Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

651 records in EU in 2019

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773France · 6,057Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778Germany · 295Austria · 218United States · 141Belgium · 1Estonia · 1Search this topic

Records

Decision· DCELEX 32019D1192in force

Council Decision (EU) 2019/1192 of 8 July 2019 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the European Union, within the EEA Joint Committee concerning an amendment to Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms (Budget line 02 03 01 — Operation and development of the internal market of goods and services, and Budget line 02 03 04 — Internal Market Governance Tools) (Text with EEA relevance.)

European Union · EUR-Lex · 8 July 2019

Decision· DCELEX 32019D1191in force

Council Decision (EU) 2019/1191 of 8 July 2019 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the European Union, within the EEA Joint Committee concerning an amendment to Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms (Budget line 04 03 01 03 — Free movement of workers, co-ordination of social security schemes and measures for migrants, including migrants from third countries) (Text with EEA relevance.)

European Union · EUR-Lex · 8 July 2019

Decision· DCELEX 32019D1178in force

Council Decision (EU) 2019/1178 of 8 July 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Cooperation Committee set up by the Agreement on Cooperation and Customs Union betwee the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of San Marino, of the other part with regard to applicable provisions on organic production and labelling of organic products, and arrangements for imports of organic products

European Union · EUR-Lex · 8 July 2019

Record· TOCELEX 62018TO0662decided

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 July 2019.#romwell GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark twistpac — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Duty of care — Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-662/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 July 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0036decided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 July 2019.#Daico International BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Word mark RoB — Declaration of revocation — Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Rule 62(3) — Due notification — Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-36/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 July 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0099decided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 July 2019.#FTI Touristik GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Opposition proceedings — Article 8(1)(b) — Application for registration of the figurative mark including the word element ‘Fl’ — Opposition by the proprietor of the figurative mark including the word element ‘fly.de’ — Rejection — Similarity between the signs — Name in normal script in the European Union Trade Marks Bulletin — Likelihood of confusion.#Case C-99/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 July 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0056decided

Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 4 July 2019.#European Commission v Gmina Miasto Gdynia and Port Lotniczy Gdynia Kosakowo sp. z o.o.#Appeal — State aid — Article 108(2) TFEU — Investment aid — Operating aid — Airport infrastructure — Public funding by the municipalities of Gdynia and Kosakowo for setting up the Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport — Decision of the European Commission — Aid incompatible with the internal market — Order for recovery of the aid — Annulment by the General Court of the European Union — Essential procedural requirement — Procedural rights of the interested parties.#Case C-56/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 July 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0668decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 July 2019.#Viridis Pharmaceutical Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – Word mark Boswelan – Genuine use – Absence – Use of the mark in the context of a clinical trial prior to the submission of an application for marketing authorisation for a medicinal product – Proper reason for non-use – Concept.#Case C-668/17 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 July 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0644decided

