PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects

Digitalisation

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

103 records in 2023

Records

Motion· Motie2023Z02735adopted

Motion by member Rajkowski et al. on reconsidering the transfer of personal data and government data to countries outside the EEA and opting for a European cloud initiative

Original: Motie van het lid Rajkowski c.s. over het heroverwegen van de doorgifte van persoonsgegevens en overheidsdata naar landen buiten de EER en het kiezen voor een Europees cloudinitiatief

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 30 July 2026

Translated from Dutch

Motion by member Rajkowski et al. on reconsidering the transfer of personal data and government data to countries outside the EEA and opting for a European cloud initiative

Question· Schriftliche Frage20/9234open

Mögliche negative Auswirkungen des Energieeffizienzgesetzes auf die Digitalisierung

Germany · German Bundestag · 26 May 2026

Originaltext der Frage(n):<br /> <br /> Gedenkt die Bundesregierung, den vorgetragenen Befürchtungen, dass das Energieeffizienzgesetz die Digitalisierung hemmen könnte (www.silicon.de/41709713/bremst-energieeffizienzgesetz-diedigitalisierung-aus) entgegenzukommen, und wenn ja, in welcher Weise?

Motion· Motie2023Z02750concluded

Motion by member Drost on the Europese voorstellen regarding digitalisering scherper en krititscher toetsen aan uitgangspunten als vrijwilligheid, regie over eigen data en transparantie

Original: Motie van het lid Drost over de Europese voorstellen inzake digitalisering scherper en krititscher toetsen aan uitgangspunten als vrijwilligheid, regie over eigen data en transparantie

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 18 May 2026

Translated from Dutch

Motion by member Drost on the Europese voorstellen regarding digitalisering scherper en krititscher toetsen aan uitgangspunten als vrijwilligheid, regie over eigen data en transparantie

Question· Schriftliche Frage20/8804open

Digitalisierung des Vollzugs notarieller Urkunden

Germany · German Bundestag · 13 January 2026

Originaltext der Frage(n):<br /> <br /> Beabsichtigt die Bundesregierung, das Projekt "eNoVA" (elektronischer Notar-Verwaltung-Austausch) zur Digitalisierung des Vollzugs notarieller Urkunden, das bereits in der 19. Legislaturperiode initiiert worden ist, weiter voranzutreiben, und falls nein, warum nicht?<br /> <br /> Welche langfristige Strategie verfolgt die Bundesregierung, um die Digitalisierung im Bereich notarieller Beurkundungen, insbesondere der jährlich mehr als einer Million Immobilienkaufverträge in Deutschland, und vor allem auch die Kommunikation mit den Finanzämtern zu verbessern?

Question· Schriftliche Frage20/7274open

Letztmögliches Datum für einen motion auf Förderung gemäß der Richtlinie zur Förderung von Vorhaben zur Digitalisierung der Prozesse und Strukturen im Verlauf eines Krankenhausaufenthaltes von Patientinnen und Patienten

Original: Letztmögliches Datum für einen Antrag auf Förderung gemäß der Richtlinie zur Förderung von Vorhaben zur Digitalisierung der Prozesse und Strukturen im Verlauf eines Krankenhausaufenthaltes von Patientinnen und Patienten

