Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

201 records in EU

All countriesUnited States · 41,749Ireland · 23,760United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,713France · 4,098Netherlands · 3,841Austria · 3,566European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0223_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 October 2025.#VZ v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Members of the European Parliament – Psychological harassment – Decisions of the President of the Parliament finding that several accredited parliamentary assistants had been subjected to psychological harassment, and ordering the forfeiture of a Member’s right to the daily subsistence allowance and that the Member be suspended from taking part in the Parliament’s activities for thirty days – Procedural deadlines – Rights of the defence – Presumption of innocence.#Case T-223/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0582_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Claims Balkans d.o.o. Beograd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark CLAIMS – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-582/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0582decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Claims Balkans d.o.o. Beograd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark CLAIMS – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-582/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0083_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#VP v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Members of the Parliament – Psychological harassment – Decision of the Parliament finding that an accredited parliamentary assistant suffered psychological harassment by the applicant – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Principle of good administration – Concept of ‘harassment’ – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Error of assessment.#Case T-83/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1105_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Roman Arkadyevich Abramovich v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘leading businesspersons operating in Russia’ – Concept of ‘businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Citizenship of the Union – Right to property – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-1105/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0083decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#VP v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Members of the Parliament – Psychological harassment – Decision of the Parliament finding that an accredited parliamentary assistant suffered psychological harassment by the applicant – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Principle of good administration – Concept of ‘harassment’ – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Error of assessment.#Case T-83/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1105decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Roman Arkadyevich Abramovich v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘leading businesspersons operating in Russia’ – Concept of ‘businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Citizenship of the Union – Right to property – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-1105/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0573decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 September 2025.#Positive Group PAO v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Definition of ‘entities operating in the Russian IT sector with a license administered by the FSB’ – Article 2(1)(i) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(i) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence.#Case T-573/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0573_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 September 2025.#Positive Group PAO v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Definition of ‘entities operating in the Russian IT sector with a license administered by the FSB’ – Article 2(1)(i) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(i) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence.#Case T-573/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0091decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a decoration for bags of packaging – Earlier national word and figurative marks – Ground for invalidity – Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Applicable substantive law – Rights of the defence – Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal.#Case T-91/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0083decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a decoration for bags of packaging – Earlier national word and figurative marks – Ground for invalidity – Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Applicable substantive law – Rights of the defence – Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal.#Case T-83/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0091_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a decoration for bags of packaging – Earlier national word and figurative marks – Ground for invalidity – Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Applicable substantive law – Rights of the defence – Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal.#Case T-91/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0083_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a decoration for bags of packaging – Earlier national word and figurative marks – Ground for invalidity – Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Applicable substantive law – Rights of the defence – Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal.#Case T-83/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0092decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing packaging – Earlier national figurative mark – Ground for invalidity – Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Rights of the defence – Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal.#Case T-92/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0092_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing packaging – Earlier national figurative mark – Ground for invalidity – Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Rights of the defence – Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal.#Case T-92/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 September 2025

Report· XGCELEX 52025XG04237open

Notice for the attention of the persons, entities and bodies to whom measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1532, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2025/1547 and in Council Regulation (EU) 2023/1529, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1548 concerning restrictive measures in view of Iran’s military support of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and to armed groups and entities in the Middle East and the Red Sea region apply

European Union · Council of the European Union · 28 July 2025

Report· XGCELEX 52025XG04236open

Notice for the attention of the persons, entities and bodies to whom measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1532, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2025/1547 and in Council Regulation (EU) 2023/1529, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1548 concerning restrictive measures in view of Iran’s military support of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and to armed groups and entities in the Middle East and the Red Sea region apply

European Union · Council of the European Union · 28 July 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0084decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 July 2025.#UBS Group AG, venant aux droits de Credit Suisse Group AG and Others v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Sector of Foreign Exchange (Forex) spot trading of G10 currencies – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Exchanges of information – Agreements or concerted practices relating to G10 foreign exchange activities – Restriction of competition by object – Single and continuous infringement – Principle of sound administration – Rights of the defence – Fines – Basic amount – Proxy for value of sales – Article 23(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-84/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 July 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0084_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 July 2025.#UBS Group AG, venant aux droits de Credit Suisse Group AG and Others v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Sector of Foreign Exchange (Forex) spot trading of G10 currencies – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Exchanges of information – Agreements or concerted practices relating to G10 foreign exchange activities – Restriction of competition by object – Single and continuous infringement – Principle of sound administration – Rights of the defence – Fines – Basic amount – Proxy for value of sales – Article 23(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-84/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 July 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1095_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 July 2025.#OT v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Error of assessment – Rights of the defence – Proportionality.#Case T-1095/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 July 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1095decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 July 2025.#OT v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Error of assessment – Rights of the defence – Proportionality.#Case T-1095/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 July 2025

PreviousPage 4 of 5Next