PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Person

Pascale Martin

France

Records

28 records where Pascale Martin is listed as a sponsor, author, or other actor. Search with topics and years

Question· Question écrite18503open

Question 18503 — elections and referendums

France · National Assembly · 11 June 2024

Ms. Pascale Martin questions the Minister of the Interior and Overseas Territories on the distribution of electoral envelopes for the European elections scheduled for June 9, 2024. Following the call for tenders from the Ministry of the Interior, La Poste was entrusted with the entire distribution of electoral envelopes on the national territory until 2024. Following the unprecedented fiasco in the distribution of professions of faith during the last departmental and regional elections, ensured by Adrexo and with a record non-delivery rate of 27% and 42% respectively, (La Poste presenting non-delivery rates of 8.7% for departmental and 8.9% for regional), it wishes to ensure the organizational arrangements concerning the distribution of electoral envelopes for the election of June 9, 2024. Several questions remain unanswered today. : how will the distribution of electoral envelopes be organized? What budget is allocated to it? Which service provider will ensure the enclosure of professions of faith and ballot papers? Are additional hires planned and under what conditions? How will the Minister ensure that each citizen has actually received their professions of faith and voting slips on time? What control methods are put in place ? How will the Ministry of the Interior ensure that the electoral envelopes arrive early enough so as not to disrupt the tours in the communities crossed by the Olympic flame? Furthermore, the professional unions in the postal activities sector are rightly demanding that the surplus work generated by the distribution of electoral envelopes to the entire population be taken into account. In this sense, it is imperative that the State allocation to La Poste for the distribution of electoral materials returns entirely to the employees responsible for this distribution. Work overload must indeed be remunerated at its fair value. In view of the difficulties encountered at each election (delay in the delivery of envelopes, excessive daily traffic, job vacancies, etc.), the MP joins the demands of the unions which demand: a bonus of 250 euros for agents impacted by this additional workload; meal support for each day of sorting and distribution; the establishment of effective reinforcements; the allocation of a day of compensatory rest. Thus, the MP questions the minister to find out if he will force La Poste to accede to these demands. It is his responsibility to ensure the proper conduct of these elections. on the national territory. She asks him if he will implement all the necessary means for the smooth running of democratic life in the territory.

Question· Question écrite16583open

Question 16583 — foreign policy

France · National Assembly · 26 March 2024

Mrs. Pascale Martin alerts the Minister of the Armed Forces about the rapes of Afar women, committed for more than twenty years by the Djiboutian army. On February 27, 2024, four Afar women were kidnapped in Ethiopia by the Djiboutian army. At the end of each clash between the army and the FRUD (front for the restoration of unity and democracy), the Djiboutian army attacks the civilian population and more particularly women. It was once again the case in Dawdawya on February 23, 2024. According to the Djiboutian Human Rights League (LDDH), many villagers, men and women are still detained to this day and completely illegally in an army camp. But on February 27, 2024, the Djiboutian army was not content, as it is accustomed to, to crack down on civilians inside Djiboutian territory. She crossed the Ethiopian border, entering up to 37 km into the Afar region, where it terrorized the inhabitants of the village of Arda, destroying homes and food. Djiboutian soldiers kidnapped several villagers, including four women, Awa Soumbou, Hasna Arbahim, Hawa Hanfaré and Ga'si Mohamed, who were immediately taken by force to Djiboutian territory. Questioned by the Femmes solidaires association, the MP echoes their great fear regarding the recurring actions of the Djiboutian army against women whose only crime is being women and Afar. Indeed, for several years, the government of Djibouti has been carrying out particular repression against women in the north and southwest of the country, with this violence being used as a weapon of war. Afar women from the north and southwest of the Republic of Djibouti ask the states militarily present in their country to denounce these crimes and finally act to put an end to the impunity of the perpetrators of violence against them. The MP asks the Government to act with the Djiboutian State to ensure that these crimes stop and that Afar women are protected by the Ethiopian authorities. She also denounces this borderless repression against Afar women and calls for the immediate release of the kidnapped women.

Question· Question écrite16448open

Question 16448 — hunting and fishing

France · National Assembly · 26 March 2024

Ms. Pascale Martin questions the Minister of Ecological Transition and Territorial Cohesion on the suffering of fish and the practice of stocking for recreational fishing. Stocking is the practice of releasing millions of farmed fish for the sole purpose of dumping them into rivers, ponds, lakes and bodies of water for recreational fishing. Massive and widespread, this practice takes place every year everywhere in France, especially before the opening of trout fishing. Other species are also concerned, such as pike or black bass, non-endemic species in certain departments. These stockings have deleterious effects on ecosystems and cause imbalances. The studies carried out by scientists on these effects show in particular that the presence of these fish has a significant impact on the native amphibians. The practice of stocking for recreational fishing involves mass rearing of fish. They suffer from poor breeding conditions, but there are no specific regulations to limit the suffering of the fish. Transporting fish from farms to discharge at fishing sites involves rough and stressful handling. The deputy asks the Government to specify which species are affected by stocking, the number of fish dumped each year, the impact of this practice on suffering and the impact on biodiversity. Finally, she wants to know if the Government is considering banning stocking for recreational fishing.

