Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

151 records in EU in 2019

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 493Germany · 292United States · 141Austria · 75Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0560decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 5 December 2019.#Izba Gospodarcza Producentów i Operatorów Urządzeń Rozrywkowych v European Commission.#Appeal — Access to documents of the institutions — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Article 4(2), third indent — Exceptions to the right of access — Exception relating to protection of the purpose of investigations — Documents concerning pending infringement proceedings — Detailed opinions issued in the course of a notification procedure under Directive 98/34/EC — Request for access — Refusal — Disclosure of documents requested in the course of the proceedings before the General Court of the European Union — Disclosure — Inadmissibility — Interest in bringing proceedings — Continuation.#Case C-560/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 December 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0564decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 5 December 2019.#LH v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Application for international protection – Article 33(2) – Grounds of inadmissibility – National legislation under which an application is inadmissible if the applicant has arrived in the Member State concerned via a country in which he or she is not exposed to persecution or the risk of serious harm, or if that country provides sufficient protection – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Judicial review of administrative decisions concerning the inadmissibility of applications for international protection – Time limit of eight days within which to give a decision – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-564/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 December 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0406decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 5 December 2019.#PG v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection — Common procedures for granting international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 46(3) — Full and ex nunc examination — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to an effective remedy — Powers and obligations of the first-instance court or tribunal — No power to vary the decisions of the authorities competent in the area of international protection — National legislation providing for an obligation to adjudicate within a time limit of 60 days.#Case C-406/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0029decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 December 2019.#Idea Groupe v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Idealogistic Verhoeven Greatest care in getting it there — Earlier national word marks idéa logistique, IDEA and groupe idea — Earlier national figurative mark iDÉA — International registrations designating the European Union — Earlier figurative mark iDÉA and earlier word mark IDEA — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Use of a sign in the course of trade of more than mere local significance — Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-29/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0524_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 December 2019.#Billa AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Billa — Earlier EU word marks BILLABONG — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Comparison of the goods and services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-524/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 December 2019

Record· COCELEX 62018CO0181(01)_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 December 2019.#Republic of Poland v European Commission.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Action for annulment — Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU Article 263 — Admissibility — Decision which is of neither direct nor individual concern to the appellant — Regulatory act — Absence — Article 130 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Assessment of the pleas on the substance — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to effective judicial protection and to a fair trial — Principle of audi alteram partem — Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-181/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0413decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 December 2019.#H v Council of the European Union.#Appeal — Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) — Composition of the Chamber of the General Court of the European Union — Regularity — Decision 2009/906/CFSP — European Union Police Mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina (EUPM) — National staff member on secondment — Redeployment to a regional office of that mission — Powers of the Head of Mission — Misuse of powers — Claim for damages — Principle of audi alteram partem.#Case C-413/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 December 2019

Record· COCELEX 62018CO0181(01)decided

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 December 2019.#Republic of Poland v European Commission.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Action for annulment — Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU Article 263 — Admissibility — Decision which is of neither direct nor individual concern to the appellant — Regulatory act — Absence — Article 130 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Assessment of the pleas on the substance — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to effective judicial protection and to a fair trial — Principle of audi alteram partem — Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-181/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0413_INFdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 December 2019.#H v Council of the European Union.#Appeal — Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) — Composition of the Chamber of the General Court of the European Union — Regularity — Decision 2009/906/CFSP — European Union Police Mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina (EUPM) — National staff member on secondment — Redeployment to a regional office of that mission — Powers of the Head of Mission — Misuse of powers — Claim for damages — Principle of audi alteram partem.#Case C-413/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0524decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 December 2019.#Billa AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Billa — Earlier EU word marks BILLABONG — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Comparison of the goods and services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-524/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0482_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 December 2019.#Czech Republic v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment — Approximation of laws — Directive (EU) 2017/853 — Control of the acquisition and possession of weapons — Validity — Legal basis — Article 114 TFEU — Amendment of an existing directive — Principle of proportionality — Absence of impact assessment — Interference with the right to property — Proportionality of the measures adopted — Measures creating barriers in the internal market — Principle of legal certainty — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations — Measures obliging Member States to adopt legislation with retroactive effect — Principle of non-discrimination — Derogation for the Swiss Confederation — Discrimination affecting Member States of the European Union or Member States of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) other than that State.#Case C-482/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0658_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 3 December 2019.#Hästens Sängar AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark representing a chequered gingham pattern — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-658/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0482decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 December 2019.#Czech Republic v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment — Approximation of laws — Directive (EU) 2017/853 — Control of the acquisition and possession of weapons — Validity — Legal basis — Article 114 TFEU — Amendment of an existing directive — Principle of proportionality — Absence of impact assessment — Interference with the right to property — Proportionality of the measures adopted — Measures creating barriers in the internal market — Principle of legal certainty — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations — Measures obliging Member States to adopt legislation with retroactive effect — Principle of non-discrimination — Derogation for the Swiss Confederation — Discrimination affecting Member States of the European Union or Member States of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) other than that State.#Case C-482/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0658decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 3 December 2019.#Hästens Sängar AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark representing a chequered gingham pattern — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-658/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 December 2019

Decision· DCELEX 32019D2008in force

Council Decision (EU) 2019/2008 of 28 November 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union at the International Maritime Organization during the 31st session of its Assembly on the adoption of amendments to resolution A.658(16) on Use and fitting of retro-reflective materials on life-saving appliances and the adoption of a resolution on Survey Guidelines under the Harmonized System of Survey and Certification (HSSC)

European Union · EUR-Lex · 28 November 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0643decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark DermoFaes — Earlier EU word mark Dermowas — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-643/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 November 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0642decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark DermoFaes Atopimed — Earlier EU word mark Dermowas — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-642/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 November 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0736decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#Runnebaum Invest GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Bergsteiger — Earlier Benelux word marks and EU figurative and word marks BERG — Relative ground for refusal — Article 47(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Admissibility of a request for proof of genuine use — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-736/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 November 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0665decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#Soundio A/S v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark Vibble — Earlier German word mark vybe — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-665/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 November 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0665_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#Soundio A/S v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark Vibble — Earlier German word mark vybe — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-665/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 November 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0643_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark DermoFaes — Earlier EU word mark Dermowas — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-643/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 November 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0644_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark DermoFaes Atopiderm — Earlier EU word mark Dermowas — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-644/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 November 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0642_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark DermoFaes Atopimed — Earlier EU word mark Dermowas — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-642/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 November 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0736_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#Runnebaum Invest GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Bergsteiger — Earlier Benelux word marks and EU figurative and word marks BERG — Relative ground for refusal — Article 47(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Admissibility of a request for proof of genuine use — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-736/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 November 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0644decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark DermoFaes Atopiderm — Earlier EU word mark Dermowas — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-644/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 November 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0702decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 28 November 2019.#Przedsiębiorstwo Produkcyjno-Handlowe „Primart” Marek Łukasiewicz v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Application for EU figurative mark PRIMART Marek Łukasiewicz — Earlier national trade mark PRIMA — Article 8(1)(b) — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 76(1) — Scope of review by the General Court of the European Union.#Case C-702/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 November 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0711decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 26 November 2019.#Wyld GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark wyld — Earlier international word mark WILD CRISP — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Rejection in part of the application for registration.#Case T-711/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 November 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0711_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 26 November 2019.#Wyld GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark wyld — Earlier international word mark WILD CRISP — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Rejection in part of the application for registration.#Case T-711/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 November 2019

PreviousPage 3 of 4Next