Records
15 records where Zahia Hamdane is listed as a sponsor, author, or other actor. Search with topics and years
Question· Question écrite15462open
France · National Assembly · 26 May 2026
Ms Zahia Hamdane questions the Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs on the alarming situation of Dr Hussam Abu Safiya, director of the Kamal Adwan hospital in Gaza and consultant pediatrician, whose detention by the Israeli authorities has just been extended "indefinitely" by the Beersheba District Court on April 28, 2026. Arrested on December 27, 2024 during a military raid against his establishment, Dr Abu Safiya is kept in detention without any formal charges being brought against him. Reports from international organizations, including Amnesty International and Physicians for Human Rights, document undignified conditions of detention at the Negev prison, marked by mistreatment, severe weight loss and refusal of access to the medical care necessary for his declining health. The application of the law on illegal combatants” here allows prolonged administrative detention which amounts to manifest arbitrariness. Dr. Abu Safiya, who continued to treat children despite grieving the loss of his own son killed in a strike, appears to be sanctioned for refusing to evacuate his hospital facility, thereby fulfilling his medical duty and protecting civilians in northern Gaza from a forced exodus. These facts constitute serious violations of the Fourth Geneva Convention, in particular articles 18 (protection of hospitals), 49 (prohibition of forced transfers) as well as the provisions relating to the treatment of protected persons (articles 73, 84 and 91). France, through its historic attachment to international humanitarian law and human rights, cannot remain silent regarding the fate of a doctor arrested in the exercise of his duties. She asks him what concrete diplomatic initiatives the Government intends to take with its Israeli counterparts to demand the immediate release of Dr Hussam Abu Safiya and more broadly, to ensure the protection of Gazan health personnel in accordance with international conventions to which France and Israel are signatories.
Question· Question écrite15391open
France · National Assembly · 26 May 2026
Ms. Zahia Hamdane questions the Minister of Labor and Solidarity on the administrative consequences and failures of State control in the so-called “HOPPS Group - Adrexo/Milee” affair. By a judgment of November 12, 2024, the industrial tribunal of Aix-en-Provence condemned the managers of HOPPS Group for concealed work as part of systemic partial unemployment fraud, as well as for moral harassment and discrimination salary against Mr. Bruno Justet. Mme the MP is surprised that despite this conviction, the Ministry of Labor closed, in June 2025, the alert from Mr. Justet relating to this partial unemployment fraud. This inertia appears all the more worrying given that the liquidation of the Milee company led to the dismissal of nearly 11,000 employees, constituting the largest layoff plan in France since forty years. Many former employees today denounce a feeling of abandonment on the part of the supervisory and supervisory authorities. Faced with what clearly appears to be a failure in the control of the use of public money, she asks him if the Government has taken note of the reasons for the judgment rendered on November 12, 2024 and what instructions have been given to the services of the Ministry of Labor in order to draw all the consequences of the facts of concealed work recognized by the courts; what emergency measures the Government intends to implement in order to guarantee the effective protection, both legal and material, of the whistleblower Bruno Justet, in accordance with the provisions of Law No. 2022-401 of March 21, 2022 aimed at improving the protection of whistleblowers; if an investigation by the General Inspectorate of Social Affairs (IGAS) will be carried out in order to examine the conditions under which several hundred million euros of public aid could have been paid without effective control of their actual use.
Question· Question écrite15215open
France · National Assembly · 19 May 2026
Ms. Zahia Hamdane draws the attention of the Minister of National Education to the unfair treatment suffered by agents of his ministry regarding childcare assistance after 6 years, in comparison with agents of other ministries. The universal service employment check (CESU) “childcare for 0-6 year olds” is an interministerial social action benefit. However, beyond the child's sixth birthday, support financial support for parenthood falls under the social action specific to each ministry. However, glaring disparities are noted. For example, the Ministry of the Interior and that of Justice offer CESU assistance for children aged 6 to 12, with a 20% increase provided to single-parent families as well as children with disabilities. The Ministry of Finance has, for its part, considerably expanded this system up to 14 years (or even 17 years for single-parent families) under the name “family finance check”. Conversely, national education personnel, whether teachers or administrators, are excluded from these extension measures as soon as the child reaches 6 years of age. This situation is particularly detrimental for single-parent families, for whom extracurricular and childcare costs remain a burden. heavy load well beyond the sixth year. This breakdown in equality between state servants is experienced as a major injustice by national education agents, already faced with purchasing power issues. She therefore asks him if he intends to initiate a harmonization of ministerial social action so that national education agents can benefit from the same support for parenthood, extended up to 12, 14, or even 17 years, like the systems already in force in other ministries.
