Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Transport

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

51 records in EU in 2020

All countriesIreland · 74,985United States · 19,023Austria · 8,877France · 7,984Netherlands · 6,595United Kingdom · 5,168European Union · 3,736Germany · 2,171Belgium · 59Estonia · 15Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0430_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 16 December 2020.#American Airlines, Inc. v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – Air transport market – Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement – Commitments – Decision granting Grandfathering rights – Error of law – Concept of appropriate use.#Case T-430/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0430decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 16 December 2020.#American Airlines, Inc. v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – Air transport market – Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement – Commitments – Decision granting Grandfathering rights – Error of law – Concept of appropriate use.#Case T-430/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0236decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 December 2020.#Balti Gaas OÜ v European Commission and Innovation and Networks Executive Agency.#Financial assistance under the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2014-2020 – Field of trans-European energy infrastructure – Calls for proposals – Action for failure to act – No invitation to act – Inadmissibility – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Preparatory act – Partial inadmissibility – Decision rejecting a proposal – Manifest errors of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Competence of the Commission.#Joined Cases T-236/17 and T-596/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0236_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 December 2020.#Balti Gaas OÜ v European Commission and Innovation and Networks Executive Agency.#Financial assistance under the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2014-2020 – Field of trans-European energy infrastructure – Calls for proposals – Action for failure to act – No invitation to act – Inadmissibility – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Preparatory act – Partial inadmissibility – Decision rejecting a proposal – Manifest errors of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Competence of the Commission.#Joined Cases T-236/17 and T-596/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0160_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 10 décembre 2020.#Comune di Milano contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Aides d’État – Secteur du transport aérien – Services d’assistance en escale aux aéroports de Milan-Linate (Italie) et de Milan-Malpensa (Italie) – Injections de capitaux effectuées par le gestionnaire de ces aéroports dans sa filiale détenue à 100 % fournissant ces services – Actionnariat public du gestionnaire – Décision déclarant ces mesures d’aides d’État illégales et incompatibles avec le marché intérieur – Article 107, paragraphe 1, TFUE – Notions de “ressources d’État”, de “mesure imputable à l’État” et d’“avantage économique” – Principe de l’opérateur privé – Critère de l’investisseur privé – Charge de la preuve – Appréciations économiques complexes – Intensité du contrôle juridictionnel – Dénaturation d’éléments de preuve.#Affaire C-160/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 December 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0160decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 10 December 2020.#Comune di Milano v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Air transport sector – Ground handling services at Milan-Linate and Milan-Malpensa airports (Italy) – Injections of capital by the company managing those airports into its wholly owned subsidiary providing those services – Public ownership of the managing company – Decision declaring those State aid measures unlawful and incompatible with the internal market – Article 107(1) TFEU – Concepts of ‘State resources’, ‘measure imputable to the State’ and ‘economic advantage’ – Private operator principle – Private investor test – Burden of proof – Complex economic assessments – Intensity of judicial review – Distortion of evidence.#Case C-160/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 December 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0620_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 December 2020.#Hungary v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Directive (EU) 2018/957 – Freedom to provide services – Posting of workers – Terms and conditions of employment – Remuneration – Duration of posting – Determination of the legal basis – Articles 53 and 62 TFEU – Amendment of an existing directive – Article 9 TFEU – Misuse of powers – Principle of non-discrimination – Necessity – Principle of proportionality – Extent of the principle of freedom to provide services – Road transport – Article 58 TFEU – Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 – Scope – Principles of legal certainty and legislative clarity.#Case C-620/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 December 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0620decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 December 2020.#Hungary v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Directive (EU) 2018/957 – Freedom to provide services – Posting of workers – Terms and conditions of employment – Remuneration – Duration of posting – Determination of the legal basis – Articles 53 and 62 TFEU – Amendment of an existing directive – Article 9 TFEU – Misuse of powers – Principle of non-discrimination – Necessity – Principle of proportionality – Extent of the principle of freedom to provide services – Road transport – Article 58 TFEU – Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 – Scope – Principles of legal certainty and legislative clarity.#Case C-620/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 December 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0626_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 December 2020.#Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Directive (EU) 2018/957 – Freedom to provide services – Posting of workers – Terms and conditions of employment – Remuneration – Duration of posting – Determination of the legal basis – Articles 53 and 62 TFEU – Amendment of an existing directive – Article 9 TFEU – Principle of non-discrimination – Necessity – Principle of proportionality – Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 – Scope – Road transport – Article 58 TFEU.#Case C-626/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 December 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0626decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 December 2020.#Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Directive (EU) 2018/957 – Freedom to provide services – Posting of workers – Terms and conditions of employment – Remuneration – Duration of posting – Determination of the legal basis – Articles 53 and 62 TFEU – Amendment of an existing directive – Article 9 TFEU – Principle of non-discrimination – Necessity – Principle of proportionality – Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 – Scope – Road transport – Article 58 TFEU.#Case C-626/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 December 2020

