PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Person

Anne-Sophie Ronceret

France

Records

23 records where Anne-Sophie Ronceret is listed as a sponsor, author, or other actor. Search with topics and years

Question· Question écrite17974open

Question 17974 — businesses

France · National Assembly · 8 September 2026

Ms. Anne-Sophie Ronceret draws the attention of the Minister of Agriculture, Agri-Food and Food Sovereignty to the difficulties encountered by small landscape businesses following the episodes of heatwave and drought occurring since spring 2026. Companies specializing in maintenance work have been particularly affected by the absence and scarcity of shoots, leading to a reduction significant increase in their activity and a weakening of their economic situation. A very large proportion of these companies also fall under the agricultural regime and the Mutualité sociale agricole. In this context, it appears important that professionals in the sector can benefit from the support measures implemented in favor of the agricultural world, particularly in terms of deferrals or reductions in charges and support for cash flow. Specific financing or cash loan schemes are also mentioned to enable the companies concerned to get through this period of sharp reduction in their activity. She therefore asks whether the Government intends to allow landscape companies covered by the agricultural regime and the MSA and faced with the economic consequences of these climatic episodes to benefit from support measures, reduction or deferral of charges implemented in favor of the agricultural sector and what cash flow support measures could be available to them.

Question· Question écrite17955open

Question 17955 — employment and activity

France · National Assembly · 8 September 2026

Ms. Anne-Sophie Ronceret draws the attention of the Minister of Labor and Solidarity to the situation of landscaping companies faced with the economic consequences of episodes of heatwave and drought occurring since spring 2026. These climatic conditions have particularly affected companies carrying out maintenance, mowing or pruning work, due to the absence or scarcity of shoots. The National Chamber of public works and landscape craftsmen (CNATP) thus reports a sharp decrease in the activity of many small companies in the sector. Faced with this situation, some companies wanted to resort to partial activity in order to preserve the employment of their employees while waiting for a resumption of their activity. Several companies wishing to resort to partial activity from mid-July, however, would have seen their request refused, some having then been forced to make layoffs. This situation appears all the more worrying as the difficulties encountered are directly linked to exceptional climatic circumstances and are, for the companies concerned, essentially cyclical in nature. She therefore asks him to specify under what conditions landscape companies whose activity is significantly reduced due to drought and episodes of high heat can benefit from the partial activity system and if it intends to take measures to ensure clear and uniform treatment of their requests throughout the territory in order to preserve the activity of these companies and the employment of their employees.

Question· Question écrite16747open

Question 16747 — family benefits

France · National Assembly · 7 July 2026

Ms. Anne-Sophie Ronceret draws the attention of the Minister of Labor and Solidarity to the terms of application of additional birth leave for farmers. Indeed, the social security financing law for 2026 created additional birth leave, applicable from July 1, 2026, in order to allow parents to have additional time with their child after birth leave. maternity, paternity and child fostering or adoption. In this context, Decree No. 2026-426 of May 30, 2026 specifies the conditions of access to the replacement allowance and, in the absence of effective replacement, to the fixed daily allowance associated with this leave for non-agricultural employees. It provides in particular that the request for replacement allowance must be sent to the agricultural social mutual fund twenty days from less, except force majeure, before the date planned for the interruption of activity. However, this twenty-day period may prove difficult to reconcile with the organizational constraints specific to agricultural operations, which require anticipating the replacement of the farmer concerned. This difficulty is all the more sensitive as the replacement service itself has fifteen days from receipt of the request, to indicate to the MSA and the insured whether or not it is able to provide for the replacement. If it is impossible to provide for replacement, the insured may therefore find himself with a reduced period of time to organize an alternative solution. Therefore, this situation risks weakening the effectiveness of the right to additional birth leave for the farmers concerned, even though this system constitutes an expected step forward to better take into account the family and professional realities of the agricultural world. Also, she asks him if the Government plans to change the methods of application of this deadline, in particular in order to better take into account the organizational constraints of non-salaried agricultural workers and replacement services and to guarantee effective implementation of the system in good conditions.

