Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Healthcare

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

39 records in EU in 2020

All countriesUnited States · 38,231Austria · 12,175Ireland · 11,064Netherlands · 4,600Germany · 1,149United Kingdom · 1,134European Union · 715France · 121Belgium · 4Search this topic

Records

Record· TOCELEX 62019TO0568(01)_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 December 2020.#Micreos Food Safety BV v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Public health – Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 – Phage-based product used to reduce the presence of the bacterial pathogen Listeria monocytogenes in animal-derived ready-to-eat food – Rejection of the request to approve Listex™ P100 as a decontaminant in animal-derived ready-to-eat food – Act not open to challenge – Act not intended to produce binding legal effects – Purely confirmatory act – Informative act – Inadmissibility.#Case T-568/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2020

Record· TOCELEX 62019TO0568(01)decided

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 December 2020.#Micreos Food Safety BV v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Public health – Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 – Phage-based product used to reduce the presence of the bacterial pathogen Listeria monocytogenes in animal-derived ready-to-eat food – Rejection of the request to approve Listex™ P100 as a decontaminant in animal-derived ready-to-eat food – Act not open to challenge – Act not intended to produce binding legal effects – Purely confirmatory act – Informative act – Inadmissibility.#Case T-568/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0225_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 November 2020.#R.N.N.S. and K.A. v Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken.#References for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Community Code on Visas – Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 – Article 32(1) to (3) – Decision to refuse a visa – Annex VI – Standard form – Statement of reasons – Threat to public policy, internal security or public health, or to the international relations of any of the Member States – Article 22 – Procedure of prior consultation of central authorities of other Member States – Objection to the issuing of a visa – Appeal against a decision to refuse a visa – Scope of judicial review – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy.#Joined Cases C-225/19 and C-226/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 November 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0225decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 November 2020.#R.N.N.S. and K.A. v Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem.#References for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Community Code on Visas – Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 – Article 32(1) to (3) – Decision to refuse a visa – Annex VI – Standard form – Statement of reasons – Threat to public policy, internal security or public health, or to the international relations of any of the Member States – Article 22 – Procedure of prior consultation of central authorities of other Member States – Objection to the issuing of a visa – Appeal against a decision to refuse a visa – Scope of judicial review – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy.#Joined Cases C-225/19 and C-226/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 November 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0663_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 November 2020.#Criminal proceedings against B S and C A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of goods – Common organisation of the markets in the flax and hemp sector – Exceptions – Protection of public health – National legislation limiting the industrialisation and marketing of hemp solely to fibre and seeds – Cannabidiol (CBD).#Case C-663/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 November 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0663decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 November 2020.#Criminal proceedings against B S and C A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel d'Aix-En-Provence.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of goods – Common organisation of the markets in the flax and hemp sector – Exceptions – Protection of public health – National legislation limiting the industrialisation and marketing of hemp solely to fibre and seeds – Cannabidiol (CBD).#Case C-663/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 November 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0649decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#A v Daniel B and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Paris.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products for human use not subject to compulsory medical prescription – Online sales – Advertising for a pharmacy’s website – Limitations – Prohibition on discounts where the order exceeds certain amounts and the use of paid referencing – Obligation to require a patient to complete a health questionnaire prior to validation of his or her first order on a pharmacy’s website – Protection of public health – Directive 2000/31/EC – Electronic commerce – Article 2(a) – Information society service – Article 2(h) – Coordinated field – Article 3 – Country-of-origin principle – Derogations – Justification – Protection of public health – Protection of the dignity of the profession of pharmacist – Prevention of the abusive consumption of medicinal products.#Case C-649/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 October 2020

