Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects

Asylum

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

501 records in 2017

Records

Question· Written questionHL HL1257answered

Doctors: Refugees

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 5 September 2017

To ask Her Majesty's Government how many refugee doctors have been able to become registered by the General Medical Council in the last five years; and in which medical specialties those doctors are practicing.

Question· Written questionHL HL1208answered

Burma: Refugees

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 5 September 2017

To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the needs of refugees fleeing violence in the Rakhine region of Myanmar.

Question· Written questionHL HL1343answered

South Sudan: Refugees

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 5 September 2017

To ask Her Majesty's Government what assistance they are giving to the government of Uganda to help with the reception of refugees from South Sudan; and what assessment they have made of how the health services in that country are coping with the needs of

Question· Written questionHL HL1290answered

Asylum

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 5 September 2017

To ask Her Majesty's Government, in the light of the recommendations of the report Refugees Welcome? by the All Party Parliamentary Group on Refugees, what measures they have taken to improve the experience of successful asylum seekers.

Question· Written questionHL HL1291answered

Asylum

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 5 September 2017

To ask Her Majesty's Government what lessons have been learned from the integration of recent Syrian refugees, in particular in relation to the provision of (1) housing, (2) National Insurance numbers, and (3) support in finding employment; whether those

Question· Written questionHL HL1313answered

Refugees: Sri Lanka

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 5 September 2017

To ask Her Majesty's Government, in the light of Sri Lanka's new Counter Terrorism Act, what assessment they have made of risks to Tamil returnees to Sri Lanka who have been refugees in the UK.

Question· Written questionUIN 8593answered

Refugees: Children

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 5 September 2017

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many unaccompanied children are supported by each local authority; how many children each local authority has offered to support; and what support has been offered to local authorities to increase

Question· Written questionUIN 8163answered

Asylum: EU Law

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 4 September 2017

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if the UK will continue to apply the Dublin III Regulation when the UK leaves the EU.

Question· Written questionUIN 8417answered

Refugees: Children

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 4 September 2017

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many councils have (a) ended their involvement in the voluntary national transfer scheme to take child refugees and (b) suspended involvement in the Dubs Scheme.

Question· Written questionUIN 8194answered

Refugees: Children

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 4 September 2017

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, with reference to the July 2017 report by Christine Beddoe on separated and unaccompanied minors in Europe, whether the Government plans to create safe travel routes for those minors with a family mem

Question· Written questionUIN 8195answered

Refugees: Children

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 4 September 2017

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether officials are working with French authorities to ensure that unaccompanied child refugees in France have information about their legal rights and options.

Question· Written questionUIN 8317answered

Asylum: Children

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 4 September 2017

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what the number of children is who were transferred under the Dublin III Regulation in 2016 by nature of the relative they were reunited with.

Question· Written questionUIN 8318answered

Asylum: Children

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 4 September 2017

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many children have been transferred to the UK under the Dublin III Regulation since January 2017; and if she will make a statement.

Question· Written questionUIN 7827answered

Refugees: Children

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 4 September 2017

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what plans she has to ensure that unaccompanied children will be able to be reunited with their close family when the UK leaves the EU.

Question· Written questionUIN 7197answered

Asylum: Afghanistan

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 4 September 2017

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many asylum applications have been (a) granted and (b) refused to Afghan nationals in each year since 2010.

Question· Written questionUIN 7352answered

Asylum: Zimbabwe

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 4 September 2017

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many asylum applications from Zimbabwean nationals have been (a) received, (b) granted and (c) refused in each year since 2008.

Question· Written questionUIN 7032answered

Asylum

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 4 September 2017

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many asylum seekers fall into destitution or homelessness during the process of their application for refuge in the UK.

Question· Written questionUIN 7031answered

Asylum

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 4 September 2017

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many asylum support applications are processed within the Government's target times.