Germany · German Bundestag · 13 January 2026

Translated from German

Originaltext der Frage(n):<br /> <br /> Welches ist &ndash; mit Blick auf die nach Auffassung betroffener Akteure an mich herangetragenen unterschiedlichen Auslegungen der Förderrichtlinie (Richtlinie zur Förderung von Vorhaben zur Digitalisierung der Prozesse und Strukturen im Verlauf eines Krankenhausaufenthaltes von Patientinnen und Patienten nach § 21 Absatz 2 der Krankenhausstrukturfonds-Verordnung &ndash; KHSFV) zur Ausschüttung der Fördergelder des Krankenhauszukunftsgesetzes (KHZG) in den Bundesländern mit Bezug auf den letztmöglichen Vorhabenbeginn für förderberechtigte Vorhaben &ndash; nach Kenntnis der Bundesregierung das letztmögliche Datum bundesweit beziehungsweise in den einzelnen Ländern (bitte nach Bundesländern aufschlüsseln), um im Rahmen des KHZG ein förderberechtigtes Vorhaben zu beginnen, damit alle Beteiligten durch eine strukturierte sowie transparente Auflistung Klarheit bezüglich des Förderzeitraums erhalten und entsprechende Maßnahmen ergreifen können, und welche Kulanzen bestehen hierbei eventuell?

Question· Mündliche Frage20/6667open

Tagungen der Staatssekretärsrunde zum Monitoring der Digitalstrategie

Germany · German Bundestag · 13 January 2026

Originaltext der Frage(n):<br /> <br /> Wie oft hat die Staatssekretärsrunde unter Vorsitz des Bundesministeriums für Digitales und Verkehr zum Monitoring der Digitalstrategie bisher getagt, und welche Fragestellungen wurden behandelt?

Question· Mündliche Frage20/6667open

Stärkung der Digitalisierung des ÖPNV

Germany · German Bundestag · 13 January 2026

Originaltext der Frage(n):<br /> <br /> Wie will die Bundesregierung die Defizite bei der Digitalisierung im Vertrieb in Deutschland, die im Zuge von Bestellung und Versand des 49-Euro-Tickets aufgetreten sind (vgl. https://background.tagesspiegel.de/mobilitaet/verkehrsminister-wuenscht-sich-mehr-tempo-bei-digitalisierung-im-oepnv) verbessern und generell die Digitalisierung des öffentlichen Personennahverkehrs stärken?

Question· Mündliche Frage20/6667open

Digitalisierung in der Verwaltung

Germany · German Bundestag · 13 January 2026

Originaltext der Frage(n):<br /> <br /> Wie möchte die Bundesregierung die Digitalisierung in der Verwaltung voranbringen (www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/unternehmen/onlinezugangsgesetz-fdp-droht-behoerden-bei-langsamer-digitalisierung-mit-strafen-a-e1e23bd0-0dfc-4885-8763-68d126bda472)?

Question· Mündliche Frage20/6389open

Tagungen der Staatssekretärsrunde zum Monitoring der Digitalstrategie

Germany · German Bundestag · 13 January 2026

Originaltext der Frage(n):<br /> <br /> Wie oft hat die Staatssekretärsrunde unter Vorsitz des Bundesministeriums für Digitales und Verkehr zum Monitoring der Digitalstrategie bisher getagt, und welche Fragestellungen wurden behandelt?

Question· Schriftliche Frage20/5615open

Anzahl der in der Bundesverwaltung mit dem Thema "Digitalisierung" befassten Mitarbeiter

Germany · German Bundestag · 13 January 2026

Originaltext der Frage(n):<br /> <br /> Wie viele Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeiter, Teams und Abteilungen beschäftigen sich in den einzelnen Bundesministerien und ihnen nachgeordneten Behörden und sonstigen Einrichtungen des Bundes mit dem Thema Digitalisierung (bitte für jedes Bundesministerium einzeln angeben), und aus welchem konkreten Grund wurde durch die gegenwärtige Bundesregierung kein eigenständiges Digitalministerium geschaffen?

Question· Schriftliche Frage20/5615open

Schaffung rechtlicher Grundlagen zur Digitalisierung der Bauleitplanverfahren

Germany · German Bundestag · 13 January 2026

Originaltext der Frage(n):<br /> <br /> Welche rechtlichen Grundlagen hat die Bundesregierung für eine vollständige Digitalisierung der Bauleitplanverfahren bereits geschaffen, und welche weiteren Maßnahmen sind geplant (bitte mit zeitlichem Verlauf angeben)?