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0225decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 9 September 2020.#R.N.N.S. and K.A. v Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem.#References for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Community Code on Visas – Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 – Article 32(1) to (3) – Decision to refuse a visa – Annex VI – Standard form – Statement of reasons – Threat to public policy, internal security or public health, or to the international relations of any of the Member States – Article 22 – Procedure of prior consultation of central authorities of other Member States – Objection to the issuing of a visa – Appeal against a decision to refuse a visa – Scope of judicial review – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy.#Joined Cases C-225/19 and C-226/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 September 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0429_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 July 2020.#BRF SA and SHB Comércio e Indústria de Alimentos SA v European Commission.#Public health — Specific rules for the organisation of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption — Amendment of the lists of third country establishments from which imports of specified products of animal origin are permitted, regarding certain establishments from Brazil — Article 12(4)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 — Comitology — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of defence — Powers of the Commission — Equal treatment — Proportionality.#Case T-429/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 July 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0429decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 July 2020.#BRF SA and SHB Comércio e Indústria de Alimentos SA v European Commission.#Public health — Specific rules for the organisation of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption — Amendment of the lists of third country establishments from which imports of specified products of animal origin are permitted, regarding certain establishments from Brazil — Article 12(4)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 — Comitology — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of defence — Powers of the Commission — Equal treatment — Proportionality.#Case T-429/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 July 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0328decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 June 2020.#Proceedings brought by Porin kaupunki.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2004/18/EC – Article 1(2)(a) – Public procurement in the field of transport services – Cooperation agreement between municipalities regarding the organisation and provision of social and healthcare services based on the model of the ‘responsible municipality’ under Finnish law – Transfer of responsibility for the organisation of services to one of the municipalities in the area covered by the cooperation concerned – ‘In-house’ contract – Award of services to a company wholly owned by the responsible municipality without a call for competition.#Case C-328/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 June 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0786_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 June 2020.#ratiopharm GmbH v Novartis Consumer Health GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of public health – Internal market – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Advertising – Article 96 – Distribution of free samples of medicinal products to persons qualified to prescribe them – Pharmacists excluded from the distribution of free samples of medicinal products – Inapplicability to distribution of free samples of non-prescription medicinal products – Consequences for the Member States.#Case C-786/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 June 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0786decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 June 2020.#ratiopharm GmbH v Novartis Consumer Health GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of public health – Internal market – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Advertising – Article 96 – Distribution of free samples of medicinal products to persons qualified to prescribe them – Pharmacists excluded from the distribution of free samples of medicinal products – Inapplicability to distribution of free samples of non-prescription medicinal products – Consequences for the Member States.#Case C-786/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 June 2020

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0663decided

Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 14 May 2020.#Criminal proceedings against B S and C A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel d'Aix-En-Provence.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of goods – Common organisation of the markets in the flax and hemp sector – Exceptions – Protection of public health – National legislation limiting the industrialisation and marketing of hemp solely to fibre and seeds – Cannabidiol (CBD).#Case C-663/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 May 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0182_SUMdecided

Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Siebte Kammer) vom 26. März 2020.#Pfizer Consumer Healthcare Ltd gegen Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Gemeinsamer Zolltarif – Kombinierte Nomenklatur – Zolltarifliche Einreihung – Positionen 3005 und 3824 – Wärme erzeugende Auflagen und Gürtel, um Schmerzen zu lindern – Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2016/1140 – Ungültigkeit.#Rechtssache C-182/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 March 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0182decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 March 2020.#Pfizer Consumer Healthcare Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber).#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Combined Nomenclature — Tariff classification — Heading 3005 and heading 3824 — Self-heating patches and belts to relieve pain — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1140 — Invalidity.#Case C-182/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 March 2020

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0649decided

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 27 February 2020.#A v Daniel B and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Paris.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products for human use not subject to compulsory medical prescription – Online sales – Advertising for a pharmacy’s website – Limitations – Prohibition on discounts where the order exceeds certain amounts and the use of paid referencing – Obligation to require a patient to complete a health questionnaire prior to validation of his or her first order on a pharmacy’s website – Protection of public health – Directive 2000/31/EC – Electronic commerce – Article 2(a) – Information society service – Article 2(h) – Coordinated field – Article 3 – Country-of-origin principle – Derogations – Justification – Protection of public health – Protection of the dignity of the profession of pharmacist – Prevention of the abusive consumption of medicinal products.#Case C-649/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 February 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0524_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 January 2020.#Dr. Willmar Schwabe GmbH & Co.KG v Queisser Pharma GmbH & Co. KG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public health — Information and consumer protection — Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 — Implementing Decision 2013/63/EU — Nutritional and health claims made on foods — Article 10(3) — Reference to general, non-specific benefits — Concept of ‘accompanying’ a specific health claim — Obligation to produce scientific evidence — Scope.#Case C-524/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 January 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0524decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 January 2020.#Dr. Willmar Schwabe GmbH & Co.KG v Queisser Pharma GmbH & Co. KG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public health — Information and consumer protection — Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 — Implementing Decision 2013/63/EU — Nutritional and health claims made on foods — Article 10(3) — Reference to general, non-specific benefits — Concept of ‘accompanying’ a specific health claim — Obligation to produce scientific evidence — Scope.#Case C-524/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 January 2020