Question· Question écrite15196answered
France · National Assembly · 19 May 2026
Ms. Zahia Hamdane draws the attention of the Minister of Labor and Solidarity to an anomaly in the reform of the free choice of childcare supplement (CMG) concerning single-parent families. Since September 1, 2025, regulations have conveniently extended the payment of CMG until the child is 12 years old for single parents. However, it appears that this extension is strictly reserved for parents directly employing a childminder or home care. It de facto excludes families using specialized structures (associations or personal service companies), as well as reception in micro-crèches. This restriction heavily penalizes single-parent families who, due to lack of time or administrative resources, choose service providers. However, these organizations provide essential security for a parent carrying out their professional activity alone, in particular by guaranteeing the immediate replacement of the caregiver in the event of illness. By imposing direct recruitment to benefit from assistance after the child turns 6, the reform considerably increases the mental load and legal responsibilities (establishment of the contract, payroll management, social declarations) of parents already weakened by their situation of isolation. This distinction between direct employment and recourse to a third party organization seems all the more unjustified as the principle of aid remains the same: to support the remaining costs of the parent for the care of their child. There is no justification for a family to be deprived of financial support because it delegates the administrative management of its employee to a professional in the sector. She therefore asks him the reasons for the exclusion of childcare methods “ providers” of the extension of the CMG up to 12 years. She questions him about the measures he intends to take to correct this disparity and allow all single-parent families, regardless of the contractual method chosen, to benefit from this essential financial support.
Question· Question écrite14546answered
France · National Assembly · 21 April 2026
Ms. Zahia Hamdane questions the Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs on the blocking of democratic space in Tunisia, illustrated by the fate reserved for Ayachi Zammel. Candidate for the October 2024 presidential election, Mr. Zammel was sentenced, through an accumulation of summary sentences, to a total of 35 years in prison for allegations of falsification of sponsorships. This unprecedented sentence, which came when the Electoral Authority (ISIE) had initially validated his candidacy before ignoring the decisions of the administrative court favorable to the opposition, characterizes a clear instrumentalization of the judicial system for the purposes of political survival of the regime. Beyond this case, nearly 80 political figures and members of civil society are currently detained for reasons of opinion, often under the charge of "conspiracy against the security of the State. In November 2025, heavy prison sentences (up to 45 years) were confirmed on appeal against several dozen opponents. The MP asks the Government how it analyzes the legitimacy of Tunisian institutional processes in such a context of repression. She would like to know whether France intends to maintain its support for the Kaïs Saïed regime or whether it plans to condition the continuation of certain aspects of bilateral cooperation to restore political pluralism and the release of political prisoners.
Question· Question écrite14544answered
France · National Assembly · 21 April 2026
Mrs. Zahia Hamdane alerts the Minister of Europe and Foreign Affairs on the structuring of bilateral cooperation between France and Tunisia. While the official website of the national gendarmerie welcomes an “institutional, technical and operational” relationship described as a “partnership of equals” and a “win-win” balance sheet, the reality on the ground depicts a neocolonial outsourcing system with consequences atrocious humans. On the security front, France proudly claims to provide its “expertise” via the Directorate of International Security Cooperation (DCIS). In 2024, it is officially admitted that 20% of technical cooperation for the benefit of the Tunisian National Guard (GNT) focused on migration and that 36 of the 94 Tunisian agents trained were specifically in this area by French instructors. At the same time, the operator Civipol, the armed wing of the Ministry of the Interior, is piloting European projects worth 33 and 18 million euros for border management, including the delivery of maritime patrol boats. However, this technical satisfaction obscures a human toll that international organizations consider unbearable. While France trains and equips the GNT, Amnesty International and the World Organization Against Torture (OMCT) document acts of torture, sexual violence and collective pushbacks to desert areas on the Libyan and Algerian borders, where children are abandoned without assistance. At sea, testimonies collected by Amnesty describe GNT agents piercing migrant canoes with pointed sticks, leaving them to drown before their eyes. By using Tunisia as Europe's "border guard", France is not not cooperation, it operates a “repression by proxy”. This dangerous, extremely serious and neocolonial logic is coupled with revolting industrial complicity in the Gabès region. While the population is suffocating (310 hospitalizations for respiratory distress documented in 2025), the French Government brushes aside these alerts