Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects

Rule of law

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

251 records in 2012

Records

Bill· HRH.R. 4405 (112th)reported

Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act of 2012

United States · United States Congress · 19 April 2012

Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act of 2012 - Directs the Secretary of State to publish and update a list of each person the Secretary has reason to believe: (1) is responsible for the detention, abuse, or death of Sergei Magnitsky, participated in related liability concealment efforts, financially benefited from Sergei Magnitsky's detention, abuse, or death, or was involved in the criminal conspiracy uncovered by Sergei Magnitsky; or (2) is responsible for extrajudicial killings, torture, or other human rights violations committed against individuals seeking to expose illegal activity carried out by Russian officials, or against persons seeking to promote human rights and freedoms. Makes an alien on such list ineligible to enter or be admitted to the United States. Revokes any visa issued for such person. Authorizes the Secretary to waive such prohibition if in the U.S. national security interest. Requires congressional notification of any such waiver. Directs the Secretary of the Treasury to freeze and prohibit U.S. property transactions of an individual who is on the list or who acts as an agent for a listed individual. Authorizes the Secretary to waive such actions if in the U.S. national security interest. Requires congressional notification of any such waiver. Subjects a person who violates, attempts to violate, or causes a violation of such prohibitions to specified penalties. Terminates this Act 10 years after its enactment.

Record· CJCELEX 62010CJ0221decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 19 April 2012.#Artegodan GmbH v European Commission.#Appeal — Second paragraph of Article 288 EC — Non-contractual liability of the Union — Conditions — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Decision withdrawing marketing authorisations for medicinal products for human use containing amfepramone.#Case C‑221/10 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 April 2012

Law· Initiatiefwetgeving2012Z08588adopted

Voorstel van wet van het lid Schouw houdende verklaring dat er grond bestaat een voorstel in overweging te nemen tot verandering in de Grondwet, strekkende tot de deconstitutionalisering van de benoeming van de commissaris van de Koning en de burgemeester

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 19 April 2012

Voorstel van wet van het lid Schouw houdende verklaring dat er grond bestaat een voorstel in overweging te nemen tot verandering in de Grondwet, strekkende tot de deconstitutionalisering van de benoeming van de commissaris van de Koning en de burgemeester

Report· Ausschussbericht1756 d.B.ausschussbericht

BVG Sicherheitsbehörden-Neustrukturierung 2012

Austria · National Council · 18 April 2012

Bericht des Ausschusses für innere Angelegenheiten über die Regierungsvorlage (1679 d.B.): Bundesverfassungsgesetz, mit dem das Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz und das Fremdenpolizeigesetz 2005 geändert werden (BVG Sicherheitsbehörden-Neustrukturierung 2012)

Bill· HRH.R. 4388 (112th)referred

Right to Habeas Corpus Act

United States · United States Congress · 18 April 2012

Right to Habeas Corpus Act - States that nothing in the Authorization for Use of Military Force or the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 shall be construed to deny the availability of the writ of habeas corpus in a court ordained or established by or under Article III of the Constitution for any person detained in the United States pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force.

Record· Overig2012Z07408concluded

Brief van de Onderwijsraad t.g.v. het rapport "Artikel 23 Grondwet in maatschappelijk perspectief". Deze adviesaanvraag is op verrzoek van de Kamer verricht door de Onderwijsraad (zie Kamerstuk 32 500 VIII, nr. 145)

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 10 April 2012

Brief van de Onderwijsraad t.g.v. het rapport "Artikel 23 Grondwet in maatschappelijk perspectief". Deze adviesaanvraag is op verrzoek van de Kamer verricht door de Onderwijsraad (zie Kamerstuk 32 500 VIII, nr. 145)

Resolution· Selbständiger Entschließungsantrag1906/A(E)selbständiger entschließungsantrag

Erfüllung des Staatsvertrages von Wien

Austria · National Council · 29 March 2012

Antrag der Abgeordneten Herbert Scheibner, Kolleginnen und Kollegen betreffend Erfüllung des Staatsvertrages von Wien <i>(hinsichtlich zweisprachiger topographischer</i> <i>Ortsbezeichnungen, die Amtssprache und die weitere</i> <i>Zusammenarbeit mit der slowenischen Volksgruppe in Kärnten)</i>

