Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

551 records in EU in 2022

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 494Germany · 293Austria · 142United States · 141Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Report· CCCELEX 62020CC0695decided

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 15 September 2022.#Fenix International Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Implementing power of the Council of the European Union – Article 291(2) TFEU – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 28 and 397 – Taxable person, acting in his or her own name but on behalf of another person – Provider of services by electronic means – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2011 – Article 9a – Presumption – Validity.#Case C-695/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 September 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0046decided

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 15 September 2022.#European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators v Aquind Ltd.#Appeal – Energy – Regulation (EC) No 714/2009 – Article 17 – Request for exemption relating to an electrical interconnector – Refusal decision from the European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Regulation (EC) No 713/2009 – Article 19 – Board of Appeal of ACER – Intensity of the review.#Case C-46/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0423decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Sebastiano Gioioso v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark MARE GIOIOSO di Sebastiano IMPORT EXPORT – Earlier national figurative mark GIOIA DI MARE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-423/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0607decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Blueroots Technology GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark SKILLTREE STUDIOS – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of descriptive character – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-607/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0416decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Itinerant Show Room Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ITINERANT – Earlier EU figurative mark representing a singing duck in a circle – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Similarity – Reputation – Link – Undue advantage – Lack of due cause – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Document produced for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Inadmissibility.#Case T-416/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0417decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Itinerant Show Room Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ITINERANT – Earlier EU figurative mark representing a singing duck in a circle – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Similarity – Repute – Link – Unfair advantage – No due cause – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Document produced for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Inadmissibility.#Case T-417/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0609decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Privatbrauerei Eichbaum GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark STEAM – Genuine use of the mark – Nature of use – Article 18(1), second subparagraph, heading (a), and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-609/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0498_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Lotion LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark BLACK IRISH – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-498/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0423_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Sebastiano Gioioso v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark MARE GIOIOSO di Sebastiano IMPORT EXPORT – Earlier national figurative mark GIOIA DI MARE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-423/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0686_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Task Food s.r.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark ENERGY CAKE – Declaration of invalidity – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/2011).#Case T-686/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0609_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Privatbrauerei Eichbaum GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark STEAM – Genuine use of the mark – Nature of use – Article 18(1), second subparagraph, heading (a), and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-609/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0795_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Protectoplus GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark Li-SAFE – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Restriction of the goods designated in the trade mark application.#Case T-795/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0607_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Blueroots Technology GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark SKILLTREE STUDIOS – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of descriptive character – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-607/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0416_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Itinerant Show Room Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ITINERANT – Earlier EU figurative mark representing a singing duck in a circle – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Similarity – Reputation – Link – Undue advantage – Lack of due cause – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Document produced for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Inadmissibility.#Case T-416/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0417_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Itinerant Show Room Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ITINERANT – Earlier EU figurative mark representing a singing duck in a circle – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Similarity – Repute – Link – Unfair advantage – No due cause – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Document produced for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Inadmissibility.#Case T-417/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0795decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Protectoplus GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark Li-SAFE – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Restriction of the goods designated in the trade mark application.#Case T-795/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0498decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Lotion LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark BLACK IRISH – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-498/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0686decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Task Food s.r.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark ENERGY CAKE – Declaration of invalidity – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/2011).#Case T-686/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 September 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0130decided

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 September 2022.#Biologische Heilmittel Heel GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark TRAUMGEL – Earlier EU word mark Traumeel – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-130/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 September 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0130_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 September 2022.#Biologische Heilmittel Heel GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark TRAUMGEL – Earlier EU word mark Traumeel – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-130/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 September 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0368_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#R.T. v Hauptzollamt Hamburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Union Customs Code – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 – Place where the customs debt is incurred – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 30 – Article 60 – Article 71(1) – Chargeable event and place where the import VAT becomes chargeable – Place where the tax liability is incurred – Finding of a failure to comply with an obligation imposed by EU customs legislation – Determination of the place of importation of goods – Means of transport registered in a third country and imported into the European Union in infringement of customs legislation.#Case C-368/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 September 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0132decided

