinct from that of casinos, excluding in particular the most emblematic and addictive games of chance, foremost among which is roulette. Beyond the economic issues put forward by certain players in the sector, such authorization raises important questions in terms of public health. Roulette is a particularly accessible game, whose simple mechanics and fast pace are likely to encourage problematic gambling behavior. However, more than a million people in France already practice excessive or risky gambling, while the social cost of excessive gambling is estimated at several billion euros each. year. This development could also lead to blurring the historical distinction between Parisian gaming clubs and casinos, even though this specificity constitutes the basis of the legal regime applicable to the capital. He therefore wishes to know if the Government intends to preserve the specific model of Parisian gaming clubs, by maintaining the ban on roulette. Otherwise, he asks him what studies impact, particularly in terms of public health, addiction prevention, public order and the fight against money laundering, were carried out before considering such a development.
Question· Question écrite16509open
France · National Assembly · 30 June 2026
Mr. Emmanuel Duplessy alerts the Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs about the consequences of the presidential election in Colombia for human rights defenders, minorities and political opponents. The election to the presidency of the Republic of Colombia of Mr. Abelardo de la Espriella, a figure of the Colombian extreme right, raises many concerns among human rights organizations and part of Colombian civil society. During his campaign, the president-elect multiplied particularly aggressive statements against his political opponents, progressive organizations and several minorities. He has been criticized in particular for misogynistic and homophobic remarks, for his proximity to certain figures of the international extreme right, as well as for his support for extremely repressive measures inspired in particular by the Salvadoran model. These concerns are part of a context already marked by a sharp deterioration in the security situation in several Colombian regions. International organizations regularly document threats, intimidation and assassinations targeting union leaders, journalists, human rights defenders, community leaders, local elected officials as well as as environmental and indigenous activists. In this context, he would like to know the Government's analysis of the consequences of this political alternation for the rule of law, public freedoms and the protection of fundamental rights in Colombia. He also asks what diplomatic initiatives France intends to take, in conjunction with its European partners, in order to support human rights defenders, civil society organizations and vulnerable populations who may be exposed to discrimination or persecution. Finally, he would like to know if the Government plans to strengthen the measures enabling the reception or protection of Colombian nationals who would be subject to serious threats because of their associative, trade union or political commitment or their membership of a particularly minority. exposed.
Question· Question écrite15783open
France · National Assembly · 9 June 2026
Ministry of the Interior
Question· Question écrite15441answered
France · National Assembly · 26 May 2026
Mr. Emmanuel Duplessy draws the attention of the Minister of Ecological Transition, Biodiversity and International Negotiations on Climate and Nature to the noise and environmental pollution linked to the development of the A10 motorway in the Ingré sector (Loiret). Since the widening of the A10 to 2 x 4 lanes and the construction of a flyover at the A10/A71 interchange, the situation of local residents has deteriorated significantly: intensification of noise due to the resonance of metal structures, replacement of absorbing walls with reflective walls, lack of effective sound protection in certain sectors, notably north of Ingré and around the bridge on the RD2157. Furthermore, during the consultation and information phases of the project, visuals and communication elements presented by the Vinci company may have led certain local residents to consider that sound protection would be implemented in the sectors affected by noise pollution. However, the official documents relating to the project did not explicitly include these measures. This difference in interpretation today contributes to the incomprehension expressed by some local residents regarding the developments carried out and the commitments associated with the project. Acoustic measurements carried out by the company Vinci dealership in March 2024 concludes regulatory compliance, but they were carried out over a single week with low traffic and do not reflect daily reality. However, according to the recommendations of the World Health Organization, the noise levels endured by residents are largely excessive and have proven impacts on their health (sleep disorders, stress, anxiety). The summer of 2025 illustrated this dramatic situation: residents were unable to ventilate their homes during heatwaves as the noise was unbearable. Residents also denounce a loss of real estate value and a general deterioration of their living environment, while the profitability of motorways would make it possible to invest in suitable sound protection. He therefore wishes to know what measures the Government intends to take to require motorway concessionaire the implementation of truly effective acoustic and environmental protection, consistent with the initial commitments presented during the public consultation and consistent with WHO recommendations; guarantee the completion of new independent acoustic studies, carried out over a period representative of real traffic; and ensure that public health and the quality of life of residents be taken into account in the development and operation of motorway infrastructure.