Bill· SS. 347 (118th)referred

ANTI-SOCIAL CCP Act

United States · United States Congress · 9 January 2026

Averting the National Threat of Internet Surveillance, Oppressive Censorship and Influence, and Algorithmic Learning by the Chinese Communist Party Act or the ANTI-SOCIAL CCP Act This bill requires the President to impose property-blocking sanctions on TikTok, its parent company ByteDance Ltd., and larger social media companies with ties to certain foreign countries. Specifically, the sanctions shall apply if the relevant property interests are (1) in the United States; or (2) in the possession or control of a U.S. person, if blocking the transaction is necessary to prevent the company's commercial operation in the United States. These sanctions shall also apply to larger social media companies involved with countries or persons (entities or individuals) of concern, generally defined as any foreign government or person engaged in activities adverse to U.S. security and safety and includes specific countries such as China, Russia, and North Korea. For the purposes of this bill, a person of concern also includes private companies and individuals domiciled in a country of concern and subject to the substantial influence of the government. Specifically, in addition to TikTok and ByteDance, the sanctions shall apply to any social media company that is based in or organized under the laws of a country of concern; where a country or person of concern owns 20% of its outstanding voting stock or shares; that uses software or algorithms controlled by a country or person of concern, including through export controls; or where a country or person of concern has substantial influence over the company's data sharing or content moderation practices.

Bill· HRH.R. 1081 (118th)referred

ANTI-SOCIAL CCP Act

United States · United States Congress · 9 January 2026

Averting the National Threat of Internet Surveillance, Oppressive Censorship and Influence, and Algorithmic Learning by the Chinese Communist Party Act or the ANTI-SOCIAL CCP Act This bill requires the President to impose property-blocking sanctions on TikTok, its parent company ByteDance Ltd., and larger social media companies with ties to certain foreign countries. Specifically, the sanctions shall apply if the relevant property interests are (1) in the United States; or (2) in the possession or control of a U.S. person, if blocking the transaction is necessary to prevent the company's commercial operation in the United States. These sanctions shall also apply to larger social media companies involved with countries or persons (entities or individuals) of concern, generally defined as any foreign government or person engaged in activities adverse to U.S. security and safety and includes specific countries such as China, Russia, and North Korea. For the purposes of this bill, a person of concern also includes private companies and individuals domiciled in a country of concern and subject to the substantial influence of the government. Specifically, in addition to TikTok and ByteDance, the sanctions shall apply to any social media company that is based in or organized under the laws of a country of concern; where a country or person of concern owns 20% of its outstanding voting stock or shares; that uses software or algorithms controlled by a country or person of concern, including through export controls; or where a country or person of concern has substantial influence over the company's data sharing or content moderation practices.

Motion· Motie2023Z05433adopted

Motion by member Kathmann c.s. over onderzoeken in hoeverre de inzet van expertteams die volledige inzage hebben in een algoritme, succesvol kan zijn in het bestrijden van discriminerende algoritmes

Original: Motie van het lid Kathmann c.s. over onderzoeken in hoeverre de inzet van expertteams die volledige inzage hebben in een algoritme, succesvol kan zijn in het bestrijden van discriminerende algoritmes

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 16 December 2025

Translated from Dutch

Motion by member Kathmann c.s. over onderzoeken in hoeverre de inzet van expertteams die volledige inzage hebben in een algoritme, succesvol kan zijn in het bestrijden van discriminerende algoritmes

Bill· HRH.R. 2739 (118th)referred

Quantum Sandbox for Near-Term Applications Act of 2023

United States · United States Congress · 5 December 2025

Quantum Sandbox for Near-Term Applications Act of 2023 This bill requires the Department of Commerce, in coordination with the National Institute of Standards and Technology, to establish a public-private partnership to accelerate the deployment of quantum applications and algorithms with near-term use cases by supporting demonstration and testing.

