Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

951 records in EU

All countriesUnited States · 41,749Ireland · 23,760United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,716France · 4,100Netherlands · 3,841Austria · 3,566European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0172_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#Robert Rochefort v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Rules on expenses and allowances for Members of Parliament – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery of sums unduly paid – Burden of proof – Duty to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Error of law – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-172/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 July 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0247decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#Tibisay Lucena Ramírez v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken with regard to the situation in Venezuela – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Right to effective judicial protection – Error of assessment.#Case T-247/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 July 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0182decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#Griba Baumschulgenossenschaft landwirtschaftliche Gesellschaft v Community Plant Variety Office.#Plant varieties – Application for a Community plant variety right for the Gala Perathoner apple variety – Technical examination – Testing location – Equal treatment – Rights of the defence – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-182/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 July 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0245decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#Antonio José Benavides Torres v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Venezuela – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Right to effective judicial protection – Error of assessment.#Case T-245/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 July 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0171decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#Robert Rochefort v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Rules on expenses and allowances for Members of Parliament – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery of sums unduly paid – Burden of proof – Duty to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Error of law – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-171/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 July 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0182_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#Griba Baumschulgenossenschaft landwirtschaftliche Gesellschaft v Community Plant Variety Office.#Plant varieties – Application for a Community plant variety right for the Gala Perathoner apple variety – Technical examination – Testing location – Equal treatment – Rights of the defence – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-182/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 July 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0170_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#Robert Rochefort v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Rules on expenses and allowances for Members of Parliament – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery of sums unduly paid – Burden of proof – Duty to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Error of law – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-170/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 July 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0170decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#Robert Rochefort v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Rules on expenses and allowances for Members of Parliament – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery of sums unduly paid – Burden of proof – Duty to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Error of law – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-170/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 July 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0249decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#Tarek William Saab Halabi v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Venezuela – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Right to effective judicial protection – Error of assessment.#Case T-249/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 July 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0716_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#Interpipe Niko Tube OOO and Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant PAO v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes, of iron or steel, originating in Russia and Ukraine – Interim review – Calculation of the normal value – Selling, general and administrative costs – Sales between related companies – Ordinary course of trade – Single economic entity – Article 2(3), (4) and (6) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Export price – Adjustment – Functions similar to those of an agent working on a commission basis – Article 2(10)(i) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Manifest error of assessment – Methodology different from that used in a previous investigation – Article 11(9) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Legitimate expectations – Rights of the defence.#Case T-716/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 July 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0248_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 July 2021 (Extracts).#Diosdado Cabello Rondón v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken with regard to the situation in Venezuela – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Right to effective judicial protection – Error of assessment – Freedom of expression.#Case T-248/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 July 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0248decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 July 2021 (Extracts).#Diosdado Cabello Rondón v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken with regard to the situation in Venezuela – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Right to effective judicial protection – Error of assessment – Freedom of expression.#Case T-248/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 July 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0716decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#Interpipe Niko Tube OOO and Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant PAO v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes, of iron or steel, originating in Russia and Ukraine – Interim review – Calculation of the normal value – Selling, general and administrative costs – Sales between related companies – Ordinary course of trade – Single economic entity – Article 2(3), (4) and (6) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Export price – Adjustment – Functions similar to those of an agent working on a commission basis – Article 2(10)(i) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Manifest error of assessment – Methodology different from that used in a previous investigation – Article 11(9) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Legitimate expectations – Rights of the defence.#Case T-716/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 July 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0245_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#Antonio José Benavides Torres v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Venezuela – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Right to effective judicial protection – Error of assessment.#Case T-245/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 July 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0246_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#Maikel José Moreno Pérez v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken with regard to the situation in Venezuela – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Right to effective judicial protection – Error of assessment.#Case T-246/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 July 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0171_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#Robert Rochefort v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Rules on expenses and allowances for Members of Parliament – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery of sums unduly paid – Burden of proof – Duty to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Error of law – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-171/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 July 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0249_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#Tarek William Saab Halabi v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Venezuela – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Right to effective judicial protection – Error of assessment.#Case T-249/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 July 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0246decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#Maikel José Moreno Pérez v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken with regard to the situation in Venezuela – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Right to effective judicial protection – Error of assessment.#Case T-246/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 July 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0181_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#Griba Baumschulgenossenschaft landwirtschaftliche Gesellschaft v Community Plant Variety Office.#Plant varieties – Application for a Community plant variety right for the Stark Gugger apple variety – Technical examination – Testing location – Equal treatment – Rights of the defence – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-181/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 July 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0269_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 July 2021.#Viktor Pavlovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State respected the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-269/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 July 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0267decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 July 2021.#Sergej Arbuzov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation of the Council to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-267/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 July 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0269decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 July 2021.#Viktor Pavlovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State respected the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-269/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 July 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0268decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 July 2021.#Artem Viktorovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Retention of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation of the Council to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-268/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 July 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0267_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 July 2021.#Sergej Arbuzov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation of the Council to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-267/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 July 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0268_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 July 2021.#Artem Viktorovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Retention of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation of the Council to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-268/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 July 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0355_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 June 2021 (Extracts).#CE v Comittee of the Regions.#Civil Service – Temporary staff – Article 2(c) of the CEOS – Contract for an indefinite period – Early termination with notice – Article 47(c)(i) of the CEOS – Breakdown in the relationship of trust – Terms of notice – Abuse of process – Right to be heard – Principle of sound administration – Rights of the defence – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-355/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 June 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0415decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#KT v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Disciplinary proceedings – Summary dismissal for grave misconduct – Rights of the defence – Hearing of witnesses – Delegation of power – Preparation of the contested decision – Reasonable period of time – Impartiality – Protection of personal data – Proportionality.#Case T-415/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 June 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0586decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#PL v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Career development report – 2017 assessment exercise – Appointment of the assessor – Article 22a of the Staff Regulations – General implementing provisions for Article 43 of the Staff Regulations – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Reasonable time – Principle of impartiality – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Obligation to state reasons – Article 26 of the Staff Regulations – Rights of the defence.#Case T-586/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 June 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0415_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#KT v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Disciplinary proceedings – Summary dismissal for grave misconduct – Rights of the defence – Hearing of witnesses – Delegation of power – Preparation of the contested decision – Reasonable period of time – Impartiality – Protection of personal data – Proportionality.#Case T-415/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 June 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0355decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 June 2021 (Extracts).#CE v Comittee of the Regions.#Civil Service – Temporary staff – Article 2(c) of the CEOS – Contract for an indefinite period – Early termination with notice – Article 47(c)(i) of the CEOS – Breakdown in the relationship of trust – Terms of notice – Abuse of process – Right to be heard – Principle of sound administration – Rights of the defence – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-355/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 June 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0586_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#PL v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Career development report – 2017 assessment exercise – Appointment of the assessor – Article 22a of the Staff Regulations – General implementing provisions for Article 43 of the Staff Regulations – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Reasonable time – Principle of impartiality – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Obligation to state reasons – Article 26 of the Staff Regulations – Rights of the defence.#Case T-586/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 June 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0303decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 June 2021.#Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-303/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 June 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0302decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 June 2021.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-302/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 June 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0303_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 June 2021.#Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-303/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 June 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0302_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 June 2021.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-302/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 June 2021