by calling them “defamatory disinformation”. However, French responsibility is clear : the French group Roullier, via its subsidiary Phosphea and its massive imports of DAP 18-46 fertilizers, is the principal for the production of phosphoric acid by the Tunisian Chemical Group (GCT), the acid responsible for poisoning. Finally, indignation reaches its height with the classification of Tunisia as a “safe country” by the European Union in February 2026. How can the Government endorse this label on statistical grounds? that the asylum recognition rate is only 4%, while at the same time, the Tunisian justice system sentences its political opponents to sentences of up to 45 years in prison? In view of this gap between the "respectful" official discourse and the brutality of the facts, the MP asks the Government to specify when France will stop considering the south of the Mediterranean as a dumping ground for its industrial waste and a detention camp for its migration policies. She questions him about the persistence of this logic inherited from the colonial era, consisting of treating these territories like the garbage bins of the metropolis while condoning and financing, with public money, unforgivable human and environmental abuses.
Question· Question écrite14543answered
France · National Assembly · 21 April 2026
Ms. Zahia Hamdane draws the attention of the Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs to the judicial harassment targeting the Tunisian lawyer and columnist Sonia Dahmani. Arrested violently on May 11, 2024 at the headquarters of the Bar Association in Tunis, Ms. Dahmani is the subject of uninterrupted procedural harassment. While she had benefited from conditional release on November 27, 2025 after having been sentenced to several times, its situation has just experienced a new critical turning point. On April 13, 2026, the Tunis Court of Appeal sentenced her to 18 months in prison. This sentence, pronounced on the basis of Decree-Law No. 2022-54, follows his media comments denouncing racism and the conditions of migration management in Tunisia. The National Union of Tunisian Journalists (SNJT) strongly denounced this verdict, seeing it as a a clear desire to “silence divergent voices” and “harassment aimed at intimidating the entire media sector”. Despite her state of physical and psychological health considered fragile, Ms. Dahmani is once again threatened with immediate incarceration, illustrating the ongoing authoritarian drift where the systematic use of Decree 54 serves as a weapon of repression against freedom of expression. This case, which has become emblematic international level (Ms. Dahmani having received the human rights prize from the Council of European Bars in November 2025) directly questions Tunisia's partners. While France maintains close cooperation, particularly security cooperation, with Tunis, the MP asks her to specify the diplomatic steps taken to obtain a definitive end to the proceedings against Ms. Dahmani. Elle questions her about the position of the France faced with the multiplication of these convictions on appeal under cover of Decree 54, denounced by the United Nations and on the measures it intends to take so that French bilateral support is strictly conditioned on respect for public freedoms and the right to a fair trial.
Question· Question écrite14462open
France · National Assembly · 21 April 2026
Ms. Zahia Hamdane draws the attention of the Minister of National Education to the conclusions of the Departmental Council of National Education (CDEN) of April 9, 2026 concerning the school map in the Somme. She protests against the validation of 40 permanent class closures at the departmental level. In the 2nd constituency of the Somme, the administration has ratified brutal decisions which strike the heart of rurality and peri-urban. The MP thus denounces the closure of a class within the RPI Hailles / Thézy-Glimont (withdrawal recorded on the Thézy-Glimont site), in disregard of recent investments for the accessibility of the premises; the closure of a class on the Sains-en-Amiénois site for the RPI La Sentelette / Saint-Fuscien; the closure of a class impacting the RPI bringing together the municipalities of Cottenchy, Dommartin, Guyencourt-sur-Noye and Remiencourt, whose place of withdrawal remains arbitrarily to be defined, plunging these four villages into total uncertainty. Added to this already heavy toll is the maintenance of “conditional” closures for the Rosa Bonheur and Jules Barni schools in Amiens South. By making the maintenance of these classes dependent on a random headcount in June, the administration places teaching teams, parents and students in insecurity. organizational and psychological, making these priority neighborhoods even more precarious. Furthermore, the MP denounces budgetary choices “assumed” by the Academic Inspectorate which sacrifice out-of-class expertise through the massive elimination of departmental educational advisor (CPD) positions and the authoritarian overhaul of replacement zones. At the same time, the “forced march” deployment of support centers schooling (PAS), part of which is unduly allocated to private education, is to the detriment of a transparent assessment of inclusive public schools. She asks him if he intends to suspend all of these withdrawal measures and grant an immediate moratorium to guarantee the serenity of the 2026 school year. She wants to know if the Government finally intends to substitute a logic of educational ambition for this management accounting which lastingly weakens the Somme territory.
