Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

201 records in EU in 2019

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 493Germany · 293United States · 141Austria · 77Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0527decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 November 2019.#K.A. Schmersal Holding GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark tec.nicum — Earlier national figurative mark TECNIUM — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the services — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 18(1) and Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character — Evidence submitted for the first time before the General Court.#Case T-527/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 November 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0836decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 21 November 2019.#Subdelegación del Gobierno en Ciudad Real v RH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 20 TFEU — European Union citizens — Union citizen who has never exercised the freedom of movement — Application for a temporary residence permit for the spouse, who is a third-country national — Rejection — Obligation to support the spouse — Union citizen having insufficient resources — Obligation of the spouses to live together — National legislation and practice — Effective enjoyment of the substance of the rights conferred on Union citizens — Deprived.#Case C-836/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 November 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0527_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 November 2019.#K.A. Schmersal Holding GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark tec.nicum — Earlier national figurative mark TECNIUM — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the services — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 18(1) and Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character — Evidence submitted for the first time before the General Court.#Case T-527/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 November 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0502_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 November 2019 (Extracts).#Stefano Missir Mamachi di Lusignano, as heir to Livio Missir Mamachi di Lusignano and Others v European Commission.#Civil service — Officials — Murder of an official and his wife — Obligation to ensure the safety of staff in the service of the European Union — Liability of the institution for non-material damage suffered by the family members of a deceased official — Mother, brother and sister of the official — Action for damages — Admissibility — Standing to bring proceedings under Article 270 TFEU — Person covered by the Staff Regulations — Reasonable period of time.#Case T-502/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 November 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0101decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 20 November 2019.#Rezon OOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark imot.bg — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-101/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 November 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0101_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 20 November 2019.#Rezon OOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark imot.bg — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-101/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 November 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0502decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 November 2019 (Extracts).#Stefano Missir Mamachi di Lusignano, as heir to Livio Missir Mamachi di Lusignano and Others v European Commission.#Civil service — Officials — Murder of an official and his wife — Obligation to ensure the safety of staff in the service of the European Union — Liability of the institution for non-material damage suffered by the family members of a deceased official — Mother, brother and sister of the official — Action for damages — Admissibility — Standing to bring proceedings under Article 270 TFEU — Person covered by the Staff Regulations — Reasonable period of time.#Case T-502/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 November 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0585_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 November 2019.#A. K. and Others v Sąd Najwyższy, CP v Sąd Najwyższy and DO v Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2000/78/EC — Equal treatment in employment and occupation — Non-discrimination on the ground of age — Lowering of the retirement age of judges of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) — Article 9(1) — Right to a remedy — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Effective judicial protection — Principle of judicial independence — Creation of a new chamber of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court) with jurisdiction inter alia for cases of retiring the judges of that court — Chamber formed by judges newly appointed by the President of the Republic of Poland on a proposal of the National Council of the Judiciary — Independence of that council — Power to disapply national legislation not in conformity with EU law — Primacy of EU law.#Joined Cases C-585/18, C-624/18 and C-625/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 November 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0609_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 November 2019.#Terveys- ja sosiaalialan neuvottelujärjestö (TSN) ry v Hyvinvointialan liitto ry and Auto- ja Kuljetusalan Työntekijäliitto AKT ry v Satamaoperaattorit ry.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Article 153 TFEU — Minimum safety and health requirements for the organisation of working time — Directive 2003/88/EC — Article 7 — Right to paid annual leave of at least 4 weeks — Article 15 — Provisions of national legislation and collective agreements more favourable to the protection of the safety and health of workers — Workers incapable of working during a period of paid annual leave due to illness — Refusal to carry over that leave where not carrying over that leave does not reduce the actual duration of the paid annual leave below 4 weeks — Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Inapplicable where there is no implementation of EU law for the purposes of Article 51(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Joined Cases C-609/17 and C-610/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 November 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0660_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may succeed) of 19 November 2019.#Klaus Nonnemacher v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-660/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 November 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0659_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may succeed) of 19 November 2019.#Klaus Nonnemacher v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-659/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 November 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0660decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may succeed) of 19 November 2019.#Klaus Nonnemacher v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-660/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 November 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0585decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 November 2019.#A. K. and Others v Sąd Najwyższy, CP v Sąd Najwyższy and DO v Sąd Najwyższy.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2000/78/EC — Equal treatment in employment and occupation — Non-discrimination on the ground of age — Lowering of the retirement age of judges of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) — Article 9(1) — Right to a remedy — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Effective judicial protection — Principle of judicial independence — Creation of a new chamber of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court) with jurisdiction inter alia for cases of retiring the judges of that court — Chamber formed by judges newly appointed by the President of the Republic of Poland on a proposal of the National Council of the Judiciary — Independence of that council — Power to disapply national legislation not in conformity with EU law — Primacy of EU law.#Joined Cases C-585/18, C-624/18 and C-625/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 November 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0609decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 November 2019.#Terveys- ja sosiaalialan neuvottelujärjestö (TSN) ry v Hyvinvointialan liitto ry and Auto- ja Kuljetusalan Työntekijäliitto AKT ry v Satamaoperaattorit ry.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Työtuomioistuin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Article 153 TFEU — Minimum safety and health requirements for the organisation of working time — Directive 2003/88/EC — Article 7 — Right to paid annual leave of at least 4 weeks — Article 15 — Provisions of national legislation and collective agreements more favourable to the protection of the safety and health of workers — Workers incapable of working during a period of paid annual leave due to illness — Refusal to carry over that leave where not carrying over that leave does not reduce the actual duration of the paid annual leave below 4 weeks — Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Inapplicable where there is no implementation of EU law for the purposes of Article 51(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Joined Cases C-609/17 and C-610/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 November 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0659decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may succeed) of 19 November 2019.#Klaus Nonnemacher v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-659/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 November 2019