Arrest van het Hof (Vierde kamer) van 3 juli 2019.#Eurobolt BV tegen Staatssecretaris van Financiën.#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Artikel 267 VWEU – Recht op een doeltreffende voorziening in rechte – Omvang van de door de nationale rechter te verrichten toetsing van een handeling van de Europese Unie – Verordening (EG) nr. 1225/2009 – Artikel 15, lid 2 – Verstrekking van alle relevante gegevens aan de lidstaten uiterlijk tien werkdagen voorafgaand aan de vergadering van het raadgevend comité – Begrip ‚relevante gegevens’ – Wezenlijk vormvoorschrift – Uitvoeringsverordening (EU) nr. 723/2011 – Uitbreiding van het antidumpingrecht op bepaalde soorten ijzeren of stalen bevestigingsmiddelen van oorsprong uit China tot de invoer verzonden uit Maleisië – Geldigheid.#Zaak C-644/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 July 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0405decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 July 2019.#Fulmen v Council of the European Union.#Non-contractual liability — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran — Freezing of funds — Compensation for the damage allegedly suffered following the inclusion and retention of the applicant’s name on lists of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures — Material damage — Non-material damage.#Case T-405/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 July 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0406decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 July 2019.#Fereydoun Mahmoudian v Council of the European Union.#Non-contractual liability — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States — Compensation for the damage allegedly suffered following the inclusion and retention of the applicant’s name on lists of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures — Material damage — Non-material damage.#Case T-406/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 July 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0405_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 July 2019.#Fulmen v Council of the European Union.#Non-contractual liability — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran — Freezing of funds — Compensation for the damage allegedly suffered following the inclusion and retention of the applicant’s name on lists of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures — Material damage — Non-material damage.#Case T-405/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 July 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0406_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 July 2019.#Fereydoun Mahmoudian v Council of the European Union.#Non-contractual liability — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States — Compensation for the damage allegedly suffered following the inclusion and retention of the applicant’s name on lists of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures — Material damage — Non-material damage.#Case T-406/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 July 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0240decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 2 July 2019.#Constantin Film Produktion GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 7(1)(f) — Absolute ground for refusal — Mark contrary to accepted principles of morality — Word sign ‘Fack Ju Göhte’ — Rejection of the application for registration.#Case C-240/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 July 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0340decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 28 June 2019.#Gibson Brands, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU three-dimensional mark — Shape of a guitar body — Absolute ground for refusal — Distinctive character — Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Distinctive character acquired through use — Article 52(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 59(2) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-340/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 June 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0268_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019 (Extracts).#Luciano Sandrone v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Luciano Sandrone — Earlier EU word mark DON LUCIANO — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Application for an EU word mark consisting of a first name and of a surname — Earlier mark consisting of an honorific title and a first name — Neutrality of the conceptual comparison — No likelihood of confusion.#Case T-268/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 June 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0385decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 27 June 2019.#Aldi GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark CRONE — Earlier EU figurative marks crane and earlier word mark CRANE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-385/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 June 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0268decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019 (Extracts).#Luciano Sandrone v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Luciano Sandrone — Earlier EU word mark DON LUCIANO — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Application for an EU word mark consisting of a first name and of a surname — Earlier mark consisting of an honorific title and a first name — Neutrality of the conceptual comparison — No likelihood of confusion.#Case T-268/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 June 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0585decided

Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 27 June 2019.#A. K. and Others v Sąd Najwyższy, CP v Sąd Najwyższy and DO v Sąd Najwyższy.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2000/78/EC — Equal treatment in employment and occupation — Non-discrimination on the ground of age — Lowering of the retirement age of judges of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) — Article 9(1) — Right to a remedy — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Effective judicial protection — Principle of judicial independence — Creation of a new chamber of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court) with jurisdiction inter alia for cases of retiring the judges of that court — Chamber formed by judges newly appointed by the President of the Republic of Poland on a proposal of the National Council of the Judiciary — Independence of that council — Power to disapply national legislation not in conformity with EU law — Primacy of EU law.#Joined Cases C-585/18, C-624/18 and C-625/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 June 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0117_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 June 2019.#Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Applications for the EU word marks 200 PANORAMICZNYCH, 300 PANORAMICZNYCH, 400 PANORAMICZNYCH, 500 PANORAMICZNYCH and 1000 PANORAMICZNYCH – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001 – No misuse of powers.#Joined Cases T-117/18 to T-121/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 June 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0117decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 June 2019.#Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Applications for the EU word marks 200 PANORAMICZNYCH, 300 PANORAMICZNYCH, 400 PANORAMICZNYCH, 500 PANORAMICZNYCH and 1000 PANORAMICZNYCH – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001 – No misuse of powers.#Joined Cases T-117/18 to T-121/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 June 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0155decided

Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 26 June 2019.#Tulliallan Burlington Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Word and figurative marks ‘BURLINGTON’ — Opposition of the proprietor of the earlier word and figurative marks ‘BURLINGTON’ and ‘BURLINGTON ARCADE’ — Article 8(1)(b) — Likelihood of confusion — Nice Agreement — Class 35 — Concept of ‘retail services’ — Article 8(4) — Passing-off — Article 8(5) — Reputation — Criteria for assessment — Similarity between the goods and services — Opposition rejected.#Joined Cases C-155/18 P to C-158/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 June 2019

Decision· DCELEX 32019D1319in force

Council Decision (EU) 2019/1319 of 25 June 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the EPA Committee established under the Interim Agreement establishing a framework for an Economic Partnership Agreement between the Eastern and Southern Africa States, on the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, on the other part, as regards the amendment of certain provisions of Protocol 1 concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation

European Union · EUR-Lex · 25 June 2019

PreviousPage 13 of 14Next