Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

951 records in EU in 2023

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 494Germany · 293Austria · 174United States · 141Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0568_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#XNT ltd. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark EXANE – Earlier company name EXANTE – Domain name ‘exante.eu’ – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-568/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 June 2023

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0568decided

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#XNT ltd. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark EXANE – Earlier company name EXANTE – Domain name ‘exante.eu’ – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-568/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 June 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0408decided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#Council of the European Union v Laurent Pech.#Appeal – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Article 4(2), second indent – Protection of legal advice – Article 4(3), first subparagraph – Protection of the decision-making process – Refusal to grant full access to a legal opinion of the Council of the European Union’s Legal Service.#Case C-408/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 June 2023

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0178decided

Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 8 June 2023.#Criminal proceedings against Unknown individuals.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice delle indagini preliminari presso il Tribunale di Bolzano.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Processing of personal data in the electronic communications sector – Confidentiality of communications – Providers of electronic communications services – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 15(1) – Articles 7, 8, 11 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Access to those data requested by a national authority having competence to prosecute offences of aggravated theft – Definition of the concept of ‘serious offence’ the prosecution of which is capable of justifying serious interference with fundamental rights – Competence of the Member States – Principle of proportionality – Scope of prior review by a court of the requests to access the data retained by providers of electronic communications services.#Case C-178/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 June 2023

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0218decided

Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 8 June 2023.#BU v Comune di Copertino.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Lecce.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 7 – Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Allowance in lieu of days of leave not taken at the end of the employment relationship – National legislation prohibiting payment of that allowance in the event of the voluntary resignation of a public servant – Control of public expenditure – Organisational needs of the public employer.#Case C-218/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 June 2023