Question· writtenPQ 238asked

241 Deputy Patrick Nulty asked the Minister for Health in view of the March 2012 decision of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe in relation to the execution of the judgement in the case of A, B and C versus Ireland, which noted that, given the current status of execution of the judgement, the question is raised of how whilst waiting form measures to execute the judgement to be adopted, the situation of women who find themselves in a similar position to the third applicant is addressed and which expressed concern regarding the situation of such women: the interim measures that are in place to ensure that women in circumstances similar to those experienced by Applicant C have access to the services to which they are entitled under the Irish constitution; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17435/12]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 29 March 2012

241 Deputy Patrick Nulty asked the Minister for Health in view of the March 2012 decision of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe in relation to the execution of the judgement in the case of A, B and C versus Ireland, which noted that, given the current status of execution of the judgement, the question is raised of how whilst waiting form measures to execute the judgement to be adopted, the situation of women who find themselves in a similar position to the third applicant is addressed and which expressed concern regarding the situation of such women: the interim measures that are in place to ensure that women in circumstances similar to those experienced by Applicant C have access to the services to which they are entitled under the Irish constitution; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17435/12]

Resolution· SCONRESS.Con.Res. 39 (112th)referred

A concurrent resolution setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2013, revising the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal year 2012, and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2013 through 2022.

United States · United States Congress · 29 March 2012

Sets forth the congressional budget for the federal government for FY2013, including the appropriate budgetary levels for FY2013-FY2022. Lists recommended budgetary levels and amounts for FY2012-FY2022 with respect to: (1) federal revenues, (2) new budget authority, (3) budget outlays, (4) deficits, (5) public debt, and (6) debt held by the public. Lists the appropriate levels of new budget authority, outlays, and administrative expenses of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund and the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund (Social Security Trust Funds), and specified major functional categories for FY2012-FY2022. Authorizes the Chairman of the Senate Budget Committee to make certain deficit-reduction reserve funds for legislation for: (1) the sale of unused or vacant federal properties, (2) the sale of excess federal lands, (3) repeal of the Davis-Bacon prevailing wage laws, (4) reduction of the federal vehicles fleet, and (5) the sale of financial assets purchased through the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). Authorizes the Chairman to reduce the allocations of committees for any savings achieved by such sales, repeal, and reduction, with the savings used to reduce the deficit. Makes it out of order to consider in the Senate any legislation that would cause the discretionary spending limits in this resolution to be exceeded, except by a supermajority waiver. Specifies such discretionary spending limits in the Senate for FY2012-FY2022. Authorizes adjustments to the discretionary spending limits, budgetary aggregates, and allocations for adjustments to support ongoing overseas deployments and other activities. Makes it out of order to consider in the Senate any legislation that would require advanced appropriations. Sets forth requirements for the treatment of emergency legislation. Allows the Chairman to adjust the estimate of budgetary effects of legislation that: (1) amends or supersedes the system for updating physician payments under title XVIII (Medicare) of the Social Security Act, (2) amends the Internal Revenue Code to establish a flat 17% tax rate, and (3) extends the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) relief for individuals. Permits the Chairman to make such adjustments only for points of order in this legislation relating to: (1) pay-as-you-go, and (2) long- and short-term deficits. Makes it out of order to consider in the Senate any budget resolution after the enactment of this resolution until a balanced budget amendment to the U.S. Constitution has been adopted, except by a supermajority waiver. Requires Senate committees to: (1) review programs and tax expenditures in their jurisdictions to identify waste, fraud, and abuse or duplication, and to increase the use of performance data to inform committee work; (2) review the matters for congressional consideration identified on the Government Accountability Office (GAO) High Risk list report; and (3) make recommendations to the Senate Budget Committee to improve governmental performance in their annual views and estimates reports. Rescinds any unobligated or unspent adjustments of allocations and aggregates made pursuant to this resolution after 36 months. Sets forth reconciliation instructions for the Senate Committees on: (1) Foreign Relations; (2) Commerce, Science, and Transportation; (3) Agriculture, Nutrition, and Energy [ sic ]; (4) Environment and Public Works; (5) Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions; (6) Finance; and (7) Energy and Natural Resources. Requires the Senate Committee on the Budget to report legislation to the Senate that amends the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act) to replace the sequester established by the Budget Control Act of 2011 that revises the discretionary spending limits and reduces the discetionary appropriations and direct spending specified in such Act unless a joint committee bill achieving an amount greater than $1.2 trillion in deficit reduction is enacted by January 15, 2012. Requires such legislation to include language making its application contingent upon the enactment of the reconciliation bill required by this Act. Declares the policy of Congress on attainment of Social Security solvency, reduction in Medicare unfunded liabilities, and tax reform. Expresses the sense of Congress on: (1) applying regulatory analysis requirements for executive branch agencies to independent agencies, (2) voting on the Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act, (3) the automatic biennial sunsetting of all federal regulations unless repromulgated by Congress, (4) implementing regulatory process reform, and (5) incorporating formal rulemaking procedures for all major regulations.

