Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Asylum

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

51 records in EU in 2021

All countriesUnited Kingdom · 12,687Ireland · 6,790Austria · 3,733Netherlands · 2,243United States · 2,034Germany · 1,646European Union · 1,412France · 895Belgium · 1Estonia · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0505_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2021

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0505decided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2021

Record· TOCELEX 62021TO0303_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 December 2021.#FC v European Asylum Support Office.#Action for annulment – Civil Service – Temporary staff – Disciplinary proceedings – Applications for suspension – Summons to attend a hearing before the Disciplinary Board – Postponement of the date of the hearing – No act adversely affecting the applicant – Premature action – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-303/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 December 2021

Record· TOCELEX 62021TO0303decided

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 December 2021.#FC v European Asylum Support Office.#Action for annulment – Civil Service – Temporary staff – Disciplinary proceedings – Applications for suspension – Summons to attend a hearing before the Disciplinary Board – Postponement of the date of the hearing – No act adversely affecting the applicant – Premature action – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-303/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 December 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0821_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 November 2021.#European Commission v Hungary.#Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Directives 2013/32/EU and 2013/33/EU – Procedure for granting international protection – Grounds of inadmissibility – Concepts of ‘safe third country’ and ‘first country of asylum’ – Assistance given to asylum seekers – Criminalisation – Prohibition on entry to the border transit zone of the relevant Member State.#Case C-821/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 November 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0821decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 November 2021.#European Commission v Hungary.#Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Directives 2013/32/EU and 2013/33/EU – Procedure for granting international protection – Grounds of inadmissibility – Concepts of ‘safe third country’ and ‘first country of asylum’ – Assistance given to asylum seekers – Criminalisation – Prohibition on entry to the border transit zone of the relevant Member State.#Case C-821/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 November 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0091_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 November 2021.#LW v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection – Standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection – Directive 2011/95/EU – Articles 3 and 23 – More favourable standards capable of being retained or introduced by the Member States for the purpose of extending the refugee or subsidiary protection status of a beneficiary of international protection to family members – Grant of a parent’s refugee status to his or her minor child as a derived right – Maintaining family unity – Best interests of the child.#Case C-91/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 November 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0091decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 November 2021.#LW v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection – Standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection – Directive 2011/95/EU – Articles 3 and 23 – More favourable standards capable of being retained or introduced by the Member States for the purpose of extending the refugee or subsidiary protection status of a beneficiary of international protection to family members – Grant of a parent’s refugee status to his or her minor child as a derived right – Maintaining family unity – Best interests of the child.#Case C-91/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 November 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0018decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 September 2021.#XY.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Asylum policy – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 40 – Subsequent application – New elements or findings – Concept – Circumstances which already existed before a procedure relating to a previous application for international protection was definitively concluded – Principle of res judicata – Fault on the part of the applicant.#Case C-18/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 September 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0768decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 September 2021.#Bundesrepublik Deutschland v SE.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection – Directive 2011/95/EU – Third indent of Article 2(j) – Concept of ‘family member’ – Adult applying for international protection on the basis of his or her family relationship with a minor who has already been granted subsidiary protection – Relevant date for assessing ‘minor’ status.#Case C-768/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 September 2021

Regulation· RCELEX 32021R1060in force

Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2021 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund and the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy

European Union · EUR-Lex · 24 June 2021

Report· AGCELEX 52021AG0027(02)open

Statement of Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 27/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund and the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy 2021/C 246/02

European Union · Council of the European Union · 24 June 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0921decided

Arrest van het Hof (Derde kamer) van 10 juni 2021.#LH tegen Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Grenstoezicht, asiel en immigratie – Asielbeleid – Gemeenschappelijke procedures voor de toekenning en intrekking van de internationale bescherming – Richtlijn 2013/32/EU – Artikel 40, lid 2 – Volgend verzoek – Nieuwe elementen of bevindingen – Begrip – Documenten waarvan de authenticiteit niet kan worden vastgesteld of waarvan de bron niet objectief verifieerbaar is – Richtlijn 2011/95/EU – Artikel 4, leden 1 en 2 – Beoordeling van het bewijsmateriaal – Verplichting tot samenwerking van de betrokken lidstaat.#Zaak C-921/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 June 2021

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0186decided

Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 June 2021.#J.A. v Republika Slovenija.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Upravno sodišče Republike Slovenije.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Immigration and asylum policy – International protection – Directive 2013/33/EU – Point (d) of the first subparagraph of Article 8(3) – Detention of applicants for international protection – Applicant detained subject to a return procedure under Directive 2008/115/EC and in respect of whom there are reasonable grounds to believe that he or she is making the application for international protection merely in order to delay or frustrate the enforcement of the return decision – Objective criteria on which such grounds may be based – Applicant who has already had the opportunity to access the asylum procedure.#Case C-186/21 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 June 2021

Proposal· PCCELEX 52021PC0291open

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT pursuant to Article 294(6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union concerning the position of the Council on the adoption of Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund and the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy

European Union · European Commission · 3 June 2021

Report· AGCELEX 52021AG0027(01)open

Position (EU) No 27/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund and the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy Adopted by the Council on 27 May 2021 2021/C 246/01

European Union · Council of the European Union · 27 May 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0008_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 May 2021.#L.R. v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Application for international protection – Grounds of inadmissibility – Article 2(q) – Concept of ‘subsequent application’ – Article 33(2)(d) – Rejection by a Member State of an application for international protection as inadmissible due to the rejection of a previous application made by the person concerned in a third State with which the European Union has concluded an agreement on the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining an application for asylum lodged in one of the States parties to that agreement – Final decision taken by the Kingdom of Norway.#Case C-8/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 May 2021

Page 1 of 2Next