Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

151 records in EU in 2025

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0646_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 July 2025.#Criminal proceedings against P.B. and R.S.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Independence of the judiciary – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective judicial protection in areas covered by Union law – Principle of irremovability of judges – Military judge found unfit for professional military service – National legislation requiring the early retirement of that judge.#Joined Cases C-646/23 and C-661/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 July 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0715_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 July 2025.#Cellnex Telecom, SA and Retevisión I, SA v European Commission.#State aid – Digital television – Aid for the deployment of DTT in remote and less urbanised areas (outside Castilla-La Mancha) – Decision declaring the aid unlawful and incompatible with the internal market – Decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure – Article 6(1) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Procedural rights of interested parties – Rights of the defence – Selectivity – Burden of proof.#Case T-715/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 July 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0715decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 July 2025.#Cellnex Telecom, SA and Retevisión I, SA v European Commission.#State aid – Digital television – Aid for the deployment of DTT in remote and less urbanised areas (outside Castilla-La Mancha) – Decision declaring the aid unlawful and incompatible with the internal market – Decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure – Article 6(1) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Procedural rights of interested parties – Rights of the defence – Selectivity – Burden of proof.#Case T-715/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 July 2025

Record· TOCELEX 62024TO0676_INFdecided

Order of the President of the General Court of 27 June 2025.#Iran Air - The Airline of the Islamic Republic of Iran (Iran Air) v Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures in view of Iran’s military support to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and to armed groups and entities in the Middle East and the Red Sea region – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-676/24 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 June 2025

Record· TOCELEX 62024TO0676decided

Order of the President of the General Court of 27 June 2025.#Iran Air - The Airline of the Islamic Republic of Iran (Iran Air) v Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures in view of Iran’s military support to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and to armed groups and entities in the Middle East and the Red Sea region – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-676/24 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 June 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0502_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 May 2025.#Hashem Anwar Akkad v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Criterion of ‘leading businessperson operating in Syria’ – Presumption of a link with the Syrian regime – Error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Right to a fair trial – Right to effective judicial protection – Proportionality – Right to property – Right to private life – Damage to reputation – New plea in law.#Case T-502/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 May 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0502decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 May 2025.#Hashem Anwar Akkad v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Criterion of ‘leading businessperson operating in Syria’ – Presumption of a link with the Syrian regime – Error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Right to a fair trial – Right to effective judicial protection – Proportionality – Right to property – Right to private life – Damage to reputation – New plea in law.#Case T-502/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 May 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0102_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#SBK Art OOO v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1), in fine, of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-102/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 April 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0102decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#SBK Art OOO v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1), in fine, of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-102/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 April 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0356_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 March 2025 (Extracts).#LG Chem, Ltd. v European Commission.#Dumping – Import of superabsorbent polymers originating in the Republic of Korea – Regulation (EU) 2022/547 – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Article 3(2), (3), (5), (6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Article 9(4) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Determination of injury – Examination of the effect of the imports on prices for like products sold on the EU market – Analysis of price undercutting – Application of the product control number method – Causal link – Attribution and non-attribution analysis – Other known factors – Amount of anti-dumping duty – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-356/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 March 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0356decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 March 2025 (Extracts).#LG Chem, Ltd. v European Commission.#Dumping – Import of superabsorbent polymers originating in the Republic of Korea – Regulation (EU) 2022/547 – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Article 3(2), (3), (5), (6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Article 9(4) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Determination of injury – Examination of the effect of the imports on prices for like products sold on the EU market – Analysis of price undercutting – Application of the product control number method – Causal link – Attribution and non-attribution analysis – Other known factors – Amount of anti-dumping duty – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-356/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 March 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0349_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 March 2025.#Monica Semedo v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Member of Parliament – Psychological harassment – Decisions of the President of the Parliament finding that an accredited parliamentary assistant suffered psychological harassment and imposing on a Member the penalty of forfeiture of entitlement to the subsistence allowance for 10 days – Right to be heard – Rights of the defence.#Case T-349/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 March 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0349decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 March 2025.#Monica Semedo v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Member of Parliament – Psychological harassment – Decisions of the President of the Parliament finding that an accredited parliamentary assistant suffered psychological harassment and imposing on a Member the penalty of forfeiture of entitlement to the subsistence allowance for 10 days – Right to be heard – Rights of the defence.#Case T-349/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 March 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1158decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 12 March 2025.#deluxe holding ApS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing electric candles – Ground for invalidity – Lack of individual character – Degree of freedom of the designer – No different overall impression – Articles 4 and 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Rights of the defence – Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal.#Case T-1158/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 March 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1158_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 12 March 2025.#deluxe holding ApS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing electric candles – Ground for invalidity – Lack of individual character – Degree of freedom of the designer – No different overall impression – Articles 4 and 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Rights of the defence – Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal.#Case T-1158/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 March 2025

PreviousPage 3 of 4Next