Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Asylum

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

51 records in EU in 2019

All countriesUnited Kingdom · 12,687Ireland · 6,788Austria · 3,733Netherlands · 2,241United States · 2,034Germany · 1,645European Union · 1,412France · 895Belgium · 1Estonia · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0519_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#TB v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Immigration policy — Right to family reunification — Directive 2003/86/EC — Article 10(2) — Optional provision — Prerequisites for exercising the right to family reunification — Member of a refugee’s family not referred to in Article 4 — Concept of a ‘dependant’.#Case C-519/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0519decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#TB v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Immigration policy — Right to family reunification — Directive 2003/86/EC — Article 10(2) — Optional provision — Prerequisites for exercising the right to family reunification — Member of a refugee’s family not referred to in Article 4 — Concept of a ‘dependant’.#Case C-519/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0380decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v E.P.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Border controls, asylum and immigration — Regulation (EU) 2016/399 — Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) — Article 6 — Entry conditions for third-country nationals — Concept of ‘threat to public policy’ — Return decision issued to an illegally staying third-country national.#Case C-380/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0381decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 December 2019.#G.S. and V.G. v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#References for a preliminary ruling — Border controls, asylum and immigration — Immigration policy — Directive 2003/86/EC — Right to family reunification — Requirements for the exercise of the right to family reunification — Concept of ‘grounds of public policy’ — Rejection of an application for entry and residence of a family member — Withdrawal of or refusal to renew a residence permit of a family member.#Joined Cases C-381/18 and C-382/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0564decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 5 December 2019.#LH v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Application for international protection – Article 33(2) – Grounds of inadmissibility – National legislation under which an application is inadmissible if the applicant has arrived in the Member State concerned via a country in which he or she is not exposed to persecution or the risk of serious harm, or if that country provides sufficient protection – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Judicial review of administrative decisions concerning the inadmissibility of applications for international protection – Time limit of eight days within which to give a decision – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-564/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 December 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0406decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 5 December 2019.#PG v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection — Common procedures for granting international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 46(3) — Full and ex nunc examination — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to an effective remedy — Powers and obligations of the first-instance court or tribunal — No power to vary the decisions of the authorities competent in the area of international protection — National legislation providing for an obligation to adjudicate within a time limit of 60 days.#Case C-406/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 December 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0584decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 21 November 2019.#D. Z. v Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Eparchiako Dikastirio Larnakas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Decision No 565/2014/EU – Simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders – Third-country national in possession of a temporary residence permit issued by a Member State – Article 3 – Recognition by Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus and Romania of certain documents as equivalent to their national visas – Ability to rely on a decision against a State – Direct effect – Body governed by private law regarded as an emanation of the State – Conditions – Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 – Schengen Borders Code – Article 13 – Refusal of entry into the territory of a Member State – Obligation to state reasons – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Compensation and assistance to air passengers in the event of denied boarding – Article 2(j) – Denied boarding based on the allegedly inadequate nature of travel documentation – Article 15 – Obligations of air carriers towards passengers – Inadmissibility of the derogations provided for in the contract of carriage or other documents.#Case C-584/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 November 2019

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-9-2019-003943answered

Turkey and refugees

European Union · European Parliament · 20 November 2019

Proposal· NLE2018/0419(NLE)voted

Conclusion of a Protocol between the European Union, the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway to the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Iceland or Norway regarding the access to Eurodac for law enforcement purposes

European Union · European Parliament · 13 November 2019

Record· COCELEX 62017CO0540_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 November 2019.#Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Adel Hamed and Amar Omar.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Area of freedom, security and justice — Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 33(2)(a) — Rejection by the authorities of a Member State of an application for asylum as being inadmissible because of the prior granting of refugee status in another Member State — Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Substantial risk of suffering inhuman or degrading treatment — Living conditions of those granted refugee status in that other Member State.#Joined Cases C-540/17 and C-541/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 November 2019

