Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,151 records in EU in 2024

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0262decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Mushie & Co, LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Mushie – Earlier EU word mark KUSHIES – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Professional representation – Article 120(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-262/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0301decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Petr Aven v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘supporting or implementing actions or policies’ – Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Concepts of ‘supporting, materially or financially, Russian decision-makers’ and of ‘benefitting’ from those decision-makers – Article 2(1)(d) of Decision 2014/145 – Article 3(1)(d) of Regulation No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-301/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0062decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Maxeon Solar Pte. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing part of solar panels – Earlier design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Informed user – No different overall impression – Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-62/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0654decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 April 2024 (Extracts).#M&T 1997, a.s. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing door and window handles – Earlier design – Ground for invalidity – Individual character – Article 25(1)(b) and Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-654/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0022decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#AL v Council of the European Union.#Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Removal from post – OLAF investigation – Principle of sound administration – Article 22 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Article 10 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Proportionality – Legitimate expectations – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials.#Case T-22/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0304decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Mikhail Fridman v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘supporting actions and policies’ Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Concepts of ‘supporting, materially or financially’ and ‘benefitting from’ Russian decision-makers – Article 2(1)(d) of Decision 2014/145 – Article 3(1)(d) of Regulation No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-304/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0042decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Häcker Küchen GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark MH Cuisines – International registration of the earlier figurative mark MM CUISINES – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-42/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 April 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0304_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Mikhail Fridman v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘supporting actions and policies’ Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Concepts of ‘supporting, materially or financially’ and ‘benefitting from’ Russian decision-makers – Article 2(1)(d) of Decision 2014/145 – Article 3(1)(d) of Regulation No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-304/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 April 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0551_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 April 2024.#European Commission v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Decision (EU) 2021/1117 – Implementing Protocol to the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the Gabonese Republic and the European Community (2021-2026) – Signing on behalf of the European Union – Institution competent to designate the person empowered to sign – Article 13(2) TEU – Observance by each institution of the limits of the powers conferred on it – Mutual sincere cooperation between the EU institutions – Article 16(1) and (6) TEU – Power of the Council of the European Union to make policies and plan the EU’s external action – Article 17(1) TEU – Power of the European Commission to ensure the external representation of the European Union – Article 218 TFEU.#Case C-551/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 April 2024

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0012_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 8 April 2024.#Sattvica SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-12/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 April 2024

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0670_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 8 April 2024.#Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik Anonim Sirketi v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-670/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 April 2024

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0670decided

Order of the Court of 8 April 2024.#Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik Anonim Sirketi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-670/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 April 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62023TO0139decided

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 April 2024.#Miskolci Egyetem v Council of the European Union and European Commission.#Action for annulment – Measures for the protection of the Union budget against breaches of the principles of the rule of law in Hungary – Prohibition on entering into legal commitments with any public interest trust or any entity maintained by such a public interest trust – Article 2(2) of Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2506 – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Direct concern – Admissibility – Act not open to challenge – Act not having an adverse effect – Inadmissibility.#Case T-139/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 April 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62023TO0133decided

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 April 2024.#Állatorvostudományi Egyetem v Council of the European Union and European Commission.#Action for annulment – Measures for the protection of the Union budget against breaches of the principles of the rule of law in Hungary – Prohibition on entering into legal commitments with any public interest trust or any entity maintained by such a public interest trust – Article 2(2) of Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2506 – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Direct concern – Admissibility – Act not open to challenge – Act not having an adverse effect – Inadmissibility.#Case T-133/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 April 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62023TO0138decided

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 April 2024.#Semmelweis Egyetem v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Measures for the protection of the Union budget against breaches of the principles of the rule of law in Hungary – Prohibition on entering into legal commitments with any public interest trust or any entity maintained by such a public interest trust – Article 2(2) of Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2506 – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Direct concern – Admissibility.#Case T-138/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 April 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62023TO0132decided

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 April 2024.#Óbudai Egyetem v Council of the European Union and European Commission.#Action for annulment – Measures for the protection of the Union budget against breaches of the principles of the rule of law in Hungary – Prohibition on entering into legal commitments with any public interest trust or any entity maintained by such a public interest trust – Article 2(2) of Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2506 – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Direct concern – Admissibility – Act not open to challenge – Act not having an adverse effect – Inadmissibility.#Case T-132/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 April 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62023TO0140decided

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 April 2024.#Dunaújvárosi Egyetem v Council of the European Union and European Commission.#Action for annulment – Measures for the protection of the Union budget against breaches of the principles of the rule of law in Hungary – Prohibition on entering into legal commitments with any public interest trust or any entity maintained by such a public interest trust – Article 2(2) of Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2506 – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Direct concern – Admissibility – Act not open to challenge – Act not having an adverse effect – Inadmissibility.#Case T-140/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 April 2024

Decision· DCELEX 32024D1102in force

Council Decision (EU) 2024/1102 of 25 March 2024 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the EU-UK Specialised Committee on Energy established by the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part, regarding the adoption of the guidance on working arrangements and on administrative arrangements

European Union · EUR-Lex · 25 March 2024

Decision· DCELEX 32024D1011in force

Council Decision (EU) 2024/1011 of 25 March 2024 on the position to be taken on behalf of the Union within the GNSS EU/ASECNA Committee set up by the Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the Agency for Aerial Navigation Safety in Africa and Madagascar (ASECNA) on the development of satellite navigation and the provision of associated services in ASECNA’s area of competence for the benefit of civil aviation, as regards the adoption of the rules of procedure of that Committee