Question· Question écrite16026answered

Question 16026 — Agricultural social mutuality

France · National Assembly · 16 June 2026

Ms. Anne-Sophie Ronceret draws the attention of the Minister of Agriculture, Agri-Food and Food Sovereignty to the terms of application of additional birth leave for farmers. Indeed, the social security financing law for 2026 created additional birth leave, applicable from July 1, 2026, in order to allow parents to have time additional support for their child after maternity, paternity, childcare or adoption leave. In this context, Decree No. 2026-426 of May 30, 2026 specifies the conditions of access to the replacement allowance and, in the absence of effective replacement, to the fixed daily allowance associated with this leave for non-agricultural employees. It provides in particular that the request for replacement allowance must be sent to the agricultural social mutual fund at least twenty days, except force majeure, before the date planned for the interruption of activity. However, this twenty-day period may prove difficult to reconcile with the organizational constraints specific to agricultural operations, which require anticipating the replacement of the farmer concerned. This difficulty is all the more sensitive as the replacement service has itself of fifteen days, from receipt of the request, to indicate to the MSA and the insured whether or not it is able to provide for the replacement. If it is impossible to provide for replacement, the insured may therefore find himself with a reduced period of time to organize an alternative solution. Therefore, this situation risks weakening the effectiveness of the right to additional birth leave for farmers and farmers concerned, even though this system constitutes an expected step forward to better take into account the family and professional realities of the agricultural world. Also, she asks him if the Government plans to change the methods of application of this deadline, in particular in order to better take into account the organizational constraints of non-salaried agricultural workers and replacement services and to guarantee implementation effectiveness of the device in good conditions.

Question· Question écrite15024open

Question 15024 — businesses

France · National Assembly · 12 May 2026

Ms. Anne-Sophie Ronceret draws the attention of the Minister of Labor and Solidarity to the consequences of limiting the status of collaborating spouse to five years, provided for in Article L. 121-4 of the Commercial Code. Indeed, this development, introduced by the social security financing law for 2022, was introduced in order to strengthen the social protection of spouses participating regularly in the activity of the company. family. It provides that a person cannot retain the status of collaborating spouse for a period of more than five years and that beyond this period, the spouse continuing to exercise regular professional activity in the company must opt ​​for the status of employee spouse or associated spouse. However, this limitation raises many concerns in the territories, in particular within very small businesses, local shops, crafts and agricultural operations. In these structures, the status of collaborating spouse often corresponds to a specific economic and family reality. The transition to employment or association may come up against significant financial, legal or organizational constraints. In practice, this limitation could produce effects contrary to the desired objective. Some spouses, often women, could be led to continue their activity without clearly recognized status, without appropriate social protection and without sufficient accumulation of retirement rights. Such situations require particular attention, even though the objective pursued was to better protect the spouses concerned. They also raise important issues in terms of recognition of work family, social protection and economic equality between women and men. Also, she asks him to please specify whether an assessment of the economic and social consequences of this limitation has been carried out or is being considered. She would also like to know the support measures or arrangements that could be put in place for very small businesses that cannot resort to either salaried employment or association, as well as the measures envisaged to prevent this reform from leading to a worsening of invisible work situations or economic inequalities between women and men.

