Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

601 records in EU in 2024

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 494Germany · 293United States · 141Austria · 134Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0123decided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 September 2024.#UO v Predsedatel na Balgarskata federatsia po ribolovni sportove.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Veliko Tarnovo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Interpretation of national law – Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for an interpretation of certain provisions of European Union law by the Court of Justice and of the relationship between those provisions and the national legislation applicable – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-123/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 September 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0067_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 September 2024.#Criminal proceedings against S.Z.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of Burma/Myanmar – Prohibition on the import of goods originating in or exported from Burma/Myanmar – Regulation (EC) No 194/2008 – Article 2(2)(a) – Teak logs originating in Burma/Myanmar exported to and processed in Taiwan before being transported to the European Union – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Community Customs Code – Article 24 – Concept of ‘substantial processing or working’ – Teak logs that have been debranched, debarked, sawn into the shape of wooden cuboids or cut into sawn teak wood in Taiwan – Certificate of origin issued by the Taiwanese authorities – Value of that certificate for the determination, by the customs authorities of the Member States, of the origin of those teak logs.#Case C-67/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 September 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0447_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 September 2024.#Republic of Slovenia v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Articles 107 and 108 TFEU – Measures granted by the Republic of Slovenia to a municipal network of dispensing pharmacies before its accession to the European Union – Preliminary examination phase – Failure to initiate the formal investigation procedure – Concept of ‘serious difficulties’ – Extent of the European Commission’s investigative duty – Burden of proof on the party relying on the existence of ‘serious difficulties’ – Scope.#Case C-447/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 September 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0447decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 September 2024.#Republic of Slovenia v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Articles 107 and 108 TFEU – Measures granted by the Republic of Slovenia to a municipal network of dispensing pharmacies before its accession to the European Union – Preliminary examination phase – Failure to initiate the formal investigation procedure – Concept of ‘serious difficulties’ – Extent of the European Commission’s investigative duty – Burden of proof on the party relying on the existence of ‘serious difficulties’ – Scope.#Case C-447/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 September 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0494decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 September 2024.#European Commission v Czech Republic.#Appeal – Own resources of the European Union – Financial liability of a Member State – Payment to the European Commission of amounts corresponding to a loss of own resources – Action based on unjust enrichment of the European Union – Obligations of the Member States with regard to own resources – Establishment of the amounts of own resources – Entry of amounts not recovered in the B account – Time limits – Exemption from making available amounts corresponding to established entitlements declared irrecoverable – Conditions.#Case C-494/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 September 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0494_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 September 2024.#European Commission v Czech Republic.#Appeal – Own resources of the European Union – Financial liability of a Member State – Payment to the European Commission of amounts corresponding to a loss of own resources – Action based on unjust enrichment of the European Union – Obligations of the Member States with regard to own resources – Establishment of the amounts of own resources – Entry of amounts not recovered in the B account – Time limits – Exemption from making available amounts corresponding to established entitlements declared irrecoverable – Conditions.#Case C-494/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 September 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0498_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 September 2024.#Novo Banco SA - Sucursal en España and Others v C.F.O. and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Reorganisation and winding up of credit institutions – Directive 2001/24/EC – Articles 3 and 6 – Reorganisation measure taken in respect of a credit institution – Transfer of the obligations and responsibilities of that credit institution to a ‘bridge bank’ prior to the bringing of a legal action seeking payment of a claim held against that credit institution – Transfer back to the same credit institution of certain of those obligations and responsibilities – Law of the Member State where the proceedings concerned were brought (lex concursus) – Effects of a reorganisation measure in other Member States – Mutual recognition – Effects of a failure to comply with the obligation to publish the reorganisation measure – Articles 17, 21, 38 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to property – Effective judicial protection – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EC – Article 6(1) – Unfair terms – Principles of legal certainty and the protection of legitimate expectations – Whether the ‘bridge bank’ can be sued.