Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 5081 (109th)

Military Spouses Employment Act of 2006

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

4 April 2006

Last action

4 April 2006 · Introduced

Status

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Sponsors

Rep. Carter, John R. [R-TX-31], Rep. Reyes, Silvestre [D-TX-16], Rep. Jackson Lee, Sheila [D-TX-18], Rep. Kuhl, John R. "Randy", Jr. [R-NY-29], Rep. Hayes, Robin [R-NC-8], Rep. McGovern, James P. [D-MA-2], Rep. Rothman, Steven R. [D-NJ-9], Rep. Evans, Lane [D-IL-17], Rep. Calvert, Ken [R-CA-41], Rep. Goode, Virgil H., Jr. [R-VA-5], Rep. Wilson, Joe [R-SC-2], Rep. Strickland, Ted [D-OH-6], Rep. Gonzalez, Charles A. [D-TX-20], Rep. McCaul, Michael T. [R-TX-10], Rep. Kline, John [R-MN-2], Rep. Lucas, Frank D. [R-OK-3], Rep. Pombo, Richard W. [R-CA-11], Rep. McKeon, Howard P. "Buck" [R-CA-25], Rep. Rehberg, Denny [R-MT-At Large], Rep. Porter, Jon C. [R-NV-3], Rep. Culberson, John Abney [R-TX-7], Rep. DeLay, Tom [R-TX-22], Rep. Burton, Dan [R-IN-5], Rep. Marchant, Kenny [R-TX-24], Rep. Jenkins, William L. [R-TN-1], Rep. Coble, Howard [R-NC-6], Rep. Johnson, Sam [R-TX-3], Rep. Pearce, Stevan [R-NM-2], Rep. Walsh, James T. [R-NY-25], Rep. Smith, Lamar [R-TX-21], Rep. Harris, Katherine [R-FL-13], Rep. Kingston, Jack [R-GA-1], Rep. Granger, Kay [R-TX-12], Rep. Burgess, Michael C. [R-TX-26], Rep. Shimkus, John [R-IL-15], Rep. Renzi, Rick [R-AZ-1], Rep. Wamp, Zach [R-TN-3], Rep. Cantor, Eric [R-VA-7], Rep. Sessions, Pete [R-TX-17], Rep. McHenry, Patrick T. [R-NC-10], Rep. Brady, Kevin [R-TX-8], Sen. Blackburn, Marsha [R-TN], Rep. Alexander, Rodney [R-LA-5], Rep. Davis, Lincoln [D-TN-4], Rep. Diaz-Balart, Lincoln [R-FL-21], Rep. Diaz-Balart, Mario [R-FL-26], Rep. Hayworth, J. D. [R-AZ-5], Rep. Shaw, E. Clay, Jr. [R-FL-22]

Subjects

Defence, Taxation

Source updated

15 August 2025

Defence · Taxation

Official sourceDownload fileView documentsShare

Summary

Military Spouses Employment Act of 2006 - Amends the Internal Revenue Code to include spouses of members of the Armed Forces on extended active duty (more than 90 days or for an indefinite period) as members of a targeted group for purposes of the work opportunity tax credit (thus giving employers a tax incentive for hiring military spouses).

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 4 April 2006

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 4 April 2006

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 4 April 2006

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (text)

    Introduced in House · EN · 4 April 2006

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Introduced in House (PDF)

    Introduced in House · EN · 4 April 2006

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 4 April 2006

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Showing 48 of 137 sponsors and actors.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.