Decision· DCELEX 32019D1954in force

Council Decision (EU) 2019/1954 of 18 November 2019 establishing the position to be adopted, on behalf of the European Union, in the EPA Committee set up by the Interim Agreement with a view to an Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Central Africa Party, of the other part, in connection with the adoption of the rules of procedure for mediation, the rules of procedure for arbitration and the code of conduct for arbitrators

European Union · EUR-Lex · 18 November 2019

Record· TOCELEX 62019TO0181_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 November 2019.#Sigrid Dickmanns v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Civil Service — Members of the temporary staff — Fixed-term contract with a termination clause — Clause terminating the contract in the event that the name of the agent is not included on the reserve list of a competition — Purely confirmatory act — Time limit for complaints — Inadmissibility.#Case T-181/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 November 2019

Record· TOCELEX 62019TO0181decided

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 November 2019.#Sigrid Dickmanns v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Civil Service — Members of the temporary staff — Fixed-term contract with a termination clause — Clause terminating the contract in the event that the name of the agent is not included on the reserve list of a competition — Purely confirmatory act — Time limit for complaints — Inadmissibility.#Case T-181/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 November 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0328decided

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 14 November 2019.#European Union Intellectual Property Office v Equivalenza Manufactory, SL.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) — Likelihood of confusion — Assessment of the similarity of the signs at issue — Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion — Consideration of marketing circumstances — Counteraction of a phonetic similarity through visual and conceptual differences — Conditions for counteraction.#Case C-328/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 November 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0752decided

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 14 November 2019.#Deutsche Umwelthilfe eV v Freistaat Bayern.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Article 6, the first paragraph of Article 47 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Directive 2008/50/EC — Atmospheric pollution — Ambient air quality — Air quality plan — Limit values for nitrogen dioxide — Obligation to adopt appropriate measures to ensure that any exceedance period is very short — Obligation on the national courts to take any necessary measure — Refusal of a regional government to comply with an injunction — Coercive detention contemplated in respect of senior political representatives or senior officials of the region concerned — Effective judicial protection — Right to liberty of the person — Legal basis — Proportionality.#Case C-752/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 November 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0149_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 November 2019.#Société des produits Nestlé SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU figurative mark representing the shape of a human figure on an escutcheon — EU figurative mark representing the shape of a human figure — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Power to alter decisions.#Case T-149/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 November 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0149decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 November 2019.#Société des produits Nestlé SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU figurative mark representing the shape of a human figure on an escutcheon — EU figurative mark representing the shape of a human figure — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Power to alter decisions.#Case T-149/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 November 2019