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0058decided

Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 8 June 2023.#Criminal proceedings against NR.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Craiova.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 50 – Principle ne bis in idem – Criminal proceedings brought in rem – Order that no further action be taken adopted by a public prosecutor’s office – Admissibility of later criminal proceedings brought in personam in respect of the same facts – Conditions to be satisfied for it to be held that a person has been finally acquitted or convicted – Requirement for a detailed investigation – No interview of a potential witness – No interview of the person concerned as a ‘suspect’.#Case C-58/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 June 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0545decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#Azienda Nazionale Autonoma Strade SpA (ANAS) v Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – European Union Structural Funds – Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 – Article 2(7) – Concept of ‘irregularity’ – Article 98(1) and (2) – Financial corrections by Member States in connection with irregularities detected – Criteria to be applied – Directive 2004/18/EC – Point (d) of the first subparagraph of Article 45(2) – Concept of ‘grave professional misconduct’.#Case C-545/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 June 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0322decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#E. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej we Wrocławiu.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Principle of sincere cooperation – Principle of effectiveness – Tax levied by a Member State in breach of EU law – Breach established following a ruling of the Court of Justice – Right to be paid interest on the overpayment – National legislation limiting the right to the payment of interest to the period running until the thirtieth day following the publication of the ruling of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union.#Case C-322/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 June 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0408_INFdecided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#Council of the European Union v Laurent Pech.#Appeal – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Article 4(2), second indent – Protection of legal advice – Article 4(3), first subparagraph – Protection of the decision-making process – Refusal to grant full access to a legal opinion of the Council of the European Union’s Legal Service.#Case C-408/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 June 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0519_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Société des produits Nestlé SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Procedure for the revocation of decisions or the cancellation of entries – Revocation of a decision containing an obvious error attributable to EUIPO – Article 103(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No obvious error.#Case T-519/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0735_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Luigi Aprile and Commerciale Italiana Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Figurative EU trade mark representing a bat in an oval surround – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Distinctive character – No descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Restriction of the goods covered by the application for a declaration of invalidity – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-735/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0141_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Aleksandr Vasilevich Shakutin v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Right to effective judicial protection – Error of assessment.#Case T-141/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0339_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Chocolates Lacasa Internacional, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Conguitos – Earlier EU word mark Conguitos – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Relative ground for invalidity – Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-339/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0368_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Cassa Centrale Banca - Credito Cooperativo Italiano SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark BANQUÌ – Earlier EU figurative mark Bankia – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Distinctive character of the earlier mark.#Case T-368/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0033_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Vallegre, Vinhos do Porto, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark PORTO INSÍGNIA – Earlier EU word mark INSIGNIA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-33/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0582_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Siarhei Rubnikovich v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources to which the freezing of funds and economic resources and the ban on entry into or transit through European Union territory applies – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists – Collective nature of a sanction – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-582/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0583_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Aliaksandr Bakhanovich v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources to which the freezing of funds and economic resources and the ban on entry into or transit through European Union territory applies – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists – Collective nature of the sanction – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-583/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0581_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Siarheï Skryba v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources to which the freezing of funds and economic resources and the ban on entry into and transit through European Union territory applies – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists – Collective nature of a sanction – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-581/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0543_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark BIOPLAN – Earlier national word mark BIOPLAK – Relative ground for refusal – No similarity between the goods – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-543/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0218decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Roxtec AB and Wallmax Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative trade mark representing a blue square containing eight concentric black circles – absolute ground of invalidity – Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result – Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Joined Cases T-218/22 and T-219/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0368decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Cassa Centrale Banca - Credito Cooperativo Italiano SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark BANQUÌ – Earlier EU figurative mark Bankia – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Distinctive character of the earlier mark.#Case T-368/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0339decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Chocolates Lacasa Internacional, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Conguitos – Earlier EU word mark Conguitos – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Relative ground for invalidity – Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-339/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0519decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Société des produits Nestlé SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Procedure for the revocation of decisions or the cancellation of entries – Revocation of a decision containing an obvious error attributable to EUIPO – Article 103(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No obvious error.#Case T-519/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0141decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Aleksandr Vasilevich Shakutin v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Right to effective judicial protection – Error of assessment.#Case T-141/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0543decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark BIOPLAN – Earlier national word mark BIOPLAK – Relative ground for refusal – No similarity between the goods – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-543/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0582decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Siarhei Rubnikovich v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources to which the freezing of funds and economic resources and the ban on entry into or transit through European Union territory applies – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists – Collective nature of a sanction – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-582/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0735decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Luigi Aprile and Commerciale Italiana Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Figurative EU trade mark representing a bat in an oval surround – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Distinctive character – No descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Restriction of the goods covered by the application for a declaration of invalidity – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-735/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0581decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Siarheï Skryba v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources to which the freezing of funds and economic resources and the ban on entry into and transit through European Union territory applies – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists – Collective nature of a sanction – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-581/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0583decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Aliaksandr Bakhanovich v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources to which the freezing of funds and economic resources and the ban on entry into or transit through European Union territory applies – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists – Collective nature of the sanction – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-583/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0033decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Vallegre, Vinhos do Porto, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark PORTO INSÍGNIA – Earlier EU word mark INSIGNIA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-33/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0063decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Brooks England Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark BROOKS ENGLAND – Earlier EU word mark BROOKS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 43(2) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-63/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0047decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#DDR Kultur UG (haftungsbeschränkt) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark THE PLANET – Earlier EU figurative mark PLANÈTE + – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-47/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0063_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Brooks England Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark BROOKS ENGLAND – Earlier EU word mark BROOKS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 43(2) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-63/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0419_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Medex, živilska industrija, d.o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark medex – Genuine use of the mark – Article 18 and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Classification of the goods for which genuine use has been shown.#Case T-419/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0047_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#DDR Kultur UG (haftungsbeschränkt) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark THE PLANET – Earlier EU figurative mark PLANÈTE + – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-47/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0218_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Roxtec AB and Wallmax Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative trade mark representing a blue square containing eight concentric black circles – Absolute ground of invalidity – Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result – Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Joined Cases T-218/22 and T-219/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0700_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 June 2023.#O. G. v Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Grounds for optional non-execution of the European arrest warrant – Article 4(6) – Objective of social rehabilitation – Third-country nationals staying or residing on the territory of the executing Member State – Equal treatment – Article 20 in the Charter of the Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-700/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 June 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0700decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 June 2023.#O. G. v Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte costituzionale.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Grounds for optional non-execution of the European arrest warrant – Article 4(6) – Objective of social rehabilitation – Third-country nationals staying or residing on the territory of the executing Member State – Equal treatment – Article 20 in the Charter of the Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-700/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 June 2023

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0669_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 June 2023.#Rozhlas a televízia Slovenska v CI.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Scope – Statement of the reasons justifying the need for an interpretation of certain provisions of European Union law by the Court of Justice and of the relationship between those provisions and the national legislation applicable – Insufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-669/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 June 2023

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0669decided

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 June 2023.#Rozhlas a televízia Slovenska v CI.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Prešov.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Scope – Statement of the reasons justifying the need for an interpretation of certain provisions of European Union law by the Court of Justice and of the relationship between those provisions and the national legislation applicable – Insufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-669/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 June 2023

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0433_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 June 2023.#Spreewood Distillers GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark STORK – Earlier national word mark GOLDEN STORK – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-433/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 June 2023

PreviousPage 19 of 20Next