Bill· SS. 1439 (118th)referred

Quantum Sandbox for Near-Term Applications Act of 2023

United States · United States Congress · 5 December 2025

Quantum Sandbox for Near-Term Applications Act of 2023 This bill requires the Department of Commerce, in coordination with the National Institute of Standards and Technology, to establish a public-private partnership to accelerate the deployment of quantum applications and algorithms with near-term use cases by supporting demonstration and testing.

Bill· SS. 2325 (118th)referred

Algorithmic Justice and Online Platform Transparency Act

United States · United States Congress · 5 December 2025

Algorithmic Justice and Online Platform Transparency Act This bill establishes requirements for certain commercial online platforms (e.g., social media sites) that withhold or promote content through algorithms and related computational processes that use personal information. The platforms must make disclosures about their collection and use of personal information and their content moderation practices; retain specified records that describe how the algorithms use personal information and assess whether the algorithms produce disparate outcomes based on race and other demographic factors in terms of access to housing, employment, financial services, and related matters; employ algorithms safely and effectively; and allow users to access and transfer their personal information. If a platform uses algorithms to publish or sell advertising, it must maintain a library of the advertisements. The Federal Trade Commission must also adopt rules concerning deceptive advertising. A platform's chief executive officer or other senior officer must certify compliance with disclosure requirements. Additionally, platforms may not (1) employ algorithms or other design features that result in discrimination or similar harms based on demographic or biometric factors, or (2) process information such that it impairs voting rights. Further, users of a platform may not violate civil rights laws using the platform's algorithms. The bill prohibits waivers or other methods that limit rights under the bill; provides whistleblower protections for individuals who report violations; and authorizes enforcement by specified federal agencies, states, and private individuals. The bill also provides funding for an interagency task force to study the discriminatory use of personal information by platforms' algorithms.

Bill· HRH.R. 4624 (118th)referred

Algorithmic Justice and Online Platform Transparency Act

United States · United States Congress · 5 December 2025

Algorithmic Justice and Online Platform Transparency Act This bill establishes requirements for certain commercial online platforms (e.g., social media sites) that withhold or promote content through algorithms and related computational processes that use personal information. The platforms must make disclosures about their collection and use of personal information and their content moderation practices; retain specified records that describe how the algorithms use personal information and assess whether the algorithms produce disparate outcomes based on race and other demographic factors in terms of access to housing, employment, financial services, and related matters; employ algorithms safely and effectively; and allow users to access and transfer their personal information. If a platform uses algorithms to publish or sell advertising, it must maintain a library of the advertisements. The Federal Trade Commission must also adopt rules concerning deceptive advertising. A platform's chief executive officer or other senior officer must certify compliance with disclosure requirements. Additionally, platforms may not (1) employ algorithms or other design features that result in discrimination or similar harms based on demographic or biometric factors, or (2) process information such that it impairs voting rights. Further, users of a platform may not violate civil rights laws using the platform's algorithms. The bill prohibits waivers or other methods that limit rights under the bill; provides whistleblower protections for individuals who report violations; and authorizes enforcement by specified federal agencies, states, and private individuals. The bill also provides funding for an interagency task force to study the discriminatory use of personal information by platforms' algorithms.

Motion· Motie2023Z10790adopted

Motion by member Dekker-Abdulaziz over alle nieuwe hoogrisicoalgoritmes opnemen in het Algoritmeregister en die onderwerpen aan een mensenrechtentoets

Original: Motie van het lid Dekker-Abdulaziz over alle nieuwe hoogrisicoalgoritmes opnemen in het Algoritmeregister en die onderwerpen aan een mensenrechtentoets

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 10 September 2025

Translated from Dutch

Motion by member Dekker-Abdulaziz over alle nieuwe hoogrisicoalgoritmes opnemen in het Algoritmeregister en die onderwerpen aan een mensenrechtentoets

Bill· HRH.R. 5230 (118th)referred

Basic Allowance for Housing Calculation Improvement Act of 2023

United States · United States Congress · 9 September 2025

Basic Allowance for Housing Calculation Improvement Act of 2023 This bill requires the Department of Defense to seek to enter into an agreement with an entity to calculate the monthly basic allowance for housing rates for members of the uniformed services in at least 15 military housing areas. Under the bill, the entity must be a nationally recognized entity in the field of single-family housing that has data on local rental rates in real estate markets across the United States. Additionally, the entity must use industry standard machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithms in its calculations.

