Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · EU

Transport

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

101 records in EU in 2020

All countriesSearch this topic

Records

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-9-2020-005307answered

Public transport

European Union · European Parliament · 29 September 2020

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0288decided

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 17 September 2020.#QM v Finanzamt Saarbrücken.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht des Saarlandes.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 2(1)(c) – Supplies of services for consideration – Article 26(1) – Transactions treated as supplies of services for consideration – Article 56(2) – Determination of the point of reference for tax purposes – Hiring of means of transport – Making cars available to employees.#Case C-288/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 September 2020

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0137decided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 September 2020.#MV v SATA International - Serviços e Transportes Aéreos SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(3) – Compensation to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights – Scope – Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation – Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ – Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory famework of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-137/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 September 2020

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0137_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 September 2020.#MV v SATA International - Serviços e Transportes Aéreos SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(3) – Compensation to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights – Scope – Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation – Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ – Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory famework of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-137/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 September 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0356decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 September 2020.#Delfly sp. z o.o. v Smartwings Poland sp. z o. o., formerly Travel Service Polska sp. z o.o.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 7 – Right to compensation in the event of delay or cancellation of a flight – Compensation procedure – Claim expressed in national currency – National provision prohibiting the creditor from choosing the currency.#Case C-356/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 September 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0530decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 September 2020.#NM, acting as liquidator of de NIKI Luftfahrt GmbH v ON.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Articles 5 and 9 – Obligation of the air carrier to offer hotel accommodation to passengers whose flights have been cancelled – Damage suffered by a passenger during her stay at the hotel providing the accommodation – Possibility of invoking the liability of the air carrier as a result of negligence on the part of employees of the hotel.#Case C-530/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 September 2020

Record· TOCELEX 62019TO0613_INFdecided

Beschikking van het Gerecht (Zevende kamer) van 2 september 2020.#European Network on Independent Living Brussels Office (ENIL Brussels Office) e.a. tegen Europese Commissie.#Beroep tot nietigverklaring – EFRO – Operationeel programma ,Regio’s in groei’ – Prioritaire as 5 (Regionale sociale infrastructuur) – Subsidie ter ondersteuning van de deïnstitutionalisatie van diensten voor volwassen en personen met een handicap – Afwijziging van het verzoek van organisaties die personen met een handicap verdedigen en vertegenwoordigen om de oproep tot het indienen van voorstellen op te schorten – Niet voor beroep vatbare handeling – Niet-ontvankelijkheid.#Zaak T-613/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 September 2020

Record· TOCELEX 62019TO0613decided

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 September 2020.#European Network on Independent Living Brussels Office (ENIL Brussels Office) and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment – ERDF – Operational programme ‘Regions in Growth’ – Priority Axis 5 (Regional social infrastructure) – Grant intended to support the deinstitutionalisation of services for elderly people and people with disabilities – Refusal to suspend the call for proposals at the request of organisations for the defence and representation of people with disabilities – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility.#Case T-613/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 September 2020

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0619decided

Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 16 July 2020.#Land Baden-Württemberg v D.R.#Request for a preliminary ruling from Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Aarhus Convention – Directive 2003/4/EC – Public access to environmental information – ‘Stuttgart 21’ infrastructure project – Refusal of a request for environmental information – Article 4(1) – Grounds for refusal – Term ‘internal communications’ – Scope – Limitation in time of the protection of such communications.#Case C-619/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0771_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 16 juillet 2020.#Commission européenne contre Hongrie.#Manquement d’État – Marchés intérieurs de l’électricité et du gaz naturel – Réseaux de transport de l’électricité et du gaz naturel – Conditions d’accès – Règlement (CE) no 714/2009 – Article 14, paragraphe 1 – Règlement (CE) no 715/2009 – Article 13, paragraphe 1 – Coûts – Fixation des redevances d’accès aux réseaux – Directive 2009/72/CE – Article 37, paragraphe 17 – Directive 2009/73/CE – Article 41, paragraphe 17 – Voies de recours internes – Principe de protection juridictionnelle effective.#Affaire C-771/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2020

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-9-2020-004201answered

Animal transport to Libya

European Union · European Parliament · 15 July 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0086_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 9 juillet 2020.#SL contre Vueling Airlines SA.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Transport aérien – Convention de Montréal – Article 17, paragraphe 2 – Responsabilité des transporteurs aériens en matière de bagages enregistrés – Perte avérée d’un bagage enregistré – Droit à indemnisation – Article 22, paragraphe 2 – Limites de responsabilité en cas de destruction, de perte, d’avarie ou de retard de bagages – Absence d’informations concernant le bagage perdu – Charge de la preuve – Autonomie procédurale des États membres – Principes d’équivalence et d’effectivité.#Affaire C-86/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 July 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0257decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 July 2020.#European Commission v Ireland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Principles governing the investigation of accidents in the maritime transport sector — Directive 2009/18/EC — Article 8(1) — Parties whose interests could conflict with the task entrusted to the investigative body — Members of the investigative body simultaneously performing other functions — Failure to provide for an independent investigative body.#Case C-257/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 July 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0276_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2020.#KrakVet Marek Batko sp. K. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 33 — Determination of the place where taxable transactions are carried out — Supply of goods with transport — Supply of goods dispatched or transported by or on behalf of the supplier — Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 — Articles 7, 13 and 28 to 30 — Cooperation between the Member States — Exchange of information.#Case C-276/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 June 2020