Proposal· PCCELEX 52019PC0589open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the signing, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of the Protocol amending the Ancillary Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the first part, Iceland, of the second part, and the Kingdom of Norway, of the third part, on the application of the Air Transport Agreement between the United States of America, of the first part, the European Union and its Member States, of the second part, Iceland, of the third part, and the Kingdom of Norway, of the fourth part, signed on 16 and 21 June 2011, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia

European Union · European Commission · 14 November 2019

Proposal· PCCELEX 52019PC0585open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of the Protocol amending the Air Transport Agreement between the United States of America and the European Community and its Member States signed on April 25 and 30, 2007 as amended by the Protocol to amend the Air Transport Agreement between the United States of America and the European Community and its Member States, signed on April 25 and 30, 2007, signed by the United States of America and the European Union and its Member States on 24 June 2010, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia

European Union · European Commission · 14 November 2019

Proposal· PCCELEX 52019PC0590open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of the Protocol amending the Ancillary Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the first part, Iceland, of the second part, and the Kingdom of Norway, of the third part, on the application of the Air Transport Agreement between the United States of America, of the first part, the European Union and its Member States, of the second part, Iceland, of the third part, and the Kingdom of Norway, of the fourth part, signed on 16 and 21 June 2011, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia

European Union · European Commission · 14 November 2019

Proposal· PCCELEX 52019PC0588open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of the Protocol amending the Air Transport Agreement between the United States of America, of the first part, the European Union and its Member States, of the second part, Iceland of the third part, and the Kingdom of Norway, of the fourth part, signed on June 16 and 21, 2011, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia

European Union · European Commission · 14 November 2019

Proposal· PCCELEX 52019PC0586open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the signing, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of the Protocol amending the Air Transport Agreement between the United States of America, of the first part, the European Union and its Member States, of the second part, Iceland of the third part, and the Kingdom of Norway, of the fourth part, signed on June 16 and 21, 2011, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia

European Union · European Commission · 14 November 2019

Proposal· PCCELEX 52019PC0584open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the signing, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of the Protocol amending the Air Transport Agreement between the United States of America and the European Community and its Member States signed on April 25 and 30, 2007 as amended by the Protocol to amend the Air Transport Agreement between the United States of America and the European Community and its Member States, signed on April 25 and 30, 2007, signed by the United States of America and the European Union and its Member States on 24 June 2010, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia

European Union · European Commission · 14 November 2019

Record· COCELEX 62017CO0540_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 November 2019.#Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Adel Hamed and Amar Omar.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Area of freedom, security and justice — Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 33(2)(a) — Rejection by the authorities of a Member State of an application for asylum as being inadmissible because of the prior granting of refugee status in another Member State — Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Substantial risk of suffering inhuman or degrading treatment — Living conditions of those granted refugee status in that other Member State.#Joined Cases C-540/17 and C-541/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 November 2019

Record· COCELEX 62017CO0540decided

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 November 2019.#Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Adel Hamed and Amar Omar.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Area of freedom, security and justice — Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 33(2)(a) — Rejection by the authorities of a Member State of an application for asylum as being inadmissible because of the prior granting of refugee status in another Member State — Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Substantial risk of suffering inhuman or degrading treatment — Living conditions of those granted refugee status in that other Member State.#Joined Cases C-540/17 and C-541/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 November 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0502decided

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 12 November 2019.#Criminal proceedings against Oriol Junqueras Vies.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Expedited procedure — Institutional law — Citizen of the European Union elected to the European Parliament while being held in provisional detention in the context of criminal proceedings — Article 14 TEU — Concept of ‘Member of the European Parliament’ — Article 343 TFEU — Immunities necessary for the performance of the tasks of the European Union — Protocol (No 7) on the privileges and immunities of the European Union — Article 9 — Immunities enjoyed by Members of the European Parliament — Immunity as regards travel — Immunities as regards sessions — Personal, temporal and material scope of the various immunities — Waiver of immunity by the European Parliament — Request to waive immunity from a national court — Act concerning the election of Members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage — Article 5 — Term of office — Article 8 — Electoral procedure — Article 12 — Verification of the credentials of Members of the European Parliament following the official declaration of the election results — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 39(2) — Election of Members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage in a free and secret ballot — Right to stand as a candidate at elections.#Case C-502/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 November 2019

PreviousPage 4 of 5Next