Record· COCELEX 62017CO0540decided

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 November 2019.#Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Adel Hamed and Amar Omar.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Area of freedom, security and justice — Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 33(2)(a) — Rejection by the authorities of a Member State of an application for asylum as being inadmissible because of the prior granting of refugee status in another Member State — Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Substantial risk of suffering inhuman or degrading treatment — Living conditions of those granted refugee status in that other Member State.#Joined Cases C-540/17 and C-541/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 November 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0233_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 12 November 2019.#Zubair Haqbin v Federaal Agentschap voor de opvang van asielzoekers.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Applicants for international protection — Directive 2013/33/EU — Article 20(4) and (5) — Serious breach of the rules of the accommodation centres as well as seriously violent behaviour — Scope of the Member States’ right to determine the sanctions applicable — Unaccompanied minor — Reduction or withdrawal of material reception conditions.#Case C-233/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 November 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0233decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 12 November 2019.#Zubair Haqbin v Federaal Agentschap voor de opvang van asielzoekers.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidshof te Brussel.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Applicants for international protection — Directive 2013/33/EU — Article 20(4) and (5) — Serious breach of the rules of the accommodation centres as well as seriously violent behaviour — Scope of the Member States’ right to determine the sanctions applicable — Unaccompanied minor — Reduction or withdrawal of material reception conditions.#Case C-233/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 November 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0519decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 5 September 2019.#TB v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Immigration policy — Right to family reunification — Directive 2003/86/EC — Article 10(2) — Optional provision — Prerequisites for exercising the right to family reunification — Member of a refugee’s family not referred to in Article 4 — Concept of a ‘dependant’.#Case C-519/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 September 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0556decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 July 2019.#Alekszij Torubarov v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Pécsi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection — Common procedures for granting international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 46(3) — Full and ex nunc examination — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to an effective remedy — Extent of the powers of the first-instance court or tribunal — No power to vary — Refusal by the competent administrative or quasi-judicial body to comply with a decision of that court or tribunal.#Case C-556/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 July 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0556_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 July 2019.#Alekszij Torubarov v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection — Common procedures for granting international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 46(3) — Full and ex nunc examination — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to an effective remedy — Extent of the powers of the first-instance court or tribunal — No power to vary — Refusal by the competent administrative or quasi-judicial body to comply with a decision of that court or tribunal.#Case C-556/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 July 2019

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-9-2019-002315answered

Flüchtlinge

European Union · European Parliament · 18 July 2019

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-9-2019-002304answered

Environmental refugees

European Union · European Parliament · 17 July 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0380decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 11 July 2019.#Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v E.P.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Border controls, asylum and immigration — Regulation (EU) 2016/399 — Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) — Article 6 — Entry conditions for third-country nationals — Concept of ‘threat to public policy’ — Return decision issued to an illegally staying third-country national.#Case C-380/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0381decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 11 July 2019.#G.S. and V.G. v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#References for a preliminary ruling — Border controls, asylum and immigration — Immigration policy — Directive 2003/86/EC — Right to family reunification — Requirements for the exercise of the right to family reunification — Concept of ‘grounds of public policy’ — Rejection of an application for entry and residence of a family member — Withdrawal of or refusal to renew a residence permit of a family member.#Joined Cases C-381/18 and C-382/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0233decided

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 6 June 2019.#Zubair Haqbin v Federaal Agentschap voor de opvang van asielzoekers.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidshof te Brussel.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Applicants for international protection — Directive 2013/33/EU — Article 20(4) and (5) — Serious breach of the rules of the accommodation centres as well as seriously violent behaviour — Scope of the Member States’ right to determine the sanctions applicable — Unaccompanied minor — Reduction or withdrawal of material reception conditions.#Case C-233/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 June 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0720_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 May 2019.#Mohammed Bilali v Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Asylum policy — Subsidiary protection — Directive 2011/95/EU — Article 19 — Revocation of subsidiary protection status — Error on the part of the administrative authorities with respect to the facts.#Case C-720/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 May 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0720decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 May 2019.#Mohammed Bilali v Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Asylum policy — Subsidiary protection — Directive 2011/95/EU — Article 19 — Revocation of subsidiary protection status — Error on the part of the administrative authorities with respect to the facts.#Case C-720/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 May 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62016CJ0391_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 May 2019.#M and Others v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Asylum policy — International protection — Directive 2011/95/EU — Refugee status — Article 14(4) to (6) — Refusal to grant or revocation of refugee status in the event of danger to the security or the community of the host Member State — Validity — Article 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 78(1) TFEU — Article 6(3) TEU — Geneva Convention.#Joined Cases C-391/16, C-77/17 and C-78/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 May 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62016CJ0391decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 May 2019.#M and Others v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud and Conseil du Contentieux des Étrangers.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Asylum policy — International protection — Directive 2011/95/EU — Refugee status — Article 14(4) to (6) — Refusal to grant or revocation of refugee status in the event of danger to the security or the community of the host Member State — Validity — Article 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 78(1) TFEU — Article 6(3) TEU — Geneva Convention.#Joined Cases C-391/16, C-77/17 and C-78/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 May 2019

Decision· DCELEX 32019D0836in force

Council Decision (EU) 2019/836 of 13 May 2019 on the conclusion of the Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark on the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in Denmark or any other Member State of the European Union and ‘Eurodac’ for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of the Dublin Convention regarding access to Eurodac for law enforcement purposes

European Union · EUR-Lex · 13 May 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0556decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 30 April 2019.#Alekszij Torubarov v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Pécsi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection — Common procedures for granting international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 46(3) — Full and ex nunc examination — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to an effective remedy — Extent of the powers of the first-instance court or tribunal — No power to vary — Refusal by the competent administrative or quasi-judicial body to comply with a decision of that court or tribunal.#Case C-556/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 April 2019

Proposal· NLE2018/0423(NLE)voted

Conclusion of a Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark on the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in Denmark or any other Member State of the European Union and 'Eurodac' for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of the Dublin Convention extending that agreement to law enforcement

European Union · European Parliament · 3 April 2019

Page 1 of 2Next