Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

401 records in EU in 2024

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 494Germany · 293United States · 141Austria · 114Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0211_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 October 2024.#Fractal Analytics, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark FRACTALIA Remote Systems – Genuine use of the mark – Article 18(1) and (2) and Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Nature of use – Assessment of evidence – Comparison of the subcategories of services used and the specification of the services covered by the mark.#Case T-211/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 October 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62024TO0221_INFdecided

Order of the President of the General Court of 16 October 2024.#Alexander Dmitrievich Pumpyanskiy v Council of the European Union.#Interim measures – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-221/24 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0324_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 16 October 2024.#J. García Carrión, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark LimoLife – Earlier EU and national word marks SIMON LIFE – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-324/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0211decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 October 2024.#Fractal Analytics, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark FRACTALIA Remote Systems – Genuine use of the mark – Article 18(1) and (2) and Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Nature of use – Assessment of evidence – Comparison of the subcategories of services used and the specification of the services covered by the mark.#Case T-211/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0194decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 October 2024.#Fractal Analytics, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark FRACTALIA – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 18(1) and (2) and Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Nature of use – Assessment of the evidence – Comparison between the subcategories of services used and the specification of the services covered by the trade mark.#Case T-194/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 October 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62024TO0221decided

Order of the President of the General Court of 16 October 2024.#Alexander Dmitrievich Pumpyanskiy v Council of the European Union.#Interim measures – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-221/24 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0506decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 October 2024.#Freistaat Bayern v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Neuschwanstein – Earlier business names Neuschwanstein and Schloss Neuschwanstein – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-506/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0344decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 October 2024.#Sergio Rossi SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark sr 1 – Earlier national figurative marks SR – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-344/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0324decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 16 October 2024.#J. García Carrión, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark LimoLife – Earlier EU and national word marks SIMON LIFE – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-324/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0508decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 October 2024.#Medspa Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark ALDO COPPOLA AMO – Earlier national word marks and earlier international registration of word mark MIAMO – Earlier national figurative mark and earlier international registration of figurative mark MIAMO Healthy Skin System – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-508/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0570decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 16 October 2024.#Telefónica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark e.plus – No proof of genuine use of the mark in connection with some of the services – Determination of independent subcategories of services – Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-570/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0201decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 October 2024.#Communications Regulatory Authority (CRA) v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Iran – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection – Proportionality – Misuse of powers.#Case T-201/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0494_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 16 October 2024.#HG v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Compensation for damage suffered by the European Union – Recovery of a debt by offsetting – Limitation period – Applicable law – Second subparagraph of Article 98(2) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Concept of ‘normal circumstances’ – Prior formal decision establishing the claim which was the subject of the action.#Case T-494/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 October 2024

Proposal· PCCELEX 52024PC0477open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the 233rd session of the Council of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) as regards the proposed amendments to Chapter 1 (“Definitions and general principles”), Chapter 3 (“Entry and Departure of persons and their baggage”) Paragraph C (“Security of travel documents”), Paragraph D (“Travel documents”), Paragraph G (“Embarkation/Disembarkation Cards”), Paragraph H (“Inspection of travel documents”) and Chapter 8 (“Facilitation provisions covering specific subjects”) Paragraph H (“Trafficking in persons”) and I (“Wildlife Trafficking”) as included in Amendment 30 of Annex 9 – Facilitation to the Convention on International Civil Aviation (‘the Chicago Convention’)

European Union · European Commission · 16 October 2024

Proposal· PCCELEX 52024PC0478open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the 233rd session of the Council of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) as regards the proposed amendments to Chapter 2 (“Entry and Departure of aircraft”), Chapter 3 (“Entry and Departure of persons and their baggage”), Chapter 6 (“International airports – Facilities and services for traffic”) and Chapter 8 (“Facilitation provisions covering specific subjects”) Paragraph C (“Facilitation of search, rescue, accident investigation and salvage”) Paragraph E (“Establishment of national facilitation programmes”), Paragraph F (“Facilitation of transport of persons with disabilities”) and Paragraph G (“Assistance to aircraft accident victims and their families”) as included in Amendment 30 of Annex 9 – Facilitation to the Convention on International Civil Aviation (‘the Chicago Convention’)

