Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

501 records in EU in 2025

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 494Germany · 293United States · 141Austria · 134Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0038decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#G.L. v AB SpA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities – Articles 2, 5 and 7 – Articles 21, 24 and 26 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Article 1 – Article 2(1) and (2)(b) – Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of disability – Indirect discrimination – Difference of treatment in respect of an employee who does not himself or herself have a disability but cares for his or her child who has a disability – Article 5 – Employer’s obligation to make reasonable accommodation.#Case C-38/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 September 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0038_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#G.L. v AB SpA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities – Articles 2, 5 and 7 – Articles 21, 24 and 26 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Article 1 – Article 2(1) and (2)(b) – Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of disability – Indirect discrimination – Difference of treatment in respect of an employee who does not himself or herself have a disability but cares for his or her child who has a disability – Article 5 – Employer’s obligation to make reasonable accommodation.#Case C-38/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 September 2025

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0248_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 11 September 2025.#ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk s.c. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrated that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-248/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 September 2025

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0247_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 11 September 2025.#ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk s.c. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-247/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 September 2025

Proposal· PCCELEX 52025PC0483open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Specialised Committee on Road Transport established by the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part, on the national electronic register of road transport undertakings and the modalities of exchange of information contained in these registers

European Union · European Commission · 11 September 2025

Decision· DCELEX 32025D2053in force

Council Decision (EU) 2025/2053 of 10 September 2025 authorising the opening of negotiations with the Kingdom of Morocco for an agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters on the amendment of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco on the amendment of Protocols 1 and 4 to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part

European Union · EUR-Lex · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0198_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#DM and DN v Mission d'assistance de l'Union européenne pour une gestion intégrée des frontières en Libye (EUBAM Libya).#Non-contractual liability – Common foreign and security policy – Jurisdiction of the EU judicature – European Union Integrated Border Management Assistance Mission in Libya – Private security staff engaged by a third-party company for the protection of members of the mission – Causal link.#Case T-198/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0448_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#JSherwood sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark JSherWood wear it with pride – Earlier EU word marks SHER-WOOD and SHER-WOOD SL and earlier EU figurative mark SHERWOOD – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity between products – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-448/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0642_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-642/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0541_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Dmitry Alexandrovich Pumpyanskiy v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Article 2(1)(f) and (g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(f) and (g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-541/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1105_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Roman Arkadyevich Abramovich v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘leading businesspersons operating in Russia’ – Concept of ‘businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Citizenship of the Union – Right to property – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-1105/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1116_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Tigran Khudaverdyan v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection – Concept of ‘businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination – Proportionality – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-1116/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0592_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#European Federation of Financial Analysts'Societies (EFFAS) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark CEFA Certified European Financial Analyst – Earlier EU word mark CFA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Lack of peaceful coexistence.#Case T-592/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0522_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Seven.One Entertainment Group GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark GERMANY’S NEXT top kebab by Uncle Charlie – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-522/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0497_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Telefónica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark LOOP – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Objective characteristics inherent in the nature of the goods and services – Sufficiently direct and specific relationship – Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision – Res judicata – Article 266 TFEU – Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Power of the General Court to alter decisions.#Case T-497/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0086_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Vinatis v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark VINATIS – Earlier Benelux word mark VINITES – Relative ground for refusal – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Admissibility of new evidence – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Cross-claim before the General Court.#Case T-86/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0444_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Montres Tudor SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark 1926 – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-444/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0425_EXTdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2025 (Extracts).#Ffauf Italia SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark pastaZARA Sublime – Earlier EU word mark ZARA – Relative ground for refusal – No injury to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – No link between the signs – No risk of unfair advantage being taken of the mark with a reputation – Existence of due cause for the use of the mark applied for.#Case T-425/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0642decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-642/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0643_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-643/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0643decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-643/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0592decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#European Federation of Financial Analysts'Societies (EFFAS) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark CEFA Certified European Financial Analyst – Earlier EU word mark CFA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Lack of peaceful coexistence.#Case T-592/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0541decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Dmitry Alexandrovich Pumpyanskiy v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Article 2(1)(f) and (g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(f) and (g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-541/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0255decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Martijn Frederik Nouwen v Council of the European Union.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents concerning the work of the Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation) established by the Council – Partial refusal of access – Article 4(1)(a) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exceptions relating to the protection of the public interest as regards international relations and the financial, monetary or economic policy of the Union or of a Member State – General presumption of confidentiality – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-255/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0255_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Martijn Frederik Nouwen v Council of the European Union.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents concerning the work of the Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation) established by the Council – Partial refusal of access – Article 4(1)(a) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exceptions relating to the protection of the public interest as regards international relations and the financial, monetary or economic policy of the Union or of a Member State – General presumption of confidentiality – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-255/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0497decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Telefónica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark LOOP – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Objective characteristics inherent in the nature of the goods and services – Sufficiently direct and specific relationship – Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision – Res judicata – Article 266 TFEU – Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Power of the General Court to alter decisions.#Case T-497/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0444decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Montres Tudor SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark 1926 – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-444/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0522decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Seven.One Entertainment Group GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark GERMANY’S NEXT top kebab by Uncle Charlie – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-522/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0425_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2025 (Extracts).#Ffauf Italia SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark pastaZARA Sublime – Earlier EU word mark ZARA – Relative ground for refusal – No injury to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – No link between the signs – No risk of unfair advantage being taken of the mark with a reputation – Existence of due cause for the use of the mark applied for.#Case T-425/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0425decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2025 (Extracts).#Ffauf Italia SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark pastaZARA Sublime – Earlier EU word mark ZARA – Relative ground for refusal – No injury to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – No link between the signs – No risk of unfair advantage being taken of the mark with a reputation – Existence of due cause for the use of the mark applied for.#Case T-425/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1105decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Roman Arkadyevich Abramovich v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘leading businesspersons operating in Russia’ – Concept of ‘businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Citizenship of the Union – Right to property – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-1105/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0435decided

Judgment of the General Court (Intermediate Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#YL v Council of the European Union and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Decision of the Management Board of EUIPO not to submit to the Council a proposal for extension of the applicant’s term of office – Decision of the Council not to extend the applicant’s term of office – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Liability.#Cases T-435/23 and T-224/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0086decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Vinatis v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark VINATIS – Earlier Benelux word mark VINITES – Relative ground for refusal – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Admissibility of new evidence – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Cross-claim before the General Court.#Case T-86/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0573decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 September 2025.#Positive Group PAO v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Definition of ‘entities operating in the Russian IT sector with a license administered by the FSB’ – Article 2(1)(i) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(i) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence.#Case T-573/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0573_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 September 2025.#Positive Group PAO v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Definition of ‘entities operating in the Russian IT sector with a license administered by the FSB’ – Article 2(1)(i) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(i) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence.#Case T-573/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0448decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#JSherwood sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark JSherWood wear it with pride – Earlier EU word marks SHER-WOOD and SHER-WOOD SL and earlier EU figurative mark SHERWOOD – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity between products – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-448/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1116decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Tigran Khudaverdyan v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection – Concept of ‘businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination – Proportionality – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-1116/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0371_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#La Superquímica, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Monta – Earlier national figurative mark MONTACK – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-371/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0435_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Intermediate Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#YL v Council of the European Union and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Decision of the Management Board of EUIPO not to submit to the Council a proposal for extension of the applicant’s term of office – Decision of the Council not to extend the applicant’s term of office – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Liability.#Cases T-435/23 and T-224/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

PreviousPage 10 of 11Next