Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

451 records in EU

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0789_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 26 June 2024.#PB v Single Resolution Board.#Civil service – Temporary agents – Psychological harassment – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Rejection of the request – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Absence of prima facie evidence – Rights of the defence – Right to be heard – Principle of impartiality – Principle of sound administration – Duty of care – Responsibility.#Case T-789/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 June 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0789decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 26 June 2024.#PB v Single Resolution Board.#Civil service – Temporary agents – Psychological harassment – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Rejection of the request – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Absence of prima facie evidence – Rights of the defence – Right to be heard – Principle of impartiality – Principle of sound administration – Duty of care – Responsibility.#Case T-789/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 June 2024

Report· XGCELEX 52024XG04069open

Notice for the attention of the entity subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1532 as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/1791 and in Council Regulation (EU) 2023/1529 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1793 concerning restrictive measures in view of Iran’s military support of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and to armed groups and entities in the Middle East and the Red Sea region

European Union · Council of the European Union · 25 June 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0696_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#C SPRL v contreAdministrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice (AJFP) Cluj and Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice (DGRFP) Cluj-Napoca.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common – system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 64(1) and (2) – Applicability – Services of court-appointed administrators and liquidators – Continuous supply of services – Article 168(a) – Deduction of input VAT – Expenditure relating to the right to use a trade name – Rights of the defence – Right to be heard.#Case C-696/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 June 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0649_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 June 2024.#Issam Shammout v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Criterion of ‘leading businessperson operating in Syria’ – Presumption of a link with the Syrian regime – Error of assessment – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Right to property – Freedom to choose an occupation and right to engage in work – Freedom to conduct a business – Admissibility of evidence.#Case T-649/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 June 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0649decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 June 2024.#Issam Shammout v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Criterion of ‘leading businessperson operating in Syria’ – Presumption of a link with the Syrian regime – Error of assessment – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Right to property – Freedom to choose an occupation and right to engage in work – Freedom to conduct a business – Admissibility of evidence.#Case T-649/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 June 2024

Report· XGCELEX 52024XG03633open

Notice for the attention of the persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2023/1532/CFSP as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/1605 and in Council Regulation (EU) No 2023/1529 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1604 concerning restrictive measures in view of Iran’s military support of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and to armed groups and entities in the Middle East and the Red Sea region

European Union · Council of the European Union · 4 June 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0235_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 15 May 2024.#Russian Direct Investment Fund v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on investing in, participating in or otherwise contributing to projects co-financed by the applicant – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Admissibility – Plea of illegality – Manifest error of assessment – Rights of the defence – Freedom to conduct a business – Proportionality.#Case T-235/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0235decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 15 May 2024.#Russian Direct Investment Fund v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on investing in, participating in or otherwise contributing to projects co-financed by the applicant – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Admissibility – Plea of illegality – Manifest error of assessment – Rights of the defence – Freedom to conduct a business – Proportionality.#Case T-235/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 May 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0015_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 May 2024.#Criminal proceedings against CH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2013/48/EU – The right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings – Art. 3(6)(b) – Temporary derogation from the right of access to a lawyer in exceptional circumstances – Article 9 – Waiver of the presence or assistance of a lawyer – Conditions – Article 12(2) – Respect for the rights of the defence and the fairness of the proceedings – Admissibility of evidence – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. – Written waiver of an illiterate suspect’s right of access to a lawyer – No explanation as to the possible consequences of waiving that right – Implications for subsequent investigative acts – Decision on an appropriate restraint measure – Assessment of evidence obtained in breach of the right of access to a lawyer.#Case C-15/24 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 May 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0015decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 May 2024.#Criminal proceedings against CH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2013/48/EU – The right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings – Art. 3(6)(b) – Temporary derogation from the right of access to a lawyer in exceptional circumstances – Article 9 – Waiver of the presence or assistance of a lawyer – Conditions – Article 12(2) – Respect for the rights of the defence and the fairness of the proceedings – Admissibility of evidence – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. – Written waiver of an illiterate suspect’s right of access to a lawyer – No explanation as to the possible consequences of waiving that right – Implications for subsequent investigative acts – Decision on an appropriate restraint measure – Assessment of evidence obtained in breach of the right of access to a lawyer.#Case C-15/24 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0555_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 May 2024.#French Republic v European Commission.#Rules on languages – Notice of open competition for the recruitment of administrators and experts in the fields of defence industry and space – Restriction of the choice of language 2 to English – Regulation No 1 – Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations – Discrimination on grounds of language – Interest of the service – Proportionality.#Case T-555/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0234decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2024.#Gulbakhor Ismailova v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1), in fine, of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Rights of the defence – Right to property and freedom to conduct a business – Freedom of movement – Proportionality.#Case T-234/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0555decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 May 2024.#French Republic v European Commission.#Rules on languages – Notice of open competition for the recruitment of administrators and experts in the fields of defence industry and space – Restriction of the choice of language 2 to English – Regulation No 1 – Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations – Discrimination on grounds of language – Interest of the service – Proportionality.#Case T-555/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0234_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2024.#Gulbakhor Ismailova v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1), in fine, of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Rights of the defence – Right to property and freedom to conduct a business – Freedom of movement – Proportionality.#Case T-234/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0600decided

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 11 April 2024.#Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó and Antoni Comín i Oliveres v European Parliament.#Appeal – Law governing the institutions – Members of the European Parliament – Official communication, by the Member States, of the names of elected Members – Powers of the Parliament – Request for defence of immunity – Acts in respect of which an action for annulment cannot be brought.#Case C-600/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0445_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Columbus Stainless (Pty) Ltd v European Commission.#Protective measures – Steel products market – Imports of certain steel products – Economic Partnership Agreement – Southern African Development Community – Exemption clause – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/664 – Initiation of an investigation – Rights of the defence – Principle of good administration – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-445/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0445decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Columbus Stainless (Pty) Ltd v European Commission.#Protective measures – Steel products market – Imports of certain steel products – Economic Partnership Agreement – Southern African Development Community – Exemption clause – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/664 – Initiation of an investigation – Rights of the defence – Principle of good administration – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-445/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 April 2024

Report· XGCELEX 52024XG01945R(01)open

Corrigendum to Common Military List of the European Union adopted by the Council on 19 February 2024 (equipment covered by Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP defining common rules governing the control of exports of military technology and equipment) (updating and replacing the Common Military List of the European Union adopted by the Council on 20 February 2023 (1)) (CFSP) (Official Journal of the European Union C, C/2024/1945, 1 March 2024)

European Union · Council of the European Union · 6 March 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0339decided

Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 5 September 2024.#BSH Hausgeräte GmbH v Electrolux AB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 4(1) – General jurisdiction – Article 24(4) – Exclusive jurisdiction – Jurisdiction in proceedings concerned with the registration or validity of patents – Infringement action – European patent validated in Member States and in a third State – Challenge to the validity of the patent raised as a defence – International jurisdiction of the court hearing the infringement action.#Case C-339/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 February 2024

PreviousPage 9 of 10Next