Motion· Motie2023Z05432adopted

Motion by member Slootweg over binnen het bestuursrecht de positie van burgers versterken met betrekking tot foutieve overheidsbesluiten gebaseerd op algoritmes

Original: Motie van het lid Slootweg over binnen het bestuursrecht de positie van burgers versterken met betrekking tot foutieve overheidsbesluiten gebaseerd op algoritmes

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 18 July 2025

Translated from Dutch

Motion by member Slootweg over binnen het bestuursrecht de positie van burgers versterken met betrekking tot foutieve overheidsbesluiten gebaseerd op algoritmes

Motion· Motie2023Z00686adopted

Amended motion by member Van Baarle over altijd aangeven of een overheidsbesluit gebaseerd is op een algoritme of op risicoprofilering (t.v.v. 29279-760)

Original: Gewijzigde motie van het lid Van Baarle over altijd aangeven of een overheidsbesluit gebaseerd is op een algoritme of op risicoprofilering (t.v.v. 29279-760)

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 18 July 2025

Translated from Dutch

Amended motion by member Van Baarle over altijd aangeven of een overheidsbesluit gebaseerd is op een algoritme of op risicoprofilering (t.v.v. 29279-760)

Record· Brief regering2023Z14649concluded

Antwoorden op vragen commissie on the bevindingen van het ministry of Buitenlandse Zaken on the onderzoek gebruik afkomstgerelateerde gegevens en gebruik risicomodellen (Kamerstuk 26643-1031) en response to het verzoek van het lid Van Baarle, gedaan tijdens de regeling van Werkzaamheden van 9 mei 2023, over the report ‘Pas op met deze visumaanvraag’, waarschuwt het algoritme van het ministerie’ (Nrc.nl, 23 april 2023)

Original: Antwoorden op vragen commissie over de bevindingen van het ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken over het onderzoek gebruik afkomstgerelateerde gegevens en gebruik risicomodellen (Kamerstuk 26643-1031) en reactie op het verzoek van het lid Van Baarle, gedaan tijdens de regeling van Werkzaamheden van 9 mei 2023, over het bericht ‘Pas op met deze visumaanvraag’, waarschuwt het algoritme van het ministerie’ (Nrc.nl, 23 april 2023)

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 4 June 2025

Translated from Dutch

Antwoorden op vragen commissie on the bevindingen van het ministry of Buitenlandse Zaken on the onderzoek gebruik afkomstgerelateerde gegevens en gebruik risicomodellen (Kamerstuk 26643-1031) en response to het verzoek van het lid Van Baarle, gedaan tijdens de regeling van Werkzaamheden van 9 mei 2023, over the report ‘Pas op met deze visumaanvraag’, waarschuwt het algoritme van het ministerie’ (Nrc.nl, 23 april 2023)

Record· Brief regering2023Z01319concluded

Uitvoering van de motion by member Marijnissen c.s. on a voorstel hoe binnen overheidsinstellingen vervuilde data worden opgeruimd (Kamerstuk 35510-21) en de motion by member Klaver c.s. over opzetten van een algoritmeregister (Kamerstuk 35510-16)

Original: Uitvoering van de motie van het lid Marijnissen c.s. over een voorstel hoe binnen overheidsinstellingen vervuilde data worden opgeruimd (Kamerstuk 35510-21) en de motie van het lid Klaver c.s. over opzetten van een algoritmeregister (Kamerstuk 35510-16)