Question· Question écrite10056answered
France · National Assembly · 7 October 2025
Ms. Zahia Hamdane draws the attention of the Minister of Ecological Transition, Biodiversity, Forests, Sea and Fisheries to the environmental and health risks linked to the waste landfill center in Boves (Somme), operated by the company Véolia, as well as its extension project. For two years, the association “Against a century of landfilling in Boves” has been warning about the nuisances on the site and regularly informing residents about developments in the project. She now participates in the site monitoring commissions (November 2023 and November 2024), bodies supervised by the State and which have become the only reliable sources of information in a context of persistent silence from the town hall and partial responses from the operator. The Boves site receives nearly 180,000 tonnes of waste each year. Each locker, once filled, retains a potential of nuisance for around 30 years, due to gas emissions and odors. Despite Véolia's announcements (installation of methane and H2S sensors, use of drones, reduction in the size of lockers from 2025), incidents persist. The nights of January 12, 13 and 14, 2025 were, for example, marked by strong olfactory nuisances linked to a rupture in the biogas pipeline. The company only recognized its liability for only one of these three nights, accentuating the mistrust of the population. Between July 2023 and August 2024, 225 complaints were recorded by the local association. However, only 13% were deemed “relevant” by the operator, 32% classified “uncertain” and 55% “not relevant”. These figures raise questions about the methodology for processing complaints, especially since reports from residents sometimes take up to a week to reach. Veolia. Public controls seem insufficient. In one year, only one unannounced inspection was carried out (at 5 a.m.), while nuisances are mainly reported in the evening, at night and early in the morning. Furthermore, measurements revealed the presence of sulfur dioxide gas (H2S) in the air, which is harmful to health, particularly respiratory health. In addition to the direct impact on air quality and public health, the extension project threatens agricultural land essential to local production. If the zoning is changed, these fertile lands, already greatly reduced in the region, would be permanently lost to landfill. Finally, the related project called “VALOPOLE” is undergoing adjustments: the yellow bag sorting workshop could be moved to Amiens North and the solid recovery fuel (CSR) workshop relocated or eliminated. If it limits traffic road in Boves, this in no way resolves the question of landfilling and risks moving the nuisance to other already fragile districts of the Amiens metropolitan area. She therefore asks what measures the Government intends to take to strengthen the transparency and frequency of controls, in particular at times when nuisances are reported by the population, to guarantee the health protection of residents in the face of emissions. of dangerous gas, preserve agricultural land threatened by the extension of the site and ensure that the ecological transition does not result in a worsening of territorial and social inequalities in the Amiens metropolis.
