Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

93 records in EU in 2018

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0240decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 July 2018.#Andriy Klyuyev v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Retention of the applicant’s name on the list — Legal basis — Manifest error of assessment — Rights of defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to property — Right to reputation — Plea of illegality.#Case T-240/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0325decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 June 2018.#České dráhy a.s. v European Commission.#Competition — Administrative procedure — Decision ordering an inspection — Proportionality — Non-arbitrariness — Obligation to state reasons — Reasonable grounds — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Right to respect for private life — Rights of the defence.#Case T-325/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 June 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0621decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 June 2018.#České dráhy a.s. v European Commission.#Competition — Administrative procedure — Decision ordering an inspection — Inspection ordered on the basis of information obtained from a separate inspection — Proportionality — Obligation to state reasons — Right to respect for private life — Rights of defence’.#Case T-621/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 June 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0408decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 June 2018.#HX v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Principle of ne bis in idem — Rights of the defence — Right to a fair trial — Obligation to state reasons — Right to an effective remedy — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property — Proportionality — Right to a normal life — Damage to reputation.#Case T-408/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 June 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0086decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 June 2018.#Marion Le Pen v European Parliament.#Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances of Members of the European Parliament — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of sums unduly paid — Power of the Secretary-General — Rights of the defence — Burden of proof — Obligation to state reasons — Equal treatment — Misuse of powers — Independence of the Members — Error of fact — Proportionality.#Case T-86/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 June 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0458decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 June 2018.#Rami Makhlouf v Council of the European Union.#Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against influential businessmen and women engaged in activities in Syria and against influential members of the Assad and Makhlouf families — Rights of defence — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded.#Case C-458/17 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 June 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0210decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 June 2018.#Olena Lukash v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Obligation to state reasons — Failure to fulfil criteria for listing — Error of fact — Error of assessment — Rights of the defence — Right to an effective remedy — Right to property.#Case T-210/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 June 2018

Report· XGCELEX 52018XG0604(01)open

The following information is brought to the attention of AL NASSER Abdelkarim Hussein Mohamed, AL-YACOUB Ibrahim Salih Mohammed, IZZ-AL-DIN Hasan, MOHAMMED Khalid Shaikh, Hizballah Military Wing, Ejército de Liberación Nacional (‘National Liberation Army’), Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine — General Command, Sendero Luminoso (SL) (‘Shining Path’) — persons and groups included on the list provided for in Article 2(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (see Annex to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/468 of 21 March 2018)

European Union · Council of the European Union · 4 June 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0626decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 May 2018.#Mylène Troszczynski v European Parliament.#Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of sums unduly paid — Power of the Secretary-General — Electa una via — Rights of the defence — Burden of proof — Obligation to state reasons — Political rights — Equal treatment — Misuse of power — Independence of the Members — Error of fact — Proportionality.#Case T-626/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 May 2018

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0093decided

Opinion of Advocate General Wathelet delivered on 16 May 2018.#European Commission v Hellenic Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — State aid — Aid declared unlawful and incompatible with the internal market — Recovery requirement — Judgment of the Court establishing a failure to fulfil its obligations — Undertaking which engages in both civil and military activities — Non-implementation — Essential interests of the security of a Member State — Article 346(1)(b) TFEU — Financial penalties — Periodic penalty payment — Lump sum — Ability to pay — ‘N’ Factor — Factors which are the basis for the assessment of the ability to pay — Gross domestic product — Weighting of votes of the Member State in the Council of the European Union — New voting rules in the Council.#Case C-93/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 May 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0190decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 April 2018.#Mykola Yanovych Azarov v Council of the European Union.#Common Foreign and Security Policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Rights of the defence — Principle of good administration — Misuse of power — Right to property — Freedom to conduct a business — Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-190/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 April 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0554decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 April 2018.#Hungary v European Commission.#State aid — Aid granted under the Hungarian Law No XCIV of 2014 on the health contribution of tobacco companies — Aid resulting from a 2014 amendment to the Hungarian Food Chain Act 2008 and the official control thereof — Taxes with progressive annual turnover rates — Decision to open the procedure provided for in Article 108(2) TFEU — Simultaneous adoption of a suspension order — Action for annulment — Severable nature of the suspension order — Interest in bringing proceedings — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Rights of the defence — Principle of sincere cooperation — Article 11(1) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999.#Joined Cases T-554/15 and T-555/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 April 2018

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0099decided

Opinion of Advocate General Wathelet delivered on 12 April 2018.#Infineon Technologies AG v European Commission.#Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for smart card chips — Network of bilateral contacts — Exchanges of commercially sensitive information — Challenge of the authenticity of the evidence — Rights of the defence — Restriction of competition ‘by object’ — Single and continuous infringement — Judicial review — Unlimited jurisdiction — Scope — Calculation of the amount of the fine.#Case C-99/17 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 April 2018

Record· TOCELEX 62017TO0134decided

Order of the President of the General Court of 20 March 2018.#Hércules Club de Fútbol, SAD v European Commission.#Interim proceedings — Access to documents — Documents relating to the administrative procedure prior to the adoption of a Commission decision on State aid implemented by Spain in favour of three professional football clubs — Rights of the defence — Refusal of access — Application for provisional measures — Lack of urgency.#Case T-134/17 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 March 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0542(01)decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 March 2018.#Alouminion tis Ellados VEAE, formerly Alouminion AE v European Commission.#State aid — Electricity — Decision declaring the aid unlawful and incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Preferential electricity tariff granted by a contract entered into with the incumbent supplier — Termination of the contract by the incumbent supplier — Judicial suspension, by way of interim measures, of the effects of termination of the contract — Annulment of the Commission’s decision by the General Court — Judgment of the General Court set aside by the Court of Justice — Referral of the case back to the General Court — Scope of the action after being referred back — Classification of the order granting interim measures as constituting new aid — Competence of the Commission — Effective judicial protection — Classification of the preferential tariff as State aid — Advantage — Legitimate expectations — Rights of defence of the recipient — Obligation to recover — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-542/11 RENV.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 March 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0624decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 March 2018.#Bruno Gollnisch v European Parliament.#Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of sums unduly paid — Power of the Secretary-General — Electa una via — Rights of the defence — Burden of proof — Obligation to state reasons — Legitimate expectations — Political rights — Equal treatment — Misuse of power — Independence of the Members — Error of fact — Proportionality.#Case T-624/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 March 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0731decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 February 2018 (Extracts).#Sergiy Klyuyev v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Duty to state reasons — Legal basis — Factual basis — Manifest error of assessment — Rights of defence — Right to property — Right to reputation — Proportionality — Protection of fundamental rights equivalent to that guaranteed in the European Union — Plea of illegality.#Case T-731/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 February 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0118decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 February 2018.#Institute for Direct Democracy in Europe ASBL (IDDE) v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions — European Parliament — Decision awarding a grant to a political foundation for the financial year 2017 and providing for pre-financing at a rate of 33% of the maximum grant amount and the obligation to provide a pre-financing bank guarantee — Action for annulment — Challengeable act — Admissibility — Obligation of impartiality — Rights of the defence — Financial regulation — Rules of application of the Financial Regulation — Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 — Proportionality.#Case T-118/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 February 2018

Report· INI2018/2004(INI)voted

Cyber defence

European Union · European Parliament · 18 January 2018

PreviousPage 2 of 2