Bill· HJRESH.J.Res. 107 (112th)referred

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to parental rights.

United States · United States Congress · 29 March 2012

Constitutional Amendment - States that the liberty of parents to direct the education of their children is a fundamental right. States that neither the United States nor any state shall infringe upon this right without demonstrating that its governmental interest as applied to the person is of the highest order and not otherwise served. Declares that no treaty may be adopted nor shall any source of international law be employed to supersede, modify, interpret, or apply to the rights guaranteed by this amendment.

Bill· Selbständiger Antrag1897/Aselbständiger antrag

Verschiebung der Kompetenz für Jugendschutz, Änderung

Austria · National Council · 28 March 2012

Antrag der Abgeordneten Herbert Scheibner, Kolleginnen und Kollegen betreffend ein Bundesverfassungsgesetz, mit dem zur Verschiebung der Kompetenz für Jugendschutz das Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz geändert wird

Resolution· Unselbständiger Entschließungsantrag822/UEAunselbständiger entschließungsantrag

Novellierung des Bundes-Verfassungsgesetzes zur Schaffung einer alleinigen Gesetzgebungskompetenz des Bundes im Bereich des Gesundheitswesens

Austria · National Council · 28 March 2012

Unselbständiger Entschließungsantrag der Abgeordneten Mag. Werner Kogler, Kolleginnen und Kollegen betreffend Einbringung einer Regierungsvorlage zur Novellierung des Bundes-Verfassungsgesetzes zur Schaffung einer alleinigen Gesetzgebungskompetenz des Bundes im Bereich des Gesundheitswesens

Bill· HRH.R. 4265 (112th)referred

Shared Responsibility in Preserving America's Future Act

United States · United States Congress · 27 March 2012

Shared Responsibility in Preserving America's Future Act - Amends the Internal Revenue Code to impose, in taxable years beginning after 2012 and before 2023,&nbsp;an additional 5% tax on individual taxpayers whose modified adjusted gross income exceeds $1 million (adjusted for inflation after 2013). Defines "modified adjusted gross income" as adjusted gross income reduced by the excess of: (1) gross income from a trade or business which is not a passive activity and with respect to which wages are paid to at least one full-time equivalent employee, over (2) the tax deductions properly allocable to such income.&nbsp; Makes this additional tax contingent upon the submission and ratification&nbsp;of a proposed amendment to the Constitution requiring a balanced budget or limiting spending.

Bill· HJRESH.J.Res. 106 (112th)open

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to protect the rights of crime victims.

United States · United States Congress · 26 March 2012

Constitutional Amendment - Prohibits denial or abridgement of the rights of a crime victim to fairness, respect, and dignity. Grants a crime victim the right: (1) to reasonable notice of, and to not be excluded from, public proceedings relating to the offense; (2) to be heard at any release, plea, sentencing, or other such proceeding involving any right established under this amendment; (3) to proceedings free from unreasonable delay; (4) to reasonable notice of the release or escape of the accused; (5) to due consideration of the crime victim's safety; and (6) to restitution. Grants the crime victim, or the victim's lawful representative, standing to fully assert and enforce such rights in any court.

Bill· SJRESS.J.Res. 39 (112th)referred

A joint resolution removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights amendment.

United States · United States Congress · 22 March 2012

Eliminates the time limit for ratification of the equal rights amendment (prohibits discrimination on account of sex) proposed to the states in House Joint Resolution 208 of the 92nd Congress, as agreed to in the Senate on March 22, 1972. Declares that such amendment shall be part of the Constitution whenever ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several states.