Question· Question écrite9267answered
France · National Assembly · 5 August 2025
Ms. Zahia Hamdane alerts the Minister of State, Keeper of the Seals, Minister of Justice, of the need to finance a real policy of reintegration of detained persons in order to effectively combat recidivism, particularly at the Amiens remand center. While the Ministry of Justice favors the creation of ultra-secure neighborhoods, the MP wishes to recall the alarming reality of prison overpopulation and the resulting structural inadequacies. She emphasizes that this situation is not only the result of the increase in the number of people in prison, but also of the glaring lack of funding to develop support and reintegration systems. The absence of an ambitious policy in this area strongly contributes to recidivism, which itself fuels the saturation of penitentiary establishments. The Government has contracted a debt of 5.4 billion euros to build new prison places, but this does not solve the root causes of overpopulation. The average occupancy rate of penitentiary establishments today exceeds 164%, and this dynamic seems to be maintained despite the numerous warnings issued by professionals in the sector. Since the rejection of the finance bill in November 2024, the credits allocated to prison administration have certainly increased, going from 5.2 to 5.3 billion euros, but these budgetary increases are allocated neither to the renovation of dilapidated establishments, nor to the development of alternatives to incarceration, nor to the strengthening of human resources dedicated to reintegration. During her visit to the Amiens remand center, the MP was able to note that the proper functioning of the establishment depends solely on the exceptional commitment of prison officers. But their professionalism, as remarkable as it may be, cannot compensate for the lack of personnel and resources necessary to implement sustainable reintegration projects. The director of the establishment, Mr. Alain Yomi, is carrying out an ambitious project for a semi-freedom unit intended for 24 inmates, based on a progression in three stages towards autonomy, in partnership with specialized structures. This program aims to prepare prisoners for their release, by promoting individualized, concerted and coordinated support between prison services, associations and medico-social professionals. However, for this project to really see the light of day and operate sustainably, it is essential to allocate significant human resources: additional supervisors, social workers, medical-psychological staff. Without this, the efforts made locally risk remaining a dead letter and the progress made in detention very often collapses upon release, due to lack of follow-up and continuity of support. The testimonies collected during this visit converge: a significant proportion of the people detained are young, repeat offenders and faced with serious addiction problems. and mental health. Despite the support of the Amiens University Hospital and the Somme public mental health establishment, the tools for effective reintegration remain insufficient. Also, she solemnly asks him when the Government will finally intend to provide the prison environment with the human and material resources necessary for an ambitious and structured reintegration policy. She particularly emphasizes the urgency of supporting and finance the future semi-freedom area of the Amiens remand prison, so that it becomes a model of synergy between institutions, associations and professionals to sustainably fight against recidivism.
Question· Question écrite8941answered
France · National Assembly · 22 July 2025
Mme Zahia Hamdane appelle l'attention de Mme la ministre des sports, de la jeunesse et de la vie associative, sur les conséquences préoccupantes de la réforme du dispositif Pass'Sport, notamment dans le département de la Somme. Le décret du 8 juillet 2025, publié en pleine période estivale, modifie en profondeur les critères d'éligibilité au Pass'Sport. Les enfants âgés de 6 à 13 ans, pourtant bénéficiaires de l'allocation de rentrée scolaire, sont désormais exclus du dispositif. Celui-ci est désormais restreint aux jeunes de 14 à 17 ans allocataires de l'ARS, aux personnes en situation de handicap jusqu'à 30 ans, ainsi qu'aux étudiants boursiers. Cette réforme, annoncée à quelques semaines seulement de la rentrée sportive, suscite une vive inquiétude chez les familles, les clubs sportifs et les bénévoles, déjà mobilisés pour préparer la nouvelle saison. Dans la Somme, département à fort ancrage rural et populaire, l'impact s'annonce particulièrement sévère. Selon les données du district local, plus de 44 % des licenciés en football seraient concernés par cette exclusion. Outre l'effet brutal sur les dynamiques associatives locales, c'est également le choix du public visé qui interpelle. L'exclusion des enfants de 6 à 13 ans, tranche d'âge cruciale pour le développement moteur, social et éducatif, remet en cause les fondements mêmes de la pratique sportive précoce. C'est à cet âge que se construisent les habitudes, les repères collectifs et que l'on peut agir efficacement contre les inégalités d'accès au sport. Le Pass'Sport jouait ici un rôle fondamental d'amortisseur social. Sa suppression, sans concertation apparente, semble aller à rebours de l'ambition d'un véritable héritage des Jeux olympiques et paralympiques de Paris 2024. Le 13 septembre 2024, le Président de la République annonçait la création d'une fête nationale du sport chaque 14 septembre, dans « nos écoles, nos quartiers, nos villages ». Dans ce contexte, comment célébrer le sport pour tous tout en en restreignant l'accès aux plus jeunes ? Cette incohérence interroge. Mme la députée demande donc à Mme la ministre de bien vouloir préciser les motivations ayant conduit à cette réforme, ainsi que les éventuelles évaluations territorialisées qui auraient été menées en amont, notamment dans des départements comme la Somme. Elle lui demande également si un réexamen de ces critères d'éligibilité est envisagé, afin de ne pas priver des milliers d'enfants d'un accès essentiel à la pratique sportive.