Question· Question écrite16071open

Question 16071 — civil servants and public agents

France · National Assembly · 12 March 2024

Ms. Pascale Martin draws the attention of the Minister of the Interior and Overseas Territories to the working conditions of agents of the French Office for the Protection of Refugees and Stateless Persons (OFPRA), the latter having serious consequences on the agents themselves, which have repercussions on asylum seekers. The staff of this public administrative establishment (EPA) placed with the Ministry of the Interior and Overseas Territories and responsible for implementing constitutional and international obligations regarding the right to asylum, has mobilized four times since October 2023 to defend the quality of the public service provided by the Office. He denounced unrealistic pressure on his work resulting from the activity figures required by the objectives and performance contract which links OFPRA to the ministries of the interior and the budget; pressure relayed by their hierarchy, both in terms of collective and individual objectives. Staff point out the complexity of the procedures for examining requests for international protection, due to constraints relating, in particular, to the detection of profiles presenting a possible security threat on the one hand and a requirement for better consideration of vulnerabilities arising from national and European texts on the other hand. The program budgetary 303 “Immigration and asylum” of the “Immigration, asylum and integration” mission of the latest finance law for 2024 notes that the very high turnover of OFPRA staff, due to this strong work pressure which is also a source of psycho-social risks, is damaging for the very achievement of the set numerical objectives. The MP denounces the consequences of this frantic pace of work imposed on staff, which has direct repercussions on the exercise of the rights of asylum seekers. Indeed, their story, central to their protection, must be heard in the best possible conditions. In addition, since October 2023, the Director General of OFPRA has referred the possible revision of the numerical objectives that OFPRA staff considers unrealistic (such as the rate of 1.7 summons per day in the investigation services), to the negotiations of the objectives and performance contract (COP) for the years 2024-2026 which should, it seems, be concluded in March 2024, between the Office, its ministry and the budget ministry. However, on February 5, 2024, Mediapart revealed the content of an audit report commissioned by the Director General of OFPRA in 2021 from the Interministerial Directorate for Public Transformation (DITP) with a view to reducing processing times for asylum requests by OFPRA. Three private firms analyzed the working procedures within the Office for an amount of nearly 485,000 euros, as revealed in the report of the Senate commission of inquiry into the growing influence of private consulting firms on public policies and submitted their conclusions to the Director General of OFPRA from April 2022. The conclusions of this report have not been made public, nor even communicated to OFPRA staff by the management of the Office. The MP is surprised that a report financed with public funds is not systematically the subject of a publication of interest to both the agents of the public service concerned and the users, citizens and parliamentarians, guarantors of the control and evaluation of public policies. Besides this, she notes that according to the press article cited, the DITP report mentions that the target of 1.7 interviews per day is “unrealistic” and that it causes “unnecessary pressure” on agents. Furthermore, this same report recommends as a first “priority solution” a reduction in the summons rate to 1.2 asylum application interviews per day, making the drafting of decisions more fluid and ultimately reducing processing times. Also, she asks him if, as part of the development of the OFPRA's 2024-2026 objectives and performance contract (COP), the quantified objectives per staff will be based on a reduction in the target objective of interviews per day, from 1.7 to 1.2, as recommended by the DITP report of April 2022.

Question· Question écrite10388answered

Question 10388 — industry

France · National Assembly · 25 July 2023

Ms. Pascale Martin alerts the Minister Delegate to the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Industrial and Digital Sovereignty, responsible for industry, on the situation of Papeteries de Condat in Dordogne. Tuesday July 11, 2023, the European group Lecta, owner of the site, presented its job protection plan. It provides for the shutdown of line 4 (one of the last two production lines on the site) and the elimination of 187 positions, or almost half of the employees. These job cuts, if they materialize, will have a catastrophic effect on the economic fabric of the Dordogne. Les Papeteries de Condat is currently the largest industrial employer in this rural department. In addition to the 187 families directly impacted by the PSE, it is estimated that there are up to 2,000 jobs in Dordogne dependent on the proper functioning of the paper mills. Of the Companies, whose main customer is stationery, risk finding themselves in great difficulty. Not to mention that many local players fear that paper mills will not be viable with a single production line and that the remaining jobs will also be threatened in the near future. The company's management itself admitted, a few months ago, that the site could not be profitable with only line 8 ! At a time when the Government claims to be acting to reindustrialize the country, it would be shameful if it did not do everything in its power to avoid these massive job cuts. Especially since Condat is the last French manufacturer of double-sided coated paper and its paper is used by several major French publishing houses! Many local actors (employees, unions, elected officials) share the same conviction: that the company's management, under the pretext of a decline in the market, in reality made the deliberate choice to relocate the production of coated paper to its other factories located in Italy and Spain. How else can we explain that the group is announcing a drop in orders for coated paper at Condat when sales of this paper are doing much better at its other European sites? How to explain that the other factories of the group have benefited from a diversification of their production, while Condat seems to have been abandoned to an increasingly restricted number of production lines over the course of social plans? Such a relocation, if it were to occur, would be all the more scandalous as the State and the Nouvelle-Aquitaine region have allocated recent aid of 33 million euros to the company, in order to finance a boiler CSR. The amount allocated by the region (19 million euros) is particularly impressive: with such a sum, the region usually helps several dozen, even hundreds, of different companies! Lecta will have to repay this sum, but this is not the case for the aid of 14 million euros it received from the State. Will the taxes of fellow citizens have been used to finance the development of businesses located in Italy and Spain? Concerning public aid to businesses, we must stop giving public money without any justification and without precise evaluation. It's a question of social justice! It is necessary to condition aid measures for companies in difficulty on the fact that they do not pay dividends to their shareholders, with clauses to maintain activity and employment. The MP therefore asks Mr. Minister what he is going to do in order to explore all possible alternatives to the closure of line 4 and all the means to save these 187 jobs. She also asks him what he plans to do to ensure that management's desire to close line 4 is not part of a project to relocate production to other factories in the group.

Question· Question écrite9937answered

Question 9937 — public order

France · National Assembly · 11 July 2023

Ms. Pascale Martin questions the Minister of the Armed Forces about the participation of military personnel in the group of individuals who “arrested” “rioters” in Lorient. On the night of June 30 to July 1, 2023, in Lorient, hooded and masked individuals would have supported the police forces in their fight against the various urban violence caused by the death of a teenager due to a shooting by a police officer in Nanterre. Some Videos show these individuals running alongside the police or roaming the city with young people whom they themselves have handcuffed with cable ties, with a certain degree of violence, according to one of the participants. Ouest-France notes that four people were handed over to the police by these individuals, a figure exactly similar to the number of official arrests by the police. One of these individuals testified in the newspaper Ouest-France, presenting himself as a 25-year-old soldier. As reported by Mediapart, he would have acted with around thirty “colleagues”, “riflemen, perhaps commandos”, “between 20 and 25 years old”, “but also a few civilians”. If, initially, the maritime force of marine riflemen and commandos (FORFUSCO) assured that it had “not heard of this type of action among young or old », she, secondly, recognized the presence of soldiers in this group. She adds that “civilian and military citizens who were at the scene of the clashes spontaneously found themselves involved. They made it possible to control rioters before handing them over to the police. They protected individuals and property from violent actions attributed to groups of thugs.” These words, almost laudatory of the action of said individuals, are not hearable. Such a statement is unacceptable. The military state cannot in fact allow personnel, who serve at all times and in all places, to engage in such actions. Likewise, the force's comments suggest that these individuals were on the scene spontaneously, whereas their coordination and the fact that they are all masked reveal an action rather premeditated. In any case, citizens who would like to apprehend perpetrators of flagrant crimes or major offenses cannot do so in such a manner, without resembling a militia. Also, the attempt by certain soldiers to replace the internal security forces is unacceptable. Finally, the press release contrasts with the reaction of the ministry which considered the matter serious enough for a command investigation is opened, as indicated by Mediapart. This media also quotes an individual on a military discussion forum indicating that “it seems that the DRM (sic) took up the matter of the other evening in Lorient during the riots”. Also, it wishes to know the consequences and possible sanctions that it intends to give to these facts, to their authors and to the FORFUSCO press release.

