Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

501 records in EU in 2022

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 494Germany · 293United States · 141Austria · 134Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0342decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 28 September 2022.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-342/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 September 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0320decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeal may proceed) of 28 September 2022.#the airscreen company GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-320/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0454decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 September 2022.#G-Core Innovations Sàrl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark G CORELABS – Earlier EU figurative mark CORE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-454/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0572decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 September 2022.#Copal Tree Brands, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark COPAL TREE – Earlier national figurative mark COMPAL – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-572/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 September 2022

Report· DCCELEX 52022DC0486open

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL on the exercise of the power to adopt delegated acts conferred on the Commission pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2018 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Union Aviation Safety Agency, and amending Regulations (EC) No 2111/2005, (EC) No 1008/2008, (EU) No 996/2010, (EU) No 376/2014 and Directives 2014/30/EU and 2014/53/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Regulations (EC) No 552/2004 and (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91

European Union · European Commission · 28 September 2022

Decision· DCELEX 32022D1665in force

Council Decision (EU) 2022/1665 of 26 September 2022 on the signing, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union

European Union · EUR-Lex · 26 September 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0335_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 September 2022.#Vicente v Delia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices – Principle of effectiveness – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Summary procedure for the recovery of lawyers’ fees – Potentially unfair terms contained in a fee agreement – National law not providing for the possibility of review by a court – Article 4(2) – Scope of the exception – Directive 2005/29/EC – Article 7 – Misleading commercial practice – Contract concluded between lawyer and client prohibiting the client from withdrawing, without the knowledge or against the advice of the lawyer, on pain of a financial penalty.#Case C-335/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 September 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0518_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 September 2022.#XP and AR v Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide and St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH.#References for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Organisation of working time – Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 7(1) – Right to paid annual leave – Total invalidity or incapacity for work due to illness occurring during a leave year – National legislation providing for the loss of entitlement to paid annual leave on expiry of a certain period – Employer’s obligation to enable the worker to exercise his or her right to paid annual leave.#Joined Cases C-518/20 and C-727/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 September 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0120_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 September 2022.#LB v TO.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Organisation of working time – Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 7 – Right to paid annual leave – Allowance in lieu of leave not taken after the termination of the employment relationship – Three-year limitation period – Starting point – Adequate information provided to the worker.#Case C-120/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 September 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62021TO0624decided

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 September 2022.#Primagran sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark prımagran – Earlier EU figurative mark PRIMA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 27(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Prohibition of reformatio in pejus – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-624/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 September 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0120decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 September 2022.#LB v TO.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Organisation of working time – Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 7 – Right to paid annual leave – Allowance in lieu of leave not taken after the termination of the employment relationship – Three-year limitation period – Starting point – Adequate information provided to the worker.#Case C-120/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 September 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62021TO0624_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 September 2022.#Primagran sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark prımagran – Earlier EU figurative mark PRIMA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 27(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Prohibition of reformatio in pejus – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-624/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 September 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0338_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 22 September 2022.#Anna Hrebenyuk v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-338/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 September 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0338decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 22 September 2022.#Anna Hrebenyuk v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-338/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 September 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0335decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 September 2022.#Vicente v Delia.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Sevilla.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices – Principle of effectiveness – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Summary procedure for the recovery of lawyers’ fees – Potentially unfair terms contained in a fee agreement – National law not providing for the possibility of review by a court – Article 4(2) – Scope of the exception – Directive 2005/29/EC – Article 7 – Misleading commercial practice – Contract concluded between lawyer and client prohibiting the client from withdrawing, without the knowledge or against the advice of the lawyer, on pain of a financial penalty.#Case C-335/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 September 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0518decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 September 2022.#XP and AR v Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide and St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht.#References for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Organisation of working time – Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 7(1) – Right to paid annual leave – Total invalidity or incapacity for work due to illness occurring during a leave year – National legislation providing for the loss of entitlement to paid annual leave on expiry of a certain period – Employer’s obligation to enable the worker to exercise his or her right to paid annual leave.#Joined Cases C-518/20 and C-727/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 September 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0339_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 20 September 2022.#Criminal proceedings against VD bd] Criminal proceedings against VD and SR.#References for a preliminary ruling – Single market for financial services – Market abuse – Insider dealing – Directive 2003/6/EC – Article 12(2)(a) and (d) – Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 – Article 23(2)(g) and (h) – Supervisory and investigatory powers of the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) – General interest objective seeking to protect the integrity of financial markets in the European Union and public confidence in financial instruments – Option open to the AMF to require the traffic data records held by an operator providing electronic communications services – Processing of personal data in the electronic communications sector – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 15(1) – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 7, 8 and 11 and Article 52(1) – Confidentiality of the communications – Restrictions – Legislation providing for the general and indiscriminate retention of traffic data by operators providing electronic communications services – Option for a national court to restrict the temporal effects of a declaration of invalidity in respect of provisions of national law that are incompatible with EU law – Precluded.#Joined Cases C-339/20 and C-397/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 September 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0793_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 20 September 2022.#Bundesrepublik Deutschland v SpaceNet AG and Telekom Deutschland GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Processing of personal data in the electronic communications sector – Confidentiality of communications – Providers of electronic communications services – General and indiscriminate retention of traffic and location data – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 15(1) – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 6, 7, 8 and 11 and Article 52(1) – Article 4(2) TEU.#Joined Cases C-793/19 and C-794/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 September 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0339decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 20 September 2022.#Criminal proceedings against VD bd]
 