Report· Ausschussbericht1712 d.B.ausschussbericht

Akkreditierungsgesetz 2012, das Maß- und Eichgesetz und das Kesselgesetz

Austria · National Council · 21 March 2012

Bericht des Ausschusses für Wirtschaft und Industrie über die Regierungsvorlage (1687 d.B.): Bundesgesetz, mit dem ein Akkreditierungsgesetz 2012 erlassen wird und das Maß- und Eichgesetz und das Kesselgesetz geändert werden

Bill· SS. 2205 (112th)referred

Second Amendment Sovereignty Act of 2012

United States · United States Congress · 19 March 2012

Second Amendment Sovereignty Act of 2012 - Expresses the sense of Congress that U.S. sovereignty and the constitutionally protected freedoms of American gun owners must be upheld and not be undermined by a United Nations Arms Trade Treaty. Prohibits funds from being obligated or expended to use U.S. influence, in connection with negotiations for a United Nations Arms Trade Treaty, to restrict the rights of U.S. citizens under the second amendment to the Constitution, or to otherwise regulate domestic manufacture, assembly, possession, use, transfer, or purchase of firearms, ammunition, or related items.

Resolution· HRESH.Res. 586 (112th)referred

Expressing the concern of Congress regarding the Argentine Republic's willful and repeated disregard for the rule of law in the United States.

United States · United States Congress · 16 March 2012

Declares that: (1) Argentina's refusal to honor U.S. court and arbitral award judgments threatens the economic well-being of the United States and undermines court integrity and efficacy, and (2) Argentina should honor its obligations to U.S. investors. Declares that the United States should: (1) work with International Monetary Fund (IMF) member states to restrict Argentina's access to IMF benefits until Argentina has complied with its obligations, and (2) oppose further loans to Argentina by the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank and encourage other countries to do the same. Declares that Argentina's behavior is not befitting a member of The Group of Twenty Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors (G-20) and that the United States should work with other G-20 members to re-evaluate Argentina's G-20 membership.

Question· writtenPQ 60asked

112 Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Taoiseach if he will increase the scope of the constitutional convention to an examination of the fundamental rights provisions in Articles 40 to 45 of the Constitution. [13636/12]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 13 March 2012

112 Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Taoiseach if he will increase the scope of the constitutional convention to an examination of the fundamental rights provisions in Articles 40 to 45 of the Constitution. [13636/12]

Record· Verzoek bij regeling van werkzaamheden2012Z04997concluded

Brief van de minister en staatssecretaris van Buitenlandse Zaken over de inzet van het kabinet tijdens het informele overleg geïnitieerd door de Duitse minister van Buitenlandse Zaken over een mogelijke nieuwe Europese grondwet

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 13 March 2012

Brief van de minister en staatssecretaris van Buitenlandse Zaken over de inzet van het kabinet tijdens het informele overleg geïnitieerd door de Duitse minister van Buitenlandse Zaken over een mogelijke nieuwe Europese grondwet

Question· Schriftliche Frage17/8958open

Unterschiede zwischen der im Fiskalvertrag und im deutschen Grundgesetz festgelegten Schuldenbremse

Germany · German Bundestag · 9 March 2012

Originaltext der Frage(n):<br /> <br /> In welchen konkreten Punkten unterscheidet sich die im sog. Fiskalvertrag festgelegte Schuldenbremse von der im deutschen Grundgesetz festgelegten Schuldenbremse (auch hier bitte eine vollständige Auflistung aller Unterschiede machen)?<br /> <br /> Auf welche Art und Weise soll nach den Vorstellungen der Bundesregierung der in Artikel 3 Absatz 1 Buchstabe e des sog. Fiskalvertrags genannte automatische Korrekturmechanismus in das deutsche Grundgesetz eingefügt werden?

Bill· Selbständiger Antrag1864/Aselbständiger antrag

Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz, Änderung

Austria · National Council · 8 March 2012

Antrag der Abgeordneten Dr. Josef Cap, Karlheinz Kopf, Kolleginnen und Kollegen betreffend ein Bundesverfassungsgesetz, mit dem das Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz geändert wird <i>(Senkung der Mitgliederzahlen im National- und Bundesrat)</i>

Bill· SS. 2175 (112th)referred

Due Process and Military Detention Amendments Act of 2012

United States · United States Congress · 8 March 2012

Due Process and Military Detention Amendments Act of 2012 - Amends the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 to provide that, in the case of a person detained in the United States pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force, disposition under the law of war shall only mean transfer for trial and proceedings by a court established under article III of the Constitution. Requires such trial and proceedings to have all due process provided under the Constitution. Repeals the requirement of detention in military custody pending disposition under the law of war for individuals determined to be a member or part of al Qaeda or an associated force who has participated in planning or carrying out an attack or attempted attack against the United States or its coalition partners.

Bill· HRH.R. 4181 (112th)referred

To amend title 9, United States Code, to exclude employment contracts and employment disputes from such title.

