Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

551 records in EU in 2024

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 494Germany · 293United States · 141Austria · 134Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0198decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 September 2024.#Giacomo Santini and Others v European Parliament.#Appeal – Law governing the institutions – Single Statute for Members of the European Parliament – Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies – Adoption by the Italian Chamber of Deputies of a decision on pensions – Change in the amounts of the pensions of members of the Italian Parliament – Corresponding change, by the European Parliament, in the amounts of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy – Replacement of the decisions of the Parliament – Continuing interest in bringing proceedings for annulment of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union.#Case C-198/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 September 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0253decided

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 19 September 2024.#ASG 2 Ausgleichsgesellschaft für die Sägeindustrie Nordrhein-Westfalen GmbH v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Dortmund.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 101 TFEU – Directive 2014/104/EU – Actions for damages for infringements of competition law – Point 4 of Article 2 – Concept of ‘action for damages’ – Article 3(1) – Right to full compensation for harm suffered – Assignment of compensation claims to a provider of legal services – National law precluding recognition of the standing of such a provider with a view to group collection of those claims – Article 4 – Principle of effectiveness – First paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to effective judicial protection.#Case C-253/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 September 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0725decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 September 2024.#Maria Teresa Coppo Gavazzi and Others v European Parliament.#Appeal – Law governing the institutions – Single Statute for Members of the European Parliament – Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies – Adoption by the Italian Chamber of Deputies of a decision on pensions – Change in the amounts of the pensions of members of the Italian Parliament – Corresponding change, by the European Parliament, in the amounts of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy – Replacement of the decisions of the Parliament – Continuing interest in bringing proceedings for annulment of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union.#Case C-725/20 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 September 2024

Proposal· PCCELEX 52024PC0412open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Trade Committee of the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia, Peru and Ecuador of the other part, regarding modifications to Appendixes 2, 2A and 5 to Annex II to the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia, Peru, and Ecuador of the other part

European Union · European Commission · 19 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0607_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 18 September 2024.#Andrey Anatolyevich Kozitsyn v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on such a list – Concept of ‘leading businesspersons’ – Concept of ‘businessperson involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection – Error of assessment – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business.#Joined Cases T-607/22 and T-731/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0534_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 September 2024.#Belarusian Potash Company AAT v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Support for the regime – Financial support – Benefiting from the regime – Error of assessment.#Case T-534/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0521_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 September 2024.#Ivan Ivanovich Golovaty v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Support for the regime – Financial support – Benefiting from the regime – Repression of civil society – Error of assessment.#Case T-521/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2024

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0339_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 18 September 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-339/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1099_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 18 September 2024.#Miguel Ángel Rodríguez Ruiz v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark LEMOON – Earlier national word mark LENNON – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-1099/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0497_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 18 September 2024.#Fidia farmaceutici SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark HYALERA – Earlier national word mark HYAL – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-497/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1168_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 18 September 2024.#Richards Brothers Group v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark EL CABRÓN – Earlier national figurative mark CABRÓ ! – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/2001.#Case T-1168/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2024

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0339decided

Order of the Court of 18 September 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-339/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0528decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 18 September 2024.#Belaruskali AAT v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Support for the regime – Financial support – State-owned undertaking – Benefitting from the regime – Repression of civil society – Error of assessment.#Case T-528/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0534decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 September 2024.#Belarusian Potash Company AAT v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Support for the regime – Financial support – Benefiting from the regime – Error of assessment.#Case T-534/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0607decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 18 September 2024.#Andrey Anatolyevich Kozitsyn v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on such a list – Concept of ‘leading businesspersons’ – Concept of ‘businessperson involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection – Error of assessment – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business.#Joined Cases T-607/22 and T-731/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1168decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 18 September 2024.#Richards Brothers Group v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark EL CABRÓN – Earlier national figurative mark CABRÓ! – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/2001.#Case T-1168/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1099decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 18 September 2024.#Miguel Ángel Rodríguez Ruiz v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark LEMOON – Earlier national word mark LENNON – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-1099/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62023TO1120decided