Question· Question écrite7509answered
France · National Assembly · 17 June 2025
Mme Zahia Hamdane alerte Mme la ministre de la culture sur le caractère xénophobe d'une commande d'œuvre d'art s'inscrivant dans le dispositif du « 1 % artistique » pour un futur centre de formation à la lutte contre l'immigration irrégulière et clandestine à Amiens. L'appel à candidatures (référence:2024-42amiens-cfliic-1pc-art), dans le cadre de « l'obligation de décoration des constructions publiques » et au sujet de la commande d'une œuvre pour le futur « centre de formation à la lutte contre l'immigration irrégulière et clandestine (CFLIIC) » à la caserne Garin à Amiens, dans la Somme, suscite l'indignation de nombreux élus locaux et associations. En aucun cas, la mission de l'art public ne peut servir une idéologie xénophobe et mortifère pour la nation française et au-delà, pour l'espèce humaine. Par sa destination, cette commande d'œuvre d'art contrevient à la loi n° 90-615 du 13 juillet 1990, loi dite Gayssot, tendant à réprimer toute légitimation d'actes racistes, antisémites ou xénophobes. L'appel à candidatures, qui à ce jour n'en a reçu aucune, indique que « l'œuvre favorisera une mise en contact quotidienne de la création contemporaine avec les usagers présents temporairement dans le bâtiment pour actualiser leurs compétences et leurs connaissances, dans une démarche de formation continue ». Or le coût engendré par cet appel à candidatures, estimé à 38 000 euros, concerne des locaux spécialement rénovés pour ce centre et réservés principalement aux gendarmes en formation. De surcroît, ces espaces ne seront pas accessibles au personnel de la caserne. Cette commande ne s'adresse donc pas à un public large et ne peut, dès lors, pleinement entrer dans le cadre du dispositif du « 1 % artistique », qui a pour but principal de rendre accessible au plus grand nombre l'art dans l'espace public. L'implantation de ces locaux qui prennent une surface disproportionnée dans un quartier dense et classé quartier prioritaire de la ville depuis peu, est une énième insulte envers la population amiénoise de ce faubourg défavorisé qui n'aura même pas la jouissance de cette commande artistique dans ce futur « centre de formation à la lutte contre l'immigration irrégulière et clandestine (CFLIIC) ». C'est un choix honteux, provocateur et insultant pour la République, d'autant plus que le poste de la police municipale installé tout proche, en parallèle, au 10, square Friant et où se situe également une annexe de la mairie d'Amiens, n'ont pas bénéficié du « 1 % artistique ». Pourtant cette destination n'aurait pas été aussi polémique dans ce cadre et ne renfermerait pas de relents xénophobes qui ne peuvent être que condamnés dans le cas du futur « centre de formation à la lutte contre l'immigration irrégulière et clandestine (CFLIIC) ». Elle lui demande par cette alerte, de surseoir à cet appel à candidatures afin de faire bénéficier un autre établissement public du « 1 % artistique » qui accueille les habitants et où l'œuvre d'art commandée reflète le vivre ensemble et respecte les lois et la devise de la France: « Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité ».
Question· Question écrite5085answered
France · National Assembly · 18 March 2025
Ms. Zahia Hamdane alerts Ms. Minister of State, Minister of National Education, Higher Education and Research on the recent evaluations of the High Council for the Evaluation of Research and Higher Education (HCERES) which directly threaten the future of training at the University of Picardie Jules Verne (UPJV) and, more broadly, on the increasing exploitation of this organization for restructuring purposes budgetary. Universities have been sounding the alarm for years. Rather than responding, the Government chose to worsen the situation by cutting a billion euros from the higher education and research budget in 2025, even though the country is already behind international standards. France invests less per student than the OECD average. Result: understaffed universities, precarious training and ever-increasing numbers of students facing degraded study conditions. In this context, HCERES distributes opinions which resemble condemnations. These seem to be much less sincere diagnoses than pretexts for cutting sectors. At the UPJV, several training courses in philosophy, human and social sciences, ergonomics and educational sciences are directly threatened. They are criticized for declining success rates, a lack of professionalization and an international openness considered insufficient. How could universities strangled by years of underinvestment do better with ever less? The opinions issued by HCERES seem to follow a very specific ideological orientation: weakening sectors which do not align with the immediate demands of the market and increasingly weaken fundamental research and the human sciences. It is unacceptable that training courses are threatened with disappearance without corrective measures having been proposed, without in-depth analysis of their specificities and without taking into account the conditions in which they operate. The Minister cannot ignore the fact that these evaluations now serve as leverage to justify the elimination of training, in an accounting logic that has nothing to do with academic excellence. What are the safeguards that guarantee that HCERES evaluations will not serve as an alibi for arbitrary closures of training at the UPJV and in other universities? Why have these assessments become so punitive and ideologically biased? Does the Government assume that HCERES is no longer a tool for improving training but an instrument for their liquidation with a view to privatizing higher education? Higher education and public research are pillars of emancipation and social and economic progress. They cannot be driven by a logic of austerity and brutal selection. Through cuts and closures, public higher education is losing its rank. When it's too late, who will take responsibility the consequences? She asks him his position on the subject.
