Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

101 records in EU in 2023

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 493Germany · 292United States · 141Austria · 75Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0533decided

Order of the Court of 15 December 2023.#Sanity Group GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-533/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 December 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0520decided

Order of the Court of 15 December 2023.#UGA Nutraceuticals Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-520/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 December 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0521_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 15 December 2023.#UGA Nutraceuticals Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-521/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 December 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0520_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 15 December 2023.#UGA Nutraceuticals Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-520/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 December 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0206_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 December 2023.#TF v Sparkasse Südpfalz.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Organisation of working time – Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 7 – Right to paid annual leave – SARS-Cov-2 virus – Quarantine measure – Impossible to carry over the paid annual leave granted for a period coinciding with a period of quarantine.#Case C-206/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 December 2023

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0432decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 14 December 2023.#Criminal proceedings against PT.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Criminal offences and penalties in the field of illicit drug trafficking and the fight against organised crime – Possibility to reduce applicable penalties – Scope – Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA – Articles 4 and 5 – Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA – Articles 3 and 4 – National legislation not implementing EU law – Article 51(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective judicial protection – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Criminal proceedings against several persons – Agreement for settlement of the case provided for in national law – Approval by an ad hoc court – Consent of the other defendants.#Case C-432/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 December 2023

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0626decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 14 December 2023.#C. Z. and Others v Ilva SpA in Amministrazione Straordinaria and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Article 191 TFEU – Industrial emissions – Directive 2010/75/EU – Integrated pollution prevention and control – Articles 1, 3, 8, 11, 12, 14, 18, 21 and 23 – Articles 35 and 37 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Procedures for the grant and reconsideration of a permit to operate an installation – Measures for the protection of the environment and human health – Right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment.#Case C-626/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 December 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0206decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 December 2023.#TF v Sparkasse Südpfalz.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeitsgericht Ludwigshafen am Rhein.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Organisation of working time – Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 7 – Right to paid annual leave – SARS-Cov-2 virus – Quarantine measure – Impossible to carry over the paid annual leave granted for a period coinciding with a period of quarantine.#Case C-206/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 December 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0056_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 December 2023.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark A’PEAL – Earlier national word mark APIRETAL – Relative grounds for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No link between the marks at issue – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-56/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 December 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0056decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 December 2023.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark A’PEAL – Earlier national word mark APIRETAL – Relative grounds for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No link between the marks at issue – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-56/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 December 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0010decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 December 2023.#Light Tec Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a star – Earlier design produced after the filing of the application for a declaration of invalidity – Article 28(1)(b)(v) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Discretion of the Board of Appeal – Article 63(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard.#Case T-10/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 December 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0010_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 December 2023.#Light Tec Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a star – Earlier design produced after the filing of the application for a declaration of invalidity – Article 28(1)(b)(v) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Discretion of the Board of Appeal – Article 63(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard.#Case T-10/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 December 2023

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0753_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 December 2023.#Andrea Nieß v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trademark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Gartenlux – Previous company name and business name GARTENLUX – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-753/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 December 2023

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0754_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 December 2023.#Andrea Nieß v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trademark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark GARTENLÜX – Previous company name and business name GARTENLUX – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-754/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 December 2023

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0753decided

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 December 2023.#Andrea Nieß v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trademark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Gartenlux – Previous company name and business name GARTENLUX – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-753/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 December 2023

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0754decided

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 December 2023.#Andrea Nieß v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trademark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark GARTENLÜX – Previous company name and business name GARTENLUX – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-754/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 December 2023

PreviousPage 2 of 3Next