Question· Question écrite15138answered
France · National Assembly · 19 May 2026
M. Emmanuel Duplessy attire l'attention de Mme la ministre de l'agriculture, de l'agro-alimentaire et de la souveraineté alimentaire sur la crise que traverse actuellement la filière laitière française et européenne. Depuis le début de l'année 2026, les producteurs et productrices laitiers subissent une forte baisse du prix du lait, estimée à près de 100 euros pour 1 000 litres sur un an, alors même que les coûts de production continuent d'augmenter, notamment sous l'effet de la hausse des prix de l'énergie et du gazole non routier. Cette situation s'explique notamment par une surproduction à l'échelle mondiale et européenne. Malgré la diminution du cheptel laitier dans plusieurs États membres, la production européenne continue d'augmenter sous l'effet de l'intensification des élevages et de la hausse de la productivité par vache, avec une collecte en hausse de près de 5 % en 2025 par rapport à 2024. À l'échelle mondiale, les cinq principales zones exportatrices ont collecté près de 6,5 milliards de litres supplémentaires début 2026 par rapport à l'année précédente. Face à cette situation, les coopératives et industriels ont appliqué d'importantes baisses du prix du lait payé aux producteurs français. Dans plusieurs pays européens, les prix chutent encore davantage, atteignant parfois des niveaux extrêmement bas. Lors du Conseil Agriculture de l'Union européenne du 30 mars 2026, plusieurs États membres ont demandé l'activation de mesures d'urgence, notamment une réduction volontaire de la production financée par la réserve de crise européenne ainsi qu'une revalorisation du prix d'intervention. Pourtant, malgré les alertes formulées en amont de ce Conseil, la France n'a pas soutenu publiquement ces demandes de régulation. Or la régulation des volumes demeure indissociable de la protection des prix et donc du revenu paysan. De nombreux acteurs du secteur estiment par ailleurs qu'une réduction uniquement volontaire de la production pourrait s'avérer insuffisante pour enrayer durablement la chute des prix. Dans ce contexte, il lui demande quelles mesures le Gouvernement entend mettre en œuvre afin de protéger les producteurs et productrices laitiers face à l'effondrement des prix du lait, et quelle position la France entend défendre lors du prochain Conseil Agriculture de l'Union européenne prévu le 26 mai 2026 concernant la mise en place de mécanismes européens de régulation de la production et de soutien aux revenus des éleveurs.
Question· Question écrite15217open
France · National Assembly · 19 May 2026
Mr. Emmanuel Duplessy draws the attention of the Minister of Action and Public Accounts to the consequences of the application of the annual working time set at 1,607 hours in the territorial civil service, in particular concerning the taking into account of public holidays in annualized work cycles. Since decrees n° 2000-815 of August 25, 2000 and n° 2001-623 of July 12, 2001, the annual duration of effective work in the function public is set at a maximum of 1,607 hours. This calculation is based in particular on the flat-rate deduction of 8 public holidays falling on average on working days. However, in practice, many local authorities continue to apply legal references prior to the 35 hours, in particular written question no. 69071 of May 27, 1985, the circular of March 22, 1995 as well as the decisions of the Council of State of January 21, 1991 and 16 October 1998, to consider that a public holiday falling on a day not usually worked does not give rise to any recovery. However, these references were developed before the establishment of the annual ceiling of 1,607 hours and before the flat-rate integration of public holidays in the annual calculation of working time. This situation now leads certain agents to work an effective annual duration of more than 1,607 hours. For example, when an agent works four days and a public holiday coincides with his weekly rest day, he loses the benefit of the public holiday without compensation, unlike an agent placed in a different cycle. In 2026, May 1 falling on a Friday, an agent whose weekly rest is set for that day could thus work up to 1,614 hours per year. This therefore raises a difficulty today with regard to the principle of equality between public officials as well as compliance with the regulatory ceiling of 1,607 hours. He therefore asks him if he considers that the legal references prior to the 35 hours remain fully applicable in the current framework of the annualization of working time, but also how he assesses the situation of agents forced to actually exceed 1,607 hours due to the loss of public holidays. Finally, he asks whether regulatory clarification or harmonization of the practices of local authorities is envisaged in order to guarantee effective compliance with the maximum annual working time.