European Union · EUR-Lex · 25 March 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0498decided

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 21 March 2024.#Novo Banco SA - Sucursal en España and Others v C.F.O. and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Reorganisation and winding up of credit institutions – Directive 2001/24/EC – Articles 3 and 6 – Reorganisation measure taken in respect of a credit institution – Transfer of the obligations and responsibilities of that credit institution to a ‘bridge bank’ prior to the bringing of a legal action seeking payment of a claim held against that credit institution – Transfer back to the same credit institution of certain of those obligations and responsibilities – Law of the Member State where the proceedings concerned were brought (lex concursus) – Effects of a reorganisation measure in other Member States – Mutual recognition – Effects of a failure to comply with the obligation to publish the reorganisation measure – Articles 17, 21, 38 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to property – Effective judicial protection – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EC – Article 6(1) – Unfair terms – Principles of legal certainty and the protection of legitimate expectations – Whether the ‘bridge bank’ can be sued.#Joined Cases C-498/22 to C-500/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 March 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0061decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 March 2024.#RL v Landeshauptstadt Wiesbaden.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) 2019/1157 – Strengthening the security of identity cards of EU citizens – Validity – Legal basis – Article 21(2) TFEU – Article 77(3) TFEU – Regulation (EU) 2019/1157 – Article 3(5) – Obligation for Member States to include two fingerprints in interoperable digital formats in the storage medium of identity cards – Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Respect for private and family life – Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 35 – Obligation to carry out a data protection impact assessment – Maintaining the effects for a certain time of a regulation which has been declared invalid.#Case C-61/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 March 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0778decided

Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 21 March 2024.#European Commission and Council of the European Union v Front populaire pour la libération de la Saguia el-Hamra et du Rio de oro (Front Polisario).#[As rectified by order of 15 January 2025] Appeal – External action – International agreements – Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco – Decision on the conclusion of that agreement and the implementation protocol thereto – Allegations of infringements of international law resulting from the applicability of that agreement to the waters adjacent to Western Sahara – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Capacity to be a party to legal proceedings – Locus standi – Condition that an applicant must, in certain cases, be directly and individually concerned by the measure in question – Principle of the relative effect of treaties – Principle of self-determination – Non-self-governing territories – Article 73 of the Charter of the United Nations – Discretion of the Council of the European Union – Customary international law – General principles of EU law – Consent of the people of a non-self-governing territory which holds a right to self-determination as a third party to an international agreement.#Joined Cases C-778/21 P and C-798/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 March 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0779decided

Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 21 March 2024.#European Commission and Council of the European Union v Front populaire pour la libération de la Saguia el-Hamra et du Rio de oro (Front Polisario).#Appeals – External action – International agreements – Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part – Agreement on the amendment of Protocols 1 and 4 to that agreement – Concluding act – Allegations of infringements of international law resulting from the applicability of that second agreement to the territory of Western Sahara – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Capacity to be a party to legal proceedings – Locus standi – Condition that an applicant must, in certain cases, be directly and individually concerned by the measure in question – Principle of the relative effect of treaties – Principle of self-determination – Non-self-governing territories – Article 73 of the Charter of the United Nations – Discretion of the Council of the European Union – Customary international law – General principles of EU law – Consent of the people of a non-self-governing territory which holds a right to self-determination as a third party to an international agreement.#Joined Cases C-779/21 P and C-799/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 March 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0061_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 March 2024.#RL v Landeshauptstadt Wiesbaden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) 2019/1157 – Strengthening the security of identity cards of EU citizens – Validity – Legal basis – Article 21(2) TFEU – Article 77(3) TFEU – Regulation (EU) 2019/1157 – Article 3(5) – Obligation for Member States to include two fingerprints in interoperable digital formats in the storage medium of identity cards – Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Respect for private and family life – Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 35 – Obligation to carry out a data protection impact assessment – Maintaining the effects for a certain time of a regulation which has been declared invalid.#Case C-61/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 March 2024

Decision· DCELEX 32024D0990in force

Council Decision (EU) 2024/990 of 20 March 2024 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the International Maritime Organization during the 81st session of the Marine Environment Protection Committee and the 108th session of the Maritime Safety Committee on the adoption of amendments to the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL), to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), to the International Code of Safety for Ships Using Gases or other Low-flashpoint Fuels (IGF Code), to the International Code of the Enhanced Programme of Inspections during Surveys of Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers, 2011 (2011 ESP Code), to the International Life-Saving Appliance (LSA) Code, to the International Code for Fire Safety Systems (FSS Code) and to the Seafarers’ Training, Certification and Watchkeeping (STCW) Code

European Union · EUR-Lex · 20 March 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0213decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 20 March 2024.#European Federation of Financial Analysts'Societies (EFFAS) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark CEFA Certified European Financial Analyst – Earlier EU word mark CFA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Coexistence of the marks.#Case T-213/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 March 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0245decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 20 March 2024.#Braunschweiger Versorgungs AG & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark BF energy – Earlier national word mark BS Energy – Earlier EU trade mark and national figurative marks BS ENERGY – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-245/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 March 2024

PreviousPage 23 of 24Next