Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

101 records in EU in 2025

All countriesUnited States · 41,745Ireland · 23,760United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,706France · 4,098Netherlands · 3,840Austria · 3,566European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0573decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 September 2025.#Positive Group PAO v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Definition of ‘entities operating in the Russian IT sector with a license administered by the FSB’ – Article 2(1)(i) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(i) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence.#Case T-573/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0573_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 September 2025.#Positive Group PAO v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Definition of ‘entities operating in the Russian IT sector with a license administered by the FSB’ – Article 2(1)(i) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(i) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence.#Case T-573/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0091decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a decoration for bags of packaging – Earlier national word and figurative marks – Ground for invalidity – Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Applicable substantive law – Rights of the defence – Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal.#Case T-91/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0083decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a decoration for bags of packaging – Earlier national word and figurative marks – Ground for invalidity – Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Applicable substantive law – Rights of the defence – Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal.#Case T-83/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0091_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a decoration for bags of packaging – Earlier national word and figurative marks – Ground for invalidity – Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Applicable substantive law – Rights of the defence – Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal.#Case T-91/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0083_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a decoration for bags of packaging – Earlier national word and figurative marks – Ground for invalidity – Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Applicable substantive law – Rights of the defence – Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal.#Case T-83/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0092decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing packaging – Earlier national figurative mark – Ground for invalidity – Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Rights of the defence – Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal.#Case T-92/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0092_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing packaging – Earlier national figurative mark – Ground for invalidity – Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Rights of the defence – Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal.#Case T-92/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 September 2025

Report· XGCELEX 52025XG04237open

Notice for the attention of the persons, entities and bodies to whom measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1532, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2025/1547 and in Council Regulation (EU) 2023/1529, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1548 concerning restrictive measures in view of Iran’s military support of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and to armed groups and entities in the Middle East and the Red Sea region apply

European Union · Council of the European Union · 28 July 2025

Report· XGCELEX 52025XG04236open

Notice for the attention of the persons, entities and bodies to whom measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1532, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2025/1547 and in Council Regulation (EU) 2023/1529, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1548 concerning restrictive measures in view of Iran’s military support of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and to armed groups and entities in the Middle East and the Red Sea region apply

European Union · Council of the European Union · 28 July 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0084decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 July 2025.#UBS Group AG, venant aux droits de Credit Suisse Group AG and Others v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Sector of Foreign Exchange (Forex) spot trading of G10 currencies – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Exchanges of information – Agreements or concerted practices relating to G10 foreign exchange activities – Restriction of competition by object – Single and continuous infringement – Principle of sound administration – Rights of the defence – Fines – Basic amount – Proxy for value of sales – Article 23(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-84/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 July 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0084_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 July 2025.#UBS Group AG, venant aux droits de Credit Suisse Group AG and Others v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Sector of Foreign Exchange (Forex) spot trading of G10 currencies – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Exchanges of information – Agreements or concerted practices relating to G10 foreign exchange activities – Restriction of competition by object – Single and continuous infringement – Principle of sound administration – Rights of the defence – Fines – Basic amount – Proxy for value of sales – Article 23(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-84/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 July 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1095_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 July 2025.#OT v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Error of assessment – Rights of the defence – Proportionality.#Case T-1095/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 July 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1095decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 July 2025.#OT v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Error of assessment – Rights of the defence – Proportionality.#Case T-1095/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 July 2025

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-10-2025-002959answered

Defence expenditure

European Union · European Parliament · 17 July 2025

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0483decided

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 10 July 2025.#D and Others v Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 2(1) – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Setting up of a trust – Settlor of the trust included on the list in Annex I to Regulation No 269/2014 – Freezing of the funds and economic resources held in the trust – Concepts of ‘belonging to’ and ‘control’.#Case C-483/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 July 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0387_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Sara Makhlouf v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – ‘Family membership’ criterion – Article 27(2)(b) and Article 28(2)(b) of Decision 2013/255/CFSP – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-387/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 July 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0386_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Ghada Mhana v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – ‘Family membership’ criterion – Article 27(2)(b) and Article 28(2)(b) of Decision 2013/255/CFSP – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-386/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 July 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0388decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Kinda Makhlouf v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – ‘Family membership’ criterion – Article 27(2)(b) and Article 28(2)(b) of Decision 2013/255/CFSP – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Freedom to move and reside in the Member States – Right to family life – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-388/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 July 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0386decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Ghada Mhana v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – ‘Family membership’ criterion – Article 27(2)(b) and Article 28(2)(b) of Decision 2013/255/CFSP – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-386/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 July 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0387decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Sara Makhlouf v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – ‘Family membership’ criterion – Article 27(2)(b) and Article 28(2)(b) of Decision 2013/255/CFSP – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-387/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 July 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0646decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 July 2025.#Criminal proceedings against P.B. and R.S.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Wojskowy Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Independence of the judiciary – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective judicial protection in areas covered by EU law – Principle of irremovability of judges – Military judge found unfit for professional military service – National legislation requiring the early retirement of that judge.#Joined Cases C-646/23 and C-661/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 July 2025

PreviousPage 2 of 3Next