Question· Question écrite14567answered

Question 14567 — religions and cults

France · National Assembly · 21 April 2026

La faculté donnée aux chefs de service d'accorder des autorisations d'absence pour participer à des fêtes ou à des cérémonies religieuses qui ne sont pas inscrites au calendrier des fêtes chômées, fixé par la législation et l'usage, vise à concilier les nécessités du service avec l'exercice de la liberté religieuse des agents publics. Cette pratique administrative est conforme au principe de laïcité qui, s'il repose sur la stricte séparation des religions et de l'État, garantit aussi la liberté de conscience individuelle et le droit de chacun à pratiquer sa religion (article 1er de la loi du 9 décembre 1905 concernant la séparation des églises et de l'État). Aussi, la circulaire FP n° 901 du 23 septembre 1967 relative aux autorisations d'absence dont peuvent bénéficier les agents de l'État à l'occasion des fêtes religieuses propres à leur confession, complétée par celle du 10 février 2012, énonce cette compétence du chef de service et établit une liste indicative et non limitative des fêtes religieuses pouvant susciter des demandes de la part des agents. Cette liste ne prive nullement le chef de service de sa pleine capacité d'appréciation de la compatibilité entre la demande d'autorisation spéciale d'absence pour fête religieuse d'un agent et les exigences tirées des nécessités de service, sous le contrôle du juge. Elle ne le prive pas non plus de sa compétence pour accorder une autorisation spéciale d'absence pour une fête religieuse qui n'y serait pas mentionnée explicitement. Cette interprétation est conforme à la jurisprudence constante du juge administratif. Le Conseil d'État a jugé que l'institution de fêtes légales ne fait pas obstacle, par elle-même, à ce que des autorisations d'absence soient accordées à des agents publics pour participer à d'autres fêtes religieuses correspondant à leur confession, sous réserve des nécessités du fonctionnement normal du service. Il a également rappelé que la liste publiée par l'administration présente un caractère indicatif et ne peut être regardée comme limitant les confessions ou les fêtes susceptibles de donner lieu à autorisation.

Question· Question écrite14404open

Question 14404 — supplementary insurance

France · National Assembly · 21 April 2026

Mrs. Anne-Sophie Ronceret draws the attention of the Minister of Health, Families, Autonomy and People with Disabilities to the application of article 13 of the social security financing law for 2026 relating to contributions from supplementary health insurance organizations. Indeed, this article provides that, for the year 2026, the amount of contributions cannot be increased compared to that applicable in 2025. This provision, of direct application since January 1, 2026, aims to protect the purchasing power of policyholders in a context of sharp increase in health spending. However, several policyholders are reporting significant increases in their contributions from the start of 2026. For example, a policyholder affiliated with a mutual insurance company noted a 33% increase in their contribution, or an increase of 125 euros per month. Despite several requests, this organization indicated that it would not apply this provision, considering that the legislative framework would not be stabilized. Such situations raise questions about the effectiveness of the law as well as the conditions for its application by complementary organizations, even though this measure constitutes a strong commitment from the legislator. She therefore questions him about the measures envisaged by the Government to guarantee compliance with this provision by all complementary organizations and asks it to specify the avenues of appeal open to policyholders who have suffered an increase in their contributions in 2026 in disregard of these provisions.

Question· Question écrite14200answered

Question 14200 — animals

France · National Assembly · 14 April 2026

Le 1er mai est en France un jour férié et obligatoirement chômé pour tous les salariés. Ce n'est que par exception qu'il est possible d'employer un salarié au cours de cette journée. En l'état actuel du droit, cette exception concerne les établissements et les services qui, en raison de la nature de leur activité, ne peuvent interrompre le travail. Ces règles sont d'ordre public mais elles ne portent que sur les salariés. Ainsi, les personnes qui ne sont pas salariées peuvent naturellement exercer leur activité le 1er mai. En revanche, lorsqu'il souhaite employer des salariés le jour du 1er mai, il appartient à l'employeur d'établir que, dans sa situation particulière, la nature de son activité ne lui permet pas d'interrompre le travail le jour du 1er mai, ainsi qu'il résulte de la jurisprudence constante de la Cour de cassation (Cass. crim., 8 février 2000, n° 99-82118). Par ailleurs, le juge rappelle également qu'il n'existe pas de dérogation de principe au chômage du 1er mai en faveur des établissements bénéficiant d'une dérogation de droit au repos dominical en application de article R. 3132-5 du code du travail (Cass. crim., 14 mars 2006, n° 05-83436). Ainsi, il convient d'analyser au cas par cas chaque situation de fait afin de déterminer si, en raison de la nature de l'activité (au regard de circonstances ou de besoins particuliers avérés, des impératifs de sécurité ou de l'intérêt général), l'interruption du fonctionnement de l'entreprise le 1er mai est ou non possible. Compte tenu de ce qui précède et dans la mesure où article 7.6 de la convention collective nationale des fleuristes, de la vente et des services des animaux familiers n'impose pas le chômage le 1er mai, il apparaît que les activités de nourrissage, de surveillance et de soins aux animaux ainsi que la « mission de salubrité publique » exercées par les professionnels du secteur des animaux familiers sont des éléments susceptibles de pouvoir être invoqués à bon droit par les employeurs de structures assurant la prise en charge d'animaux vivants pour justifier de l'impossibilité d'interrompre le travail le 1er mai et donc d'employer des salariés ce jour-là. Cependant, dans la mesure où article L. 3133-6 du code du travail ne prévoit pas que certaines activités entrent « de plein droit » dans son champ d'application, il appartiendra toujours au juge d'apprécier souverainement chaque situation en cas de litige.