Question· Question écrite9701answered

Question 9701 — people with disabilities

France · National Assembly · 4 July 2023

Ms. Pascale Martin questions the Minister Delegate to the Minister of Solidarity, Autonomy and Disabled People, responsible for disabled people, about the lack of solutions adapted to the care of disabled children, which prevents their parents from continuing to have a professional activity. As the Minister already knows, reception or accommodation facilities for disabled children are frequently closed for a month summer and during all other school holidays. Thanks to the disability compensation benefit, some parents can also use the services of local associations to take over during school holidays. But the staff of these associations are not always trained to care for disabled children, especially those suffering from serious pathologies. It then happens that associations stop their interventions overnight, leaving families in distress. The MP was recently questioned by the mother of a disabled child residing in Dordogne, separated from her ex-spouse, who is facing serious difficulties. She was suddenly notified on April 20, 2023 of the cessation of interventions by the ADMR of Dordogne at her home from the beginning of May, without her having any alternative solution, neither immediately, nor for the approaching summer holidays. This mother risks having to give up her job at the end of the school year to be able to take care of her son! Unfortunately, this is a common situation: it is still very difficult for parents of disabled children to find childcare arrangements that will allow them to keep their jobs. According to a 2018 report from the High Council for Family, Childhood and age, 54% of children with disabilities under the age of three are looked after exclusively by their parents, compared to 32% for other children. Many parents end up sacrificing their professional lives: among couples with at least one disabled child, both parents work in only 53% of cases, compared to 70% for other parents in a couple. These difficulties in accessing employment weaken parents disabled children, both economically and psychologically. But it is also an injustice towards women, since it is most often mothers who sacrifice their professional activity to be able to take care of their child, as a DREES study showed in 2020. This failure in care is discriminatory against disabled children and their parents, who should, like others, being able to benefit from after-school daycare and leisure centers during school holidays. She therefore asks what new measures the Government intends to take in order to guarantee solutions for caring for disabled children, throughout the year including during school holidays, guaranteeing parents the possibility of carrying out a professional activity.

Question· Question écrite9652open

Question 9652 — young people

France · National Assembly · 4 July 2023

Mrs. Pascale Martin draws the attention of the Minister Delegate to the Minister for Ecological Transition and Territorial Cohesion, responsible for transport, to the new measures concerning the driving license announced by the Prime Minister. On Wednesday June 21, 2023, Ms. Elisabeth Borne declared that she wanted to lower the minimum age of a driving license to 17 years and extend financial aid to students in vocational high schools, of amount of 500 euros, already allocated to apprentices. The objective of this measure is to facilitate access to mobility for young people living in rural areas, to enable them to work or complete an internship. The problem of access to mobility for young people is real: according to a study by the Montaigne Institute, for 53% of 18-26 year olds, the absence of a driving license is an obstacle to finding a job. And 28% of people in professional integration abandon their job or training for reasons of mobility. These figures illustrate a real need to introduce free driving licenses. With the Prime Minister's announcements, we are far from it. Indeed, 500 euros is far from enough, given that the cost of a driving license averages 2,000 euros. This measure will therefore only benefit young people whose parents have the means to finance this training, even though the obstacle to mobility lies above all in the cost of the diploma and not in the minimum age of access to it. In addition, certain young people will remain excluded from this system if they are not registered in apprenticeship or vocational high school. She therefore asks him when the Government will decide to implement a major public policy for mobility, by establishing free driving licenses and developing the public transport network, in order to ensure equal access to employment and training for young citizens; “measures” like those that the Government has just announced will never resolve the social and territorial divide suffered by young people living in landlocked territories.

Question· Question écrite9626answered

Question 9626 — health establishments

France · National Assembly · 4 July 2023

Ms. Pascale Martin questions the Minister of Health and Prevention about recurring cyberattacks in hospitals, which endanger the health and private lives of citizens. The Digital Health Agency counted 730 cyberattacks in 2021. In response, the Minister of Solidarity and Health insisted in August 2022: “The health of the French will not be taken hostage”. However, from the month In September 2022, the Russian hacker group “LockBit 3.0” carried out a cyberattack against the South Paris region hospital center of Corbeil-Essonnes (CHSF). Faced with the hospital's refusal to pay the ransom, the criminals began to disclose sensitive content such as reports of gynecological examinations, colonoscopies, deliveries... On December 3, 2022, it was the André-Mignot hospital in Versailles which was struck in turn, the forcing us to limit reception to emergencies only. Furthermore, in addition to the ransom demanded, a hospital victim of a cyberattack is forced to overhaul its entire IT system. This was particularly the case for the Dax hospital center which, in 2021, had to pay nearly 2.3 million euros. The Government has tried to remedy this problem. The cybersecurity strategy for healthcare establishments and medico-social services have been strengthened with a budget of 350 million euros. 25 million euros have been allocated to cybersecurity audits of health establishments. As part of the France recovery plan, the National Authority for the Security and Defense of Information Systems (ANSSI) received an envelope amounting to 136 million euros to strengthen the cybersecurity of the State and the territories for the period 2021-2022. But these measures are clearly insufficient: cyberattacks on hospitals continue and health establishments are still vulnerable to them. On Wednesday June 21, 2023, the Rennes university hospital center was also the victim of a cyberattack, with no impact on patient care, but which led to a data leak the extent of which is not yet known. She therefore asks what new measures the Government intends to take to improve the protection of health establishments in the face of these repeated cyberattacks.

Question· Question écrite9363answered

Question 9363 — health establishments

France · National Assembly · 27 June 2023

Ms. Pascale Martin questions the Minister Delegate to the Minister of Health and Prevention, responsible for territorial organization and health professions, on the temporary and permanent closures of small maternity wards. Recently, the maternity ward of the Sarlat hospital center, in Dordogne, announced the suspension of deliveries from May 31 to June 12, 2023, due to the impossibility of recruiting a pediatrician. This maternity had already experienced periods of closure in previous months. At the end of April 2023, the Bergerac maternity ward, in the same department, was temporarily closed, with some patients discovering the closure on the same day of their scheduled birth. These suspensions of childbirth make the management of pregnancy and childbirth precarious and do not meet the needs of women living in rural territories. In fact, some patients have to travel more than an hour to the maternity ward to which they have been redirected. On May 31, 2023, in Côtes-d'Armor, a woman gave birth in the fire truck, without a medical team, because the Guingamp maternity hospital has been closed there since the end of April. These closures also encourage choppy medical monitoring, punctuated by the presence of different medical professionals who do not necessarily have sufficient knowledge of patients' medical records. This situation is the consequence of the destruction of the public health service carried out over many years by successive governments and which has reached new heights since the election of Emmanuel Macron. Maternity wards in small hospitals are also suffering the effects of the “Rist” law, particularly in areas rural. A report by Professor Yves Ville, published in March 2023, on behalf of the National Academy of Medicine, recommends the closure of all maternity wards which carry out fewer than a thousand deliveries per year (which represents 111 maternity wards out of 452 in France). In a country which has 1,000 more obstetrician-gynecologists than ten years ago and where the number of midwives has never been so high, this recommendation raises questions. The argument security is used in the report to justify the closure of small maternity wards; However, it has been proven that the number of deliveries carried out in an establishment is not significant in maternal and infant mortality. Conversely, the longer journeys that women who are redirected to an establishment far from their home must make are a real risk factor, just as the discontinuous medical monitoring that these changes in maternity wards can entail. The MP therefore asks the Minister to assure her of her intention not to respond to the recommendations of the City report and to prevent the permanent closures of maternity wards carrying out fewer than a thousand deliveries per year. She also asks what measures she will put in place to prevent temporary closures from increasing.

