Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · EU

Energy

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

101 records in EU in 2015

All countriesSearch this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62014TJ0061decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 October 2015.#Monster Energy Company v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).#Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the figurative Community trade mark icexpresso + energy coffee — Earlier Community word marks X-PRESSO MONSTER, HAMMER M X-PRESSO MONSTER ESPRESSO + ENERGY and MIDNIGHT M X-PRESSO MONSTER ESPRESSO + ENERGY — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.#Case T-61/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 October 2015

Decision· DCELEX 32015D1796in force

Council Decision (EU) 2015/1796 of 1 October 2015 on the conclusion of the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Union and European Atomic Energy Community and the Swiss Confederation associating the Swiss Confederation to Horizon 2020 — the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation and the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community complementing Horizon 2020, and regulating the Swiss Confederation's participation in the ITER activities carried out by Fusion for Energy

European Union · EUR-Lex · 1 October 2015

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0357decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2015.#Electrabel SA and Dunamenti Erőmű Zrt v European Commission.#Appeal — State aid — Aid granted by the Hungarian authorities to certain electricity generators — Power purchase agreements concluded between a public undertaking and certain electricity generators — Decision declaring that aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery — Meaning of ‘party’ capable of bringing an appeal before the Court — Accession of Hungary to the European Union — Date relevant to the assessment of the existence of aid — Concept of State aid — Advantage — Private investor test — Methodology for calculating the amount of aid.#Case C-357/14 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 October 2015

Record· TOCELEX 62014TO0633decided

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 September 2015.#Monster Energy Company v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).#Community trade mark — Period for bringing an action — Point from which time starts to run — Notification of the Board of Appeal’s decision by fax machine — Receipt of the fax — Lateness — No force majeure or unforeseeable circumstances — Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-633/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 September 2015

Record· TOCELEX 62014TO0666decided

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 September 2015.#Monster Energy Company v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).#Community trade mark — Period for bringing an action — Point from which time starts to run — Notification of the Board of Appeal’s decision by fax machine — Receipt of the fax — Lateness — No force majeure or unforeseeable circumstances — Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-666/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 September 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0564decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 September 2015.#Ministry of Energy of Iran v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Error of assessment — Breach of fundamental rights — Proportionality.#Case T-564/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 September 2015

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-8-2015-012260open

Energy taxation in the EU

European Union · European Parliament · 31 August 2015

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-8-2015-012181open

Jaderná energie

European Union · European Parliament · 27 August 2015

Proposal· PCCELEX 52015PC0398open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION approving the conclusion by the Commission, on behalf of the European Atomic Energy Community, of the Agreement continuing the International Science and Technology Center between the European Union and EURATOM acting as one Party and Georgia, Japan, the Kingdom of Norway, the Kyrgyz Republic, the Republic of Armenia, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Tajikistan, and the United States of America

European Union · European Commission · 7 August 2015

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-8-2015-012026open

Wind energy in Ireland

European Union · European Parliament · 5 August 2015

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-8-2015-011493open

Energy poverty

European Union · European Parliament · 17 July 2015

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0083decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2015.#"CHEZ Razpredelenie Bulgaria" AD v Komisia za zashtita ot diskriminatsia.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad.#Directive 2000/43/EC — Principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin — Urban districts lived in mainly by persons of Roma origin — Placing of electricity meters on pylons forming part of the overhead electricity supply network, at a height of between six and seven metres — Concepts of ‘direct discrimination’ and ‘indirect discrimination’ — Burden of proof — Possible justification — Prevention of tampering with electricity meters and of unlawful connections — Proportionality — Widespread nature of the measure — Offensive and stigmatising effect of the measure — Directives 2006/32/EC and 2009/72/EC — Inability of final consumers to monitor their electricity consumption.#Case C-83/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2015

Decision· DCELEX 32015D1402in force

Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1402 of 15 July 2015 determining the European Union position with regard to a decision of the management entities under the Agreement between the Government of the United States of America and the European Union on the coordination of energy-efficiency labelling programmes for office equipment on the revision of specifications for computers included in Annex C to the Agreement (Text with EEA relevance)

European Union · EUR-Lex · 15 July 2015

Record· FJCELEX 62014FJ0034decided

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 8 July 2015.#DP v Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER).#Civil service — ACER staff — Member of the contract staff — Non-renewal of a contract — Action for annulment — Admissibility of the action — Plea of illegality of Article 6(2) of ACER’s GIP having regard to Article 85(1) of the CEOS — Action for damages — Notice period — Non-material harm — Damages.#Case F-34/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 July 2015

Report· XGCELEX 52015XG0707(01)open

Notification of Lithuania’s national regulatory authority — National Commission for Energy Control and Prices (hereinafter NCC) — pursuant to Article 10(2) of Directive 2009/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and repealing Directive 2003/55/EC regarding the designation of AB Amber Grid as natural gas transmission system operator in Lithuania

European Union · Council of the European Union · 7 July 2015

Record· TOCELEX 62013TO0019(01)decided

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 June 2015.#Frank Bold Society v European Commission.#Environment — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading — Decision granting the Czech Republic an option for transitional free allocation of quotas for the modernisation of electricity generation — Request for internal review of that decision — No measure of individual scope — Commission decision declaring the request for a review inadmissible — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-19/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 June 2015

PreviousPage 2 of 3Next