Question· Written questionUIN 8104answered

Asylum

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 4 September 2017

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps she is taking to ensure that asylum assessment standards comply with her Department's guidelines.

Question· Written questionUIN 8103answered

Asylum

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 4 September 2017

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps she is taking to ensure that expert medical opinions are taken into account as part of the application process for victims of torture seeking asylum.

Question· Written questionUIN 8106answered

Asylum

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 4 September 2017

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps she is taking to support torture victims seeking asylum in the UK.

Question· Written questionUIN 7036answered

Asylum

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 4 September 2017

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many civil servants process asylum applications; and how many have done so in each year since 2010.

Question· Written questionUIN 7033answered

Asylum

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 4 September 2017

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many section 98 applications submitted from asylum seekers before 3pm receive a reply on the same day.

Question· Written questionUIN 7695answered

Refugees: Children

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 4 September 2017

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what plans she has to ensure that unaccompanied child refugees are able to be reunited with their families in the UK once the UK leaves the EU.

Question· Written questionUIN 7448answered

Refugees

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 4 September 2017

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many applications her Department received for refugee family reunion visas on the basis of exceptional compelling compassionate circumstances outside the immigration rules for each country and yea

Question· Written questionUIN 7449answered

Refugees: Families

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 4 September 2017

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many refugee family reunion visas were granted on the basis of exceptional compelling compassionate circumstances outside the immigration rules for each country and year since 2010.

Question· Written questionUIN 7034answered

Asylum

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 4 September 2017

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many section 95 support applications from asylum seekers are dealt with within 14 days.

Question· Written questionUIN 7035answered

Asylum

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 4 September 2017

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many straightforward asylum applications are completed within six months.

Question· Written questionUIN 7679answered

Asylum: Children

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 4 September 2017

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, when she plans to publish the strategy on the safeguarding of unaccompanied asylum-seeking and refugee children.

Question· Written questionUIN 7641answered

Asylum: Glasgow East

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 4 September 2017

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Answer of 29 June 2017 to Question 106, how many asylum cases awaiting an asylum decision at 31 July 2017 gave a last address which was within Glasgow East constituency.

Question· Written questionUIN 7343answered

Asylum

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 4 September 2017

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what guidance her Department uses for assessments of humanitarian protection after refugees have been in the UK for five years; and what that guidance advises on the (a) retention of documents, (b) ti

Question· Written questionUIN 7675answered

Refugees: Families

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 4 September 2017

To ask the Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, whether the Government will continue to apply the family reunification Dublin III Regulation when the UK leaves the EU.

Question· Written questionUIN 7830answered

Asylum: Children

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 4 September 2017

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, with reference to table AS 08 Q of the Quarterly Immigration Statistics, January to March 2017, published on 25 May 2017, how many applications for asylum made during Quarter 1 of 2017 were made by un

Question· Schriftliche Anfrage14002/Jschriftliche anfrage

nächstes Transitlager für Flüchtlinge am Terminal Brennersee?

Austria · National Council · 16 August 2017

Schriftliche Anfrage der Abgeordneten Peter Wurm, Kolleginnen und Kollegen an den Bundesminister für Landesverteidigung und Sport betreffend nächstes Transitlager für Flüchtlinge am Terminal Brennersee?

Question· Schriftliche Anfrage14004/Jschriftliche anfrage

nächstes Transitlager für Flüchtlinge am Terminal Brennersee?

Austria · National Council · 16 August 2017

Schriftliche Anfrage der Abgeordneten Peter Wurm, Kolleginnen und Kollegen an den Bundesminister für Verkehr, Innovation und Technologie betreffend nächstes Transitlager für Flüchtlinge am Terminal Brennersee?

Question· Schriftliche Anfrage14003/Jschriftliche anfrage

nächstes Transitlager für Flüchtlinge am Terminal Brennersee?