Question· Question écrite9307open

Question 9307 — cycles and motorcycles

France · National Assembly · 27 June 2023

Ms. Pascale Martin draws the attention of the Minister Delegate to the Minister for Ecological Transition and Territorial Cohesion, responsible for transport, to the establishment of a periodic technical inspection every two years for motorized two and three wheels. The National Assembly and the Senate have already spoken out against this European proposal. However, European Directive No. 2014/45/EU was passed and recommends a implementation of a motorcycle technical inspection from January 1, 2022, while allowing Member States to derogate from it, if they have put in place effective alternative road safety measures. The Government has chosen to implement a technical inspection of two-wheeled motorized vehicles. An implementing decree was therefore published in August 2021, then repealed in July 2022. The Council of State contested this decision in October 2022, by bringing back into force the decree of August 2021. Finally, a public consultation was announced in June 2023 for the implementation of this measure. The MP was contacted by local representatives of the French federation of angry bikers (FFMC), who are worried that this new directive will further reduce their purchasing power and make the good days of companies in the sector. The FFMC puts forward several arguments legitimate to oppose this implementation. First of all, motorcycle inspections are more regular than automobile inspections and, on this occasion, safety checks are systematically carried out by mechanics. As such, it is not justified for a technical inspection on motorcycles to take the example of that of cars. For several years, studies have shown that the technical condition of these vehicles is a cause rare accident. According to the MAIDS report, material failure is only responsible for 0.3 to 0.7% of accidents in which a motorcycle is involved, while the human factor remains the leading cause of accidents. In addition, these studies show that road fatalities for motorized two-wheelers have fallen by 19% in ten years, while the motorcycle fleet has increased by 30%, without technical inspection. Finally, still according to the FFMC, the impact The financial cost of another technical inspection would be significant for motorcyclists and motorists. Especially since with few centers capable of carrying out a technical inspection on a motorcycle, the price of the latter could be higher than that of a car. The MP recalls that the European directive lists alternative road safety measures for two- or three-wheeled vehicles, taking into account in particular takes into account relevant road safety statistics for the last five years. If these are put in place, it is possible to deviate from the technical inspection. Consequently, the Member asks the Minister Delegate to take advantage of the public consultation deadlines to indicate to the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union the alternative measures notified by the Government as compensation for the Directive No. 2014/45/EU. She also asks him if he is considering other measures such as establishing a normative list of checkpoints each time a motorcycle passes through the garage, or the necessary strengthening of education, training and learning good behavior on the road.

Question· Question écrite9235answered

Question 9235 — rail transport

France · National Assembly · 20 June 2023

Ms. Pascale Martin draws the attention of the Minister Delegate to the Minister for Ecological Transition and Territorial Cohesion, responsible for transport, to his announcements concerning Fret SNCF following the opening of an investigation by the European Commission on January 18, 2023. This procedure against France is motivated by an alleged non-compliance with the rules on state aid intended to avoid "distortions of competition ". This is the culmination of 15 years of rail freight liberalization organized jointly by the European Union and successive governments. Since 2006, when rail freight was opened to competition following the adoption by the European Commission of the second rail package, the situation in rail freight has continued to deteriorate. While this liberalization had been sold as the cure miracle to revive traffic, it collapsed by 30%. Fret SNCF, for its part, saw the number of railway workers drop from 15,000 to 5,000 and lost market share, only transporting around 50% of bloodless traffic (nearly 2/3 less volume of goods transported for Fret SNCF since 2003). Competition is not the solution, it is the problem. Between 2006 and 2019, many private companies, swearing only by economic profitability, competed with Fret SNCF in profitable segments, leaving only the least profitable sectors to Fret SNCF. However, rail freight has many strategic and ecological advantages. While SNCF Freight should be at the heart of the major public policies necessary for the ecological transition and national industrial development, the Minister decides to complete the dismantling started by his predecessors under the guise of anticipation of a European sanction. Sanction which is itself the direct consequence of the law “For a new railway pact” of 2018 carried by Ms. Elisabeth Borne. Après 15 years of neoliberal management, the European Commission therefore intends to step on the accelerator in the midst of the climate crisis and push for the dismantling of the historic public operator. By his incompetence and his submission to Brussels, the Government signs with the stroke of a pen the dismissal of more than 500 railway workers on their way out, as sole thanks for hard work and numerous sacrifices. The Minister also announces a sale of so-called dedicated trains, including the emblematic early food train, from December 31, 2023, which represents a loss of 30% of the total volume of SNCF Freight activity. Incidentally, the Government is organizing the cut sale of the company by transferring more than 60 locomotives to the private sector, by selling 40% of the real estate assets as well as the Saint-Priest logistics platform to private sector competitors! Instead of satisfying the demands of the European Commission which are incompatible with an ambitious policy to revive public rail freight, the minister should lead the fight against Brussels to impose a public monopoly on the freight sector. railway. What does the minister intend to do? In the name of the general interest of the nation, there is an urgent need to place rail freight under the aegis of a 100% public, unified and integrated company such as SNCF. She wants to know his position on the subject.