Question· Question écrite14010open

Question 14010 — self-employed workers and self-employed

France · National Assembly · 31 March 2026

Ms. Anne-Sophie Ronceret draws the attention of the Minister of Action and Public Accounts to the tax consequences of the abolition of the status of individual entrepreneur with limited liability (EIRL) for former holders of this status who have opted for corporate tax. Before the reform which entered into force in 2022, entrepreneurs operating under EIRL status and subject to corporate tax benefited from a tax framework identified for the sale of their activity, allowing them to reinvest the proceeds of this sale in a new structure, in particular of the SAS or SARL type, under tax conditions considered to be more understandable by those concerned. Since the abolition of the EIRL status and the switch to the new status of individual entrepreneur, while retaining for some the option of corporate tax, uncertainties remain as to to the tax regime applicable to the transfer of their activity. In particular, it appears that questions remain regarding the treatment of the capital gain on sale for former EIRLs having retained their option for corporate tax. This uncertainty gives rise to fears, in certain situations, that a capital gain constituted within the framework of an activity already subject to corporate tax could, upon sale, be also subject to income tax under the single flat-rate levy, thus creating a risk of economic double taxation. Such a situation would be likely to penalize entrepreneurs who have structured their activity on the basis of existing law at the time of their tax choice and to slow down their transfer or reinvestment projects in new activities. While several parliamentarians have already alerted the Government on this difficulty, she asks what is the Government's position on the tax regime applicable to transfers of activity of former EIRLs having opted for corporate tax and whether clarifications are envisaged, by doctrinal or legislative means, in order to secure the situation of the entrepreneurs concerned.

Question· Question écrite13537open

Question 13537 — social security

France · National Assembly · 10 March 2026

Ministry of Health, Families, Autonomy and People with Disabilities

Question· Question écrite13252open

Question 13252 — maternity health insurance

France · National Assembly · 3 March 2026

Ms. Anne-Sophie Ronceret draws the attention of the Minister of Health, Families, Autonomy and People with Disabilities to the difficulties encountered, in certain territories, in securing coverage by health insurance for hearing aid medical devices when they are prescribed following a teleconsultation with an ENT doctor. Indeed, professionals in the sector report situations observed particularly in Charente where, due to particularly long delays in accessing an ENT appointment, patients with hearing problems have resorted to an ENT teleconsultation in order to avoid a disruption in their journey. In these cases, the teleconsultation would have been covered by health insurance. On the other hand, the coverage of medical devices prescribed on this occasion would sometimes be subject to a posteriori questioning by the National Health Insurance Fund (CNAM), with request for restitution of the sums paid, on the grounds that the prescription would have been established within the framework of a teleconsultation. These situations seem to reveal a need for clarification and harmonization, in order to guarantee a clear and secure application of the rules of care, both for patients and for professionals, in a context where telemedicine contributes to facilitate access to care in areas under tension. Also, the MP would like to know if the Government intends to specify the framework applicable to prescriptions for hearing aid medical devices delivered following an ENT teleconsultation, in order to secure their care, to harmonize the practices of the funds throughout the territory and to define, where applicable, the traceability requirements which must appear on the order.