United States · United States Congress · 8 March 2012

Amends federal arbitration law to exclude from the definition of &quot;commerce&quot; all contracts of employment. (Current law excludes only the employment contracts of seamen, railroad employees, and other classes of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce.) Declares that no predispute arbitration agreement shall be valid or enforceable if it requires arbitration of an employment dispute. Defines &quot;employment dispute&quot; as a dispute between an employer and employee arising out of the employer-employee relationship. Exempts from this Act arbitration provisions in a contract between an employer and a labor organization. Denies to any such arbitration provision, however, the effect of waiving the right of an employee to seek judicial enforcement of a right arising under the U.S. Constitution, a state constitution, a federal or state statute, or related public policy.

Bill· HRH.R. 4192 (112th)referred

Due Process and Military Detention Amendments Act

United States · United States Congress · 8 March 2012

Due Process and Military Detention Amendments Act - Amends the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 to provide that, in the case of a person detained in the United States pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force, disposition under the law of war shall only mean transfer for trial and proceedings by a court established under article III of the Constitution. Requires such trial and proceedings to have all due process provided under the Constitution. Repeals the requirement of detention in military custody pending disposition under the law of war for individuals determined to be a member or part of al Qaeda or an associated force who has participated in planning or carrying out an attack or attempted attack against the United States or its coalition partners.

Resolution· HCONRESH.Con.Res. 107 (112th)referred

Expressing the sense of Congress that the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under Article II, section 4 of the Constitution.

United States · United States Congress · 7 March 2012

Expresses the sense of Congress that, except in response to an actual or imminent attack against the United States, the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress violates the exclusive power of Congress to declare war under article I of the Constitution, and therefore constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II.

Resolution· SRESS.Res. 386 (112th)passed

A resolution calling for free and fair elections in Iran, and for other purposes.

United States · United States Congress · 1 March 2012

Reaffirms the commitment of the United States to democracy, human rights, civil liberties, and the rule of law, and supports the Iranian people in their calls for a democratic government that respects such rights and freedoms. Condemns Iran's human rights violations. Urges the President, the Secretary of State, and world leaders to express support for the universal rights and freedoms of the Iranian people and to condemn elections that are not free and do not meet international standards.

Report· CCCELEX 62009CC0335decided

Opinion of Advocate General Cruz Villalón delivered on 1  March 2012.#Republic of Poland v European Commission.#Appeal — Common organisation of the markets — Transitional measures adopted because of the accession of new Member States — Regulation (EC) No 1972/2003 laying down measures in respect of trade in agricultural products — Action for annulment — Period within which an action must be brought — Point from which that period starts to run — Lateness — Inadmissibility — Amendment of a provision of that regulation — Recommencement of period within which an action must be brought — Partial admissibility — Grounds of appeal — Infringement of the principles underlying a community based on the rule of law and of the principle of effective judicial protection — Infringement of the principles of free movement of goods and of non-discrimination on grounds of nationality — Infringement of the principles of proportionality and protection of legitimate expectations — Infringement of the hierarchy of norms — Infringement of Article 41 of the 2003 Act of Accession — Erroneous interpretation of Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1972/2003 — Infringement of duty to state reasons.#Case C-335/09 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 March 2012

Amendment· AbänderungsantragAA-240abänderungsantrag

Opferfürsorgegesetz

Austria · National Council · 29 February 2012

Amendment· AbänderungsantragAA-238abänderungsantrag

EBIG-Einführungsgesetz

Austria · National Council · 29 February 2012

Bill· Selbständiger Antrag1859/Aselbständiger antrag

Preisgesetz, Änderung

Austria · National Council · 29 February 2012

Antrag der Abgeordneten Bernhard Themessl, Kolleginnen und Kollegen betreffend ein Bundesgesetz, mit dem das Bundesgesetz, mit dem Bestimmungen über Preise und Sachgüter und Leistungen getroffen werden (Preisgesetz 1992), BGBl. Nr. 145/1992, geändert wird

Bill· Regierungsvorlage: Bundes(verfassungs)gesetz1679 d.B.regierungsvorlage: bundes(verfassungs)gesetz

BVG Sicherheitsbehörden-Neustrukturierung 2012

Austria · National Council · 28 February 2012

Bundesverfassungsgesetz, mit dem das Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz und das Fremdenpolizeigesetz 2005 geändert werden (BVG Sicherheitsbehörden-Neustrukturierung 2012)

PreviousPage 5 of 6Next