Question· Question écrite9120open

Question 9120 — women

France · National Assembly · 20 June 2023

Ms. Pascale Martin questions the Secretary of State to the Prime Minister, responsible for the social and solidarity economy and community life, about public funding allocated to feminist associations to counter the influence of anti-rights actors. Anti-rights actors take the form of NGOs, think tanks, associations or collectives which call into question the sexual and reproductive rights of women, but also the rights LGBTQI+ and are attacking international instruments like the 2011 Istanbul Convention. The deployment of these ideas has never been more important and is particularly visible since the Metoo movement. In ten years, their funding has increased significantly according to the European Parliament Forum for sexual and reproductive rights. They now have a considerable capacity to influence the political orientations of many States, including included in Europe. This funding also allows the implementation of anti-abortion campaigns, the most recent dating from May 25, 2023 on the Vélib' in Paris. Parliamentarians receive more and more anti-abortion letters and documents. Faced with this dazzling progress, many feminist associations are recommending increasing their funding in order to obtain greater media, political, economic and legal weight. facing these groups. She therefore asks her if she will defend to the Government an increase in funding allocated to feminist associations in the next finance bill in order to enable them to better counter the growing influence of these groups opposed to republican values.

Question· Question écrite9106answered

Question 9106 — higher education

France · National Assembly · 20 June 2023

Mrs. Pascale Martin questions the Minister of Higher Education and Research about the failure to take into account the 13,000 secondary school teachers assigned to higher education (ESAS) and assimilated in the compensation scheme for teaching and research staff (RIPEC). Until the end of 2021, ESAS and similar benefited from a higher education bonus equal to that of teacher-researchers and teacher-researchers (EC). But Decree No. 2021-1895 of December 29, 2021 and the implementation of RIPEC put an end to this equity. However, these higher education teachers (ES) represent 40% of the teaching hours provided in higher education, with a course load twice that of ECs. Without them, the proper functioning of higher education establishments could not be ensured! For ES is a double punishment, since they are also excluded from the measures to “revalorize the teaching profession” put in place by the Ministry of National Education in April 2023. Faced with this injustice, ES are mobilizing, particularly within Collective 384, to demand, among other things, access to the same compensation plan as ECs, or to bonuses of equivalent amount. They are supported by the Assembly of directors of IUTs and by numerous higher education establishments. A large number of ES have decided to resign from part of their administrative and teaching tasks, which are not inherent to their status and are too poorly paid. Questioned by the collective as well as by several parliamentarians, the Minister responded that the bonuses of the ES have still been revalued and that the difference in compensation observed with the EC is justified by the latter's higher level of education, as well as by their research activities. However, there is no reason to prevent ES from accessing the C2 and C3 components of RIPEC, in order to receive identical remuneration for their administrative and educational missions which are similar to those of EC. She therefore asks him what justifies the exclusion of higher education teachers from the C2 and C3 components of the RIPEC and more broadly, what it intends to do in order to restore the equity of remuneration and bonuses granted to the different categories of teachers who ensure the proper functioning of the higher education system.

Question· Question écrite9066answered

Question 9066 — fundamental rights

France · National Assembly · 20 June 2023

Ms. Pascale Martin questions the Minister Delegate to the Prime Minister, responsible for equality between women and men, diversity and equal opportunities, about information concerning the origin of funding for anti-rights actors in France as well as the Government's control over these organizations. Particularly visible following the Metoo movement, anti-rights actors take the form of NGOs, think tanks, associations or collectives. They particularly challenge the sexual and reproductive rights of women, but also LGBTQI+ rights and notably attack the 2011 Istanbul Convention. In ten years, their funding has increased significantly, according to the European Parliament Forum for sexual and reproductive rights. Their capacity for influence is therefore considerable and notably allows for an increased presence on French territory. Some anti-rights actors actively campaign against women's rights and use these funds to launch anti-abortion actions, such as the Velib campaign on May 25, 2023. The legal status of certain organizations theoretically allows them to obtain French public funding. To this is added, for certain organizations, funding from abroad. Feminist organizations like Equipop have already produces publications on anti-rights movements in France. But many unknowns remain about the number and nature of the actors involved in the fight against women's rights, the origin of their funding and in particular, whether some of them (having the status of association or political party) receive public funding. She therefore asks her what actions she intends to put in place in order to improve the knowledge of the anti-rights movement in France, its political influence and its financing.

Question· Question écrite8744open

Question 8744 — sports

France · National Assembly · 6 June 2023

Mme Pascale Martin interroge Mme la ministre des sports et des jeux Olympiques et Paralympiques sur la nécessité de mettre en œuvre un véritable plan d'action pour lutter contre les violences sexistes et sexuelles lors des grands évènements sportifs se déroulant en France. Les compétitions sportives majeures représentent de grands moments de fête et de communion pour de nombreuses spectatrices, spectateurs, supporters et supportrices qui y participent. Malheureusement, de nombreux acteurs et actrices venant du monde sportif déplorent régulièrement un manque de réactions et de prises de conscience face à l'ampleur des violences sexistes et sexuelles en leur sein. Ces faits ne se cantonnent pas uniquement aux fédérations sportives ou aux clubs car les grands évènements rassemblant des foules importantes autour d'infrastructures sportives ou de fan zones sont bien trop souvent encore le théâtre de violences sexistes et sexuelles. Alors que le pays se prépare à accueillir l'un des plus grands évènements sportifs mondiaux à travers les jeux Olympiques et Paralympiques de 2024, il est nécessaire dès à présent d'anticiper les moyens pouvant être mis en œuvre pour protéger les participants et établir un protocole pour mettre en sécurité et accompagner les éventuelles victimes. Aussi, des safe zones et des points d'écoute bien identifiés pourraient être installés sur chaque lieu de rassemblement. Des campagnes pourraient être mises en œuvre pour sensibiliser les participants et communiquer sur les divers dispositifs en place. Par ailleurs, la formation de tous les agents assurant la sécurité des sites apparaît impérative et obligatoire pour qu'ils puissent repérer ces comportements, savoir comment réagir dans de telles circonstances et faire remonter les faits par un protocole précis. Enfin, il existe une véritable inquiétude quant au fait que des réseaux de prostitution puissent se créer ou se renforcer lors de tels évènements au regard du nombre de visiteurs accueillis, c'est pourquoi il est important de rappeler que l'achat d'actes sexuels est interdit en France ainsi que les sanctions encourues et de lutter contre ces réseaux en amont. Ainsi, elle lui demande quelles sont les mesures qui sont mises en œuvre à chaque grand évènement sportif pour protéger les participants face aux violences sexistes et sexuelles et si elle compte les renforcer à l'approche des JOP 2024.