Austria · National Council · 16 August 2017

Schriftliche Anfrage der Abgeordneten Peter Wurm, Kolleginnen und Kollegen an den Bundesminister für Inneres betreffend nächstes Transitlager für Flüchtlinge am Terminal Brennersee?

Bill· HRH.R. 3647 (115th)referred

Save America Comprehensive Immigration Act of 2017

United States · United States Congress · 8 August 2017

Save America Comprehensive Immigration Act of 2017 This bill amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide increased protections and eligibility for family-sponsored immigrants. The bill establishes: (1) the Board of Family-based Visa Appeals, and (2) the Task Force to Rescue Immigrant Victims of American Sex Offenders. The bill sets forth provisions regarding: (1) the Border Patrol and other law enforcement officers, including regarding personnel increases; (2) status adjustment, including an adjustment for Haitians; (3) sex offenders; (4) unfair immigration-related employment practices; (5) removal proceedings, including for removal based om criminal offenses; (6) asylee and refugee proceedings; and (7) naturalization. The Anti-Smuggling Unit within the Border Patrol is reestablished. The worldwide level of diversity immigrants is increased. Gender-based persecution is established as a grounds for refugee status. Adjustment to permanent resident is provided for certain temporary protected status persons. The bill authorizes S (witness or informant) nonimmigrant status for aliens in possession of critical reliable information concerning commercial alien smuggling or trafficking in immigration documents. The definition of "law enforcement officer" under provisions of the Federal Employees Retirement System and the Civil Service Retirement System is amended to include: (1) federal employees not otherwise covered by such term whose duties include the investigation or apprehension of suspected or convicted individuals and who are authorized to carry a firearm, and (2) Internal Revenue Service employees whose duties are primarily the collection of delinquent taxes and the securing of delinquent returns. The bill repeals: (1) provisions prohibiting government entities and officials from preventing communications with federal immigration authorities, and (2) authority permitting state personnel to carry out immigration officer functions. The fashion model H-1B visa is replaced with an O-visa.

Question· Question écrite545open

Question 545 — étrangers

France · National Assembly · 7 August 2017

M. André Chassaigne interroge M. le ministre d'État, ministre de l'intérieur, sur la procédure et les délais de prise de rendez-vous avec les services des préfectures pour les personnes ayant besoin d'obtenir ou de renouveler leur titre de séjour. En effet, depuis plusieurs années, et notamment depuis l'arrêté du 04/07/2013, les personnes bénéficiant d'un titre de séjour doivent passer par internet pour fixer un rendez-vous. L'article 8 de cet arrêté instaure cependant un droit d'opposition à la dématérialisation de la procédure, suivant la délibération de la CNIL du 07/03/2013 qui alertait les autorités sur l'importance de maintenir une procédure alternative au regard de la fragilité de la population concernée. Mais cette disposition est manifestement peu ou pas appliquée. En outre, cette procédure dématérialisée imposée par le ministère s'avère totalement inadaptée aux besoins. Il faut en effet se connecter des dizaines de fois pour multiplier ses chances d'obtenir un rendez-vous, parfois sans jamais aboutir ! Et les personnes disposant d'un titre de séjour limité à un an doivent recommencer ce « parcours du combattant » tous les ans. Le comble est que le demandeur est sanctionné d'une taxe de 180 euros s'il n'a pas pu obtenir un rendez-vous avant la date limite de validité, et même s'il peut justifier de très nombreuses tentatives avant cette date. Ce dysfonctionnement a été confirmé par le Défenseur des droits, dans son rapport publié en mai 2016, soulignant que « les demandeurs n'arrivent jamais à obtenir de rendez-vous, le volume de plages horaires proposées s'avérant manifestement insuffisant » Il citait également le rapport « À guichets fermés » rendu public le 16/03/2016 par la Cimade, qui avait réalisé des enquêtes confirmant que le service public rendu par une majorité des préfectures était totalement insuffisant. Dans ce cadre, le Défenseur des droits a fait des recommandations au ministère de l'intérieur afin que celui-ci intervienne auprès des préfets. Aussi, les demandeurs et leurs proches, les associations, les élus locaux sollicités, comme le personnel concerné des préfectures, ont des raisons légitimes d'être excédés par cette situation inacceptable. Toutes les parties concernées demandent de nouveaux moyens et l'élaboration en concertation d'une procédure plus adaptée. Il lui demande de prendre en urgence les mesures nécessaires pour améliorer la prise de rendez-vous et l'instruction des dossiers de titres de séjour. Il lui demande aussi d'intervenir afin que soit supprimée toute sanction financière à l'égard des demandeurs quand le retard est manifestement imputable au dysfonctionnement du système de prise de rendez-vous.