#Joined Cases C-498/22 to C-500/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 September 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0498decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 September 2024.#Novo Banco SA - Sucursal en España and Others v C.F.O. and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Reorganisation and winding up of credit institutions – Directive 2001/24/EC – Articles 3 and 6 – Reorganisation measure taken in respect of a credit institution – Transfer of the obligations and responsibilities of that credit institution to a ‘bridge bank’ prior to the bringing of a legal action seeking payment of a claim held against that credit institution – Transfer back to the same credit institution of certain of those obligations and responsibilities – Law of the Member State where the proceedings concerned were brought (lex concursus) – Effects of a reorganisation measure in other Member States – Mutual recognition – Effects of a failure to comply with the obligation to publish the reorganisation measure – Articles 17, 21, 38 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to property – Effective judicial protection – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EC – Article 6(1) – Unfair terms – Principles of legal certainty and the protection of legitimate expectations – Whether the ‘bridge bank’ can be sued.#Joined Cases C-498/22 to C-500/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 September 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0067decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 September 2024.#Criminal proceedings against S.Z.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of Burma/Myanmar – Prohibition on the import of goods originating in or exported from Burma/Myanmar – Regulation (EC) No 194/2008 – Article 2(2)(a) – Teak logs originating in Burma/Myanmar exported to and processed in Taiwan before being transported to the European Union – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Community Customs Code – Article 24 – Concept of ‘substantial processing or working’ – Teak logs that have been debranched, debarked, sawn into the shape of wooden cuboids or cut into sawn teak wood in Taiwan – Certificate of origin issued by the Taiwanese authorities – Value of that certificate for the determination, by the customs authorities of the Member States, of the origin of those teak logs.#Case C-67/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 September 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0249_INFdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 September 2024.#ClientEarth AISBL v European Commission.#Appeal – Access to documents of the institutions of the European Union – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Article 4(2) – Community control system for fisheries – Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 – Documents concerning the state of play of the implementation of fisheries control in France and Denmark – Partial refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – General presumption of confidentiality – Overriding public interest.#Case C-249/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 September 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0249decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 September 2024.#ClientEarth AISBL v European Commission.#Appeal – Access to documents of the institutions of the European Union – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Article 4(2) – Community control system for fisheries – Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 – Documents concerning the state of play of the implementation of fisheries control in France and Denmark – Partial refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – General presumption of confidentiality – Overriding public interest.#Case C-249/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 September 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0331decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 5 September 2024.#Dranken Van Eetvelde NV v Belgische Staat.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the rechtbank van eerste aanleg Oost-Vlaanderen, afdeling Gent.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 205 – Joint and several liability for tax debts owed by a third party – Conditions and scope of liability – Fight against VAT fraud – Joint and several liability for the payment of VAT which does not allow an assessment to be made on the basis of the contribution of each taxable person in the tax evasion – Principle of proportionality – Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle non bis in idem – Criteria for application – Facts relating to different tax years against which administrative or criminal proceedings are brought – Continuing offence with unity of purpose – Facts not identical.#Case C-331/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 September 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0227decided