Question· Question écrite12796open

Question 12796 — alternative medicines

France · National Assembly · 10 February 2026

Ms. Anne-Sophie Ronceret draws the attention of the Minister of Health, Families, Autonomy and Disabled People to the uncertainties surrounding the reimbursement of osteopathic procedures by complementary organizations, within the framework of so-called “responsible” contracts. Indeed, an information report from the Senate devoted to supplementary health insurance proposed making the coverage of certain “medicine” services optional. “soft” and to remove these guarantees from the scope of joint and responsible contracts, in order to control their cost. Furthermore, in a context of broader reflection on the financial balance of the social protection system, a joint report from the High Council for the Future of Health Insurance, the High Council for the Family, Children and Age and the High Council for the Financing of Social Protection, submitted in July 2025, underlines the need for a lasting recovery of social accounts leading to questioning the levers of efficiency and the articulation between compulsory and complementary health insurance. However, the social security financing law for 2026, as promulgated, does not include an explicit provision relating to osteopathy. Under these conditions, the MP wishes to question the Minister on the possibility, in the short or medium In the long term, an evolution by regulation of the scope of responsible complementary insurance contracts, so as to totally or partially exclude the coverage of osteopathic procedures, or if on the contrary it intends to confirm the maintenance of this possibility of reimbursement. She also questions him on the timetable and the methods of consultation which would be retained with the stakeholders, as well as on the method to assess the impact of a possible development on access to care and the remainder payable by patients. Finally, representatives of the profession indicate that they have initiated discussions with the Government on a project to create an independent public authority aimed at better supervising and structuring the profession in the interest of patients (registration of professionals, control of initial and continuing training, development and monitoring of ethics, recommendations for good practices, research funding, etc.). She would like to know whether the Government intends to follow up on this proposal and, if so, according to what timetable and in what manner.

Question· Question écrite12407open

Question 12407 — energy and fuels

France · National Assembly · 27 January 2026

Mrs Anne-Sophie Ronceret questions the Minister of Cities and Housing on the guarantees surrounding requests for change of holder of an electricity contract for a delivery point associated with housing. Indeed, owners and contract holders report situations in which a request for activation or change of owner can be initiated for a given address without a systematic alert being issued. addressed to the incumbent. These reports raise questions about the value of upstream prevention mechanisms in order to limit the risks of identity theft and fraudulent procedures while preserving access to an essential service for people of good faith. The Member therefore wishes to know, on the one hand, what is the legal framework applicable to electricity suppliers in terms of identity verification during a change of owner and if this framework makes it possible to deploy reinforced authentication when the customer requests it and, secondly, if the Government plans to change or clarify the applicable rules in order to allow systematic notification to the existing owner before any modification to the contract, as well as a rapid dispute procedure in the event of a manifestly fraudulent request.