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 4 June 2025

Translated from Dutch

Uitvoering van de motion by member Marijnissen c.s. on a voorstel hoe binnen overheidsinstellingen vervuilde data worden opgeruimd (Kamerstuk 35510-21) en de motion by member Klaver c.s. over opzetten van een algoritmeregister (Kamerstuk 35510-16)

Bill· SS. 688 (118th)referred

DATA Act

United States · United States Congress · 27 May 2025

Data and Algorithm Transparency Agreement Act or the DATA Act This bill requires certain internet platforms (e.g., large websites and social networks) that use algorithms for suggesting content to obtain express consent from their users before collecting or sharing their personal data. These platforms must notify users of this requirement. The notice must include specified information, including the type of data collected and the names of any third parties with which the data is shared. The bill provides for enforcement by the Federal Trade Commission and a private right of action against a violator of the bill.

Bill· SS. 921 (118th)referred

DISCOURSE Act

United States · United States Congress · 27 May 2025

Disincentivizing Internet Service Censorship of Online Users and Restrictions on Speech and Expression Act or the DISCOURSE Act This bill limits federal liability protections for a user or provider of an interactive computer service (e.g., a social media company) related to content provided by third parties. It also requires a provider that offers its service through a mass-market offering to the public to disclose information about its content moderation activities. The bill removes liability protections (sometimes referred to as section 230 protection) for a provider with a dominant market share if the provider promotes or suppresses a viewpoint through its content moderation, including by affecting a content creator's revenue; uses automated processes (e.g., algorithms) to target and amplify content provided to a user who has not requested or searched for the content; or solicits, funds, modifies, or otherwise contributes to content. Currently, a provider retains liability protections even when it restricts access to materials that it considers objectionable. Under this bill, a provider retains protections if restricted materials fall, based on an objectively reasonable belief, into a prescribed list of harmful or unlawful categories. Additionally, the liability protections shall not apply to providers that (1) restrict access to content in a manner that burdens the exercise of religion, or (2) fail to comply with an existing requirement to notify customers of options for limiting a minor's access to harmful online content (e.g., parental controls). The bill also changes legal procedures related to the liability protections, including by specifying that the protection serves as an affirmative defense.

Bill· SS. 1732 (118th)referred

Know Your App Act

United States · United States Congress · 27 May 2025

Know Your App Act This bill requires the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) to undertake actions to inform customers about the country of origin of applications (apps) and dangers of certain foreign apps. Specifically, the NTIA must require app stores with more than 20 million U.S. customers to prominently display the country of origin for each app they distribute. In addition, app stores must enable customers to filter out apps that originate from countries of concern. These are countries, identified by the Departments of the Treasury and Commerce, with laws that allow governmental control of content moderation, algorithm design, or user data. App store pages for apps originating from a country of concern must include a disclaimer that warns customers about the potential for a foreign government to control functions of the app. Additionally, app developers must (1) certify to app stores that the information about the app displayed on the app store page, including country of origin and ownership, is correct; and (2) notify app stores about relevant changes in the country of origin or ownership. If a developer fails to provide the certification or update incorrect information, the app store must remove the app. App stores must also establish (1) a reporting mechanism to allow individuals to anonymously report when information about an app is incorrect, and (2) written policies for developers to appeal the removal of an app from the store. The bill provides for enforcement by the Department of Justice.

Bill· HRH.R. 1123 (118th)referred

Understanding Cybersecurity of Mobile Networks Act

United States · United States Congress · 27 May 2025

Understanding Cybersecurity of Mobile Networks Act This bill requires the National Telecommunications and Information Administration to examine and report on the cybersecurity of mobile service networks and the vulnerability of these networks and mobile devices to cyberattacks and surveillance conducted by adversaries. The report shall include (1) an assessment of the degree to which providers of mobile service have addressed certain cybersecurity vulnerabilities; (2) a discussion of the degree to which these providers have implemented cybersecurity best practices and risk assessment frameworks; and (3) an estimate of the prevalence and efficacy of encryption and authentication algorithms and techniques used in mobile service and communications equipment, mobile devices, and mobile operating systems and software.