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 September 2024.#Union internationale des chemins de fer (UIC) v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Trans-European networks – Regulation (EU) 2021/694 – Call for proposals – Legal entities established in the European Union but controlled from third countries – Exclusion from the call for proposals procedure – Request for review – No new facts – Purely confirmatory measure – Inadmissibility.#Case T-1120/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0521decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 September 2024.#Ivan Ivanovich Golovaty v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Support for the regime – Financial support – Benefiting from the regime – Repression of civil society – Error of assessment.#Case T-521/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0528_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 18 September 2024.#Belaruskali AAT v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Support for the regime – Financial support – State-owned undertaking – Benefitting from the regime – Repression of civil society – Error of assessment.#Case T-528/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62023TO1120_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 September 2024.#Union internationale des chemins de fer (UIC) v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Trans-European networks – Regulation (EU) 2021/694 – Call for proposals – Legal entities established in the European Union but controlled from third countries – Exclusion from the call for proposals procedure – Request for review – No new facts – Purely confirmatory measure – Inadmissibility.#Case T-1120/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0352_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 September 2024.#LF v Zamestnik-predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia za bezhantsite.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum and immigration policy – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Scope – Articles 1, 4 and 7 – Directive 2011/95/EU – Scope – Articles 2 and 3 – National protection on humanitarian grounds – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 14 – No possibility of carrying out the removal – Certification – Rights of an illegally staying third-country national in the event of postponement of removal – Directive 2013/33/EU – Scope – Material Reception Conditions.#Case C-352/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 September 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0579decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 September 2024.#Anglo Austrian AAB AG v European Central Bank (ECB) and Belegging-Maatschappij 'Far-Est' BV.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Directive 2013/36/EU – Access to the activity of credit institutions – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the European Central Bank (ECB) – Withdrawal of authorisation – Scope of the ECB’s powers – Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 – Division of powers between the ECB and the national authorities – Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing – Findings of the General Court of the European Union with regard to national law – Examination of a potential distortion of national law.#Case C-579/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 September 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0352decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 September 2024.#LF v Zamestnik-predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia za bezhantsite.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum and immigration policy – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Scope – Articles 1, 4 and 7 – Directive 2011/95/EU – Scope – Articles 2 and 3 – National protection on humanitarian grounds – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 14 – No possibility of carrying out the removal – Certification – Rights of an illegally staying third-country national in the event of postponement of removal – Directive 2013/33/EU – Scope – Material Reception Conditions.#Case C-352/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 September 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0579_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 September 2024.#Anglo Austrian AAB AG v European Central Bank (ECB) and Belegging-Maatschappij 'Far-Est' BV.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Directive 2013/36/EU – Access to the activity of credit institutions – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the European Central Bank (ECB) – Withdrawal of authorisation – Scope of the ECB’s powers – Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 – Division of powers between the ECB and the national authorities – Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing – Findings of the General Court of the European Union with regard to national law – Examination of a potential distortion of national law.#Case C-579/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0741_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Pavel Ezubov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restriction on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Letter informing the applicant of the maintenance of his name on the list – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1) in fine of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘person benefiting from a leading businessperson’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145 – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of good administration – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-741/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0497_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Marina Alexandrova Mordashova v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Applicant’s name included and maintained on the list – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘benefit obtained from a leading businessperson operating in Russia’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145 – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Legal certainty – Principle of non-discrimination – Right to be heard.#Case T-497/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0286_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#OT v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintaining the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘leading businessperson’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection – Right to an effective remedy.#Case T-286/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0286decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#OT v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintaining the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘leading businessperson’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection – Right to an effective remedy.#Case T-286/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0497decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Marina Alexandrova Mordashova v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Applicant’s name included and maintained on the list – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘benefit obtained from a leading businessperson operating in Russia’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145 – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Legal certainty – Principle of non-discrimination – Right to be heard.#Case T-497/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0362decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Musa Yusopovich Bazhaev v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection – Concept of ‘leading businesspersons’ – Article 2(1)(d) and (g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘association’ – Error of assessment – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to private life – Proportionality – Principle of non-discrimination.#Case T-362/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0741decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Pavel Ezubov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restriction on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Letter informing the applicant of the maintenance of his name on the list – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1) in fine of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘person benefiting from a leading businessperson’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145 – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of good administration – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-741/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0361decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Väderstad Holding AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Applications for EU trade marks consisting of the position of a combination of presentational features – Subject matter of the dispute – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Joined Cases T-361/23 to T-364/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0603decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Borco-Marken-Import Matthiesen GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark KINGSBURY – Earlier EU word mark FINSBURY – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-603/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0494_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 11 September 2024.#NKO AO National Settlement Depository (NSD) v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Definition of ‘supporting, materially or financially, the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to property – Proportionality.#Case T-494/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0361_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Väderstad Holding AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Applications for EU trade marks consisting of the position of a combination of presentational features – Subject matter of the dispute – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Joined Cases T-361/23 to T-364/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0635decided

Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Mikhail Fridman and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicants’ names on the list – Obligation to report funds or economic resources belonging to or owned, held or controlled by the applicants – Obligation to cooperate with the competent national authority – Participation in activities the object or effect of which is to circumvent restrictive measures – Article 9(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Direct concern – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Power of the Council – Proportionality.#Case T-635/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 September 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0494decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 11 September 2024.#NKO AO National Settlement Depository (NSD) v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Definition of ‘supporting, materially or financially, the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to property – Proportionality.#Case T-494/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 September 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0029decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 September 2024.#KS and Others v Council of the European Union and Others.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) – Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP – European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (Eulex Kosovo) – Action for damages – Damage allegedly suffered as a result of various acts and omissions by the Council of the European Union, the European Commission and the European External Action Service (EEAS) in the implementation of that joint action – Insufficient investigation of the torture, disappearance and killing of persons – Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union to rule on that action – Last sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 24(1) TEU – Article 275 TFEU.#Joined Cases C-29/22 P and C-44/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0351decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 September 2024.#Neves 77 Solutions SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Generală Antifraudă Fiscală.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the actions of the Russian Federation destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Decision 2014/512/CFSP – Article 2(2)(a) – Jurisdiction of the Court – Final sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 24(1) TEU – Article 275 TFEU – Article 215 TFEU – Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to property – Principle of legal certainty and principle that penalties must be defined by law – Brokering services in relation to military equipment – Prohibition on providing such services – Failure to notify the competent national authorities – Administrative offence – Fine – Automatic confiscation of the amounts received in consideration for the prohibited transaction.#Case C-351/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0029_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 September 2024.##Appeal – Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) – Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP – European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (Eulex Kosovo) – Action for damages – Damage allegedly suffered as a result of various acts and omissions by the Council of the European Union, the European Commission and the European External Action Service (EEAS) in the implementation of that joint action – Insufficient investigation of the torture, disappearance and killing of persons – Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union to rule on that action – Last sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 24(1) TEU – Article 275 TFEU.#Joined Cases C-29/22 P and C-44/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0351_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 September 2024.#Neves 77 Solutions SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Generală Antifraudă Fiscală.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the actions of the Russian Federation destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Decision 2014/512/CFSP – Article 2(2)(a) – Jurisdiction of the Court – Final sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 24(1) TEU – Article 275 TFEU – Article 215 TFEU – Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to property – Principle of legal certainty and principle that penalties must be defined by law – Brokering services in relation to military equipment – Prohibition on providing such services – Failure to notify the competent national authorities – Administrative offence – Fine – Automatic confiscation of the amounts received in consideration for the prohibited transaction.#Case C-351/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2024

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0123_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 September 2024.#UO v Predsedatel na Balgarskata federatsia po ribolovni sportove.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Interpretation of national law – Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for an interpretation of certain provisions of European Union law by the Court of Justice and of the relationship between those provisions and the national legislation applicable – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-123/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 September 2024

PreviousPage 11 of 12Next