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0826decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 3 December 2020.#WZ v Austrian Airlines AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 6 – Delayed flight – Article 8(3) – Diversion of a flight to an airport serving the same town, city or region – Concept of ‘cancellation’ – Extraordinary circumstances – Compensation to passengers in the event of cancellation or long delay of flights in arrival – Obligation to bear the cost of transferring passengers from the actual airport of arrival to the airport for which the booking was made.#Case C-826/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 December 2020

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-9-2020-006557answered

Könsåtskild transport

European Union · European Parliament · 2 December 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0815_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 December 2020.#Federatie Nederlandse Vakbeweging v Van den Bosch Transporten BV and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 96/71/EC – Article 1(1) and (3) and Article 2(1) – Posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services – Drivers working in international road transport – Scope – Concept of ‘posted worker’ – Cabotage operations – Article 3(1), (3) and (8) – Article 56 TFEU – Freedom to provide services – Collective agreements declared universally applicable.#Case C-815/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 December 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0815decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 December 2020.#Federatie Nederlandse Vakbeweging v Van den Bosch Transporten BV and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 96/71/EC – Article 1(1) and (3) and Article 2(1) – Posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services – Drivers working in international road transport – Scope – Concept of ‘posted worker’ – Cabotage operations – Article 3(1), (3) and (8) – Article 56 TFEU – Freedom to provide services – Collective agreements declared universally applicable.#Case C-815/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 December 2020

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0316decided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 November 2020.#VO and Others v SATA International – Azores Airlines SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights – Article 3(3) – Scope – Not included – Passengers travelling for free or at a reduced fare not available directly or indirectly to the public.#Case C-316/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 November 2020

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0316_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 November 2020.#VO and Others v SATA International – Azores Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights – Article 3(3) – Scope – Not included – Passengers travelling for free or at a reduced fare not available directly or indirectly to the public.#Case C-316/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 November 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0519_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 18 novembre 2020.#Ryanair DAC contre DelayFix.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile et commerciale – Règlement (UE) no 1215/2012 – Contrat de transport aérien – Clause attributive de juridiction contractée par le passager ayant la qualité de consommateur – Créance de ce passager à l’égard de la compagnie aérienne – Cession de cette créance à une société de recouvrement de créances – Opposabilité de la clause attributive de juridiction par la compagnie aérienne à la société cessionnaire de la créance dudit passager – Directive 93/13/CEE.#Affaire C-519/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 November 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0814_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 18 November 2020.#Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of a dominant position – Rail freight market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU – Access by third-party undertakings to infrastructure managed by Lithuania’s national railway company – Removal of a section of railway track – Concept of ‘abuse’ – Actual or likely exclusion of a competitor – Calculation of the amount of the fine – 2006 Guidelines on the method for setting fines – Remedies – Proportionality – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-814/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 November 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0814decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 18 November 2020.#Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of a dominant position – Rail freight market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU – Access by third-party undertakings to infrastructure managed by Lithuania’s national railway company – Removal of a section of railway track – Concept of ‘abuse’ – Actual or likely exclusion of a competitor – Calculation of the amount of the fine – 2006 Guidelines on the method for setting fines – Remedies – Proportionality – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-814/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 November 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0519decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 November 2020.#Ryanair DAC v DelayFix.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Contract of transport by air – Jurisdiction clause agreed to by the passenger as a consumer – Claim made by the passenger against the airline – Assignment of that claim to a collection agency – Enforceability of the jurisdiction clause by the airline against the assignee company of that passenger’s claim – Directive 93/13/EEC.#Case C-519/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 November 2020

