Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Asylum

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

23 records in EU in 2012

All countriesUnited Kingdom · 12,687Ireland · 6,788Austria · 3,733Netherlands · 2,241United States · 2,034Germany · 1,645European Union · 1,412France · 895Belgium · 1Estonia · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0364decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 19 December 2012.#Mostafa Abed El Karem El Kott and Others v Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatal.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Bíróság.#Directive 2004/83/EC — Minimum standards for determining who qualifies for refugee status or subsidiary protection status — Stateless persons of Palestinian origin who have in fact availed themselves of assistance from the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) — The right of those stateless persons to recognition as refugees on the basis of the second sentence of Article 12(1)(a) of Directive 2004/83 — Conditions under which applicable — Cessation of UNRWA assistance ‘for any reason’ — Evidence — Consequences for the persons concerned seeking refugee status — Persons ‘ipso facto … entitled to the benefits of [the] Directive’ — Automatic recognition as a ‘refugee’ within the meaning of Article 2(c) of Directive 2004/83 and the granting of refugee status in accordance with Article 13 thereof.#Case C‑364/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0277decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber), 22 November 2012.#M. M. v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common European Asylum System – Directive 2004/83/EC – Minimum standards for qualification for refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Article 4(1), second sentence – Cooperation of the Member State with the applicant to assess the relevant elements of his application – Scope – Lawfulness of the national procedure for processing an application for subsidiary protection following rejection of an application for refugee status – Observance of fundamental rights – Right to be heard.#Case C‑277/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 November 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0245decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 6 November 2012.#K v Bundesasylamt.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Asylgerichtshof.#Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 – Determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third‑country national – Humanitarian clause – Article 15 of that regulation – Person who enjoys asylum in a Member State and is dependent on the assistance of an asylum seeker because she suffers from a serious illness – Article 15(2) of the regulation – Obligation on that Member State, which is not responsible according to the criteria laid down in Chapter III of that regulation, to examine the application for asylum made by that asylum seeker – Conditions.#Case C‑245/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 November 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0179decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber), 27 September 2012.#Cimade and Groupe d’information et de soutien des immigrés (GISTI) v Ministre de l’Intérieur, de l’Outre-mer, des Collectivités territoriales et de l’Immigration.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France).#Applications for asylum — Directive 2003/9/EC — Minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers in the Member States — Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 — Obligation to guarantee asylum seekers minimum reception conditions during the procedure of taking charge or taking back by the responsible Member State — Determining the Member State obliged to assume the financial burden of the minimum conditions.#Case C‑179/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 September 2012

Proposal· PCCELEX 52012PC0526open

Proposal for a DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Decision No 573/2007/EC, Decision No 575/2007/EC and Council Decision 2007/435/EC with a view to increasing the co-financing rate of the European Refugee Fund, the European Return Fund and the European Fund for the Integration of third-country nationals as regards certain provisions relating to financial management for certain Member States experiencing or threatened with serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability

European Union · European Commission · 20 September 2012

Report· CCCELEX 62011CC0364decided

Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 13 September 2012.#Mostafa Abed El Karem El Kott and Others v Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatal.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Bíróság.#Directive 2004/83/EC — Minimum standards for determining who qualifies for refugee status or subsidiary protection status — Stateless persons of Palestinian origin who have in fact availed themselves of assistance from the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) — The right of those stateless persons to recognition as refugees on the basis of the second sentence of Article 12(1)(a) of Directive 2004/83 — Conditions under which applicable — Cessation of UNRWA assistance ‘for any reason’ — Evidence — Consequences for the persons concerned seeking refugee status — Persons ‘ipso facto … entitled to the benefits of [the] Directive’ — Automatic recognition as a ‘refugee’ within the meaning of Article 2(c) of Directive 2004/83 and the granting of refugee status in accordance with Article 13 thereof.#Case C‑364/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2012

Report· CCCELEX 62011CC0175decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bot delivered on 6 September 2012.#H. I. D. and B. A. v Refugee Applications Commissioner and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).#Request for a preliminary ruling – Common European Asylum System – Application by a national of a third country seeking refugee status – Directive 2005/85/EC – Article 23 – Possibility of prioritising the processing of asylum applications – National procedure applying a prioritised procedure for the examination of applications by persons belonging to a certain category defined on the basis of nationality or country of origin – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Article 39 of Directive 2005/85 – Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ within the meaning of that article.#Case C‑175/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 September 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0083decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 5 September 2012.#Secretary of State for the Home Department v Muhammad Sazzadur Rahman and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber).#Directive 2004/38/EC — Right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States — Article 3(2) — Obligation to facilitate, in accordance with national legislation, entry and residence for ‘any other family members’ who are dependants of a Union citizen.#Case C‑83/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 September 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0071decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 5 September 2012.#Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Y and Z.#References for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Directive 2004/83/EC — Minimum standards for determining who qualifies for refugee status or for subsidiary protection status — Article (2)(c) — Classification as a ‘refugee’ — Article 9(1) — Definition of ‘acts of persecution’ — Article 10(1)(b) — Religion as ground for persecution — Connection between the reasons for persecution and the acts of persecution — Pakistani nationals who are members of the Ahmadiyya religious community — Acts by the Pakistani authorities designed to prohibit the manifestation of a person’s religion in public — Acts sufficiently serious for the person concerned to have a well-founded fear of being persecuted on account of his religion — Individual assessment of the facts and circumstances — Article 4.#Joined Cases C‑71/11 and C‑99/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 September 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62012CJ0278decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber), 19 July 2012.#Atiqullah Adil v Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Area of freedom, security and justice − Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 — Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) — Articles 20 and 21 — Abolition of border control at internal borders — Checks within the territory − Measures having an equivalent effect to border checks − National legislation authorising checks of identity, nationality and residence status by officials responsible for border surveillance and monitoring of foreign nationals in a 20 kilometre area extending from the common border with other State parties to the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement − Checks intended to combat illegal residence − Legislation laying down certain conditions and guarantees concerning, inter alia, the frequency and intensity of the checks.#Case C‑278/12 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 July 2012

