PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 3432 (108th)

Post Office Community Partnership Act of 2003

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

4 November 2003

Last action

4 November 2003 · Introduced

Status

Referred to the House Committee on Government Reform.

Sponsors

Earl Blumenauer, Rep. Manzullo, Donald A. [R-IL-16], Rep. Moran, James P. [D-VA-8], Rep. Simmons, Rob [R-CT-2], Rep. Farr, Sam [D-CA-20], Rep. Greenwood, James C. [R-PA-8], Rep. Bereuter, Doug [R-NE-1], Rep. Frank, Barney [D-MA-4], Rep. Holden, Tim [D-PA-17], Rep. Inslee, Jay [D-WA-1], Rep. Mollohan, Alan B. [D-WV-1], JOSE SERRANO, Sen. Udall, Tom [D-NM], Sen. Brown, Sherrod [D-OH], Rep. Kanjorski, Paul E. [D-PA-11], Rep. Woolsey, Lynn C. [D-CA-6], Rep. Hoeffel, Joseph M. [D-PA-13], Rep. Hill, Baron P. [D-IN-9], Rep. Kelly, Sue W. [R-NY-19], Rep. Allen, Thomas H. [D-ME-1], Del. Christensen, Donna M. [D-VI-At Large], Rep. Murtha, John P. [D-PA-12], Rep. Holt, Rush [D-NJ-12], Rep. Filner, Bob [D-CA-51], Rep. Miller, George [D-CA-7], Rep. Waxman, Henry A. [D-CA-24], Rep. Wynn, Albert Russell [D-MD-4], Rep. McCarthy, Carolyn [D-NY-4], Rep. Rodriguez, Ciro D. [D-TX-23], Sen. Markey, Edward J. [D-MA], Rep. Evans, Lane [D-IL-17], Rep. Rahall, Nick J., II [D-WV-4], Rep. Owens, Major R. [D-NY-12], Rep. Stark, Fortney Pete [D-CA-9], Rep. McNulty, Michael R. [D-NY-23], Rep. Lewis, Ron [R-KY-2], Rep. Lipinski, William O. [D-IL-5], Rep. Thompson, Mike [D-CA-4], Rep. Baird, Brian [D-WA-3], WM. CLAY, Rep. English, Phil [R-PA-3], Rep. Emerson, Jo Ann [R-MO-8], Rep. Kilpatrick, Carolyn C. [D-MI-13], Rep. Ackerman, Gary L. [D-NY-7], Rep. Frost, Martin [D-TX-24], NITA LOWEY, Rep. Kucinich, Dennis J. [D-OH-10], Rep. Dooley, Calvin M. [D-CA-20]

Subjects

Postal service

Source updated

18 August 2025

Postal service

Summary

Post Office Community Partnership Act of 2003 - Modifies Federal postal law to revise requirements for the closing or consolidation of a post office and apply them, as well, to its proposed closing, consolidation, relocation, or construction. Requires a 60-day notice, under certain conditions, to persons (including local government officials) who are (or would be) served by the post office involved to allow such individuals an opportunity to present their views before such proposed action. Requires the notice: (1) by the deadline, to be hand delivered or delivered by mail and published once a week for at least four weeks in one or more newspapers regularly issued and of general circulation within the zip code areas which are (or would be) served by the post office involved; and (2) to include a description of the proposed action, a summary of the reasons for it, and the date on which the action is to be taken (or, in the case of the construction of a post office, the proposed timetable). Revises the factors to be considered in deciding whether or not to take such proposed actions. Requires the Postal Service to follow a community's public participation procedures to address the relocation, closing, consolidation, or construction of buildings in the community if such procedures are more stringent than those provided in this Act.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 4 November 2003

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on Government Reform.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 4 November 2003

    Introduced

    Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H10240)

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 4 November 2003

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 4 November 2003

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Showing 48 of 67 sponsors and actors.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.