Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

77 records in EU in 2013

All countriesUnited States · 41,745Ireland · 23,760United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,706France · 4,098Netherlands · 3,840Austria · 3,566European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0347decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 19 April 2013.#Adelholzener Alpenquellen GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).#Community trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark — Shape of a bottle with an embossed pattern — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Lack of declaration as to the scope of the protection — Article 37(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Infringements of the rights of the defence — Second sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.#Case T‑347/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 April 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0051decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 April 2013.#Associação de Empresas de Construção e Obras Públicas e Serviços (Aecops) v European Commission.#ESF — Training operations — Reduction in financial assistance initially granted — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 — Time-bar — Legal certainty — Rights of the defence — Reasonable period — Duty to state reasons.#Case T‑51/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 April 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0052decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 April 2013.#Associação de Empresas de Construção e Obras Públicas e Serviços (Aecops) v European Commission.#ESF — Training operations — Reduction in financial assistance initially granted — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 — Time-bar — Legal certainty — Rights of the defence — Reasonable period — Duty to state reasons.#Case T‑52/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 April 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0053decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 April 2013.#Associação de Empresas de Construção e Obras Públicas e Serviços (Aecops) v European Commission.#ESF — Training operations — Reduction in financial assistance initially granted — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 — Time-bar — Legal certainty — Rights of the defence — Reasonable period — Duty to state reasons.#Case T‑53/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 April 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0087decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 April 2013.#GRP Security v Court of Auditors of the European Union.#Arbitration clause — Public service contracts — Surveillance and security services for the buildings of the Court of Auditors — Action for annulment — Decision unilaterally to terminate the contract with application for payment of damages and interest — Measure of a contractual nature — Action not reclassified — Inadmissibility — Decision to impose a penalty of exclusion for three months — Interest in bringing proceedings — Rights of defence — Serious breach of obligations — Principle that penalties must have a proper legal basis — Misuse of powers — Proportionality.#Case T‑87/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 April 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0495decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 March 2013.#Bank Saderat plc v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Entity wholly owned by an entity identified as being involved in nuclear proliferation — Plea of illegality — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection.#Case T‑495/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 March 2013

Report· CCCELEX 62010CC0584decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bot delivered on 19 March 2013.#European Commission and Others v Yassin Abdullah Kadi.#Appeal — Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) — Restrictive measures taken against persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaeda network and the Taliban — Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 — Freezing of funds and economic resources of a person included in a list drawn up by a body of the United Nations — Listing of that person’s name in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 — Action for annulment — Fundamental rights — Rights of the defence — Principle of effective judicial protection — Principle of proportionality — Right to respect for property — Obligation to state reasons.#Joined Cases C‑584/10 P, C‑593/10 P and C‑595/10 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 March 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62008TJ0588decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber), 14 March 2013.#Dole Food Company, Inc. and Dole Germany OHG v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market in bananas — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Concept of a concerted practice having an anti-competitive object — Information exchange system — Duty to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Gravity of the infringement.#Case T‑588/08.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 March 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62008TJ0587decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber), 14 March 2013.#Fresh Del Monte Produce, Inc. v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market in bananas — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Information exchange system — Concept of a concerted practice having an anti-competitive object — Causal link between the collusion and the conduct of the undertakings on the market — Single infringement — Imputation of the infringement — Rights of the defence — Fines — Gravity of the infringement — Cooperation — Mitigating circumstances.#Case T‑587/08.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 March 2013

Regulation· RCELEX 32013R0519in force

Commission Regulation (EU) No 519/2013 of 21 February 2013 adapting certain regulations and decisions in the fields of free movement of goods, freedom of movement for persons, right of establishment and freedom to provide services, company law, competition policy, agriculture, food safety, veterinary and phytosanitary policy, fisheries, transport policy, energy, taxation, statistics, social policy and employment, environment, customs union, external relations, and foreign, security and defence policy, by reason of the accession of Croatia

European Union · EUR-Lex · 21 February 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0427decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 February 2013.#Laboratoire Bioderma v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).#Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark BIODERMA — No infringement of the rights of the defence — Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009.#Case T‑427/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 February 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0492decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber), 20 February 2013.#Melli Bank plc v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Entity wholly owned by an entity identified as being involved in nuclear proliferation — Plea of illegality — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection.#Case T‑492/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 February 2013

Proposal· PCCELEX 52013PC0051open

Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION adapting certain regulations and decisions in the fields of free movement of goods, freedom of movement for persons, company law, competition policy, agriculture, food safety, veterinary and phytosanitary policy, transport policy, energy, taxation, statistics, trans-European networks, judiciary and fundamental rights, justice, freedom and security, environment, customs union, external relations, foreign, security and defence policy and institutions, by reason of the accession of Croatia

European Union · European Commission · 8 February 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0494(01)decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber), 5 February 2013 .#Bank Saderat Iran v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Manifest error of assessment.#Case T‑494/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 February 2013

Report· CCCELEX 62011CC0418decided

Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi delivered on 31 January 2013.#Texdata Software GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck.#Company law — Freedom of establishment — Eleventh Directive 89/666/EEC — Disclosure of accounting documents — Branch of a capital company established in another Member State — Pecuniary penalty in the event of failure to disclose within the prescribed period — Right to effective judicial protection — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence — Effective, proportionate and dissuasive nature of the penalty.#Case C‑418/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 January 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0496decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber), 29 January 2013.#Bank Mellat v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Manifest error of assessment.#Case T‑496/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 January 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0137decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 January 2013.#FunFactory GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).#Community trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional trade mark — Vibrator — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — First sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 — Rights of the defence — Second sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.#Case T‑137/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 January 2013

PreviousPage 2 of 2