Question· Question écrite7602answered

Question 7602 — refugees and stateless persons

France · National Assembly · 25 April 2023

Ms. Pascale Martin questions the Minister Delegate to the Minister for Ecological Transition and Territorial Cohesion, responsible for cities and housing, on the terms of the exceptional measure of support for citizen hosts. According to the French Office for Immigration and Integration, since Russia's invasion of Ukraine, more than 110,000 Ukrainians have found refuge in France. At the end of February 2023, the Ministry of the Interior declared that around 30,000 people had been housed with citizens. In order to provide support to families who voluntarily host Ukrainian refugees, the Prime Minister announced at the beginning of October 2022 the granting of exceptional aid. Decree No. 2022-1441 of November 17, 2022 specifies the terms: the aid is aimed at all families who accommodated one or more people free of charge, for a period equal to or greater than 90 days, between April 1 and December 31, 2022. The interpretation of the decree may suggest that when accommodation is continued after December 31, 2022, aid may be requested. However, the application must be submitted on a platform whose closing is scheduled for April 30, 2023. The platform's FAQ confirms that the 90 days must be completed before the deadline of December 31, 2022. Beyond this date, the exceptional support measure cannot be mobilized. Therefore, for all people who offered accommodation after October 1, 2022, no financial assistance can be granted to them. In any case, this is the response that was given to a couple from Dordogne who found themselves in this situation. This leads to an energy problem, with high bills for landlords and landladies. She therefore asks him if he can guarantee the Government's firm desire to support all families who voluntarily host Ukrainian refugees: on the one hand by modifying the criterion of 90 cumulative days in 2022 and on the other hand by extending this exceptional measure for the year 2023.

Question· Question écrite7561open

Question 7561 — justice

France · National Assembly · 25 April 2023

Mme Pascale Martin appelle l'attention de M. le garde des sceaux, ministre de la justice, sur les moyens insuffisants de la justice pour traiter, dans le respect de l'intérêt supérieur de l'enfant, les dossiers liés à des demandes au titre de l'article 371-4 du code civil, dans lesquels des allégations de violences intrafamiliales sont faites par l'une des parties. L'article 371-4 établit le droit de l'enfant à entretenir des relations personnelles avec ses ascendants et ascendantes. Il est généralement mobilisé sur fond de conflit familial, lorsque des parents refusent que les grands-parents d'un enfant ou une enfant entretiennent une relation avec ce dernier ou cette dernière. Dans certains cas, ces dossiers comprennent des allégations de violences intra-familiales. Il peut s'agir, par exemple, d'un parent qui est un ancien ou une ancienne enfant maltraité ou maltraitéee et qui craint que son enfant subisse à son tour des maltraitances s'il ou elle est laissé seul ou seule avec ses grands-parents. Les maltraitances anciennes que le parent a subies sont très souvent impossibles à prouver, ce qui peut compliquer l'identification des situations à risque pour l'enfant dans le présent. Le manque de moyens dédiés aux juges aux affaires familiales les oblige à statuer rapidement sur ces situations souvent très complexes, qu'ils se doivent d'aborder sans aucun préjugé. Ils doivent se battre pour imposer des enquêtes sociales, en raison du coût de ces dernières, alors même qu'elles sont parfois nécessaires pour informer les magistrats et magistrates sur la réalité de la situation familiale. Au vu des risques encourus par l'enfant si les allégations de violences sont réelles, le temps et les moyens insuffisants dont disposent les magistrat et magistrates pour traiter ces dossiers entrent en contradiction avec leur obligation de faire primer l'intérêt de l'enfant sur toute autre considération. Elle lui demande donc quelles mesures il compte prendre, tant en matière d'augmentation des moyens que de formation des magistrats et magistrates sur les dynamiques intergénérationnelles dans les situations de violences intrafamiliales, afin de s'assurer que le principe de l'intérêt supérieur de l'enfant soit toujours respecté dans ces procédures, conformément au droit.

Question· Question écrite7558answered

Question 7558 — voluntary termination of pregnancy

France · National Assembly · 25 April 2023

Mrs. Pascale Martin alerts the Minister of Health and Prevention to the difficulties in obtaining abortion pills in several French departments. In a press release dated April 13, 2023, the Observatory for Transparency in Medicines Policies (OTMeds) relayed the alert launched by departmental branches of Family Planning. The latter say they have been confronted “for several weeks with difficulties supply of abortion pills", more particularly misoprostol-based products. These supply difficulties are serious, because they constitute an obstacle to the right to access an abortion and to freely choose their abortion method (medicated or instrumental), within the legal deadlines. It should be remembered that more than three quarters of abortions in France are carried out by medical method and only one laboratory (Nordic Pharma) has exclusivity on the manufacture of these products. The National Medicines Safety Agency recognizes that Misoprostol has been “in tension” since September 2022. On its website, the agency indicated that the product would be made available for the end of September 2022 and yet, supply difficulties, going locally to real shortages, have been reported to several repeated in recent weeks. It was not until April 13, 2023 that the agency made a change on its site, this time indicating that the product would be available again at the end of April. As OTMeds points out in its press release, it is alarming that shortages and shortages are observed on the ground, even before the ANSM and the Government report them; and that alerts from health professionals and associations have not been heard. She therefore asks what the Government intends to do to remedy these supply difficulties and to secure long-term access to abortion pills for all women who wish to have an abortion, throughout the national territory.

Question· Question écrite6700answered

Question 6700 — dependence

France · National Assembly · 28 March 2023

Ms. Pascale Martin questions the Minister of Health and Prevention on the access of detained persons in a dependent situation to accommodation establishments for dependent elderly people (EHPAD). There are more and more elderly people in prison and they often require medical and social care adapted to the loss of autonomy linked to aging. In their 2019-2022 “people’s health” roadmap placed under the control of justice", the Ministry of Health and that of Justice stated that their objective was to improve the access of elderly prisoners losing their autonomy to suitable downstream structures and to encourage the use of sentence adjustments for medical reasons for people who meet the conditions. In this same document, the two ministries expressed the desire to set up a group of work on this subject, bringing together the various stakeholders concerned (ARS, SPIP, DISP, penitentiary establishments, departmental councils). This working group should notably result in the creation of tools for EHPADs, making it possible to combat prejudice and facilitate the reception of former inmates in EHPADs, as well as the establishment of local partnerships between SPIPs and EHPADs in order to facilitate reception. people leaving prison in EHPAD. A recent case in Dordogne, however, shows that the problem of access to EHPAD persists for detained people: an 80-year-old man, demented and in a wheelchair, spent several months in pre-trial detention at the Périgueux remand center, in conditions unsuitable for his state of health. It took persistent efforts by the Périgueux USMP and social workers to find him a place in an EHPAD in the department. Twenty requests had to be made before obtaining a positive response. She therefore asks what concrete actions have been implemented since 2019 to promote access for elderly prisoners losing their autonomy to suitable downstream structures.