Question· Schriftliche Frage20/8008open

Nicht verausgabte Mittel für Zwecke der Digitalisierung der Verwaltung und Verwaltungsdienstleistungen

Germany · German Bundestag · 10 April 2025

Originaltext der Frage(n):<br /> <br /> Mit welcher Höhe an Ausgaberesten aus den zurückliegenden und dem aktuellen Haushaltsjahr, die zur Nutzung für die weitere Umsetzung des Onlinezugangsgesetzes (OZG) im Jahr 2024 aufgewendet werden können, rechnet das Bundesministerium des Innern und für Heimat(vgl. www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/haushaltsplaene-der-ampel-radikale-kuerzungen-bei-der-digitalisierung-19074179.html)?

Question· Schriftliche Frage20/6309open

Gewährleistung einer einheitlichen Digitalisierung von verwaltungsinternen Abläufen

Germany · German Bundestag · 4 April 2025

Originaltext der Frage(n):<br /> <br /> Welche konkreten Schwerpunkte bei der weiteren Umsetzung des Onlinezugangsgesetzes &ndash; OZG &ndash; wird die Bundesregierung definieren und setzen, um eine bundesweit einheitliche und umfassende Digitalisierung von verwaltungsinternen Abläufen zu gewährleisten, und wann ist mit einer Umsetzung der definierten und gesetzten Schwerpunkte durch die Bundesregierung zu rechnen?

Record· Brief regering2023Z08189concluded

Rapportage van de uitvoering van de motion by member Marijnissen c.s. on a voorstel hoe binnen overheidsinstellingen vervuilde data worden opgeruimd (Kamerstuk 35510-21) en van het lid Klaver c.s. over opzetten van een algoritmeregister (Kamerstuk 35510-16) door het ministry of Defensie

Original: Rapportage van de uitvoering van de motie van het lid Marijnissen c.s. over een voorstel hoe binnen overheidsinstellingen vervuilde data worden opgeruimd (Kamerstuk 35510-21) en van het lid Klaver c.s. over opzetten van een algoritmeregister (Kamerstuk 35510-16) door het ministerie van Defensie

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 21 March 2025

Translated from Dutch

Rapportage van de uitvoering van de motion by member Marijnissen c.s. on a voorstel hoe binnen overheidsinstellingen vervuilde data worden opgeruimd (Kamerstuk 35510-21) en van het lid Klaver c.s. over opzetten van een algoritmeregister (Kamerstuk 35510-16) door het ministry of Defensie

Question· Schriftliche Frage20/6668open

Digitalisierung des Abgabeverfahrens der Einkommensteuer

Germany · German Bundestag · 14 March 2025

Originaltext der Frage(n):<br /> <br /> Wie ist der derzeitige Stand zur Digitalisierung des Abgabeverfahrens der Einkommensteuer, und welche Maßnahmen sind geplant, um vorausgefüllte Einkommensteuererklärungen medienbruchfrei und in Echtzeit zu ermöglichen?

Question· Schriftliche Frage20/5942open

Mangels Finanzierung nicht umgesetzte Vorhaben der Digitalstrategie

Germany · German Bundestag · 24 February 2025

Originaltext der Frage(n):<br /> <br /> Welche Vorhaben aus der Digitalstrategie konnten vor dem Hintergrund, dass entgegen der Zielsetzung im Koalitionsvertrag zwischen SPD, BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN und FDP kein Digitalbudget für das Jahr 2023 beschlossen wurde, was nach Auffassung von Experten den Eindruck verfestigt, "dass Digitalisierung in Deutschland ein nachgeordnetes Projekt ist" (EFI-Policy Brief 03/2022), mangels Finanzierung noch nicht gestartet werden, und welche Einigung wurde im Ressortkreis unter Führung des Bundeskanzleramts hinsichtlich der Höhe und des Zeitraums für ein Digitalbudget ab dem Jahr 2024 getroffen?