Report· XGCELEX 52021XG0520(01)open

The following information is brought to the attention of ABDOLLAHI Hamed, AL-NASSER, Abdelkarim Hussein Mohamed, AL YACOUB, Ibrahim Salih Mohammed, ARBABSIAR Manssor, BOUYERI, Mohammed, IZZ-AL-DIN, Hasan, MOHAMMED, Khalid Shaikh, SHAHLAI Abdul Reza, SHAKURI Ali Gholam, COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE PHILIPPINES, including New People’s Army (NPA), HIZBALLAH MILITARY WING, EJÉRCITO DE LIBERACIÓN NACIONAL (‘National Liberation Army’), POPULAR FRONT FOR THE LIBERATION OF PALESTINE (PFLP), POPULAR FRONT FOR THE LIBERATION OF PALESTINE – General Command, and SENDERO LUMINOSO – ‘SL’ (‘Shining Path’) persons and groups included on the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Council Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism and to Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (see Annexes to Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/142 and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/138) 2021/C 193/02

European Union · Council of the European Union · 20 May 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0254_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 May 2021.#China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products and Others v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of certain cast iron articles originating in China – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Association – Standing to bring proceedings – Interest in bringing proceedings – Injury determination – Calculation of the import volume – Macroeconomic and microeconomic indicators – Sampling – Calculation of the EU industry’s cost of production – Prices charged intra-group – Causal link – Attribution and non-attribution analysis – No assessment of injury by segment – Assessment of the significance of undercutting – Confidential treatment of information – Rights of the defence – PCN-by-PCN methodology – Product comparability – Calculation of the normal value – Analogue country – Adjustment for VAT – Determination of the selling, general and administrative costs and profit.#Case T-254/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 May 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0254decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 May 2021.#China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products and Others v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of certain cast iron articles originating in China – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Association – Standing to bring proceedings – Interest in bringing proceedings – Injury determination – Calculation of the import volume – Macroeconomic and microeconomic indicators – Sampling – Calculation of the EU industry’s cost of production – Prices charged intra-group – Causal link – Attribution and non-attribution analysis – No assessment of injury by segment – Assessment of the significance of undercutting – Confidential treatment of information – Rights of the defence – PCN-by-PCN methodology – Product comparability – Calculation of the normal value – Analogue country – Adjustment for VAT – Determination of the selling, general and administrative costs and profit.#Case T-254/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 May 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0789_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 May 2021.#Tom Moerenhout and Others v European Commission.#Law governing the institutions – European citizens’ initiative – Trade with territories under military occupation – Refusal of registration – Manifest lack of powers of the Commission – Article 4(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 – Common commercial policy – Article 207 TFEU – Common foreign and security policy – Article 215 TFEU – Obligation to state reasons – Article 4(3) of Regulation No 211/2011.#Case T-789/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 May 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0789decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 May 2021.#Tom Moerenhout and Others v European Commission.#Law governing the institutions – European citizens’ initiative – Trade with territories under military occupation – Refusal of registration – Manifest lack of powers of the Commission – Article 4(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 – Common commercial policy – Article 207 TFEU – Common foreign and security policy – Article 215 TFEU – Obligation to state reasons – Article 4(3) of Regulation No 211/2011.#Case T-789/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 May 2021

PreviousPage 19 of 20Next