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 8 September 2022.#BE v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Articles 77 to 79 – Remedies – Parallel exercise – Relationship – Procedural autonomy – Effectiveness of the protection rules established by that regulation – Consistent and homogeneous application of those rules throughout the European Union – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-132/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 September 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0368decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#R.T. v Hauptzollamt Hamburg.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Union Customs Code – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 – Place where the customs debt is incurred – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 30 – Article 60 – Article 71(1) – Chargeable event and place where the import VAT becomes chargeable – Place where the tax liability is incurred – Finding of a failure to comply with an obligation imposed by EU customs legislation – Determination of the place of importation of goods – Means of transport registered in a third country and imported into the European Union in infringement of customs legislation.#Case C-368/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 September 2022

Proposal· PCCELEX 52022PC0445open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Association Committee meeting in Trade configuration established by the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other, concerning the update of Annex XV (Approximation of customs legislation) to the Agreement

European Union · European Commission · 8 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0217decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 September 2022.#SB v European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice.#Civil service – Contract staff – Staff of eu-LISA – Dismissal decision at the end of the probationary period – Obligation to state reasons – Normal probationary conditions – Right to be heard – Procedural irregularities – Duty of care – Manifest error of assessment – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-217/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0713_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 September 2022.#OQ v European Commission.#Civil service – Recruitment – Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/378/20 (AD 7) – Croatian-language lawyer-linguists at the Court of Justice of the European Union – Decision of the selection board not to admit the applicant to the next stage of the competition – Conditions for admission – Condition relating to a level of education corresponding to completed university studies attested by a diploma in Croatian law – Possession of a French diploma in law – Freedom of movement for workers – Action for annulment.#Case T-713/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0631_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 7 September 2022.#Bundesnetzagentur für Elektrizität, Gas, Telekommunikation, Post und Eisenbahnen (BNetzA) v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market in electricity – Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Decision of the Board of Appeal of ACER – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility – Competence of ACER – Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 713/2009 – Article 6(10) of Regulation 2019/942 – Article 9(12) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 – Applicable law – Regulation (EU) 2019/943.#Case T-631/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 September 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0075_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 September 2022.#Yevgeniy Viktorovich Prigozhin v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against serious human rights violations and abuses – Grounds of the decisions mentioning the applicant’s name as the financier of the Wagner Group – Assessments made in the grounds of the decisions – Acts not open to appeal – Inadmissibility.#Case T-75/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0009_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 September 2022.#Olimp Laboratories sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark – Application for the European Union word mark VITA-MIN MULTIPLE SPORT – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Lack of distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-9/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0155_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 September 2022.#Völkl GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Völkl – Earlier EU word mark Völkl – Earlier EU word mark VÖLKL – Relative ground for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the goods – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-155/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0470_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 September 2022.#DD v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.#Civil service – Temporary staff – Disciplinary regime – Removal from post – Opening of an administrative investigation – Initiation of disciplinary proceedings – Requirement for impartiality – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Articles 11, 12 and 21 of the Staff Regulations – Duty of loyalty – Legal certainty – Freedom of expression – Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Principle of sound administration – Duty of care – Presumption of innocence – Right to be heard – Reasonable period of time – Proportionality of the sanction.#Case T-470/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0713decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 September 2022.#OQ v European Commission.#Civil service – Recruitment – Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/378/20 (AD 7) – Croatian-language lawyer-linguists at the Court of Justice of the European Union – Decision of the selection board not to admit the applicant to the next stage of the competition – Conditions for admission – Condition relating to a level of education corresponding to completed university studies attested by a diploma in Croatian law – Possession of a French diploma in law – Freedom of movement for workers – Action for annulment.#Case T-713/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0631decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 7 September 2022.#Bundesnetzagentur für Elektrizität, Gas, Telekommunikation, Post und Eisenbahnen (BNetzA) v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market in electricity – Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Decision of the Board of Appeal of ACER – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility – Competence of ACER – Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 713/2009 – Article 6(10) of Regulation 2019/942 – Article 9(12) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 – Applicable law – Regulation (EU) 2019/943.#Case T-631/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 September 2022

PreviousPage 11 of 12Next