European Union · European Commission · 16 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0554decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 October 2024.#Przedsiębiorstwo produkcyjno - usługowo - handlowe Jopp - Pol Eksport - Import Ryszard Jopp - Krzysztof Jopp sp.j. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing furniture legs – Lack of individual character – Lack of different overall impression – Informed user – End user – Normal use – Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Examination by the Office of the facts of its own motion – Article 63(1) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-554/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0554_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 October 2024.#Przedsiębiorstwo produkcyjno - usługowo - handlowe Jopp - Pol Eksport - Import Ryszard Jopp - Krzysztof Jopp sp.j. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing furniture legs – Lack of individual character – Lack of different overall impression – Informed user – End user – Normal use – Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Examination by the Office of the facts of its own motion – Article 63(1) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-554/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0051_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 October 2024.#CF v European Commission.#Civil service – Retirement pensions – Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union – Transfer to the EU scheme – Rejection of the request for transfer – Request submitted out of time – Exceptional circumstances – Article 77 of the Staff Regulations – Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations – Sixth paragraph of Article 5(1) of the general implementing provisions for Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations.#Case T-51/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0051decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 October 2024.#CF v European Commission.#Civil service – Retirement pensions – Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union – Transfer to the EU scheme – Rejection of the request for transfer – Request submitted out of time – Exceptional circumstances – Article 77 of the Staff Regulations – Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations – Sixth paragraph of Article 5(1) of the general implementing provisions for Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations.#Case T-51/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 October 2024

Proposal· PCCELEX 52024PC0441open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Joint Committee established by the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin as regards the amendment of Decision 1/2023 of that Joint Committee with respect to the use of movement certificates issued electronically in the framework of the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin applicable as of 1 January 2025

European Union · European Commission · 9 October 2024

Proposal· PCCELEX 52024PC0444open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the OACPS-EU Council of Ministers concerning the adoption of joint guidelines for the conduction of partnership dialogue under Article 3 of the Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Members of the Organisation of the African, Caribbean and Pacific States, of the other part

European Union · European Commission · 9 October 2024

Proposal· PCCELEX 52024PC0443R(01)open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Joint Committee established by the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin as regards the amendment of Decision 1/2023 of that Joint Committee to include transitional provisions to the amendments of the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin applicable as of 1 January 2025

European Union · European Commission · 8 October 2024

Proposal· PCCELEX 52024PC0443open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Joint Committee established by the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin as regards the amendment of Decision 1/2023 of that Joint Committee to include transitional provisions to the amendments of the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin applicable as of 1 January 2025

European Union · European Commission · 8 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0175_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Obshtina Svishtov v Rakovoditel na Upravlyavashtia organ na Operativna programa „Regioni v rastezh“ 2014-2020.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Own resources of the European Union – Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 – Article 2(36) – Concept of ‘irregularity’ – Article 143(2) – Prejudice caused to the budget of the European Union by charging an unjustified item of expenditure – Determination of the applicable financial correction rate – Scale of flat-rate correction rates – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-175/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0502_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 4 October 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-502/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0503_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 4 October 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-503/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0134_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Somateio 'Elliniko Symvoulio gia tous Prosfyges' and Astiki Mi Kerdoskopiki Etaireia 'Ypostirixi Prosfygon sto Aigaio' v Ypourgos Exoterikon and Ypourgos Metanastefsis kai Asylou.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Granting of international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 38 – Article 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Concept of ‘safe third country’ – Classification of the Republic of Türkiye as a ‘safe third country’ – Readmission of applicants for international protection in third countries – Refusal.#Case C-134/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0503decided

Order of the Court of 4 October 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-503/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0502decided

Order of the Court of 4 October 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-502/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0175decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Obshtina Svishtov v Rakovoditel na Upravlyavashtia organ na Operativna programa „Regioni v rastezh“ 2014-2020.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Veliko Tarnovo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Own resources of the European Union – Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 – Article 2(36) – Concept of ‘irregularity’ – Article 143(2) – Prejudice caused to the budget of the European Union by charging an unjustified item of expenditure – Determination of the applicable financial correction rate – Scale of flat-rate correction rates – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-175/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0721decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#European Commission v PB.#Appeal – Public service contracts – Irregularities in the procedure for the award of contracts – Regulation (EC) No 2988/95 – Articles 4, 5 and 7 – Decision for the recovery of amounts wrongly paid – Debit notes – Distinction between administrative measures and administrative penalties – Possibility of adopting an administrative measure in the absence of a sectoral rule – Recovery decision based on Regulation No 2988/95 and Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 – Regulation No 1605/2002 – Article 103 – Possibility of recovery from the director of the economic operator benefiting from European Union funds.#Case C-721/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

PreviousPage 8 of 9Next