Question· Question écrite6461answered

Question 6461 — drugs

France · National Assembly · 21 March 2023

Ms. Pascale Martin questions Mr. the Keeper of the Seals, Minister of Justice, on the sustainability and generalization of the rehabilitation unit for drug users (URUD), an experimental project carried out at the Neuvic detention center in Dordogne since 2017. This unique device in France aims to adapt the therapeutic community model to the prison environment. Prisoners suffering from addiction can thus benefit from support. load in a therapeutic community similar to what exists in a free environment. URUD was evaluated in 2018 by the French Observatory for Drugs and Drug Addiction. The written report from the OFDT drew up a very positive overall assessment, with regard to the reduction or cessation of consumption among program participants, but also concerning the improvement of relationships between prisoners and staff. However, he emphasized some inadequacies of the system, particularly with regard to taking into account the social reintegration issues of participating prisoners. In their roadmap for 2019-2022 “health of people placed under the control of justice”, the Ministry of Justice and that of Solidarity and Health have decided to take into account the conclusions of this report to improve the system and have scheduled a new evaluation of the system with a view to its possible sustainability and generalization to other territories (action no. 27). During a visit to the Neuvic detention center on February 28, 2023, the management of the establishment nevertheless indicated that the URUD still has the status of an experimental device, for which the funding request must be renewed each year. On this occasion, the staff and inmates met took stock of very favorable of the device. The MP therefore asks the Minister if the Government intends to perpetuate this system and, if so, when. She also asks him if he plans to generalize this type of system to other establishments on French territory and, if so, when.

Question· Question écrite5473answered

Question 5473 — children

France · National Assembly · 14 February 2023

Ms. Pascale Martin draws the attention of the Keeper of the Seals, Minister of Justice, to the application of the circular of April 21, 2022 relating to the care of minors present during a feminicide or marital homicide. A protocol implemented in Seine-Saint-Denis in 2016, called the “feminicide protocol”, allows immediate and appropriate care for children whose one parent has been the victim of feminicide or homicide. In France, in 2022, 147 children lost their mothers to domestic femicide; 34 of these children were present during the murder and 4 discovered their mother's body. The circular of April 21, 2022 asks all public prosecutors to locally conclude a protocol for the care of minors present during a feminicide or marital homicide, in conjunction with the other institutional actors concerned (ARS, ASE, UAPED, forces of the order). This circular, however, appears insufficient to ensure the deployment of protocols for the care of these minors throughout France and within a reasonable time frame. Indeed, it seems that to date, only a few hospitals (in Paris, Lyon, Bordeaux and Villefranche-sur-Saône) have implemented a protocol inspired by that existing in Seine-Saint-Denis. Two others, in Nice and Nantes, are in the works. Else On the other hand, the restriction of these protocols to only minors who were present at the scene of the events raises questions. Indeed, the minors who were absent during the murder also need specific medical, psychological and social care. The MP therefore asks the Minister of Justice to provide her with a detailed inventory of the deployment to date of “feminicide protocols” across the entire territory. French. She also asks him what he intends to do to speed up this deployment and to ensure that minors who were not present at the scene of the events also benefit from appropriate care.

Question· Question écrite5472answered

Question 5472 — children

France · National Assembly · 14 February 2023

Ms. Pascale Martin draws the attention of the Minister of Health and Prevention to the application of the ministerial instruction of April 12, 2022 relating to the standard protocol for the care of children present during a feminicide or homicide within the couple. A protocol implemented in Seine-Saint-Denis in 2016, known as the “feminicide protocol”, allows immediate and appropriate care for children of whom one of the parents has been a victim. of femicide or homicide. In France, in 2022, 147 children lost their mother to domestic feminicide; 34 of these children were present during the murder and 4 discovered their mother's body. The instruction of April 12, 2022 asks all the directorates of the regional health agencies to organize the local variation of a standard protocol for the care of minors present during a femicide or marital homicide, in mobilizing regional psychotrauma centers and volunteer hospital stakeholders and in conjunction with other institutional stakeholders concerned. This instruction also requires ARS to provide information on the number of protocols signed or planned by the end of 2022. This instruction, however, appears insufficient to ensure the deployment of protocols for the care of these minors throughout the territory. French and within a reasonable time. Indeed, it seems that to date, only a few hospitals (in Paris, Lyon, Bordeaux and Villefranche-sur-Saône) have implemented a protocol inspired by that existing in Seine-Saint-Denis. Two others, in Nice and Nantes, are in the works. On the other hand, the restriction of these protocols to only minors who were present at the scene of the events raises questions. In fact, the minors who were absent during of murder also need specific medical, psychological and social care. The MP therefore asks the Minister to provide her with a detailed inventory of the deployment to date of “feminicide protocols” across the entire French territory. She also asks him what he intends to do to speed up this deployment and to ensure that minors who were not present at the scene of the events also benefit from appropriate support.

Question· Question écrite5425answered

Question 5425 — arts and entertainment

France · National Assembly · 14 February 2023

Ms. Pascale Martin questions the Minister of Culture about the future of the CGR group, number 2 in cinemas in France. Since April 2022, the CGR group has been on sale with its 74 cinemas representing 708 rooms. The group was created in 1974 in La Rochelle and is very present in New Aquitaine. In addition to its activity in the operation of cinema complexes, the group is active in the hotel and catering sectors. and tourism and employs around 3,000 people. It now seems that pension funds and non-European companies are positioning themselves to buy the group. Such intentions motivated by reasons of pure economic profitability, if they were to be confirmed, would pose numerous risks for French cinema, the model of which is envied in Europe and in the world: weakening of European sovereignty by the flight of cultural assets whose value was carried by public money; risks for local employment; certain weakening of cinema distribution circuits in medium-sized towns in France. In November 2022, the Minister expressed her desire to protect “strategic cultural assets” from foreign capital. During meetings of the ARP, the Civil Society of Authors, Directors and Producers, in Le Touquet, she declared : "Today, there is this risk of seeing production companies, their catalogs of works or even networks of cinemas [] bought by companies, moreover often far removed from any cultural objective, such as non-European investment funds". She asks her if she can guarantee the Government's firm desire to ensure that the conditions for the buyout of the CGR group are compatible with the objectives preserving the independence of French cinema, strengthening the national ecosystem of cinema production and distribution based on the principle of the French cultural exception, preserving local employment and developing the cultural vitality of the territories.

