Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

751 records in EU in 2022

Records

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0245decided

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 12 July 2022.#Cipla Europe NV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Intervention – EU trade mark – Cancellation proceedings – Leave for other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to participate in the proceedings in the case before the General Court – Time limits – Unforeseeable circumstances – Participation in the oral proceedings – Rejection.#Case C-245/22 P(I).

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 July 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0348decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 12 July 2022.#Nord Stream 2 AG v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Energy – Internal market in natural gas – Directive 2009/73/EC – Directive (EU) 2019/692 – Extension of the application of Directive 2009/73 to gas lines between Member States and third countries – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Action for annulment – Condition that an applicant must be directly concerned by the measure that forms the subject matter of its action – Lack of discretion as to the obligations imposed on the appellant – Condition that an applicant must be individually concerned by the measure that forms the subject matter of its action – Arrangements for the exemptions and derogations excluding the appellant as the sole operator from their benefit – Request that documents be removed from the case file – Rules on the production of evidence before the EU Courts – Documents internal to the European Union institutions.#Case C-348/20 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 July 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0187_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 11 July 2022.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-187/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0187decided

Order of the Court of 11 July 2022.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-187/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2022

Proposal· PCCELEX 52022PC0339open

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT pursuant to Article 294(6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union concerning the position of the Council on the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 as regards the use of the regulatory procedure with scrutiny in order to adapt it to Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

European Union · European Commission · 11 July 2022

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0710_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 July 2022.#Criminal proceedings against AM.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Field of application – Article 51 – Legislative procedure for the adoption of a resolution relating to the revocation of an amnesty – Judicial procedure for review of the compliance of that resolution with the national Constitution – Failure to implement EU law – Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-710/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 July 2022

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0710decided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 July 2022.#Criminal proceedings against AM.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Bratislava II.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Field of application – Article 51 – Legislative procedure for the adoption of a resolution relating to the revocation of an amnesty – Judicial procedure for review of the compliance of that resolution with the national Constitution – Failure to implement EU law – Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-710/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 July 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0261_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 July 2022.#F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and Others v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Obligation on Member States to provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective legal protection in the fields covered by EU law – Article 267 TFEU – Obligation on the referring court to give full effect to the interpretation of EU law provided by the Court of Justice – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Access to an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Judgment of a national court of last instance after a preliminary ruling by the Court – Alleged non-conformity of that judgment with the interpretation of EU law provided by the Court – National legislation preventing the bringing of an action for revision of that judgment.#Case C-261/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 July 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0257_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 July 2022.#Coca-Cola European Partners Deutschland GmbH v L.B. and R.G.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Article 153 TFEU – Protection of workers – Directive 2003/88/EC – Organisation of working time – Night work – Collective agreement which provides for a lower supplementary allowance for regular night work than that established for irregular night work – Equal treatment – Article 20 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Implementation of Union law for the purposes of Article 51(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Joined Cases C-257/21 and C-258/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 July 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0007_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 July 2022.#LKW WALTER Internationale Transportorganisation AG v CB and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Service of documents – Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 – Article 8(1) – One-week period within which the right to refuse to accept a document is to be exercised – Enforcement order made in one Member State and served in another Member State in the language of the first Member State only – Legislation of that first Member State laying down an eight-day period to lodge an objection to that order – Period for lodging an objection starting to run at the same time as the period laid down for the purpose of exercising the right to refuse to accept the document – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy.#Case C-7/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 July 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0348decided

Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 7 July 2022.#Criminal proceedings against HYA and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings – Article 8(1) – Right of an accused person to be present at the trial – Second paragraph of Article 47 and Article 48(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to a fair trial and rights of the defence – Examination of witnesses for the prosecution in the absence of the accused person and his or her lawyer at the pre-trial stage of the criminal proceedings – Impossibility of examining witnesses for the prosecution during the judicial stage of those proceedings – National legislation allowing a criminal court to base its decision on the prior testimony of those witnesses.#Case C-348/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 July 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0007decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 July 2022.#LKW WALTER Internationale Transportorganisation AG v CB and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bezirksgericht Bleiburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Service of documents – Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 – Article 8(1) – One-week period within which the right to refuse to accept a document is to be exercised – Enforcement order made in one Member State and served in another Member State in the language of the first Member State only – Legislation of that first Member State laying down an eight-day period to lodge an objection to that order – Period for lodging an objection starting to run at the same time as the period laid down for the purpose of exercising the right to refuse to accept the document – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy.#Case C-7/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 July 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0257decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 July 2022.#Coca-Cola European Partners Deutschland GmbH v L.B. and R.G.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Article 153 TFEU – Protection of workers – Directive 2003/88/EC – Organisation of working time – Night work – Collective agreement which provides for a lower supplementary allowance for regular night work than that established for irregular night work – Equal treatment – Article 20 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Implementation of Union law for the purposes of Article 51(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Joined Cases C-257/21 and C-258/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 July 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0296decided