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0367decided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 November 2020.#SP v KLM Royal Dutch Airlines.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights – Article 5(1)(c) – Article 7(1) – Right to compensation – Long delay in arrival – Flight reserved through a Community air carrier involving two flights, operated by different air carriers, departing from a third country for a Member State – Long delay which occurred during the first flight operated, under a code-share agreement, by an air carrier established in a third country – Action brought for compensation against the Community carrier.#Case C-367/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 November 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0321decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 October 2020.#BY and CZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 1999/62/EC – Directive 2006/38/EC – Charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures – Article 7(9) – Article 7a(1) and (2) – Tolls – Principle of the recovery of infrastructure costs – Infrastructure costs – Operating costs – Costs related to traffic police – Cost overrun – Direct effect – Ex post justification of an excessive toll rate – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment.#Case C-321/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 October 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0521decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 October 2020.#Pegaso Srl Servizi Fiduciari and Others v Poste Tutela SpA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Procurement in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 13 – Activities relating to the provision of postal services – Contracting entities – Public undertakings – Admissibility.#Case C-521/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 October 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0597_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 October 2020.#Hermann Albers eK v European Commission.#State aid – Public transport of passengers – Offsetting of the costs involved in the performance of public service obligations – Obligation to establish maximum tariffs for pupils, students, apprentices and persons with reduced mobility – Article 7a of the Niedersächsisches Nahverkehrsgesetz (Law on local transport of the Land of Lower Saxony) – Decision not to raise objections – Article 3(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Transfer of financial resources from a Land to transport authorities at municipal level – Concept of aid – Obligation to notify.#Case T-597/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 October 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0597decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 October 2020.#Hermann Albers eK v European Commission.#State aid – Public transport of passengers – Offsetting of the costs involved in the performance of public service obligations – Obligation to establish maximum tariffs for pupils, students, apprentices and persons with reduced mobility – Article 7a of the Niedersächsisches Nahverkehrsgesetz (Law on local transport of the Land of Lower Saxony) – Decision not to raise objections – Article 3(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Transfer of financial resources from a Land to transport authorities at municipal level – Concept of aid – Obligation to notify.#Case T-597/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 October 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0583decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 October 2020.#Gesamtverband Verkehrsgewerbe Niedersachsen (GVN) eV v European Commission.#State aid – Public transport of passengers – Offsetting of the costs involved in the performance of public service obligations – Obligation to establish maximum tariffs for pupils, students, apprentices and persons with reduced mobility – Article 7a of the Niedersächsisches Nahverkehrsgesetz (Law on local transport of the Land of Lower Saxony) – Decision not to raise objections – Article 3(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Transfer of financial resources from a Land to transport authorities at municipal level – Concept of aid.#Case T-583/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 October 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0583_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 October 2020.#Gesamtverband Verkehrsgewerbe Niedersachsen (GVN) eV v European Commission.#State aid – Public transport of passengers – Offsetting of the costs involved in the performance of public service obligations – Obligation to establish maximum tariffs for pupils, students, apprentices and persons with reduced mobility – Article 7a of the Niedersächsisches Nahverkehrsgesetz (Law on local transport of the Land of Lower Saxony) – Decision not to raise objections – Article 3(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Transfer of financial resources from a Land to transport authorities at municipal level – Concept of aid.#Case T-583/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 October 2020

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0654_SUMdecided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#FP Passenger Service v Austrian Airlines AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Compensation of air passengers in the event of long delay of flights – Right to compensation in the event of delay – Length of delay – Time of opening of the aircraft’s doors at destination – Actual arrival time – Scheduled time of arrival – Question on which the Court has already ruled or where the answer to such a question may be clearly deduced from the case-law.#Case C-654/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 October 2020

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0654decided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#FP Passenger Service v Austrian Airlines AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Compensation of air passengers in the event of long delay of flights – Right to compensation in the event of delay – Length of delay – Time of opening of the aircraft’s doors at destination – Actual arrival time – Scheduled time of arrival – Question on which the Court has already ruled or where the answer to such a question may be clearly deduced from the case-law.#Case C-654/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 October 2020

Page 1 of 2Next