Report· CCCELEX 62011CC0245decided

Opinion of Advocate General Trstenjak delivered on 27 June 2012.#K v Bundesasylamt.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Asylgerichtshof.#Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 – Determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third‑country national – Humanitarian clause – Article 15 of that regulation – Person who enjoys asylum in a Member State and is dependent on the assistance of an asylum seeker because she suffers from a serious illness – Article 15(2) of the regulation – Obligation on that Member State, which is not responsible according to the criteria laid down in Chapter III of that regulation, to examine the application for asylum made by that asylum seeker – Conditions.#Case C‑245/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 June 2012

Report· CCCELEX 62011CC0179decided

Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 15 May 2012.#Cimade and Groupe d’information et de soutien des immigrés (GISTI) v Ministre de l’Intérieur, de l’Outre-mer, des Collectivités territoriales et de l’Immigration.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France).#Applications for asylum — Directive 2003/9/EC — Minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers in the Member States — Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 — Obligation to guarantee asylum seekers minimum reception conditions during the procedure of taking charge or taking back by the responsible Member State — Determining the Member State obliged to assume the financial burden of the minimum conditions.#Case C‑179/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 May 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62010CJ0620decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber), 3 May 2012.#Migrationsverket v Nurije Kastrati and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Kammarrätten i Stockholm — Migrationsöverdomstolen.#Dublin system — Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 — Procedure for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application — Third-country nationals in possession of a valid visa issued by the ‘Member State responsible’ within the meaning of Regulation No 343/2003 — Asylum application lodged in a Member State other than the State responsible pursuant to that regulation — Application for a residence permit in a Member State other than the State responsible followed by the withdrawal of the asylum application — Withdrawal occurring before the Member State responsible accepted that it should take charge — Withdrawal terminating the procedures set up by Regulation No 343/2003.#Case C‑620/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 May 2012

Report· CCCELEX 62011CC0277decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bot delivered on 26 April 2012.#M. M. v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common European Asylum System – Directive 2004/83/EC – Minimum standards for qualification for refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Article 4(1), second sentence – Cooperation of the Member State with the applicant to assess the relevant elements of his application – Scope – Lawfulness of the national procedure for processing an application for subsidiary protection following rejection of an application for refugee status – Observance of fundamental rights – Right to be heard.#Case C‑277/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 April 2012

Report· CCCELEX 62011CC0071decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bot delivered on 19 April 2012.#Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Y and Z.#References for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Directive 2004/83/EC — Minimum standards for determining who qualifies for refugee status or for subsidiary protection status — Article (2)(c) — Classification as a ‘refugee’ — Article 9(1) — Definition of ‘acts of persecution’ — Article 10(1)(b) — Religion as ground for persecution — Connection between the reasons for persecution and the acts of persecution — Pakistani nationals who are members of the Ahmadiyya religious community — Acts by the Pakistani authorities designed to prohibit the manifestation of a person’s religion in public — Acts sufficiently serious for the person concerned to have a well-founded fear of being persecuted on account of his religion — Individual assessment of the facts and circumstances — Article 4.#Joined Cases C‑71/11 and C‑99/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 April 2012

Report· CCCELEX 62011CC0083decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bot delivered on 27 March 2012.#Secretary of State for the Home Department v Muhammad Sazzadur Rahman and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber).#Directive 2004/38/EC — Right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States — Article 3(2) — Obligation to facilitate, in accordance with national legislation, entry and residence for ‘any other family members’ who are dependants of a Union citizen.#Case C‑83/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 March 2012

Proposal· PCCELEX 52012PC0110open

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSIONTO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENTpursuant to Article 294(6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Unionconcerning the position of the Council on the adoption of a proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council of amending Decision no 573/2007/EC establishing the European Refugee Fund for the period 2008 to 2013 as part of the General programme "Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows" and repealing Council Decision 2004/904/EC (“establishment of a Joint EU Resettlement Programme”)

European Union · European Commission · 9 March 2012

Report· CCCELEX 62010CC0620decided

Opinion of Advocate General Trstenjak delivered on 12 January 2012.#Migrationsverket v Nurije Kastrati and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Kammarrätten i Stockholm — Migrationsöverdomstolen.#Dublin system — Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 — Procedure for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application — Third-country nationals in possession of a valid visa issued by the ‘Member State responsible’ within the meaning of Regulation No 343/2003 — Asylum application lodged in a Member State other than the State responsible pursuant to that regulation — Application for a residence permit in a Member State other than the State responsible followed by the withdrawal of the asylum application — Withdrawal occurring before the Member State responsible accepted that it should take charge — Withdrawal terminating the procedures set up by Regulation No 343/2003.#Case C‑620/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 January 2012