Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,101 records in EU in 2024

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773France · 6,057Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778Germany · 295Austria · 222United States · 141Belgium · 1Estonia · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0605decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 April 2024.#Heureka Group a.s. v Google LLC.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Městský soud v Praze.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 102 TFEU – Principle of effectiveness – Actions for damages under national law for infringements of competition law provisions – Directive 2014/104/EU – Late transposition of the directive – Temporal application – Article 10 – Limitation period – Detailed rules for the dies a quo – Cessation of the infringement – Knowledge of the information necessary for bringing an action for damages – Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of the summary of the European Commission’s decision finding an infringement of the competition rules – Binding effect of a Commission decision that is not yet final – Suspension or interruption of the limitation period for the duration of the Commission’s investigation or until the date when its decision becomes final.#Case C-605/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 April 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0447decided

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 18 April 2024.#Republic of Slovenia v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Articles 107 and 108 TFEU – Measures granted by the Republic of Slovenia to a municipal network of dispensing pharmacies before its accession to the European Union – Preliminary examination phase – Failure to initiate the formal investigation procedure – Concept of ‘serious difficulties’ – Extent of the European Commission’s investigative duty – Burden of proof on the party relying on the existence of ‘serious difficulties’ – Scope.#Case C-447/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 April 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0567decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 April 2024.#Vasile Dumitrescu and Others v European Commission and Court of Justice of the European Union.#Appeal – Civil service – Second subparagraph of Article 8(2) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Flat-rate payment of travel expenses from the place of employment to the place of origin – Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 – New calculation rules – Officials whose place of origin is outside the territories of the Member States as well as outside the countries and territories listed in Annex II to the FEU Treaty and the territories of the Member States of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) – Principle of equal treatment.#Joined Cases C-567/22 P to C-570/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 April 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0634decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 April 2024.#Criminal proceedings against OT and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Values and objectives of the European Union – Article 2 TEU – Rule of law – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Independent and impartial court – Reorganisation of jurisdiction of courts in a Member State – Abolition of a specialised criminal court – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-634/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 April 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62023TO0006(01)decided

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 April 2024.#UC v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-6/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 April 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62023TO0006(01)_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 April 2024.#UC v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-6/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0288_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 17 April 2024.#Unilab LP v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Healthily – Earlier EU figurative mark Healthies – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-288/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0255_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 17 April 2024.#Escobar Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark Pablo Escobar – Absolute ground for refusal – Trade mark contrary to public policy and to accepted principles of morality – Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Presumption of innocence.#Case T-255/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0076_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 17 April 2024.#DDP Specialty Electronic Materials US 8 LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark AMBERTEC – Earlier EU word mark AMPERTEC – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-76/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0209_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 April 2024.#Yadex International GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark doyum – Earlier national word mark Doyum – Relative ground for refusal – No similarity between the goods – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-209/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0782_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 April 2024.#Cogebi and Cogebi, a.s. v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on purchasing, importing or transferring, directly or indirectly, in the European Union, goods which generate significant revenues for Russia as listed in Annex XXI to Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Mica products – Action for annulment – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures which directly affects the legal situation of importers – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Right of access to the file – Freedom to conduct a business – Proportionality.#Case T-782/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0126_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 April 2024.#Coinbase, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark coinbase – International registration of the earlier word mark COINBASE – International registration of the earlier figurative mark coinbase exchange – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-126/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0119_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 April 2024.#Insider LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark in Insajderi – Earlier national word mark INSAJDERI and earlier national figurative mark in Insajderi Gazetë online – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Extent of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal – Article 27(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Failure to submit evidence – Translation – Article 7 of Delegated Regulation 2018/625 – Right to be heard – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Possibility for the Board of Appeal to accept evidence submitted for the first time before it – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625 – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-119/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0209decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 April 2024.#Yadex International GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark doyum – Earlier national word mark Doyum – Relative ground for refusal – No similarity between the goods – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-209/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0076decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 17 April 2024.#DDP Specialty Electronic Materials US 8 LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark AMBERTEC – Earlier EU word mark AMPERTEC – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-76/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0288decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 17 April 2024.#Unilab LP v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Healthily – Earlier EU figurative mark Healthies – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-288/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0782decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 April 2024.#Cogebi and Cogebi, a.s. v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on purchasing, importing or transferring, directly or indirectly, in the European Union, goods which generate significant revenues for Russia as listed in Annex XXI to Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Mica products – Action for annulment – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures which directly affects the legal situation of importers – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Right of access to the file – Freedom to conduct a business – Proportionality.#Case T-782/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0255decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 17 April 2024.#Escobar Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark Pablo Escobar – Absolute ground for refusal – Trade mark contrary to public policy and to accepted principles of morality – Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Presumption of innocence.#Case T-255/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0119decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 April 2024.#Insider LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark in Insajderi – Earlier national word mark INSAJDERI and earlier national figurative mark in Insajderi Gazetë online – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Extent of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal – Article 27(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Failure to submit evidence – Translation – Article 7 of Delegated Regulation 2018/625 – Right to be heard – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Possibility for the Board of Appeal to accept evidence submitted for the first time before it – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625 – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-119/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0126decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 April 2024.#Coinbase, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark coinbase – International registration of the earlier word mark COINBASE – International registration of the earlier figurative mark coinbase exchange – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-126/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 April 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62023TO0020(01)_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 April 2024.#Japan Tobacco, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark FLOW FILTER – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – Lack of descriptive character – Lack of customary character – Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (d) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-20/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 April 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62023TO0020(01)decided