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0321decided

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 18 June 2020.#BY and CZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 1999/62/EC – Directive 2006/38/EC – Charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures – Article 7(9) – Article 7a(1) and (2) – Tolls – Principle of the recovery of infrastructure costs – Infrastructure costs – Operating costs – Costs related to traffic police – Cost overrun – Direct effect – Ex post justification of an excessive toll rate – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment.#Case C-321/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 June 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0328decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 June 2020.#Proceedings brought by Porin kaupunki.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2004/18/EC – Article 1(2)(a) – Public procurement in the field of transport services – Cooperation agreement between municipalities regarding the organisation and provision of social and healthcare services based on the model of the ‘responsible municipality’ under Finnish law – Transfer of responsibility for the organisation of services to one of the municipalities in the area covered by the cooperation concerned – ‘In-house’ contract – Award of services to a company wholly owned by the responsible municipality without a call for competition.#Case C-328/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 June 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0276decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2020.#KrakVet Marek Batko sp. K. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 33 — Determination of the place where taxable transactions are carried out — Supply of goods with transport — Supply of goods dispatched or transported by or on behalf of the supplier — Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 — Articles 7, 13 and 28 to 30 — Cooperation between the Member States — Exchange of information.#Case C-276/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 June 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0088_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 June 2020.#Asociaţia “Alianța pentru combaterea abuzurilor” v TM and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Directive 92/43/EEC – Article 12(1) – System of strict protection for animal species – Annex IV – Canis lupus (wolf) – Article 16(1) – Natural range – Capture and transport of a specimen of a wild animal of the canis lupus species – Public safety.#Case C-88/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 June 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0074_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 June 2020.#LE v Transportes Aéreos Portugueses SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 5(3) — Article 7(1) — Compensation to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights — Exemption — Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ — Unruly passengers — Possibility of relying on the occurrence of an extraordinary circumstance in respect of a flight not affected by that circumstance– Concept of ‘reasonable measures’.#Case C-74/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 June 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0074decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 June 2020.#LE v Transportes Aéreos Portugueses SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Lisboa - Juízo Local Cível de Lisboa – Juiz 18.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 5(3) — Article 7(1) — Compensation to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights — Exemption — Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ — Unruly passengers — Possibility of relying on the occurrence of an extraordinary circumstance in respect of a flight not affected by that circumstance– Concept of ‘reasonable measures’.#Case C-74/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 June 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0088decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 June 2020.#Asociaţia “Alianța pentru combaterea abuzurilor” v TM and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Zărnești.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Directive 92/43/EEC – Article 12(1) – System of strict protection for animal species – Annex IV – Canis lupus (wolf) – Article 16(1) – Natural range – Capture and transport of a specimen of a wild animal of the canis lupus species – Public safety.#Case C-88/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 June 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0564_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 June 2020.#Spliethoff's Bevrachtingskantoor BV v European Commission.#Financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) – Transport sector for the period 2014-2020 – Calls for proposals – Decision establishing the list of proposals selected – Rejection of the proposal – Manifest errors of assessment – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-564/15 RENV.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 June 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0564decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 June 2020.#Spliethoff's Bevrachtingskantoor BV v European Commission.#Financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) – Transport sector for the period 2014-2020 – Calls for proposals – Decision establishing the list of proposals selected – Rejection of the proposal – Manifest errors of assessment – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-564/15 RENV.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 June 2020

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0153_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#FZ v DER Touristik GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 12 – Package tour – Long delay of a flight – Passenger compensation – Further compensation — Passenger’s right to a reduction of the price of the trip.#Case C-153/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 May 2020

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0153decided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#FZ v DER Touristik GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Köln.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 12 – Package tour – Long delay of a flight – Passenger compensation – Further compensation — Passenger’s right to a reduction of the price of the trip.#Case C-153/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 May 2020

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0626decided

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 28 May 2020.#Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Directive (EU) 2018/957 – Freedom to provide services – Posting of workers – Terms and conditions of employment – Remuneration – Duration of posting – Determination of the legal basis – Articles 53 and 62 TFEU – Amendment of an existing directive – Article 9 TFEU – Principle of non-discrimination – Necessity – Principle of proportionality – Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 – Scope – Road transport – Article 58 TFEU.#Case C-626/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 May 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0263decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 May 2020.#T-Systems Magyarország Zrt. and BKK Budapesti Közlekedési Központ v Közbeszerzési Hatóság Közbeszerzési Döntőbizottság.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Award of public contracts – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 1(2) and Article 72 – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 1(2) and Article 89 – Procedures for review of the award of public supply and public works contracts – Directive 89/665/EEC – Article 2e(2) – Procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors – Directive 92/13/EEC – Article 2e(2) – Modifications to a contract concluded following a public procurement procedure – No new public procurement procedure – Fines imposed on the contracting authority and on the successful tenderer – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-263/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 May 2020

Report· AGCELEX 52020AG0004(02)open

Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 4/2020 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down specific rules with respect to Directive 96/71/EC and Directive 2014/67/EU for posting drivers in the road transport sector and amending Directive 2006/22/EC as regards enforcement requirements and Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 2020/C 149/02

European Union · Council of the European Union · 5 May 2020

PreviousPage 2 of 3Next