Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

451 records in EU in 2026

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0326decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 March 2026.#Kiss Nail Products, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark IMPRESS – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Legal certainty – Equal treatment – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-326/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 March 2026

Proposal· PCCELEX 52026PC0124open

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT pursuant to Article 294(6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union concerning the position of the Council on the adoption of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2014/49/EU as regards the scope of deposit protection, the use of deposit guarantee schemes funds, cross-border cooperation, and transparency

European Union · European Commission · 6 March 2026

Proposal· PCCELEX 52026PC0123open

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT pursuant to Article 294(6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union concerning the position of the Council on the adoption of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2014/59/EU as regards early intervention measures, conditions for resolution and funding of resolution action and Directive 2014/24/EU as regards valuation services in resolution

European Union · European Commission · 6 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0457_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Romania v European Commission.#Appeal – Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) – European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/2020 – Expenditure excluded from European Union financing – Expenditure incurred by Romania – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 52 – Conformity clearance procedure – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 908/2014 – Article 34 – Change in the legal basis of the European Commission’s proposals for financial corrections – Possibility for the Member State concerned to make its views on those proposals known in a meaningful way – Concept of ‘external factor’ – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Article 44 – Diversification requirements – Confusion between set-aside land and temporary grassland – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 – Article 35 – Increase in the control rate – Concept of ‘significant non-compliance’.#Case C-457/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0210decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Asociación de Empresas de Servicios para la Dependencia (AESTE) v Ayuntamiento de Ortuella.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Contract for social services without accommodation – Contract with a value below the threshold for that directive to apply – Article 67 – Award criteria of a social nature – Most economically advantageous tender – Salary increase of staff performing the contract above the salary level provided for in the sectoral collective agreement – Connection with the subject matter of the contract – Proportionality and non-discrimination – Article 28 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to negotiate by collective agreement.#Case C-210/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 March 2026

Decision· DCELEX 32026D0860in force

Council Decision (EU) 2026/860 of 5 March 2026 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the European Union, within the Joint Committee established under the Protocol to the Agreement on the international occasional carriage of passengers by coach and bus (Interbus Agreement) regarding the international regular and special regular carriage of passengers by coach and bus, as regards draft Decision No …/… of that committee establishing its Rules of Procedure

European Union · EUR-Lex · 5 March 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0106_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 March 2026.#Pols Erm Tarim Anonim Sirketi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Pol’s FREEZE FRESH – Earlier EU figurative marks PAUL depuis 1889 and PAUL LE CAFE – Relative ground for refusal – Detriment to the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Link between the marks at issue.#Case T-106/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 March 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0719_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 4 March 2026.#La Superquímica, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-719/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 March 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0719decided

Order of the Court of 4 March 2026.#La Superquímica, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency of development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-719/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 March 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0106decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 March 2026.#Pols Erm Tarim Anonim Sirketi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Pol’s FREEZE FRESH – Earlier EU figurative marks PAUL depuis 1889 and PAUL LE CAFE – Relative ground for refusal – Detriment to the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Link between the marks at issue.#Case T-106/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0382_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Defence alleging State constraint – Decision of the General Court of the European Union not to rule on certain pleas – Proof of participation in a single and continuous infringement – Evidence relating to recitals in the decision at issue supporting a part of the operative part thereof which was annulled by the General Court.#Case C-382/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0092decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#European Commission v Hungary.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Electronic communications networks and services – Radio spectrum – Directives 2002/20/EC, 2002/21/EC, 2002/77/EC and (EU) 2018/1972 – Individual rights of use – National legislation and administrative decisions depriving a commercial radio station of the possibility of broadcasting content on an analogue terrestrial FM radio frequency – Principles of proportionality, transparency, non-discrimination and good administration – Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Freedom of expression and information – Freedom of the media.#Case C-92/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0382decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Defence alleging State constraint – Decision of the General Court of the European Union not to rule on certain pleas – Proof of participation in a single and continuous infringement – Evidence relating to recitals in the decision at issue supporting a part of the operative part thereof which was annulled by the General Court.#Case C-382/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0403_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#SAS Cargo Group A/S and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Rights of the defence – Right of access to the file – Inculpatory and exculpatory evidence – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Statement of objections – Right to be heard – Single and continuous infringement – Geographic scope of the cartel – State coercion defence – Conditions under which applicable – Proof of participation in a single and continuous infringement – Calculation of the fine – Unlimited jurisdiction of the General Court of the European Union – Distortion.#Case C-403/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0092_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#European Commission v Hungary.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Electronic communications networks and services – Radio spectrum – Directives 2002/20/EC, 2002/21/EC, 2002/77/EC and (EU) 2018/1972 – Individual rights of use – National legislation and administrative decisions depriving a commercial radio station of the possibility of broadcasting content on an analogue terrestrial FM radio frequency – Principles of proportionality, transparency, non-discrimination and good administration – Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Freedom of expression and information – Freedom of the media.#Case C-92/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0403decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#SAS Cargo Group A/S and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Rights of the defence – Right of access to the file – Inculpatory and exculpatory evidence – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Statement of objections – Right to be heard – Single and continuous infringement – Geographic scope of the cartel – State coercion defence – Conditions under which applicable – Proof of participation in a single and continuous infringement – Calculation of the fine – Unlimited jurisdiction of the General Court of the European Union – Distortion.#Case C-403/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0437_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 25 February 2026.#Empreinte v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of a corkscrew – Absolute ground for refusal – Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result – Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Right to sound administration – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Legal certainty – Equal treatment.#Case T-437/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 February 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0150_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 February 2026.#AlfaStrakhovanie AO v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Entry and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Article 2(1)(b) and (f) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Infringement of essential procedural requirements – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business – Principle of non-discrimination.#Case T-150/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 February 2026

PreviousPage 9 of 10Next