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 April 2024.#Japan Tobacco, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark FLOW FILTER – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – Lack of descriptive character – Lack of customary character – Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (d) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-20/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 April 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0770_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2024.#OSTP Italy Srl v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli, Ufficio delle Dogane di Genova 1 and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Judgments at first instance annulling customs measures relating to traditional own resources of the European Union – Immediately implementable nature of those judgments – No suspension of implementation of judgments.#Case C-770/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 April 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0792decided

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 11 April 2024.#Criminal proceedings against MG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Braşov.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Directive 89/391/EEC – General obligations relating to the protection of safety and health – Parallel national proceedings – Judgment of an administrative court having force of res judicata before the criminal court – Classification of an event as an ‘accident at work’ – Effectiveness of the protection of the rights guaranteed by Directive 89/391 – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to be heard – Disciplinary proceedings against a judge of an ordinary court in the event of failure to comply with a decision of a constitutional court that is contrary to EU law – Primacy of EU law.#Case C-792/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 April 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0770decided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2024.#OSTP Italy Srl v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli, Ufficio delle Dogane di Genova 1 and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte di giustizia tributaria di primo grado di Genova.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Judgments at first instance annulling customs measures relating to traditional own resources of the European Union – Immediately implementable nature of those judgments – No suspension of implementation of judgments.#Case C-770/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 April 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0579decided

Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 11 April 2024.#Anglo Austrian AAB AG v European Central Bank (ECB) and Belegging-Maatschappij 'Far-Est' BV.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Directive 2013/36/EU – Access to the activity of credit institutions – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the European Central Bank (ECB) – Withdrawal of authorisation – Scope of the ECB’s powers – Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 – Division of powers between the ECB and the national authorities – Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing – Findings of the General Court of the European Union with regard to national law – Examination of a potential distortion of national law.#Case C-579/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0042_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Häcker Küchen GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark MH Cuisines – International registration of the earlier figurative mark MM CUISINES – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-42/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0062_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Maxeon Solar Pte. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing part of solar panels – Earlier design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Informed user – No different overall impression – Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-62/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0063_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Maxeon Solar Pte. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing part of solar panels – Earlier design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Informed user – No different overall impression – Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-63/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0161_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Schönegger Käse-Alm GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark Rebell – Partial revocation – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-161/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0301_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Petr Aven v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘supporting or implementing actions or policies’ – Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Concepts of ‘supporting, materially or financially, Russian decision-makers’ and of ‘benefitting’ from those decision-makers – Article 2(1)(d) of Decision 2014/145 – Article 3(1)(d) of Regulation No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-301/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0262_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Mushie & Co, LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Mushie – Earlier EU word mark KUSHIES – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Professional representation – Article 120(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-262/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0654_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 April 2024 (Extracts).#M&T 1997, a.s. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing door and window handles – Earlier design – Ground for invalidity – Individual character – Article 25(1)(b) and Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-654/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0063decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Maxeon Solar Pte. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing part of solar panels – Earlier design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Informed user – No different overall impression – Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-63/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0038decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#IB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Civil service – Officials – Total and permanent invalidity – Refusal to resume the invalidity procedure – Article 266 TFEU – Decision adopted to give effect to a judgment of the General Court – Measures necessary to give effect to a judgment delivered in an action for annulment – Disciplinary proceedings – Removal from post – Liability.#Case T-38/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0161decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Schönegger Käse-Alm GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark Rebell – Partial revocation – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-161/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0038_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#IB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Civil service – Officials – Total and permanent invalidity – Refusal to resume the invalidity procedure – Article 266 TFEU – Decision adopted to give effect to a judgment of the General Court – Measures necessary to give effect to a judgment delivered in an action for annulment – Disciplinary proceedings – Removal from post – Liability.#Case T-38/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 April 2024

PreviousPage 22 of 23Next