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 5 September 2024.#Kwantum Nederland BV and Kwantum België BV v Vitra Collections AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual and industrial property – Copyright – Directive 2001/29/EC – Articles 2 to 4 – Exclusive rights – Copyright protection for subject matter of applied art the country of origin of which is not a Member State – Berne Convention – Article 2(7) – Criterion of material reciprocity – Division of competences between the European Union and its Member States – Application by the Member States of the criterion of material reciprocity – First paragraph of Article 351 TFEU.#Case C-227/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 September 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62024CC0387decided

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 5 September 2024.#C v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Roermond.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Border control, asylum and immigration – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 15(2)(b) – Detention of a third-country national for the purpose of removal – Directive 2013/33/EU – Article 9 – Detention of an applicant for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Article 28(2) – Detention for the purpose of transfer – Unlawful detention – Articles 6 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-387/24 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0373_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2024.#Galenica AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark VIVORA – Earlier word mark VERFORA – Partial rejection of the opposition – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Interdependence – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-373/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0373decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2024.#Galenica AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark VIVORA – Earlier word mark VERFORA – Partial rejection of the opposition – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Interdependence – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-373/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0073_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2024.#Tertianum AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark TERTIANUM – International registration of the earlier figurative mark Tertianum WOHNEN UND LEBEN IM DRITTEN ALTER – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Nature of use – Proof of genuine use.#Case T-73/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0651_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2024.#Kirill Shamalov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restriction on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘leading businessperson’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Obligation to state reasons – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Misuse of powers.#Case T-651/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0651decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2024.#Kirill Shamalov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restriction on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘leading businessperson’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Obligation to state reasons – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Misuse of powers.#Case T-651/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0290_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2024.#Igor Albertovich Kesaev v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘businessperson involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Right to be heard – Right to property – Proportionality – Legal certainty – Equal treatment.#Cases T-290/22 and T-763/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0347decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2024.#EvivaMed Distribution GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark VIVORA – Earlier word mark VERFORA – Partial rejection of the application for registration – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-347/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0347_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2024.#EvivaMed Distribution GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark VIVORA – Earlier word mark VERFORA – Partial rejection of the application for registration – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-347/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0694_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 September 2024.#CMT Compagnia manifatture tessili Srl (CMT Srl) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark CAMOMILLA italia – Earlier EU word mark CAMOMILLA – Relative ground for refusal – Comparison of the goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Power of the Court to alter decisions.#Case T-694/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0694decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 September 2024.#CMT Compagnia manifatture tessili Srl (CMT Srl) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark CAMOMILLA italia – Earlier EU word mark CAMOMILLA – Relative ground for refusal – Comparison of the goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Power of the Court to alter decisions.#Case T-694/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0503_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 September 2024 (Extracts).#Ammar Sharif v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Maintaining the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Criterion of association with members of the Assad or Makhlouf families – Plea of illegality – Errors of assessment – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-503/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0503decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 September 2024 (Extracts).#Ammar Sharif v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Maintaining the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Criterion of association with members of the Assad or Makhlouf families – Plea of illegality – Errors of assessment – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-503/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0370decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 September 2024 (Extracts).#Samer Kamal Al-Assad v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted against Syria – Freezing of funds and economic resources – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Family membership criterion – Plea of illegality – Requirement that any limitation must be provided for by law – Error of assessment – Right to property.#Case T-370/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0290decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2024.#Igor Albertovich Kesaev v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘businessperson involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Right to be heard – Right to property – Proportionality – Legal certainty – Equal treatment.#Cases T-290/22 and T-763/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0073decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2024.#Tertianum AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark TERTIANUM – International registration of the earlier figurative mark Tertianum WOHNEN UND LEBEN IM DRITTEN ALTER – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Nature of use – Proof of genuine use.#Case T-73/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0370_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 September 2024 (Extracts).#Samer Kamal Al-Assad v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted against Syria – Freezing of funds and economic resources – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Family membership criterion – Plea of illegality – Requirement that any limitation must be provided for by law – Error of assessment – Right to property.#Case T-370/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0051_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2024.#OSR Enterprises AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark evolver – Partial revocation – Genuine use of a mark – Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Late submission of documents – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-51/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0051decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2024.#OSR Enterprises AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark evolver – Partial revocation – Genuine use of a mark – Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Late submission of documents – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-51/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0568_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 September 2024.#August Storck KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark MiT FREUDE NASCHEN! – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-568/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0568decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 September 2024.#August Storck KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark MiT FREUDE NASCHEN! – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-568/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 September 2024

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0109decided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 September 2024.#Viviane Van Oosterwijck v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Officials – Surviving spouse – Survivor’s pension – Eligibility conditions – Duration of the marriage – Article 20 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations – Plea of illegality – Equal treatment – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-109/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 September 2024

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0334_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 3 September 2024.#DEC Technologies BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-334/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 September 2024

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0109_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 September 2024.#Viviane Van Oosterwijck v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Officials – Surviving spouse – Survivor’s pension – Eligibility conditions – Duration of the marriage – Article 20 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations – Plea of illegality – Equal treatment – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-109/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 September 2024

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0334decided

Order of the Court of 3 September 2024.#DEC Technologies BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-334/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 September 2024

PreviousPage 12 of 13Next