Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,001 records in EU

All countriesUnited States · 41,749Ireland · 23,760United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,716France · 4,100Netherlands · 3,841Austria · 3,570European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0791decided

Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 6 May 2021.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Disciplinary regime applicable to judges – Rule of law – Independence of judges – Effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Disciplinary offences resulting from the content of judicial decisions – Independent disciplinary courts or tribunals established by law – Respect for reasonable time and the rights of the defence in disciplinary proceedings – Article 267 TFEU – Restriction of the right of national courts to submit requests for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice and of their obligation to do so.#Case C-791/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 May 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0260_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 April 2021.#Mazen Al-Tarazi v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted against Syria – Freezing of funds – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Rights of defence – Right to property – Right to exercise an economic activity – Right to respect for private and family life – Proportionality.#Case T-260/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 April 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0285_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 April 2021.#SGI Studio Galli Ingegneria Srl v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) – Grant agreement – The MARSOL Project – Eligible costs – OLAF investigation report finding certain expenses incurred to be ineligible – Repayment of sums paid – Burden of proof – Principle of good faith – Right to be heard – Principle of sound administration – Rights of the defence – Proportionality.#Case T-285/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 April 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0260decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 April 2021.#Mazen Al-Tarazi v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted against Syria – Freezing of funds – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Rights of defence – Right to property – Right to exercise an economic activity – Right to respect for private and family life – Proportionality.#Case T-260/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 April 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0285decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 April 2021.#SGI Studio Galli Ingegneria Srl v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) – Grant agreement – The MARSOL Project – Eligible costs – OLAF investigation report finding certain expenses incurred to be ineligible – Repayment of sums paid – Burden of proof – Principle of good faith – Right to be heard – Principle of sound administration – Rights of the defence – Proportionality.#Case T-285/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 April 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0152_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 March 2021.#Deutsche Telekom AG v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of dominant position – Slovak market for broadband internet access services – Regulatory obligation on the part of operators with significant market power to grant access to the local loop – Conditions laid down by the incumbent operator for unbundled access by other operators to the local loop – Indispensability of the access – Imputability of a subsidiary’s conduct to the parent company – Rights of the defence.#Case C-152/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 March 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0165_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 March 2021.#Slovak Telekom, a.s. v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of dominant position – Slovak market for broadband internet access services – Regulatory obligation on the part of operators with significant market power to grant access to the local loop – Conditions laid down by the incumbent operator for unbundled access by other operators to the local loop – Indispensability of the access – Margin squeeze – Costs – Competitor at least as efficient as the dominant undertaking – Rights of the defence.#Case C-165/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 March 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0152decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 March 2021.#Deutsche Telekom AG v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of dominant position – Slovak market for broadband internet access services – Regulatory obligation on the part of operators with significant market power to grant access to the local loop – Conditions laid down by the incumbent operator for unbundled access by other operators to the local loop – Indispensability of the access – Imputability of a subsidiary’s conduct to the parent company – Rights of the defence.#Case C-152/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 March 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0165decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 March 2021.#Slovak Telekom, a.s. v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of dominant position – Slovak market for broadband internet access services – Regulatory obligation on the part of operators with significant market power to grant access to the local loop – Conditions laid down by the incumbent operator for unbundled access by other operators to the local loop – Indispensability of the access – Margin squeeze – Costs – Competitor at least as efficient as the dominant undertaking – Rights of the defence.#Case C-165/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 March 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62016CJ0611decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 March 2021.#Xellia Pharmaceuticals ApS and Alpharma, LLC, anciennement Zoetis Products LLC v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Pharmaceutical products – Market for antidepressants (citalopram) – Settlement agreements relating to disputes concerning process patents concluded by a manufacturer of originator medicines who is the holder of those patents and manufacturers of generic medicines – Article 101 TFEU – Potential competition – Restriction by object – Characterisation – Calculation of the amount of the fine – Rights of the defence – Reasonable time – Loss of documents due to the passage of time – General duty of care – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Second subparagraph of Article 23(2) – Maximum amount of the fine – Taking into account the business year preceding that in which the European Commission’s decision was adopted – Last full year of normal economic activity.#Case C-611/16 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 March 2021