Question· Question écrite3673answered
France · National Assembly · 4 February 2025
Mrs. Zahia Hamdane questions the Minister of State, Minister of National Education, Higher Education and Research, about the unacceptable situation in which the students and staff of the Amiens school campus find themselves. For several weeks, they have been studying and working in unworthy conditions due to largely insufficient heating, incapable of ensuring a minimum of thermal comfort. mrs the MP recalls that, at the beginning of January 2025, the students of this establishment decided to go on strike to raise awareness about this recurring problem. The conditions are particularly alarming: sports classes take place in a gymnasium where the temperature does not exceed 5°C and classrooms struggle to reach 12°C. The interns, for their part, have to sleep with their coats on in freezing dormitories. This situation repeats every year, plunging the entire school community into permanent worry as winter approaches. However, despite the 65 million euros invested in recent years, no complete renovation of the heating system has been considered. The school complex, made up of around thirty buildings scattered over a 40 hectare site, still relies on a single boiler, clearly unsuitable for the needs of the establishment. Faced with the emergency, the president of the region had additional heaters delivered, but this temporary solution raises new concerns. The electrical installations in the corridors, which are insufficient, cannot support the load linked to these devices, regularly leading to power cuts throughout an entire corridor. This situation forces students to choose between heating themselves, drying their hair or recharging their electronic devices. In addition, cables several meters long trail around the rooms, increasing the risk of accidents. The real problem lies in the need to completely renovate the heating system. The current strategy of replacing radiators gradually is proving ineffective: every time one radiator is replaced or repaired, another fails, making the situation unsustainable. Mrs. MP therefore asks the Minister what immediate measures will be taken to guarantee decent working and living conditions for students and staff at the Amiens school campus. She also wants to understand why, while costly work has been carried out, the issue of heating has not been addressed as a priority. Finally, she asks him about the actions planned to prevent such situations from arising. reproduce in the future. It is essential that the Amiens school campus does not become a symbol of the neglect of public high schools. While substantial subsidies are regularly granted to private establishments, it is legitimate to question the political will to preserve and improve public high schools in France. She wants to know his intentions on this matter.
Question· Question écrite83answered
France · National Assembly · 1 October 2024
Ms. Zahia Hamdane draws the attention of the Minister of Labor and Employment to the situation of employees of the company Milee, formerly Adrexo, in great difficulty following the judicial liquidation of the company pronounced on September 9, 2024. Since this date, several thousand employees have still not received their salary for the month of August, even though the liquidation of the company led to the end of their employment contract without official notification of dismissal. This prevents these employees from claiming their unemployment rights, thus aggravating an already critical situation for many families who find themselves without resources to meet their basic needs. Several testimonies report difficulties in paying current charges, or even bank overdrafts for certain employees, in a context where no immediate solution is available to them. proposed. These employees, often in precarious situations or in part-time employment, depend entirely on this income. However, despite the promises of rapid compensation via guaranteed salary insurance (AGS) mechanisms, the reality is that many of them are still waiting for their salary as well as their balance on any account. This unsustainable situation causes significant economic and psychological distress within these households. The MP would therefore like to know what urgent measures the Government intends to put in place to guarantee the payment of salaries due to Milee employees, as well as to speed up the sending of dismissal letters so that they can benefit from their unemployment insurance rights as quickly as possible. She also asks him if specific aid is envisaged to support families who find themselves unable to meet their essential needs while awaiting the complete resolution of this case.