Question· Question écrite3602answered

Question 3602 — politique extérieure

France · National Assembly · 29 November 2022

Mme Pascale Martin alerte Mme la ministre de l'Europe et des affaires étrangères sur la situation de M. Salah Hamouri, citoyen franco-palestinien, emprisonné depuis le mois de mars 2022 en Cisjordanie occupée. Salah Hamouri est victime, depuis plus de 17 ans, de détentions arbitraires répétées de la part du gouvernement israélien. Outre sa détention administrative actuelle, il est également menacé d'expulsion et est privé de sa carte de résident (seul document qui l'autorise à rester sur le sol palestinien). Or M. Hamouri souhaite pouvoir vivre avec sa famille à Jérusalem où il est né. Initialement prévue pour une durée de trois mois, sa détention administrative a déjà été prolongée à deux reprises et est renouvelable indéfiniment. Ce type de détention est une violation de nombreux principes du droit international et des droits humains. Une délégation de députées et députés LFI, dont Mme la députée était membre, a été reçue au ministère de l'Europe et des affaires étrangères le 17 octobre 2022. À cette occasion, l'engagement du ministère en faveur de la libération de ce citoyen français a été réaffirmé. Les modalités de la détention provisoire de M. Hamouri devraient être revues au début du mois de décembre 2022. Mais, sans une intervention plus forte du gouvernement français, les espoirs de le voir être libéré sont très minces. Elle demande donc par quels moyens l'État envisage désormais d'agir afin que Salah Hamouri retrouve au plus vite sa famille et puisse vivre librement à Jérusalem.

Question· Question écrite2741open

Question 2741 — environnement

France · National Assembly · 1 November 2022

Mme Pascale Martin alerte Mme la ministre de la transition énergétique sur une grave ambiguïté du projet de loi relatif à l'accélération de la production d'énergies renouvelables, déposé au Sénat le 26 septembre 2022. Un certain flou entoure le champ d'action de l'article 4 du projet de loi. Sa troisième partie prévoit en effet, selon l'exposé des motifs, « pour tous les projets, que la déclaration d'utilité publique (DUP) puisse valoir reconnaissance du caractère d'opérations répondant à des RIIPM » (p. 10), c'est-à-dire à des raisons impératives d'intérêt public majeur. Tandis que parties I et II de l'article 4 concernent explicitement et uniquement les projets d'énergies renouvelables, la partie III a donc visiblement une portée plus générale. C'est ce que confirme le texte de l'article lui-même, selon lequel toutes les opérations en application de l'article L. 121-1 du code de l'expropriation pour cause d'utilité publique sont concernées, c'est-à-dire tous les projets (d'aménagement, d'infrastructures routières, etc.) susceptibles d'affecter l'environnement, qu'ils concernent ou non la production d'énergies renouvelables. L'étude d'impact relative à cet article du projet de loi conforte cette interprétation extensive, puisqu'elle est basée sur l'analyse d'un projet routier, le contournement de Beynac, qui n'a rien à voir avec les énergies renouvelables. Non seulement cet article est problématique dans la mesure où son application pourrait entraîner un affaiblissement du droit environnemental (puisqu'il ouvre la porte à des dérogations importantes aux règles de protection des espèces protégées), mais il pourrait concerner des projets, comme des infrastructures routières, n'ayant rien à voir avec le développement des énergies renouvelables. Mme la députée demande donc à Mme la ministre de clarifier la portée de l'article 4 du projet de loi relatif à l'accélération de la production d'énergies renouvelables. Si l'article 4 a effectivement une portée générale, comment le Gouvernement justifie-t-il avoir fait le choix d'inclure, dans un projet de loi censé concerner uniquement la production d'énergies renouvelables, des mesures facilitant in fine la construction de projets n'ayant rien à voir avec les énergies renouvelables ? Elle souhaite avoir des précisions à ce sujet.

Question· Question écrite2492answered

Question 2492 — enfants

France · National Assembly · 25 October 2022

Mme Pascale Martin attire l'attention de Mme la secrétaire d'État auprès de la Première ministre, chargée de l'enfance, sur le nombre insuffisant de salles « Mélanie » déployées sur le territoire national. Ces salles d'audition sont spécialement aménagées et équipées pour recueillir, dans les meilleures conditions possibles, la parole des mineurs victimes de violences. En janvier 2020, il y avait en France près de 200 salles « Mélanie » en gendarmeries, 29 dans des commissariats de police et 71 installées hors des locaux des forces de sécurité, généralement dans des structures hospitalières. La CIIVISE (Commission indépendante sur l'inceste et les violences sexuelles faites aux enfants), dans ses conclusions intermédiaires publiées en mars 2022, juge que ce maillage territorial est insuffisant. La CIIVISE soutient l'objectif gouvernemental de déployer une UAPED (unité d'accueil pédiatrique enfants en danger) par département, ces structures permettant elles aussi le recueil de la parole de l'enfant victime dans de bonnes conditions. Mais les UAPED sont implantées dans les villes. Dans certains territoires, la distance à parcourir pour conduire un enfant jusqu'à une UAPED peut être très longue. Cela peut causer une fatigue importante pour l'enfant et mobilise des enquêteurs et enquêtrices pendant la durée du trajet. La CIIVISE recommande donc le déploiement d'une salle « Mélanie » par compagnie dans les zones de gendarmerie. Elle lui demande où en est le déploiement des salles « Mélanie » sur l'ensemble du territoire, si le Gouvernement compte répondre favorablement à cette recommandation de la CIIVISE et si oui, à quelle échéance.

Question· Question écrite2490answered

Question 2490 — enfants

France · National Assembly · 25 October 2022

Mme Pascale Martin interroge Mme la secrétaire d'État auprès de la Première ministre, chargée de l'enfance, sur l'avancée du déploiement des UAPED sur l'ensemble du territoire national. Les UAPED (unités d'accueil pédiatriques enfants en danger), ex-UAMJP (unités d'accueil médico-judiciaires pédiatriques), représentent une grande avancée dans la prise en charge complète (médicale, médico-légale, sociale et judiciaire) des mineurs et mineures victimes de violences et permettent de recueillir leur parole dans les meilleures conditions, étape cruciale pour la mise en sécurité des victimes et la condamnation des auteurs. Fin 2019, il existait 58 UAPED sur le territoire. Mme la députée salue l'effort fourni par le Gouvernement pour renforcer le maillage territorial de ces unités ces dernières années, ainsi que l'objectif affiché de disposer d'au moins une UAPED par département. Toutefois, elle note que cet objectif était initialement fixé à l'horizon 2022, dans le cadre du plan de lutte contre les violences faites aux enfants 2020-2022. Or on approche de la fin de l'année 2022 et seuls 64 départements sur 96 disposent actuellement d'une UAPED. Cette augmentation semble faible au regard du temps écoulé depuis 2019, mais surtout au regard de l'urgence d'une meilleure prise en charge des mineurs et mineures victimes de violences. Mme la secrétaire d'État a récemment fait savoir que l'objectif d'une UAPED par département est reporté à 2024. Elle lui demande quelles sont les raisons de ce retard dans le déploiement de ces unités et quels moyens ont été alloués et déployés afin de s'assurer que chaque département français dispose bien, début 2024, d'une UAPED.