Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

651 records in EU in 2016

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0006decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 25 May 2016.#Ice Mountain Ibiza, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark ocean ibiza — Earlier national figurative marks OC ocean club and OC ocean club Ibiza — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.#Case T-6/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 May 2016

Record· TOCELEX 62014TO0805decided

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 May 2016.#Stagecoach Group plc v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark — Application for a European Union word mark MEGABUS.COM — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 — Action manifestly inadmissible and manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-805/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 May 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62014TJ0753decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 25 May 2016.#Ice Mountain Ibiza, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark ocean beach club ibiza — Earlier national figurative and word marks ocean drive Ibiza-hotel and OCEAN THE GROUP — Annulment of the earlier mark on which the contested decision was based — No need to adjudicate.#Case T-753/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 May 2016

Report· CCCELEX 62015CC0223decided

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 25 May 2016.#combit Software GmbH v Commit Business Solutions Ltd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — European Union trade mark — Unitary character — Finding of a likelihood of confusion in respect of only part of the European Union — Territorial scope of the prohibition referred to in Article 102 of that regulation.#Case C-223/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 May 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0422decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 May 2016.#U-R LAB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark — Application for European Union figurative and word marks THE DINING EXPERIENCE — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.#Cases T-422/15 and T-423/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 May 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0126decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 May 2016.#El Corte Inglés, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Supeco — Earlier EU figurative mark SUPER COR — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Extent of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal — Goods and services on which the opposition is based — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Rule 15(2)(f) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Communication No 2/12.#Case T-126/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 May 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62013TJ0423decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 May 2016.#Good Luck Shipping LLC v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against certain persons and entities with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation in Iran — Freezing of funds — Error of law — Legal basis — Error of assessment — No evidence.#Joined Cases T-423/13 and T-64/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 May 2016

Decision· DCELEX 32016D0845in force

Council Decision (EU) 2016/845 of 23 May 2016 on the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the Joint Committee established by the Framework Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, on the one part, and the Republic of Korea, on the other part, in relation to the adoption of the rules of procedure of the Joint Committee, and the establishment of specialised working groups and the adoption of their terms of reference

European Union · EUR-Lex · 23 May 2016

Proposal· PCCELEX 52016PC0280open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION establishing the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Stabilisation and Association Council established by the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and Kosovo*, of the other part, concerning a Decision of the Stabilisation and Association Council adopting its rules of procedure

European Union · European Commission · 23 May 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0312decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 May 2016.#Market Watch Franchise & Consulting, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark MITOCHRON — Earlier national word mark MIVACRON — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.#Case T-312/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 May 2016

Decision· DCELEX 32016D0852in force

Council Decision (Euratom) 2016/852 of 12 May 2016 approving the conclusion, by the European Commission, on behalf of the European Atomic Energy Community, of a Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Turkmenistan, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Croatia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, Romania, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic to the European Union

European Union · EUR-Lex · 12 May 2016

Decision· DCELEX 32016D0829in force

Council Decision (Euratom) 2016/829 of 12 May 2016 approving the conclusion, by the European Commission, on behalf of the European Atomic Energy Community, of a Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Tajikistan, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union

European Union · EUR-Lex · 12 May 2016

Decision· DCELEX 32016D0853in force

Council Decision (EU) 2016/853 of 12 May 2016 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of a Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Turkmenistan, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Croatia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, Romania, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic to the European Union

European Union · EUR-Lex · 12 May 2016

Record· CJCELEX 62015CJ0358decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 May 2016.#Bank of Industry and Mine v Council of the European Union.#Appeal — Restrictive measures taken against Iran — List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 945/2012 — Legal basis — Criterion relating to the provision of material, logistical or financial support to the Government of Iran — Part of the profits of a State company paid to the Iranian State.#Case C-358/15 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 May 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62014TJ0749decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 May 2016.#Peter Chung-Yuan Chang v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark AROMA — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.#Case T-749/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 May 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62014TJ0322decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 May 2016.#mobile.international GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word and figurative trade marks mobile.de — Earlier national figurative mark mobile — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 15(1), Article 57(2) and Article 76(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Rule 40(6) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95.#Joined Cases T-322/14 and T-325/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 May 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62014TJ0776decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 May 2016.#Red Lemon Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark ABTRONICX2 — Earlier EU word mark TRONIC — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Minimal inherent distinctiveness of the earlier mark — Likelihood of confusion.#Case T-776/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 May 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62014TJ0590decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 May 2016.#Zuffa, LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark ULTIMATE FIGHTING CHAMPIONSHIP — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Descriptiveness — Distinctive character acquired through use — Obligation to state reasons — Relevant public — Article 7(1)(b) and (c), (2) and (3) and Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.#Case T-590/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 May 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62014TJ0643decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 May 2016.#Red Lemon Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark ABTRONIC — Earlier EU word mark TRONIC — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Minimal inherent distinctiveness of the earlier mark — Likelihood of confusion.#Case T-643/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 May 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62014TJ0775decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 May 2016.#Red Lemon Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark ABTRONIC — Earlier EU word mark TRONIC — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Minimal inherent distinctiveness of the earlier mark — Likelihood of confusion.#Case T-775/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 May 2016

Record· TJCELEX 62014TJ0750decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 May 2016.#Ivo-Kermartin GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark ELGO — Earlier EU word and figurative marks ERGO — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Likelihood of confusion — Successive restrictions on the application for registration — Article 43(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Second sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 — Right to be heard — Rule 69 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95.#Case T-750/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 May 2016

Report· CCCELEX 62014CC0503decided

Opinion of Advocate General Wathelet delivered on 12 May 2016.#European Commission v Portuguese Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Articles 21 TFEU, 45 TFEU and 49 TFEU — Articles 28 and 31 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area — Freedom of movement for persons — Freedom of movement for workers — Freedom of establishment — Taxation of natural persons on capital gains resulting from a share exchange — Taxation of natural persons on capital gains resulting from a transfer of all the assets used in the exercise of a business or professional activity — Exit taxation of individuals — Immediate recovery of taxation — Difference in treatment between natural persons who exchange shares and maintain their residence in the national territory and those who make such an exchange and transfer their residence to the territory of another Member State of the European Union or the European Economic Area — Difference in treatment between natural persons transferring all the assets related to an activity carried out on an individual basis to a company with its head office and effective management in Portugal and those who carry out such a transfer to a company with its head office or its effective management in the territory of another Member State of the European Union or of the European Economic Area — Proportionality.#Case C-503/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 May 2016

PreviousPage 13 of 14Next