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0546decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 18 March 2021.#FN and Others v Übernahmekommission.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Company law – Takeover bids – Directive 2004/25/EC – Article 5 – Mandatory bid – Article 4 – Supervisory authority – Final decision making a finding of infringement of the obligation to make a takeover bid – Binding effect of that decision in subsequent proceedings for an administrative sanction initiated by the same authority – EU law principle of effectiveness – General principles of EU law – Rights of the defence – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 47 and 48 – Right to silence – Presumption of innocence – Access to an independent and impartial tribunal.#Case C-546/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 March 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0719_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 March 2021.#FMC Corporation v European Commission.#Plant-protection products – Active substance flupyrsulfuron-methyl – Non-renewal of inclusion in the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 – Assessment procedure – Proposed classification of an active substance – Precautionary principle – Rights of defence – Legal certainty – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality – Principle of non-discrimination – Principle of sound administration – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-719/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 March 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0719decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 March 2021.#FMC Corporation v European Commission.#Plant-protection products – Active substance flupyrsulfuron-methyl – Non-renewal of inclusion in the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 – Assessment procedure – Proposed classification of an active substance – Precautionary principle – Rights of defence – Legal certainty – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality – Principle of non-discrimination – Principle of sound administration – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-719/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 March 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0258_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Klymenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation of the Council of the European Union to verify that that decision was taken in accordance with the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-258/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 February 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0258decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Klymenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation of the Council of the European Union to verify that that decision was taken in accordance with the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-258/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 February 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0017decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 February 2021.#Giulia Moi v European Parliament.#Institutional law – European Parliament – Psychological harassment – Decisions of the President of the Parliament finding that two accredited parliamentary assistants suffered harassment and imposing on a Member of Parliament the penalty of forfeiture of entitlement to the daily subsistence allowance for a period of 12 days – Rules 11 and 166 of the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament – Internal appeal – Decision of the Bureau of the Parliament confirming the penalty – Rule 167 of the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing an action – Admissibility – Rights of the defence – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-17/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 February 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0017_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 February 2021.#Giulia Moi v European Parliament.#Institutional law – European Parliament – Psychological harassment – Decisions of the President of the Parliament finding that two accredited parliamentary assistants suffered harassment and imposing on a Member of Parliament the penalty of forfeiture of entitlement to the daily subsistence allowance for a period of 12 days – Rules 11 and 166 of the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament – Internal appeal – Decision of the Bureau of the Parliament confirming the penalty – Rule 167 of the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing an action – Admissibility – Rights of the defence – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-17/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 February 2021

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0742decided

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 28 January 2021.#B. K. v Republika Slovenija (Ministrstvo za obrambo).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Organisation of working time – Members of the armed forces – Applicability of EU law – Article 4(2) TEU – Directive 2003/88/EC – Scope – Article 1(3) – Directive 89/391/EEC – Article 2(2) – Military activities – Concept of ‘working time’ – Stand-by period – Dispute concerning the remuneration of a worker.#Case C-742/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 January 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0009_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 27 January 2021.#ClientEarth v European Investment Bank.#Environment – Financing of a biomass power generation plant in Galicia – Resolution of the Board of Directors of the EIB approving the financing – Access to justice in environmental matters – Articles 9 and 10 of the Aarhus Convention – Articles 10 to 12 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Request for an internal review – Refusal of the request as inadmissible – Action for annulment – Admissibility of a ground of defence – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of an act adopted under environmental law – Concept of an act having a legally binding and external effect.#Case T-9/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 January 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0009decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 27 January 2021.#ClientEarth v European Investment Bank.#Environment – Financing of a biomass power generation plant in Galicia – Resolution of the Board of Directors of the EIB approving the financing – Access to justice in environmental matters – Articles 9 and 10 of the Aarhus Convention – Articles 10 to 12 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Request for an internal review – Refusal of the request as inadmissible – Action for annulment – Admissibility of a ground of defence – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of an act adopted under environmental law – Concept of an act having a legally binding and external effect.#Case T-9/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 January 2021

Report· XGCELEX 52021XG0118(02)open

The following information is brought to the attention of ABDOLLAHI Hamed, AL NASSER, Abdelkarim Hussein Mohamed, AL-YACOUB, Ibrahim Salih Mohammed, ARBABSIAR Manssor, IZZ-AL-DIN, Hasan, MOHAMMED, Khalid Shaikh, SHAHLAI Abdul Reza, SHAKURI Ali Gholam, ‘Hizballah Military Wing’, ‘EJÉRCITO DE LIBERACIÓN NACIONAL’ (‘National Liberation Army’), POPULAR FRONT FOR THE LIBERATION OF PALESTINE (PFLP), POPULAR FRONT FOR THE LIBERATION OF PALESTINE-GENERAL COMMAND and ‘SENDERO LUMINOSO’ – ‘SL’ (‘Shining Path’), persons and groups included on the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Council Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism and to Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (see Annexes to Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1132 and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1128) 2021/C 18/03

European Union · Council of the European Union · 18 January 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0541_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 16 December 2020.#Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of tartaric acid originating in China – Extension of a definitive anti-dumping duty – Determination of the normal value – Protocol of Accession of China to the WTO – Analogue country methodology – Article 2(7) and Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Vulnerability of the Union industry – Likelihood of recurrence of injury – Rights of the defence – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-541/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0541decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 16 December 2020.#Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of tartaric acid originating in China – Extension of a definitive anti-dumping duty – Determination of the normal value – Protocol of Accession of China to the WTO – Analogue country methodology – Article 2(7) and Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Vulnerability of the Union industry – Likelihood of recurrence of injury – Rights of the defence – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-541/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0286decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 December 2020.#Mykola Yanovych Azarov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-286/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0189_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 December 2020.#Maen Haikal v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against Syria – Freezing of funds – Rights of the defence – Right to a fair hearing – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection – Error of assessment – Right to property – Proportionality – Right to carry on an economic activity – Right to respect for private and family life.#Case T-189/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2020

PreviousPage 20 of 21Next