Record· Brief regering2023Z18495concluded

LNV-Actieprogramma Digitalisering

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 24 January 2025

LNV-Actieprogramma Digitalisering

Bill· SS. 1325 (118th)open

Western Hemisphere Partnership Act of 2023

United States · United States Congress · 14 January 2025

Western Hemisphere Partnership Act of 2023 This bill states that the Department of State should collaborate with democratic partners to promote certain objectives in the Western Hemisphere: (1) improvement of security conditions and the rule of law; (2) digitalization and cybersecurity; (3) improvement of economic conditions; and (4) transparent, accountable, and democratic governance. The first three of these objectives do not apply to Cuba, Nicaragua, or Venezuela.

Report· Unterrichtung durch das Europäische Parlament20/5332open

Entschließung des Europäischen Parlaments vom 13. Dezember 2022 zur digitalen Kluft: die durch die Digitalisierung entstandenen sozialen Unterschiede (2022/2810(RSP)) EP P9_TA(2022)0438

Original: Entschließung des Europäischen Parlaments vom 13. Dezember 2022 zur digitalen Kluft: die durch die Digitalisierung entstandenen sozialen Unterschiede (2022/2810(RSP)) EP P9_TA(2022)0438

Germany · German Bundestag · 27 November 2024

Translated from German

Motion· Motie2023Z16253adopted

Motion by member Van Haga over in kaart brengen wat er nodig is om de gewenste digitalisering en informele netwerkversterking te realiseren

Original: Motie van het lid Van Haga over in kaart brengen wat er nodig is om de gewenste digitalisering en informele netwerkversterking te realiseren

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 20 June 2024

Translated from Dutch

Motion by member Van Haga over in kaart brengen wat er nodig is om de gewenste digitalisering en informele netwerkversterking te realiseren

Motion· Motie2023Z05917adopted

Amended motion by member Leijten on the categorische uitzondering in het algoritmeregister voor algoritmes die zien op rechtshandhaving laten vervallen (t.v.v. 26643-987)

Original: Gewijzigde motie van het lid Leijten over de categorische uitzondering in het algoritmeregister voor algoritmes die zien op rechtshandhaving laten vervallen (t.v.v. 26643-987)

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 11 April 2024

Translated from Dutch

Amended motion by member Leijten on the categorische uitzondering in het algoritmeregister voor algoritmes die zien op rechtshandhaving laten vervallen (t.v.v. 26643-987)

Motion· Motie2023Z05431adopted

Motion by member Slootweg over ervoor zorgen dat alle overheidsorganisaties binnen twee jaar aan inwoners kenbaar maken welke persoonsgegevens en algoritmes ze gebruiken bij besluiten

Original: Motie van het lid Slootweg over ervoor zorgen dat alle overheidsorganisaties binnen twee jaar aan inwoners kenbaar maken welke persoonsgegevens en algoritmes ze gebruiken bij besluiten

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 11 April 2024

Translated from Dutch

Motion by member Slootweg over ervoor zorgen dat alle overheidsorganisaties binnen twee jaar aan inwoners kenbaar maken welke persoonsgegevens en algoritmes ze gebruiken bij besluiten

Motion· Motie2023Z15708adopted

Motion by member Eerdmans c.s. over in beeld brengen hoeveel ouderen en digitaal mindervaardigen afgehaakt raken door het tempo van de toenemende digitalisering

Original: Motie van het lid Eerdmans c.s. over in beeld brengen hoeveel ouderen en digitaal mindervaardigen afgehaakt raken door het tempo van de toenemende digitalisering

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 11 April 2024

Translated from Dutch

Motion by member Eerdmans c.s. over in beeld brengen hoeveel ouderen en digitaal mindervaardigen afgehaakt raken door het tempo van de toenemende digitalisering

Page 1 of 3Next