Question· Question écrite11670answered

Question 11670 — waste

France · National Assembly · 16 December 2025

Les déchets de pneumatiques, bien que classés comme non dangereux, constituent une menace pour l'environnement et la santé publique en cas d'incendies (émissions de gaz toxiques) ou de dépôts sauvages. La lutte contre la gestion illégale des déchets de pneumatiques est un sujet d'attention pour la gendarmerie nationale. Dans sa zone de compétence, elle constate une hausse des infractions depuis 2022: +22 % en 2023, +45 % en 2024 (529 faits). En 2025, 560 faits ont été recensés, soit une évolution de +5,9 %. L'analyse fait ressortir que 63,4 % des faits sont liés à un abandon sauvage (les pneumatiques sont généralement abandonnés avec d'autres déchets), 11,7 % concernent un brûlage à l'air libre de déchets pneumatiques et 18,3 % concernent des installations classées pour la protection de l'environnement (ICPE), notamment les garages automobiles. Les infractions liées au transport illégal de déchets pneumatiques représentent 6,6 %. En matière de lutte, la gendarmerie développe son action à trois niveaux: un commandement national par le CESAN (commandement pour l'environnement et la santé), une unité judiciaire spécialisée, disposant de dix détachements dans les zones et l'outre-mer au travers de l'OCLAESP et enfin, un maillage territorial de the whole of ses unités de recherches et territoriales. Ainsi, ce sont près de 4 200 gendarmes qui sont formés au traitement des infractions environnementales, présents dans les unités de la gendarmerie départementale et notamment dans chaque brigade territoriale. La lutte contre les déchets, dont les pneumatiques usagés, s'exerce au travers de l'action quotidienne des unités territoriales de la gendarmerie mais également lors des « opérations territoires propres » (OTP), qui sont conduites depuis 2020 par les commandements zonaux de la gendarmerie avec l'appui des partenaires institutionnels. La gendarmerie nationale agit ainsi concrètement par l'organisation déconcentrée d'opérations inter-services ciblant localement des situations potentielles d'atteintes à l'environnement et à la santé publique. Lors de ces opérations, les dépôts sauvages de pneumatiques sont également ciblés. En outre, les déchets pneumatiques sont également recherchés dans le cadre de l'opération AUGIAS qui vise à lutter contre le trafic transfrontalier de déchets au sein de l'Union européenne, et notamment à la frontière franco-espagnole. Des opérations de contrôle sont régulièrement effectuées dans ce cadre. Par ailleurs, pour accroître la connaissance de cette délinquance et la qualité de la réponse procédurale, chaque enquêteur de la gendarmerie dispose, via l'application pour smartphone « Enviro'Gend » ou via Intranet, d'une documentation spécifique sur le dépôt de déchets pneumatiques, notamment sur sa matérialisation et les infractions à relever. En parallèle, le CESAN diffuse régulièrement des infographies destinées aux unités territoriales de la gendarmerie qui traitent de la gestion irrégulière de déchets et des infractions susceptibles d'être relevées. Enfin, depuis 2022, 59,9 % des infractions constatées en lien avec cette thématique ont donné lieu à l'identification de mis en cause, traduisant une action résolue de l'État sur ce sujet. Parmi celles-ci, on note principalement que 23,4 % des auteurs d'infractions ont été convoqués en justice ou déférés et que 17,2 % des auteurs ont fait l'objet d'un classement sans suite, en grande majorité, en raison de la remise en état des sites pollués. 58,5 % des affaires avec mis en cause identifié sont encore en cours d'investigations ou en attente de décision pénale.

Question· Question écrite11092answered

Question 11092 — agri-food

France · National Assembly · 25 November 2025

Ms. Anne-Sophie Ronceret draws the attention of the Minister of Small and Medium Enterprises, Commerce, Crafts, Tourism and Purchasing Power to the proposed modification of the guidelines of the General Directorate for Competition, Consumption and Fraud Repression (DGCCRF) relating to the logistics penalties provided for in Article L. 441-17 of the Commercial Code. Since the adoption of the laws “Egalim 2” and “ Descrozaille” and the publication in 2023 of the DGCCRF guidelines, abusive logistics penalties have clearly declined and the situation has generally stabilized for manufacturers and distributors. Professional organizations in the sector emphasize that these guidelines have contributed to better regulating practices by reminding that penalties are not intended to constitute an automatic resource. but compensation for real damage that the distributor must be able to demonstrate. The draft revision of the guidelines currently subject to consultation is, however, perceived by many economic players as a significant reversal of doctrine. It would tend to assimilate penalties to a quasi-automatic right of the distributor, including on the basis of expired agreements, which raises questions with regard to the principles of law bonds. It would also weaken the scope of the one-year limitation period provided for by law by modifying the assessment of the starting point and would call into question the requirement to demonstrate harm on a case-by-case basis, which is at the heart of the legislator's will. In a context of already very tense commercial negotiations marked by the multiplication of purchasing centers and strong pressure on the margins of retail companies, agri-food, these developments raise serious concerns about the risk of a resurgence of bad practices in terms of logistical penalties and destabilization of commercial relations. The MP therefore wishes to know, on the one hand, how the Government intends to guarantee that the future guidelines of the DGCCRF will remain strictly in conformity with the spirit of the laws passed by Parliament, in particular on the obligation to demonstrate real damage in order to apply penalties and, on the other hand, what measures it intends to take to ensure that this revision will lead neither to a weakening of supplier protection nor to a new drift in logistics penalties in large-scale distribution.