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 7 July 2022.#Proceedings brought by A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Control of the acquisition and possession of weapons – Directive 91/477/EEC – Annex I, Part III – Deactivation standards and techniques – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2403 – Verification and certification of deactivation of firearms – Article 3 – Verifying entity approved by a national authority – Issuance of a deactivation certificate – Entity not included on the list published by the European Commission – Transfer of deactivated firearms within the European Union – Article 7 – Mutual recognition.#Case C-296/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 July 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0261decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 July 2022.#F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and Others v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Obligation on Member States to provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective legal protection in the fields covered by EU law – Article 267 TFEU – Obligation on the referring court to give full effect to the interpretation of EU law provided by the Court of Justice – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Access to an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Judgment of a national court of last instance after a preliminary ruling by the Court – Alleged non-conformity of that judgment with the interpretation of EU law provided by the Court – National legislation preventing the bringing of an action for revision of that judgment.#Case C-261/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 July 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0253_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 6 July 2022.#Calrose Rice v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals may proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-253/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 July 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0478_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 July 2022.#Les Éditions P. Amaury v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark BALLON D’OR – Genuine use of the mark – Partial revocation – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use – Assessment of the evidence – Classification of the services.#Case T-478/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 July 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0246_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 July 2022.#Aerospinning Master Franchising s. r. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark SPINNING – Trade mark which has become the common name in the trade for a product or service in respect of which it is registered – Article 51(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Relevant public.#Case T-246/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 July 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0288_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 July 2022.#ALO jewelry CZ s. r. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark ALOve – Earlier international figurative mark LOVe – Relative ground for refusal – Taking unfair advantage of the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-288/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 July 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0288decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 July 2022.#ALO jewelry CZ s. r. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark ALOve – Earlier international figurative mark LOVe – Relative ground for refusal – Taking unfair advantage of the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-288/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 July 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0246decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 July 2022.#Aerospinning Master Franchising s. r. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark SPINNING – Trade mark which has become the common name in the trade for a product or service in respect of which it is registered – Article 51(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Relevant public.#Case T-246/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 July 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0478decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 July 2022.#Les Éditions P. Amaury v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark BALLON D’OR – Genuine use of the mark – Partial revocation – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use – Assessment of the evidence – Classification of the services.#Case T-478/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 July 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0253decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 6 July 2022.#Calrose Rice v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals may proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-253/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 July 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0105_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 30 June 2022.#Criminal proceedings against IR.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 6 and 47 – Right to freedom of movement and residence – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Principles of equality and mutual trust – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Directive 2012/13/EU – Right to information in criminal proceedings – Letter of Rights on arrest – Right of a person to be informed of the accusation against him or her in relation to a national arrest warrant – Right of access to the materials of the case – Conditions for issuing a European arrest warrant in respect of an accused person who is in the executing Member State – Primacy of EU law.#Case C-105/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 June 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0072_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 June 2022.#M.A. v Valstybės sienos apsaugos tarnyba.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Asylum and immigration policy – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 4 – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Articles 6 and 7 – Standards for the reception of applicants for international protection – Article 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2013/33/EU – Article 8 – Detention of the applicant – Ground for detention – Protection of national security or public order – Detention of the applicant for having entered the territory of the European Union unlawfully.#Case C-72/22 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 June 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0014_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 June 2022.#QC v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Pension – Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Transfer of pension rights to the EU scheme – Calculation of the pension rights to be transferred – Competence of the national social security authority – Refusal to transfer those rights – Decision of the European Commission fixing the number of years of pensionable service – Power of assessment of the Commission in calculating these rights – None – Action for annulment and for damages – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-14/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 June 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0205decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 30 June 2022.#Criminal proceedings against V.S.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Article 4(1)(a) to (c) – Principles relating to processing of personal data – Purpose limitation – Data minimisation – Article 6(a) – Clear distinction between personal data of different categories of data subjects – Article 8 – Lawfulness of processing – Article 10 – Transposition – Processing of biometric data and genetic data – Concept of ‘processing authorised by Member State law’ – Concept of ‘strictly necessary’ – Discretion – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 7, 8, 47, 48 and 52 – Right to effective judicial protection – Presumption of innocence – Limitation – Intentional criminal offence subject to public prosecution – Accused persons – Collection of photographic and dactyloscopic data in order for them to be entered in a record and taking of a biological sample for the purpose of creating a DNA profile – Procedure for enforcement of collection – Systematic nature of the collection.#Case C-205/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 June 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0105decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 30 June 2022.#Criminal proceedings against IR.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 6 and 47 – Right to freedom of movement and residence – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Principles of equality and mutual trust – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Directive 2012/13/EU – Right to information in criminal proceedings – Letter of Rights on arrest – Right of a person to be informed of the accusation against him or her in relation to a national arrest warrant – Right of access to the materials of the case – Conditions for issuing a European arrest warrant in respect of an accused person who is in the executing Member State – Primacy of EU law.#Case C-105/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 June 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0072decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 June 2022.#M.A. v Valstybės sienos apsaugos tarnyba.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Asylum and immigration policy – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 4 – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Articles 6 and 7 – Standards for the reception of applicants for international protection – Article 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2013/33/EU – Article 8 – Detention of the applicant – Ground for detention – Protection of national security or public order – Detention of the applicant for having entered the territory of the European Union unlawfully.#Case C-72/22 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 June 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0014decided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 June 2022.#QC v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Pension – Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Transfer of pension rights to the EU scheme – Calculation of the pension rights to be transferred – Competence of the national social security authority – Refusal to transfer those rights – Decision of the European Commission fixing the number of years of pensionable service – Power of assessment of the Commission in calculating these rights – None – Action for annulment and for damages – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-14/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0609_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 June 2022 (Extracts).#LA International Cooperation Srl v European Commission.#Pre-Accession Assistance Instrument – OLAF investigation – Commission decision imposing an administrative sanction – Exclusion from procurement and grant award procedures covered by the general budget of the European Union for a period of four years – Registration in the early detection and exclusion system database – Financial regulation – Unlimited jurisdiction – Proportionality of the sanction.#Case T-609/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0306_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 June 2022.#Hijos de Moisés Rodríguez González, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark La Irlandesa 1943 – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Declaration of invalidity by the Grand Board of Appeal of EUIPO – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Court – Relevant date for the examination of an absolute ground for invalidity – Mark of such a nature as to deceive the public – Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-306/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0640_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 June 2022.#bet-at-home.com Entertainment GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for registration of the EU figurative mark bet-at-home – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-640/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 June 2022

PreviousPage 15 of 16Next