Question· Question écrite544open

Question 544 — étrangers

France · National Assembly · 7 August 2017

M. André Chassaigne interroge M. le ministre d'État, ministre de l'intérieur, sur les nouvelles conditions d'obtention de la carte de séjour portant la mention « salarié ». L'article 12 de la loi n° 2016-274 du 7 mars 2016 a profondément modifié l'article L. 313-10 du code de l'entrée et du séjour des étrangers et du droit d'asile. En effet, antérieurement à ce dispositif, la carte de séjour portant la mention « salarié » était délivrée aux étrangers titulaires d'un contrat de travail d'une durée supérieure à un an (CDI ou CDD), la carte de séjour portant la mention « travailleur temporaire » étant attribuée aux étrangers titulaires d'un CDD d'une durée inférieure à un an, entre autres. Désormais, la nouvelle rédaction de l'article L. 313-10 du CESEDA réserve la carte de séjour temporaire portant la mention « salarié » aux seuls détenteurs d'un CDI, les détenteurs d'un CDD bénéficiant de façon systématique d'une carte de séjour portant la mention « travailleur temporaire ». Or cette modification emporte des conséquences néfastes, voire désastreuses, pour certaines catégories de ressortissants étrangers, notamment au niveau de l'inscription et de l'indemnisation auprès de Pôle emploi, sans parler des conditions éminemment drastiques de renouvellement du titre de séjour « travailleur temporaire » pouvant conduire à des refus de séjour. À titre d'exemple, les étrangers régularisés au titre de la circulaire du 28 novembre 2012 et de l'article L. 313-14 du CESEDA, pour la plupart restés des années sans titre de séjour mais ayant pu apporter la preuve de leur activité salariée, ont obtenu des services préfectoraux des cartes de séjour « salarié » (souvent renouvelées plusieurs années). Le Gouvernement sait en effet qu'il s'agit d'une population souvent précaire occupant des emplois dans des secteurs économiques « gourmands » en CDD. Ces étrangers risquent désormais de basculer dans la catégorie « travailleur temporaire » et, bien qu'ayant cotisé aux ASSEDIC, pourront se voir refuser le renouvellement de leur titre de séjour. Toujours à titre d'exemple, les mineurs isolés étrangers entrés en France entre 16 et 18 ans, et confiés par décision de justice à l'aide sociale à l'enfance, et qui à leur majorité, en application de la rédaction des dispositions de l'article L. 313-15 du CESEDA, peuvent se voir délivrer une carte de séjour « salarié » ou « travailleur temporaire », risquent également de se voir opposer des refus de séjour. Alors qu'un contrat de professionnalisation, qui est un CDD de 2 ans, pouvait donner lieu à l'attribution d'une carte de séjour « salarié », les nouvelles dispositions imposeront la délivrance d'une carte de séjour « travailleur temporaire ». Or ces publics d'une grande fragilité, et qui ont été admis au titre d'une décision de justice, nécessitent une attention particulière de la part de l'État, notamment au niveau des autorisations de séjour et de travail. Il l'interroge sur les mesures qu'il compte prendre pour ne pas faire retomber dans la précarité et la clandestinité des étrangers régularisés après de longues années passées en France et les mineurs isolés étrangers dont la stabilité du séjour est une condition essentielle de leur insertion sur le territoire national.