Question· Question écrite10493answered

Question 10493 — victim assistance

France · National Assembly · 28 October 2025

Mrs. Anne-Sophie Ronceret draws the attention of the Minister of Health, Families, Autonomy and Persons with Disabilities to the situation of patients suffering from serious adverse effects following the use of synthetic progestins, in particular cyproterone acetate (Androcur), Lutényl or Lutéran. Indeed, prescribed for several decades for various indications, these drugs have been the subject of alerts from the Agency National Safety of Medicines and Health Products (ANSM) from 2018 due to an increased risk of meningiomas, non-cancerous brain tumors that can cause serious after-effects. However, many patients indicate that information relating to this risk was partially known well before this date. To date, several hundred files have been compiled and dozens of procedures legal or amicable proceedings are underway, some of which have already led to the recognition of a causal link between the consumption of these medications and the occurrence of meningiomas. Consequently, in order to avoid long and trying litigation processes and to guarantee fair compensation, the study of an amicable compensation system is mentioned by various stakeholders. Such a mechanism would allow, where appropriate, expertise on parts, harmonization of practices and shorter instruction times. Also, she asks him if the Government plans to put in place such an amicable compensation system for patients suffering from meningiomas linked to the use of synthetic progestins, in order to guarantee fair compensation and to spare these victims a long and trying legal process.

Question· Question écrite10051answered

Question 10051 — waste

France · National Assembly · 7 October 2025

Ms. Anne-Sophie Ronceret draws the attention of the Minister of Ecological Transition, Biodiversity, Forests, Sea and Fisheries to the conditions for implementing the new extended producer responsibility (EPR) sector applicable to professional packaging. Indeed, established by the law relating to the fight against waste and the circular economy promulgated on February 10, 2020, this sector must come into force. into force on January 1, 2026. However, the regulatory texts which must specify the practical arrangements are only expected in the fall, which will leave companies with insufficient time to prepare for new and complex obligations. In addition, compliance will involve several steps: identifying whether they fall under EPR, identifying the packaging concerned, putting in place the necessary internal tools, training their teams and anticipate the financial impacts, even though the budgets for 2026 have already been decided and the period of commercial negotiations will begin. Furthermore, the process of approving eco-organizations and individual systems will itself take several months after the publication of the texts. Many companies, beyond just wholesale, fear finding themselves in a situation of involuntary non-compliance as soon as on January 1, 2026. In this context, she asks what measures the Government intends to put in place to ensure a gradual and secure entry into force of the EPR sector for professional packaging and whether the hypothesis of a moratorium, mentioned by several professional organizations, could be studied to guarantee the success of this system.

Question· Question écrite5875answered

Question 5875 — automobiles

France · National Assembly · 15 April 2025

Mme Anne-Sophie Ronceret attire l'attention de M. le ministre d'État, ministre de l'intérieur, sur les difficultés rencontrées par les anciens propriétaires de véhicules lorsque les nouveaux acquéreurs tardent à effectuer le changement de carte grise. Cette situation peut entraîner des conséquences financières et administratives lourdes, puisqu'ils continuent de recevoir des amendes de post-stationnement et peuvent subir des saisies injustifiées sur leurs comptes bancaires. Mme la députée souligne notamment le cas d'une habitante de Montfort-l'Amaury, dans sa circonscription, qui reçoit des amendes pour un véhicule vendu en octobre 2022, l'acquéreur n'ayant effectué le changement de carte grise que deux ans plus tard. Malgré un dépôt de plainte et un recours déposé auprès du tribunal du stationnement payant de Limoges en février 2025, cette personne n'a reçu aucun accusé de réception ni réponse à ce jour. Elle souhaite donc connaître les mesures que le Gouvernement envisage pour sécuriser le processus de changement de carte grise, prévenir ces situations pénalisantes pour les citoyens et garantir un traitement efficace et rapide des recours engagés par les anciens propriétaires injustement mis en cause.