 Criminal proceedings against VD and SR.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#References for a preliminary ruling – Single market for financial services – Market abuse – Insider dealing – Directive 2003/6/EC – Article 12(2)(a) and (d) – Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 – Article 23(2)(g) and (h) – Supervisory and investigatory powers of the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) – General interest objective seeking to protect the integrity of financial markets in the European Union and public confidence in financial instruments – Option open to the AMF to require the traffic data records held by an operator providing electronic communications services – Processing of personal data in the electronic communications sector – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 15(1) – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 7, 8 and 11 and Article 52(1) – Confidentiality of the communications – Restrictions – Legislation providing for the general and indiscriminate retention of traffic data by operators providing electronic communications services – Option for a national court to restrict the temporal effects of a declaration of invalidity in respect of provisions of national law that are incompatible with EU law – Precluded.#Joined Cases C-339/20 and C-397/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 September 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0526decided

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 16 September 2022.#OT v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Interim relief – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the appellant’s name – Urgency – Serious and irreparable damage – None.#Case C-526/22 P(R).

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 September 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0526_INFdecided

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 16 September 2022.#OT v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Interim relief – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the appellant’s name – Urgency – Serious and irreparable damage – None.#Case C-526/22 P(R).

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 September 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0675_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 September 2022.#Colin Brown v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 4(1)(a) and (b) – EU official who is a national of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and who during the 10 years before his entry into service habitually resided within the territory of the State in which he is employed – Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union – Acquisition by that EU official of the nationality of the State in which he is employed – Withdrawal of the entitlement to receive an expatriation allowance – Action for annulment.#Case C-675/20 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 September 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0420_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 September 2022.#Criminal proceedings against HN.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 47 and 48 – European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms – Article 6 – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings – Article 8 – Right to be present at the trial – Return decision accompanied by an entry ban of five years – Conditions for holding a trial in the absence of the person concerned – Obligation to be present at the trial provided for under national law.#Case C-420/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 September 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0749decided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 September 2022.#Coordination nationale médicale santé - environnement (CNMSE) and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Regulation (EU) 2020/1043 – Aarhus Convention – Point (d) of the first subparagraph of Article 2(2) and second subparagraph of Article 2(2) – Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Article 2(1)(c) – Action for annulment – Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU – Associations concerned with the protection of human health and the environment – Lack of locus standi – Person not individually concerned – Application inadmissible – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-749/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 September 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0675decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 September 2022.#Colin Brown v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 4(1)(a) and (b) – EU official who is a national of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and who during the 10 years before his entry into service habitually resided within the territory of the State in which he is employed – Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union – Acquisition by that EU official of the nationality of the State in which he is employed – Withdrawal of the entitlement to receive an expatriation allowance – Action for annulment.#Case C-675/20 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 September 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0420decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 September 2022.#Criminal proceedings against HN.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 47 and 48 – European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms – Article 6 – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings – Article 8 – Right to be present at the trial – Return decision accompanied by an entry ban of five years – Conditions for holding a trial in the absence of the person concerned – Obligation to be present at the trial provided for under national law.#Case C-420/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 September 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0749_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 September 2022.#Coordination nationale médicale santé - environnement (CNMSE) and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Regulation (EU) 2020/1043 – Aarhus Convention – Point (d) of the first subparagraph of Article 2(2) and second subparagraph of Article 2(2) – Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Article 2(1)(c) – Action for annulment – Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU – Associations concerned with the protection of human health and the environment – Lack of locus standi – Person not individually concerned – Application inadmissible – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-749/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 September 2022

PreviousPage 10 of 11Next