Question· Question écrite15161open
France · National Assembly · 19 May 2026
Mr. Emmanuel Duplessy draws the attention of the Minister of Health, Families, Autonomy and People with Disabilities to the consequences of the dereimbursement of prescriptions drawn up by non-contracted doctors practicing in sector 3, provided for by article 76 of the social security financing law for 2026. As of January 1, 2027, this provision provides that medicines, examinations, medical devices and services prescribed by a non-approved doctor can no longer be covered by health insurance, regardless of the nature of the prescribed procedure or its medical usefulness. This measure introduces a difference in treatment between patients suffering from the same pathology and benefiting from an identical prescription, for the sole reason that their prescribing doctor or not is covered by an agreement with the CNAM. However, all doctors registered with the Order remain subject to the same ethical obligations, the same quality of care requirements as well as the freedom of prescription guaranteed by the social security code and the public health code. In many territories, including in areas considered to be adequately equipped, difficulties in accessing care also lead many patients to turn to non-approved practitioners due to fault. Appointments available in sector 1 or 2 within reasonable timeframes. This situation is even more marked in under-resourced areas, where many sector 3 doctors provide local care activities. The dereimbursement of prescriptions therefore risks leading to forgoing care, an aggravation of territorial and social inequalities in access to health as well as an additional shift towards emergency services already saturated. He therefore asks how the Government justifies a difference in care based solely on the conventional status of the prescribing doctor; how it intends to guarantee equal access to care and reimbursement for patients who do not have an accessible medical alternative within a timeframe compatible with their health needs; and finally, if the Government is considering a review or an adjustment of this measure in order to avoid particularly serious health and social consequences for the patients concerned.
Question· Question écrite14949open
France · National Assembly · 5 May 2026
Mr. Emmanuel Duplessy draws the attention of the Minister of Health, Families, Autonomy and People with Disabilities to the consequences of the 2023 reform relating to the structuring of home help and care services and their pricing. Presented as a tool for improving the coordination of the journeys of elderly people and those experiencing loss of autonomy, this reform aims to strengthen cooperation between home help and support services (SAAD) and home nursing care services (SSIAD). If this ambition for better articulation of interventions can be shared, its implementation today raises a certain number of questions from those involved in the field. Firstly, the structures concerned report organizational difficulties linked to the evolution of intervention frameworks and requirements news in terms of team coordination and qualification. These transformations, although guided by a quality objective, require significant adaptations in a context already marked by strong tensions on human resources. Secondly, professionals warn of persistent imbalances in financing methods. Home help services remain mainly financed on the basis of administered hourly rates, often considered insufficient in view of the evolution of costs, particularly salaries and logistics. Conversely, home care systems fall under distinct financing arrangements, which can create differences in care between structures working with similar populations. These differences in pricing call into question the overall clarity of the sector's economic model and may, in certain cases, making the management of support pathways more complex, even as the needs of elderly people tend to increase in intensity and complexity. More broadly, these developments take place in a context of strong budgetary tension, recruitment difficulties and the weakening of numerous associative structures, particularly in rural and peri-urban areas. This situation calls for a particular attention to guarantee the continuity and accessibility of home help and care services. Under these conditions, he asks how the Government intends to ensure sustainable and coherent financing of home services as part of the reform undertaken; what measures are being considered to reduce pricing differences between systems serving populations with similar needs; and how he plans to support structures in the organizational adaptations induced by this reform, in order to secure the continuity of the offer throughout the territory.
Question· Question écrite14847open
France · National Assembly · 5 May 2026
Ministry of National Education
Question· Question écrite14293answered
France · National Assembly · 14 April 2026
Les centres sociaux jouent un rôle crucial pour la cohésion sociale dans les territoires, qu'ils soient ruraux ou urbains. Un fonds d'urgence de 11,5 millions d'euros a été mis en place pour soutenir les centres sociaux face aux difficultés rencontrées. Fin 2024, 252 structures en ont été bénéficiaires, dans 66 départements. Le montant d'aide moyen est de 28 700 € par structure, 62 % de l'enveloppe, soit 7,25 M€, ont été mobilisés. Dans une perspective plus large, la convention d'objectifs et de gestion 2023-2027 de la branche famille de la sécurité sociale vise à renforcer le réseau des centres sociaux à travers la création de 611 nouvelles structures, dont 150 centres sociaux. Cet effort est particulièrement ciblé sur les quartiers prioritaires et les zones de revitalisation rurale afin de garantir un maillage territorial plus cohérent et une meilleure couverture des zones sous-dotées. La simplification administrative et l'amélioration de la coopération entre les acteurs du social, qui incluent la caisse d'allocations familiales, les mairies, les départements, les régions et l'État sont également des priorités. La dématérialisation des demandes d'aides sociales sur plusieurs plateformes a montré ses limites en termes de coordination, et une réflexion a été engagée pour identifier des modalités permettant de renforcer l'articulation entre ces services et faciliter l'accès aux aides pour les centres sociaux comme pour les bénéficiaires. Le Gouvernement est conscient des difficultés des centres sociaux. La situation est suivie de près avec des enquêtes régulières menées par la Caisse nationale des allocations familiales (CNAF) et un dialogue constant avec les partenaires locaux et associatifs. Des travaux menés par la CNAF sont en cours pour faire évoluer le modèle de financement des centres sociaux.
Showing the 24 most recent records of 59. Browse the full list