Bill· SS. 1720 (115th)referred

RAISE Act

United States · United States Congress · 2 August 2017

Reforming American Immigration for a Strong Economy Act or the RAISE Act This bill amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to: eliminate the diversity visa program; replace the current employment visa system with a skills-based point system; revise the worldwide level of family-sponsored immigrants, including by eliminating certain family-based immigration preferences; establish a 50,000 annual limit for refugees given permanent resident status; and create a nonimmigrant visa for parents of U.S. citizen children who are at least 21 years old. The bill prohibits an alien from being be naturalized if his or her sponsor has not repaid the federal government for all means-tested public benefits received by the alien during the five-year period beginning on the date the alien was lawfully admitted for permanent residence.

Bill· HRH.R. 3612 (115th)referred

Prioritizing Education in Conflict Zones Act of 2017

United States · United States Congress · 28 July 2017

Prioritizing Education in Conflict Zones Act of 2017 This bill amends the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to authorize the Department of State and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), through the Director of Refugee Educational Assistance (to be designated by USAID), to provide long-term assistance to expand and improve primary and secondary education for displaced children from areas of conflict. Such assistance shall be used to: (1) build the capacity for private sector and civil society organizations to develop and strengthen primary and secondary curricula, coordinate with host country educational facilities, and strengthen technical capacities; (2) establish and expand U.S.-host country educational partnerships; and (3) assist efforts to educate women and girls. The director shall seek to use funding appropriated for the purposes of this bill to leverage private sector funding for such purposes and shall prioritize efforts to identify such sources of such private sector funding.

Question· writtenPQ 515asked

515. Deputy Eoin Ó Broin asked the Minister for Justice and Equality his plans to provide a place finders service similar to that provided to programme refugees to residents of direct provision centres who have secured their leave to remain but are unable to secure permanent accommodation due to the rental crisis. [35841/17]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 26 July 2017

515. Deputy Eoin Ó Broin asked the Minister for Justice and Equality his plans to provide a place finders service similar to that provided to programme refugees to residents of direct provision centres who have secured their leave to remain but are unable to secure permanent accommodation due to the rental crisis. [35841/17]

Question· writtenPQ 514asked

514. Deputy Ruth Coppinger asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if he will make changes to the direct provision system to greatly improve the living conditions and welfare of asylum seekers and their children (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35839/17]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 26 July 2017

514. Deputy Ruth Coppinger asked the Minister for Justice and Equality if he will make changes to the direct provision system to greatly improve the living conditions and welfare of asylum seekers and their children (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35839/17]

Question· writtenPQ 467asked

467. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to Parliamentary Questions Nos. 114 to 116, inclusive, of 16 May 2017, if the legal aid available to a protection applicant who has received a negative decision from the International Protection Appeals Tribunal extends to continuing to represent that applicant in leave to remain, deportation or judicial review proceedings; and if the applicant will be legally aided or only be advised on their options. [35336/17]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 26 July 2017

467. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to Parliamentary Questions Nos. 114 to 116, inclusive, of 16 May 2017, if the legal aid available to a protection applicant who has received a negative decision from the International Protection Appeals Tribunal extends to continuing to represent that applicant in leave to remain, deportation or judicial review proceedings; and if the applicant will be legally aided or only be advised on their options. [35336/17]

Record· CJCELEX 62016CJ0348decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 July 2017.#Moussa Sacko v Commissione Territoriale per il riconoscimento della Protezione internazionale di Milano.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Asylum policy — Directive 2013/32/EU — Articles 12, 14, 31 and 46 — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to effective judicial protection — Appeal against a decision refusing an application for international protection — Whether it is possible for the court to adjudicate without hearing the applicant.#Case C-348/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 July 2017

PreviousPage 10 of 11Next